Welcome to Boston Jazz Scene

Welcome to the Boston Jazz Scene web site--the place to find out what happened, what is happening, and what is coming in jazz and other improvised music in Boston and surrounding communities. The most recent post is listed below this information. Words listed below the Topics heading to the right refer to information you can find here about jazz and other improvised music, the arts in general, food, and travel in and near Boston.

If you click on the Scheduled Jazz Highlights topic, you will see a selection of upcoming jazz gigs that we think are particularly noteworthy.

If you click on one of the History - Jazz Journal topics, you will see a selection of journal entries covering performances and relevant events that have taken place in Boston since the 1970s.

If you click on the History - Major Contributors topic, you will see a list of Bostonian musicians who have made significant contributions to the development and evolution of jazz in Boston and elsewhere.

If you click on the Images - Musicians topic, you will see a selection of photos of current and former Boston area jazz musicians and significant visiting jazz musicians. If photos of musicians are displayed on this page and you click on Older Posts at the bottom of this page, you will see earlier image pages eventually going back to page 1.

If you click on the Images - Venues topic, you will see a selection of photos of current and former Boston area jazz venue locations.

If you click on the History - Jazz Timeline topic, you will see a brief list of significant events in the development and evolution of jazz in Boston beginning with the first groundwork in colonial America.

If you click on the Essays on Music topic, you will see essays about the development of jazz and other music since the late nineteenth century and particularly the evolving context in which the music has been and continues to be created.

If you click on one of the Travel options, you will see a variety of information that may be of interest to people visiting Boston (or even some people who live here).

Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Jazz Journal 2019

December

The Leap of Faith performance 12/14 at the Outpost was both exhilarating and painful.  To a great extent at the same time.  Musically everything seemed to move along perfectly.  The size of the group--a quintet consisting of Dave Peck, Glynis Lomon, Kat Dobbins, Bob Moores, and Yuri Zbitnov--is almost perfect for audience access to individual sonic contributions and the inner workings of the group as a whole.  When the group works as well as it did 12/14, then anyone with ears is going to have a great time.  One of the big kicks for me was to catch Kat Dobbins in such a small version of the ensemble.  Prior to this Outpost gig I had witnessed her Leap of Faith work as part of larger forces in which “texture” has a tendency to overwhelm detail.  Witnessing the fine detail of her work was quite a treat.  Everyone else was listening and improvising at the usual high level.  Maybe even higher.  That’s where the pain comes in.  Yuri Zbitnov has for several decades been one of my favorite improvising percussionists and in my experience a superb human being.  Yuri has made the difficult decision to walk away from music to pursue what he refers to as an essential “journey.”  All band members obviously wish him nothing but good fortune as he takes a new path.  No doubt such feelings were at the heart of the beauty the musicians brought forth 12/14, even as the musicians and fans in the audience tried to keep it all together while processing the personal/musical loss.  After all, each of us is on some type of journey and we know that good fortune is the best hope…

The Week (12/13, p. 16) came up with some significant data, in case you are trying to nail down some hard evidence for Republican vs. Democrat animosity.  “The full Congress has passed only 70 bills into law this year, 10 of which were for renaming federal facilities.  Congress typically passes 150 to 250 bills a year.”  That’s a pretty solid case for the failures of attempted bipartisanship.  But there is more.  “The House of Representatives has passed nearly 400 bills since the Democrats took control of the chamber in 2018,” said The Week, "but the vast majority haven’t even received a vote in the Republican-controlled Senate.”  In other words, either the House passed well over 200 bad bills, or the Senate does not want to work with the House no matter what the substance of the bill is…

It was something like a reunion celebration 12/14 at the Lily Pad.  The musicians in the Bruno Råberg Trio--the bassist plus Bruce Barth and Matt Wilson--were part of a creative music stew during the late 1980s in Boston, and it seemed that the still-simmering pot was bubbling 12/14 both in the audience and on stage.  Since those days the three band mates have crossed paths but mostly traveled to different places geographically and otherwise.  Nevertheless, the communication on stage suggested the trio had been shedding together regularly since the formative days.  And apparently a third of the packed house consisted of musicians who carried their passports from 1980s Ball Square and Inman Square to revel in the sonic memories and perhaps answer questions regarding where the passage of time has taken “all of us.”  The musical language of the afternoon certainly would have sounded familiar to fans in the 1980s, but the musicians on stage have continued searching since then.  In fact, the music of the afternoon was a celebration of the recent CD release by the Bruno Råberg Trio (the same trio with the exception of Adam Cruz on drums and the same compositions performed 12/14).  Even the first work on the CD, “Message XII,” was the afternoon’s opener.  Right off the bat we could see and hear that these men play music rooted in their formative years.  For example, Bruce Barth’s piano exhibited Bill Evans aesthetics.  Evans, after all, was the keyboard icon of the 1980s in Boston and everywhere.  But those are roots.  Mr. Evans provided the foundation for the pianist’s development, but today Bruce Barth offers his own engaging “dance” on that structure, particularly when it is time to solo.  And so it is for the bass and drums.  One of the great strengths of the piano trio is that we get plenty of opportunity to hear the solo skills of each musician.  We certainly did for the first couple of compositions.  Sometimes a strength is also weakness, in this case a weakness in predictability.  As a jazz fan I want to be surprised.  Trio instrumentation has a built-in surprise-killer.  The first couple of works presented wonderful solos but invariably in the sequence of piano-bass-drums.  Such predictability undercuts surprise no matter how wonderful the improvisations are.  As I sat there, pondering such concerns, Bruno gave us a surprise in the form of “Tailwind.”  That arrangement gave us a perfect antidote to structurally-driven predictability.  Gone was the piano-bass-drums solo sequence.  Instead we got a semi-open form arrangement in which solo improvisation was replaced with duo or trio improvised conversations or support duos out front with solo “support” or all sorts of variations on those ideas.  There was plenty of improvised work to savor, and always at least part of a surprise.  There were loud applause and huzzahs from a crowd apparently looking for such answers.  The “Tailwind” event opened up the playing for subsequent works.  It was a fine afternoon with a demand (via noise from the crowd) for an encore.  The encore in jazz and so-called classical music tends to be a simple tip of the hat or even a throw-away piece.  Not often is it a gig highlight.  Whether from plan or inspiration of the moment, Bruno chose “Here’s That Rainy Day” to close out the afternoon.  It was the only work of the afternoon not penned by the bassist.  Maybe he chose the tune because his arco performance on that work on the recent CD was so effective.  In any case, he played the head to a dead silent audience, apparently as swept up as I was.  The music moved to a fine conversation between piano and pizzicato bass with really nice brushes throughout.  I suspect at least some people in the audience got their 1980s passports updated…

I am a nicotine addict.  It’s just a fact.  I learned long ago that, if I have even one cigarette, I’m hooked, back on the “habit.”  I feel fortunate.  Although I have not had a cigarette for decades, I have much empathy for smokers who--like me for so many years--cannot quit.  As much pain as I feel over the damage done by cigarettes, I am much angrier about the phenomenon known as vaping.  For example, University of Pennsylvania researchers monitored blood flow in non-smokers.  After test participants had several puffs on an e-cigarette without flavor or nicotine, vaping temporarily constricted arteries in the legs, heart, and brain by more than 30 percent.  The glycerol, propylene glycol, THC, and vitamin E acetate commonly found in vaping products make the activity even more lethal.  I’m not going to try to explain all the dangers here, but I am convinced that vaping is far more lethal than smoking cigarettes.  Further, the people who produce and market the vaping products (which not surprisingly include tobacco companies) are knowingly seducing and killing both young people and old.  If you are interested in the subject, you might start with “Dozens of deaths were linked to vaping this year” in Science News (12/21, p.21).  The problem is number 4 in the magazine’s “Top 10 Stories of the Year”…

It was the holiday season with many locals--musicians and fans--on the road to somewhere else.  Naturally, that meant a certain amount of personnel juggling to put together a sextet on 12/19 at the Outpost.  The originally scheduled drummer and guitarist were replaced by the familiar faces of Dylan Jack and Bill Lowe (who brought his trombone).  Charlie Kohlhase also brought the scheduled Brian Price, Dan Rosenthal, and Aaron Darrell.  Because it was something of a personnel shift, particularly in the case of Bill who sits in rarely, Charlie announced that the gig would be carried on somewhat in the spirit of Charles Mingus’ jazz workshops.  In other words, the audience was to expect some on-stage chatter and even stops and starts.  The results for attentive audience members were a delight.  Watching and hearing musicians discuss the “mechanics” of a work before (or during) performance of the work gives fans additional insight into the process of art.  The guys performed charts familiar to most Explorer fans.  But, again, each time the mix of musicians changes, so does the music--not necessarily better or worse--wonderfully different.  On this evening I witnessed something I cannot remember seeing before.  I have seen drummers flip over a drum because of a torn drum head, but not for any other reason.  On John Tchicai’s “Quintus T” Dylan flipped over his snare drum.  He used sticks throughout the piece.  The results were significant.  First, the sound of the drum was closer to that of a military marching band snare drum.  Also the top-side snares were available for strumming by hand or with the sticks.  Plucking to produce an emphatic snap was another option.  Fascinating and effective.  Obviously there are limitations to the technique.  For example, the setup does not lend itself well to silencing the snare.  But for specific compositions/charts it obviously is quite effective.  At the end of the gig I asked Dylan where he got the technique from.  He said that somewhere he must have seen another drummer do it, but couldn’t think of anyone.  I suspect that, because of what he said next, he never had seen someone else do it.  He went on to explain that as a small child he had access to a snare drum.  He found the snare to be the most fascinating part of the drum.  He would bang and pluck the snare to make wonderful sounds.  Then years later he studied percussion.  He said that he played drums for a few years before he remembered his childhood snare experiences and decided to develop the technique.  It certainly was an effective application 12/19 at the Outpost.  By the way, in case you are interested in pursuing the technique, Dylan claims that he uses an especially thin skin on the snare side of the drum because it emulates the military snare sound more effectively.  There were a few interesting on-stage comments involving Bill because he was less familiar than other band mates with the charts.  Before tackling the Tchicai work written for the New York Art Quartet, Charlie asked Bill to hum the support line that they would play under the main line to be performed by Dan and Brian.  They hummed the line and its permutations and the humming stopped and Bill sang, “In the beginning God.”  The six notes composed by Ellington and Strayhorn were almost identical to the last six notes of the hummed support line.  Off by perhaps a single note.  It is an event that brings to mind an aesthetic synchronicity.  The 1964 date of the Tchicai chart suggests that Mr. Tchicai was working on his chart at roughly the same time Messrs. Ellington and Strayhorn were writing and arranging music for the first Sacred Concert.  Perhaps within the same 12-month stretch.  Interesting, but there’s another bit of relevant synchronicity.  According to Duke Ellington (Music is My Mistress, p.156), when Ellington and Strayhorn were working on that six-note line, they were separated by a continent.  “When I was writing my first sacred concert, I was in California and he was in a New York hospital.  On the telephone, I told him about the concert and that I wanted him to write something.  ‘Introduction, ending, quick transitions,’ I said, ‘The title is the first four words of the Bible--In the Beginning God.’  He had not heard my theme, but what he sent to California started on the same note as mine (F natural) and ended on the same note as mine (A flat a tenth higher).  Out of six notes representing the six syllables of the four words, only two notes were different.”…

Switching to vegetarianism (particularly with the help of a professional dietitian) can be a constructive lifestyle change.  The only problem I have with a veggie diet is the self-righteous practitioners who smugly complain about how cruel to animals omnivores are.  My retort over the years has been, “Your problem is that you cannot hear the plants scream.”  The comment was only partly tongue-in-cheek.  After all, how happy can a dug up and decimated onion plant be?  Recently several newspapers and magazines have published summaries of research that suggests I was right all along.  For example, The Week (12/20, p.6) tells us the study finds “plants emit high-pitched sounds, too high for humans to hear, when they lack water or have their stems cut.”  The researchers claim, “These findings can alter the way we think about the plant kingdom, which has been considered to be almost silent until now.”  Maybe the Triffids merely were getting back at us, giving us some of our own medicine… 

The successful musical relationship between Melissa Kassel and Tom Zicarelli goes back to the 1980s.  Most of the early gigs occurred at the now long-defunct Willow Jazz Club, the nursery for an extraordinary quantity and range of new music (as well as straight-ahead stuff).  The audiences were not large, but fortunately the two of them stuck to it and built a reputation among fellow musicians.  I emphasize the importance of the other musicians because the attraction of their music meant that a number of the better musicians in the Boston area wanted to perform the Kassel-Zicarelli music.  If you have challenging and engaging music performed by top-shelf musicians, then the results in performance have a greater impact.  The solid results really began to take off about a decade ago at the Lily Pad, where the group continues to perform.  The functional continuity exists because of the presence and direction of Tom and Melissa.  The rest of the band on any given night comes out of a pool of about a dozen veteran Bostonians and presents itself usually as a quintet.  The malleable ensemble consists of interchangeable but not identical parts.  In other words, the band works no matter who shows up, but the musical personality of the band shifts from week to week (or rather from lineup to lineup).  But, because any combination seems to work quite well, that fact inevitably raises the question: Is there a mix of Kassel-Zicarelli musicians that works better than any other?  The answer probably is “no.”  But I found myself saying “yes” 12/8 at the Lily Pad.  At one point Bruce Gertz was “supporting” a Phil Grenadier solo and wandering to some realm he was carried to by the music.  Phil, thinking quite reasonably that the bassist was supposed to be sticking to the chord cycle (or facsimile thereof), turned to Bruce in mild frustration and said, “Bruce, where are you?”  The outburst was understandable.  Sometimes things are pushed just a bit too far.  But not resulting in any negative heat.  I suspect that Phil and Bruce had a good laugh about the incident at the end of the evening.  But there’s another factor.  As a member of the audience I did not have to face Phil’s problem.  For a moment I had the Cagean experience of hearing a mistuned AM radio that was presenting two completely different stations at the same time, two different musics that somehow “clashed”  beautifully as I heard anchors in the piano and the drum kit, Gary Fieldman keeping everything together, calmly looking like he was doing the laundry.  I realize that all of this sounds like a left-handed compliment.  But I’ll take this band without hesitation, and I have not even commented on the fifth voice in the band, Melissa Kassel.  She was suffering from some sort of lung infection and complained that her voice was terrible.  Why is it that some musicians (some of the better ones) always take the music to another level under duress?  The vocal part of the quintet was especially beautiful 12/8, articulating the music that is beyond mere notes.  As in the case of all of the Kassel-Zicarelli performances in memory, most of the music consisted of original material, except for the final work of the second set, Cole Porter’s “Ev’ry Time We Say Goodbye.”  It was a perfect closer for the evening.  OK, if this is such a terrific band, how can it be improved?  There is nothing wrong with Tom’s piano work.  It is perfect for this group and would be an asset in any straight-ahead group.  But there is nothing wrong with his tenor saxophone work either.  I miss it, and it adds one more resource to the palette.  Melissa and Tom have a large repertoire, but for years we have been hearing the same relatively small subset of their compositions.  Fine as they are--the same audience members keep returning to catch the repeated works on each gig--we need to hear other options.  Melissa and Tom please dig into your files and resurrect other examples from your catalog.  Or, better yet, prove to us that you still are a compelling writing team.  Rogers and Hammerstein did not stop writing just because they had a ton of great music to their credit.  Of course, that’s easy for me to say.  All I do is listen to the results.  Quite thankfully…


November

After the too-loud performance by Dave Bryant’s ensemble in October (i.e., too loud Dave), I decided to take a chance on the Dave Bryant Sextet 11/10 at the Outpost.  The lineup was great and I decided to have a chat with Dave before the music started.  Only five musicians showed up, but that was not really a problem because they were Dave, Tom Hall, Eric Hofbauer, Jacob William, and Curt Newton.  Before the music started, I explained the problem to Dave (as I have done many times before), and he said that he would cut the keyboard volume.  I tried talking him into aiming his speaker somewhere other than at me but to no avail.  As it turned out, the best solution would have been to aim Dave’s speaker at the guy who was recording the gig.  Nevertheless, Dave kept his word.  It was the first time in years that the Dave Bryant electronic keyboard was not way too loud.  The results were terrific, an almost perfectly balanced band.  And there was another plus, Tom Hall’s long-time adventures with Dave meant that he knew almost all the charts and is especially connected aesthetically with Dave’s music.  In addition to that, both Dave and Tom had charts to read.  Wonderful.  By now the rest of the people in the band recently have been grappling with Dave’s spontaneous “excursions.”  So they are remarkably well prepared for any direction.  Given Dave and Tom (bolstered by charts) nailing the heads, it was a piece of cake for the rest of the band to make it all work.  I smiled when I recalled how less than terrific “Detour” was in September when this band nailed the work on 11/10.  Curt and the front line really brought to life the ecstatic tension between the dead slow melodic sequence and the nervous busy-ness of the percussion.  And the effect was unlike that of Bob Gullotti and Chris Bowman.  Curt cut his own staccato path.  Near the end of the fine single set evening Dave brought out a chart that no one else in the band knew.  He kept a copy and gave a copy to Tom.  He asked Tom to play the line and everyone else (without charts) would follow.  Tom looked at the chart and said that the specific way to play the line was unclear to him.  Dave hummed the pattern (not the tones) of the line, and Tom responded by playing the chart quite cleanly.  He got it.  But maybe more important, everyone in the band got it.  And we in the audience got he bonus of witnessing a chart come together in sound…

The Philadelphia Inquirer recent put together some polling data that suggests all is not well in U.S. healthcare.  “A new Gallup poll,” says the paper, “shows 34 million Americans reported having had a friend or family member who died in the past five years because they could not afford needed medical treatment or medications.”  If you are in the White House or Congress that data may not get through to you because you have some pretty nifty health care.  It does not affect those politicians directly.  But wait.  There’s more.  According to The Inquirer, “Nearly 23 percent of American adults--about 58 million people--said they were unable to pay for a medication their doctor had deemed necessary in the past year.”  On the other hand, Trump and members of Congress do not have to worry about paying for medications.  But they do want to get re-elected…

On 11/6 Mark Redmond announced that Mandorla Music is operating under the organizational and economic umbrella of Fractured Atlas, a development that allows Mandorla Music to be “more sustainable as it continues to grow and evolve.”  Those who wish to support Mark’s fine work can send a check to Fractured Atlas with “Mandorla Music” in the memo line on the check.  Then mail it to Mark at 9 Ellsworth Road, Milton, MA, 02186… 

According to William Falk, Editor-in-Chief of The Week (11/29, p.3), there are some similarities between the context of the Nixon impeachment and that of Trump.  For example, Nixon, his insiders, and political consultant Roger Ailes were planning to create a “new TV network that would circumvent existing media and provide ‘pro-administration’ coverage to millions.”  Something like Fox News.  Also, Nixon had Republicans behind him, dismissing “the scandal as a Washington Post ‘witch hunt’.”  There is a difference between then and now, however.  “Then the White House tapes,” continues Falk, “proved beyond doubt that Nixon had used the levers of government to pursue vendettas against his opponents and cover up his extensive skullduggery.  Disgusted GOP leaders, including Sen. Howard Baker of the Senate Watergate committee, chose principles over party.  Nixon was forced to resign.”  But today “We live in a far different country….  Fox News provides an alternative reality to the ‘fake news,’ providing daily talking points to Republican elected officials and policing them the way a sheepdog does its flock.  Those who dare stand up to President Trump know they will be denounced as traitors on Fox, even if they’re war veterans with a purple heart on their chests.”  When the president beats the impeachment rap in the Senate, “he should send a thank you card to Roger Ailes and Richard Nixon, wherever they may be.”  Smiling somewhere no doubt…

Eric Rosenthal’s Point01Percent series offering 11/13 at the Lily Pad began with a quartet version of Cutouts (apparently now spelled as a plural)--Pandelis Karayorgis, Jorrit Dijkstra, Nathan McBride, and Luther Gray.  Pandelis’ “Shadows” was an upbeat, energetic opener that gave everyone in the band a chance to shine.  It seemed a bit strange to witness the band without the extraordinary talents of Jeb Bishop (who was on tour in the Mid-West).  But throughout the first set, it became apparent that the smaller resources had the advantage of a greater ensemble transparency.  Luther’s “Sequential Failures” was a showpiece for that transparency.  The work opened with a minimalist skeleton of sound, simple lines with spare comments from everyone, leaving “holes” to be filled in by audience ears.  As each musician presented his simple statement, the separate lines eventually came together as if the pieces of a broken vase magically rose from the ground to form a “repaired” whole vase.  The closing of the work was a moving spotlight shining on each piece of the vase, reminding us that originally the vase was in shambles.  Pandelis’ “Royal”(?) began with a wonderfully frenetic energy.  Fine work all around, including the best keyboard solo of the evening.  Jorrit’s engaging closer of Caribbean rhythms featured some terrific Luther support and superb kit solos.  The work is so listenable and different from the usual Cutout/s fare that it may well become an ensemble classic.  The first set was a solid way to kick off the evening.  The second set featured the work of two locals and two visitors.  The Stephen Haynes Quartet--Stephen Haynes, Ted Reichman, Nathan McBride, and Eric Rosenthal--was a true pickup band.  The four never had played together before.  Totally improvised music (except for an out-of-the-blue quote from Ellington’s “Caravan”).  The host duo was somewhat restrained at first.  I read that to be a courtesy to the guests.  And Ted and Stephen took advantage of the opening, dancing together with abandon.  Of course, Nate (playing electric guitar for the whole set) and Eric could not be restrained for long.  Although the four of them managed to flirt with a wide dynamic range, most of the set was all-out high energy.  One of the highlights for me was the wonderful “percussion work” between Nate and Eric, as if playing one large percussion kit.  I got the feeling that Ted moved from accordion to piano because he wanted to become a member of a percussion trio as a setup for the trumpeter.  But I was wrong.  Ted, who is both a visitor and a local because he teaches at NEC, had an accordion disaster.  Part of the instrument broke as he played it.  The piano proved to be a more than workable resource.  Stephen Haynes over the years has been and continues to be a Boston area favorite.  He and his fans had a great time 11/13.  He seemed to enjoy the sonic environment his band mates created for him, using an open horn mostly but having an enjoyable time trying a variety of mutes.  I’m guessing that he was so focussed on the moment that he never picked up either of the other two members of the trumpet family that he brought with him.  It was a fine evening of two very different Nates and two very different bands.  Point01Percent series producer Eric Rosenthal announced that the series officially hit the four-year mark on 11/13.  The two most difficult challenges in new music today are keeping a band together and running a monthly series of cutting edge performance art.  Four years.  Applause.  Applause.  Applause.  Applause…

Do Democrats in Congress produce greater economic output for their districts than Republicans do for theirs?  Early this month The Wall Street Journal presented economic data on House districts in the U.S.  The WSJ stated, “Republican House districts produced $32.6 billion in economic output per district in 2018, down from $33.3 billion in 2008.  By comparison, Democratic House districts produced $49 billion, an increase from $35.7 billion a decade ago.”  But it does not stop there.  According to the WSJ, “Democratic districts also had 71 percent of digital and professional jobs.”  I wonder if the quantity and quality of college-level institutions in blue districts has something to do with the difference…

Pandelis Karayorgis and friends put on a three-set program of music out of the European classical tradition and the current post-Ayler jazz sonic arts.  The pairing of the two distinct types of music has happened at the Lily Pad before.  And here it was again on 11/22. Chromic--Dorothy Chan and Lucy Yao--opened the evening’s music employing toy pianos (never more than one at a time), acoustic piano, toys, and electronics and featuring compositions by several different composers. Given the emphasis on the toy pianos in the Chromic publicity, I was looking forward to perhaps one of John Cage’s works.  Then when the duo performed more recent works using toy pianos and semi-prepared piano, I kept hearing “echoes” from Cage’s works for toy piano and prepared piano.  Inevitably the Chromic performance suffered by comparison.  One of the problems in presenting contemporary music (either now or any time throughout history) is that the vast majority of composers are not very good.  (Quick, how many composers of the Classical period other than Mozart and Haydn can you name?)  In other words, if you perform nothing but contemporary compositions, the chances that you will perform much music of the quality we find in the works of Monteverdi or Maderna, for example, is something in the range slim to none.  And Helmut Lachenmann is not likely to drop off his latest work at the doorstep of a relatively unknown performance duo.  These words are not a comment exclusively about Chromic; it is a problem facing any group presenting or performing music of living composers.  Therefore, although the musicians seemed more than capable of performing a wide range of music, the music presented by Chromic for the most part neither challenged nor engaged.  Composer Oliver Hickman was in attendance to hear the Boston premiere of his work, something a bit too Romantic for my taste but for the most part challenging and engaging.  It was the highlight of the first set.  The second set featured the return to the Lily Pad by Peridot Duo--this time including Rose Hegele and Ciera Cope. The vocal duo presented music of Kaija Saariaho, Anselm McDonnell and Alexis Porfiriadis.  As in the case of the duo’s previous set at the Lily Pad, the women employed an effective combination of impressive technique, challenging sonics, and engaging theatricality.  The only disappointment was that we did not get a chance to witness the trio version of Julia Werntz’ “Kaspoleo Melea” that was presented at the Lily Pad in March.  It would have been quite fine to catch a reprise of the work.  And it probably would have been a treat for Julia, who was at both gigs.  It seems that the Pandelis Karayorgis Trio now is officially known as Pools.  Pools presented its music during the third set of the evening.  The name change is a good idea.  Referring to the group as a trio is problematic in terms of likely audience expectations.  Pools is not a piano trio in the conventional sense--piano with bass and drums accompaniment.  Certainly there is a lot of accompanying going on in Pools, but this trio is not the revered format of featured pianist with terrific bass and drums support.  Pools is terrific drums with terrific piano with terrific acoustic bass.  Sometimes the bass is out front, other times the drums, and other times the piano.  I’m tempted to suggest that this group is a truly harmolodic trio, but none of what Pandelis Karayorgis, Nate McBride, and Luther Gray do brings to mind the work of Ornette Coleman.  The “burden” of presenting each piece of music is spread fairly evenly all around.  One of the great pleasures in witnessing this music is watching and hearing each musician take up the task of pursuing melody, support, or solo and where and how those tasks are executed.  It must be said that one of the salient features of Pools’ music is that it is difficult.  Nailing any given piece is fraught with challenges.  But the music is perhaps even more than difficult to grasp for audience members.  Much of the music on the surface seems simple, somewhat minimalist.  But each piece contains deceptions and booby traps.  If that is not enough, much of the music is presented very slowly.  So, if you are listening to a given theme, you hear the first tone… and… then... the… next… and… so… on… until your ears… reach… the last… motif… long after your brain has forgotten the first tone.  Therefore, the meaning of each tone of the structure is lost.  I exaggerate for effect.  But paying attention and digesting all of it are significant challenges for listeners.  It takes some re-thinking.  As I sat there I thought of that Monty Python doofus who would appear on the TV show from time to time briefly, just long enough to say, “My brain hurts.”  Of course, the quality of this music was so fine that I could not avoid listening.  But some folks in the audience lost the noble battle and withdrew into the night.  A significant number stayed and applauded enthusiastically.  But their greatest enthusiasm was for a Pools rendition of Monk’s “Work” and the thunderous “Undertow” closer, sonically the most “familiar” music of the set.  I am reminded of being present at the 1994 Annual Composers Conference in Wellesley.  There was an evening performance by Martin Goldray of Milton Babbitt’s brand new “Tutte le Corde.”  (There is a Goldray performance of the work on CRI CD 746.)  As the fourteen minute performance evolved, one-by-one many composers rose, sniffed the air in disdain and confusion, and left.  The performance was brilliant and certainly challenging (perhaps at “brain hurting” level).  I have a feeling that my brain is being super-subjective as I remember the event, but I remember the applause coming loudest from what appeared to be young music students.  And why wouldn’t it click with them?  New music presented to new (i.e., young) people…

Land left in its natural state is a great resource for the psychological and physiological well being of humans.  Even parks in cities have enormous positive effects on growing children (as mentioned here in the March Journal).  Therefore, the growing loss of natural land in the U.S. is a significant problem.  The latest issue of AMC Outdoors (winter 2020, p.12) offers some provocative data on the subject.  “Every 30 seconds the U.S. loses 1.3 acres of natural land to development,” says that publication, and “here in the Northeast 1.1 million acres of undeveloped land disappeared between 2001 and 2017.”  More disturbing is the Republican reclassification of protected U.S. lands.  “The U.S. federal government continues to reclassify and downgrade previously protected land to make way for drilling, mining, and large-scale development….  90 percent of downgrades and downsizes to protected lands over the last two centuries have occurred since 2000.…  214 billion barrels of crude oil were extracted from federal land in 2018, more than double the amount extracted in 2008.”  But there is hope.  In a survey of 1,203 registered voters by Hart Research Associates it was revealed that levels of support for land conservation is 76% among Republicans, 88% among Independents, and 94% among Democrats…

Charlie Kohlhase and his Explorers Club showed up 11/21 at the Outpost to pursue musical adventures, including original pieces and work by some of his favorite musicians.  A “typical” Explorers outing.  Like any long-established band leader, Charlie faces a variety of personnel problems, mostly band mates being out of town or being unavailable for other good reasons.  Because of his reputation, Charlie is able to call upon some of New England’s best musicians to replace missing persons.  The 11/21 gig was a perfect example of such personnel juggling at its best.  The front line consisted of regulars Seth Meicht, Daniel Rosenthal (who is enthusiastic about his second child born in September, even if a good night’s sleep is elusive), and Jeb Bishop.  Rock solid musicians who know all but the very newest material cold.  By the way, Jeb recently had returned from what must have been a killer tour with Jaap Blonk, Weasel Walter (does anybody remember the Flying Luttenbachers?), and Damon Smith.  According to Jeb, Damon and partner are settling into St. Louis quite well.  The terrific front line (including Charlie, of course) was matched with a rhythm section of superb guest musicians who were relatively unfamiliar with Charlie’s charts.  Unfamiliar or not, the guests were Kit Demos and Eric Rosenthal, sufficient reason for fans to show up to any gig.  Kit had performed with the Explorers before but was unfamiliar with a good chunk of the material.  It was Eric’s first chance to play with the band.  Even though there were charts for most of the music, the tricky details of actual performance are the things that evolve through practice.  It was the kind of setup that might be described as any serious jazz fan’s dream.  I knew that it all would work, but I had no idea how.  Even particularly tricky charts such as the deceptively “simple” “Quintus T” and the rollicking over-the-top “Man on the Moon” soared to glorious heights.  It all worked so beautifully because of the perfect storm of front-line excellence of execution encountering the brilliant ears and stratospheric creativity of the rhythm section.  Somehow it reminded me of Sabby Lewis’ advice to a young Alan Dawson in the band as it performed for an all-night stage show (in which the sequence of acts and other details are unpredictable).  “When you get lost,” advised Sabby, “go into a roll.”  We in the audience 11/21 saw some pretty creative versions of a “roll” by Kit and Eric, but there was something even more significant than that going on.  The front line is so secure with Explorers charts that the heads and solos are spot on--with or without a rhythm section.  In other words, the time and sequence of the music was so clear in the hands of the magnificent horns that Kit and Eric could hear what to play in support.  And they were freed up to take chances.  To create.  Those facts meant that everything in the room was better because the exhilaration of Kit and Eric’s dancing meant that Seth tore it up.  People praised Dan’s brass work (even suggesting he should focus on the flugelhorn).  Fortunately for us, he will keep the trumpet.  And Jeb showed us that even a fairly short tour was too long for him to be away.  And it keeps going.  Their brilliance inspired Kit and Eric.  And on and on.  What a fine evening.  Yes, Charlie is the leader, and for many reasons.  One is his breathtaking solo (every time) on “Eyes So Beautiful as Yours.”  But there is so much more.  During the gig Charlie told us that one of his students, apparently a talented pianist, is related to the late Alexander “Sandy” Williams.  For those whose memories may be a bit foggy, influenced by the great Jimmy Harrison, Williams was an important trombonist beginning particularly in the 1930s.  He played with a wide range of major musicians including Jelly Roll Morton (recording in 1930), the Fletcher Henderson Orchestra, Chick Webb’s band (even under Ella’s leadership), Coleman Hawkins, Duke Ellington, and many others.  Some of his best-known work was done with Sidney Bechet, including a couple sessions that produced such classic recordings as “Nobody Knows the Way I Feel Dis Morning” and “I know That You Know.”  He did not have much of a career as a band leader, but he did front a couple sessions for the Hot Record Society label with his Sandy Williams’ Big Eight.  It may suggest how highly regarded he was by considering the caliber of the sidemen on those sessions, Johnny Hodges, Tab Smith, Joe Thomas, Denzil Best, Harry Carney, and Shelly Manne among them.  I mention all of this to give a sense of the genetic material the young pianist carries and to say something about teacher Charlie Kohlhase.  At the end of the evening Charlie showed us an EP--a 33⅓ RPM EP--of a Bechet session with Sandy Williams on trombone.  Charlie was bringing the recording later in the evening as a gift to the young pianist.  Not surprisingly, Charlie’s nurturing does not end when he walks out of the classroom…



October

Most SCOTUS pundits are of the opinion that during this session the Republican-weighted Supreme Court will uphold the President’s executive order to send all DACA residents in the U.S. to their countries of origin.  By definition no DACA residents have any criminal records.  Further, most of them are productively engaged in the U.S. work force or matriculating in colleges in the U.S.  One of the most disturbing aspects of the executive order is that many DACA residents were so young when they arrived in the U.S. that they have no memory of their country of birth.  That’s a pretty scary prospect for anyone.  The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) is one of the most important international forces on behalf of peace and human rights.  Therefore, it is not surprising that--even before the Supreme Court decided to make a decision on the executive order during the current session--the fall issue of Quaker Action was published, including information directing DACA residents scheduled to be sent to Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, or Honduras to go to a special DACA support web page.  The web page offers options to go to information about any of the four countries.  After a person clicks on a country, that person has access to information about what to do to prepare to leave the U.S. and resources/people that will help the person to prepare to leave.  It is worth mentioning that the very last statement about transport from the U.S. to any of the four countries is, “ICE does not respect your human dignity, but we do.  Others you will find in [the destination country] through this list will also treat you well and support you as much as they can.”  Also, there is information on what to expect in that country, including cautions, repatriation, and non-profit organizations in that country that provide assistance to former DACA residents.  Compassionate humans find the idea of removing DACA residents from the U.S. to be despicable.  If you care and know a DACA resident who may be sent to any one of those countries, please tell that person to investigate the AFSC Crossing South web page

Jon Damian unquestionably is a true original--still (after 45 years teaching at Berklee) a formidable guitar technician, improvisor of enormous range and constant surprise, composer of attention-getting and occasionally movingly poignant works, and raconteur, humorist, and often self-effacing larger-than-life stage persona.  Quite obviously he loves performing and his infectious joy carries band mates and audience members along with him.  On the other hand, typically months and even years pass between Jon Damian performances with like-minded musicians, such as the ones who took the stage with him 10/11 at the Outpost--Allan Chase, Bob Nieske & Ralph Rosen.  Therefore, whether it is a matter of infrequency of performance or the superior quality of the action on stage, the 10/11 gig was a rarity to be cherished.  And the packed house knew what it had showed up for.  One cannot overstate the importance of the veteran nature of the sidemen, all of whom were respected leaders and sidemen in Boston and internationally during the early 1980s.  By the early 1990s all four musicians had been in bands together and were developing strategies of sonic communication that have expanded over the years.  What is useful to know is that each of the band members pursues his own path, generally separate from the other three.  For example, Allan Chase is the only jazz musician I’ve seen performing at the Outpost (or anywhere else for that matter) wearing an Untuckit brand shirt.  But, whenever the four of them get together--as rare as that might be--it is something of a homecoming.  In the case of a mistake musically, it is merely an opportunity for creativity.  For example, during “LaMuerte del Matador,” when Bob and Ralph did their best to work with the mandolino meccanico with less than great success, the humorous “failure” opened the door to spontaneous creativity.  The range of material was quite substantial.  For example, the blues-rooted opener and closer, “Skee-dap-m-be-bap” was a wild romp.  “Atsasambatango” was a samba tribute to tango tunesmith Astor Piazzolla.  “Saints and Angels” was melodically rooted in serial works of the Second Viennese School, but it never let go of explicit harmonic/chordal movement.  “Poiple” (Brooklynese for “purple”) in the hands of Jon was sufficiently moving as to make much better-known composers jealous.  If all that is not enough, we got Grophe’s semi-classical “On the Trail” (the only non-Damian composition of the set) and an audience participation version of “Grandpa, What’s a Rubbertellie?”  There was more, but you get the idea.  It was an evening of thoroughly engaging music by four superbly simpatico musicians.  And a simpatico audience that applauded until the quartet gave them a fine (but brief) version of Horace Silver’s “Peace.”  I’m already ready for the next gig by these guys… 

Fred Taylor died on 10/26.  He was gregarious, open, and a person of constructive energy.  I encountered him many times in a variety of circumstances and never witnessed him angry or destructive.  Those statements comprise an obituary many people might hope for.  Although true to my memory, it is not enough.  His death signifies the passing of an era in the history of jazz.  As owner and operator of the Jazz Workshop/Paul’s Mall complex on Boylston Street, Fred Taylor was the last jazz club operator to run a viable (i.e., non-subsidized) jazz club consistently featuring major name musicians in Boston (and arguably anywhere).  Jazz clubs since the Workshop closed in 1978 all have been subsidized in one fashion or another.  The Regattabar and Scullers are subsidized by the hotels.  Even the galleries in Inman Square that usually offer some form of jazz weekly are subsidized through property ownership and pay-to-play.  The image of New York as the jazz center of the world is what subsidizes the major clubs there.  Take away the tourists and the overpriced Manhattan clubs are gone.  And, yes, some true jazz clubs in Boston offering internationally respected musicians after 1978 were not subsidized in any special way.  But Tinkers, Lulu White’s, and the rest lasted two or three years.  The Jazz Workshop was a going concern for more than a decade.  That fact (given the state of jazz here in the 1960s and 1970s) is quite astonishing.  Because of his love of jazz, intelligence, creativity, and hard work beginning at mid-century, Fred Taylor developed extraordinary knowledge and skills that he would apply to a life of jazz entrepreneurship until the very end.  But his most remarkable achievement took place beginning in 1963 at 733 Boylston Street.  When the musician-run original Jazz Workshop was destroyed during construction of the Mass. Pike Extension, the owner of The Stable (home of the Jazz Workshop) opened a new club on Boylston Street.  There was some consternation when Varty Haroutunian (who did most of the booking at the original Jazz Workshop) discovered that the new club was sold to Fred Taylor and a partner.  Whatever the circumstances were at the time, Fred combined his experiences during the 1950s and ongoing seat-of-the-pants learning to create a remarkable success story, the Jazz Workshop/Paul’s Mall performance complex on Boylston Street.  Fred had intelligence, personality, and a remarkable skill set that supported enviable problem-solving skills.  His first love was straight-ahead jazz, but he loved a wide range of music.  He used his knowledge of different musics and their fan bases to make the jazz component of the performance complex work.  The Jazz Workshop, the smaller of the two venues, was where jazz was performed.  The bigger Paul’s Mall typically featured an eclectic range of musicians and comics, usually reliable draws that could make up financially for the occasional shortfall in the Workshop.  The policy helped him take a chance on talented unknowns, until eventually such people might draw enough of an audience to make money for the club.  Some jazz names were big enough draws that he would book them in Paul’s Mall, such as Miles Davis in the 1970s.  On the other hand, Fred booked Sonny Rollins during that same period in the Workshop in 1973, and the band drew well enough that it was booked in the Mall in 1974 but then back to the Workshop in 1975 and 1976.  Things started picking up with his return to the Mall in 1977.  With a Milestones All-Star gig at Symphony Hall, Sonny Rollins in 1978 was beginning his “jazz master” career explosion.  He became too expensive for the Workshop or the Mall.  This event also was connected to the fact that the policy of booking “name” acts in a club for three or more nights in a row no longer was working so well.  More and more name musicians were looking for a tour of lucrative one-nighters.  Fred called upon his entrepreneurial resources to keep the club going until 1978.  The performance complex was shuttered, but he never stopped.  He always was an active friend of the music and its supporters.  On occasion he would be invited to consult with members of the Board of the Boston Jazz Society as they attempted to put on jazz concerts to make money for jazz student scholarships.  Always solid advice.  Always gratis.  As a member of that Board I found his comments to be constructively educational.  We were trying to do good things, and he knew how to do good things.  For example, as a way of getting our attention to help us make smart decisions, he named a few well-known musicians and asked us which of them would draw the biggest audience in Boston.  There were several guesses, but no one correctly picked Mose Allison.  He then used the surprise answer to get us thinking constructively about selection of whom, when, where, and on and on.  For a variety of reasons (mostly economic) during the late 1980s the producers of the Boston Globe Jazz Festival were looking for ways to keep the fest afloat.  The people producing the fest came to the conclusion that other local festivals, clubs, and jazz support organizations were putting on gigs that in effect were “competing” with the Boston Globe event.  The Boston Globe folks persuaded most of these clubs and organizations to become part of the festival.  All of that jazz would be promoted under the same umbrella.  They asked the Boston Jazz Society to produce an event for the 1989 festival.  The BJS Board was wise enough to call upon the expertise of Fred Taylor who, although the Boylston Street performance complex had been closed for more than a decade, was still a busy guy.  I won’t go into details, but the BJS got credit for producing an evening of Miles Davis and his latest band at the Metropolitan Theater.  My notes at the time refer to “a sell-out concert.”  Members of the BJS did work hard before and during the gig.  For example, I got only brief glimpses of the trumpeter on that night because of responsibilities in the lobby.  But the key to the event--and its success--primarily was Fred’s knowledge and skills and his personal relationship with Miles Davis.  Gratis.  Over the years there have been feature articles about Fred in magazines and newspapers.  The one offering the best insight into the challenges and problem-solving that were central to Fred Taylor’s success is a fine article by Jon Garelick in an “Advertising Supplement to the Boston Phoenix” published in July 2003.  It may be available online in some form.  The title of the article is “Fred’s world and welcome to it.”  The interview focusses on his experiences from the 1960s through the early 2000s.  Fred Taylor’s strategy and tactics articulated in the interview are not very useful today, but his creativity and work ethic as he solved problems are valid constructive models today.  Thank you for so much, Fred… 

Dave Bryant likes his electronic keyboard LOUD.  I remember one gig at the Outpost a couple years ago when he used two drummers in one of his groups, and I could not hear the drums because of the volume of his keyboard.  The problem does not exist, of course, on gigs in which he uses an acoustic piano exclusively.  The announcement for the Dave Bryant Quartet gig at the Outpost 10/12 listed Dave as playing “keyboards.”  Even though the word was plural, I knew that he would not be playing both electronic keyboard and acoustic piano.  However, I was optimistic.  The other musicians on the gig--Eric Hofbauer, Jacob William, and Jeff Song--were playing functionally acoustic instruments.  In other words, Dave would not find himself encountering any musician or group of musicians competing over who could create the loudest eleven.  I was wrong.  And it’s a shame because the four of them played together beautifully, particularly during the first half of the evening.  That half consisted of completely improvised music, and the connections and creations were joyous.  True, one of the pieces essentially was a generic blues cycle with spontaneous creations over the chords.  But all of it was a delightful example of how four superb improvisors at the top of their game can create something extraordinary out of nothing (or next to nothing).  The last three pieces of the evening were déjà vu all over again (sort of).  The problem of springing Bryant compositions on band members who do not know the material has been discussed in this Journal before.  Dave is a brilliant musician and undeniably intelligent.  And yet he shows up to these gigs without charts for his compositions, previous rehearsals of the material, or even sending the musicians recordings beforehand of his compositions that will be performed.  I can understand that Dave wants to challenge the musicians in his band, and even more so when they are as outstanding as Jacob, Eric, and Jeff are.  But if your compositions/arrangements are really well written (and Dave’s are), then band members who know the charts will be challenged enough.  The first two of the final three offerings of the evening were Bryant charts, and it was apparent that Jacob was the only band member (other than Dave) who knew the work “Detour.”  Dave apparently was the only one onstage who knew the other composition.  Ironically, even though Jacob and Dave both knew “Detour,” it was the least successful performance of the evening.  Neither work was a highlight.  There is no question that, because of recordings of Dave’s work that I own and decades of witnessing his music in person, I knew those compositions by ear better than anyone in the band 10/12, except for Dave.  I also know the material enough to know that if the sidemen had heard the recordings recently, the problem would not necessarily have been solved.  Although Dave began performing each work as written/recorded, within a few bars he was taking a path nowhere found in previous recordings/performances.  That kind of activity is creative and challenging when you are working with a well-rehearsed band.  But not with unprepared musicians, no matter how superb they are.  I have mentioned how intelligent Dave is.  Maybe he’s bright enough to learn from himself.  After the band tried to play “Detour,” Dave announced that he was happy with the results when he had completed composing “Detour,” but it took him a long time to figure out how to improvise on it.  So you have three guys in the band who know the piece vaguely or not all, and you expect them to improvise on a work you struggled with.  And just playing the written part (particularly with unknown side paths thrown in) may be a bit too much to expect from the sidemen.  The last piece of the evening was Ornette’s “Dee Dee.”  Dave mentioned that Maestro Coleman’s daughter used to baby sit for Charnett Moffett.  It’s a kind of personal, comfortable reference.  And the band’s performance was personal and comfortable, probably because everyone in the band knew the work.  A fine conclusion to the evening.  Nevertheless, the volume imbalance in the band was a significant problem.  When the music began, I sat in the front row (where I enjoy the music most).  The three “strings” were in fine balance.  But the electronic keyboard volume was physically painful to my ears (no exaggeration). I got up and went to the back of the room and heard the rest of the performance.  The three sidemen still were in balance, and the problem of the keyboard was not as great.  But the problem was not solved successfully.  I was not sitting where I prefer (even though I got to the gig early enough to get a good seat), and the keyboard still was much louder than any other instrument.  Still too loud.  It’s too bad because that’s a heck of an ensemble…

According to The New York Times, while average wage earners continue to feed federal coffers at a high rate, wealthy people pay less under Trump’s current federal tax plan (“I’m shocked. Shocked,” said Captain Renault).  “The overall tax rate for the 400 wealthiest households in the U.S.--including federal, state, and local taxes--last year was 23 percent, lower than for any other income group for the first time on record.”  In 1950, for example, the wealthiest Americans “paid 70 percent of their income in taxes.”  No wonder they were the good old days…

Eric Rosenthal’s Point01Percent series returned to the Lily Pad 10/9 with perhaps the best Point01Percent gig of the year so far.  Luther Gray was away and was replaced by a very different drummer, Curt Newton.  Because they are among the best jazz percussionists anywhere, there was no question that Curt would handle the first set of the evening with Cutout--Curt, Pandelis Karayorgis, Jorrit Dijkstra, Jeb Bishop, and Nathan McBride.  In fact, in spite of the change at the kit, the summer layoff, and (according to Jeb) no rehearsal before the gig, the band was a stunning improvement over the unfocussed effort I witnessed the last time I caught the band.  There was no fuzzy minimalism.  There were minimalist lines here and there, but the insightful, crisp execution of the charts made the heads and context for solos crackle with clarity and impact.  And that was good news for the improvisors trying to build coherent sonics.  Pandelis supported beautifully and offered keyboard-destroying brilliance during solos.  Nate was on fire, both contextually and improvisationally.  It was his most impressive performance in memory.  Terrific.  The first line of Jeb and Jorrit is the out-front sonic image of the band, and they were at their best.  Fans show up for the trombone and sax solos, and justifiably so.  But one of the highlights of the evening for me occurred any time the two of them played the heads or talked to each other during soli or a solo with support of the other horn.  All ears and response at such a high level.  And then there was Curt, doing exactly what the band needed but very clearly being Curt all the time.  Imagine a uniquely distinctive band with two completely different drummers (i.e., Curt and Luther) that is the same in each case but inevitably different at the same time.  That’s quite something.  The second set featured music created by Charlie Kohlhase, Pandelis Karayorgis once again, Kit Demos, and Eric Rosenthal.  There was some minimalist written material called upon from time to time, but the forte of the quartet was improvisation.  The set opened featuring Charlie almost hesitatingly, presenting tones and simple motives in sequences.  Gradually he developed the material until he handed off improvisatory responsibilities to Pandelis, who built a sonic tornado that pushed the rest of the band into soaring conversations and solos.  There were three such adventures throughout the set, giving us a chance to witness Charlie’s mastery--on both baritone sax and alto sax--of the art of improvisatory architecture, building ideas into ever-growing sonic constructs.  Also there was some of Eric’s sonic textile work woven throughout the set.  It was always there for support and direction, always anticipating while enhancing the moment.  While all this was going on, Kit was carrying everything on his back, at the same time doing his best to be invisible.  However, a couple solos near the end of the set made it obvious to anyone paying attention that Kit is a giant of an acoustic bass player who pursues a constantly evolving (if you are lucky enough to witness his music over the years) and original technical approach to the instrument.  At the same time, all of that technique exists on behalf of the music.  The music.  One of the most positive aspects of the wonderful second set is that these four musicians in a somewhat piecemeal fashion--i.e., two or more of them in some other ensemble together--have been developing a fine artistic rapport this year in particular.  The second set on 10/9 was a wonderful example of the potential of that growing rapport…

It was Kris Davis’ first gig in the Boston area since she joined the Berklee faculty, and there was an SRO crowd to greet her 10/29 at the Lily Pad.  An enthusiastic audience filled with students, other teachers, musicians, and a number of Boston jazz regulars.  Because it was a solo piano gig, I was particularly excited about the performance beforehand.  Kris is a total-package musician and therefore able to accommodate her contributions to an ensemble, almost without limits--everything from Bill Frisell to Craig Taborn to Eric Revis to John Zorn to you-name-it.  In other words, she probably could make your uncle Louie sound good.  But alone at a piano Kris Davis does not have to accommodate anyone but Kris Davis.  She showed up prepared, bringing all sorts of useful resources--compositions (a set list?), gadgets to use for prepared piano forays, apparently limitless technical facility, and boundless intelligence and inventiveness.  But she is an improvisor.  The resources are building blocks upon which spontaneous sonic wonder is revealed.  Although the components used in creating her music are similar to--for example--those of the Bebop era, the architecture and formal constraints are significantly different.  The head-bridge-solos-eventually back to the head structure is only hinted at or absent completely in Kris’ performance.  Yes, there was at least one notable exception 10/29, but I believe that is known as proving the rule (and effectively so).  Her approach to spontaneously assembling music from the resources reminds me of an architectural structure built in Haiti by Henry Christophe, who was attempting to establish a post-colonial monarchy.  Celebrating release from slavery, he built and rebuilt palaces to tell the world that there now was a new “world power.”  Using ideas from a variety of palaces in Europe in particular, he ordered his liberated architects to create a palace and grounds of great grandeur.  Two things of significance about the castle grounds, known as Sans-Souci, are that the architectural style of the final castle is unique and the frenetic process of building, destroying, and rebuilding to obtain the final structure.  It’s almost as if Rome were built in a day.  According to Cameron Monroe, who is in charge of excavating the site, “I’ve excavated on Roman sites in the eastern Mediterranean, and this feels a lot like a Roman site, except that on those, the stratigraphy is hundreds of years old, and this one is two decades at the most (Archaeology, July/August 2018, p.41).”  It’s about as close to improvised architecture as one is likely to discover.  I find it to be something of an analogy for what I witnessed 10/29 in the Lily Pad.  Throughout the evening Kris took a range of new and older resources and deconstructed and reconstructed those resources improvisationally at a stunning level.  The materials were juggled improvisationally to create malleable, unique contexts for her completely original on-the-spot improvised lines.  Compositionally in the first set she exploited her own tone row, Cecil Taylor, György Ligeti, and Monk.  Along the way her left-hand cycle kept the music rolling while she used her free hand (she has only two) to prepare the piano (AKA Cage updated).  Then combined hands joined the battle with piano timbres and prepared timbres.  What a victory party!  At the end of the set, I was thinking about a certain pianist--Pandelis Karayorgis--in the audience as Kris offered a final bit of Evidence of her love for the predecessor giants.  I did not see his face, but I bet Pandelis (passionate as he is about Maestro Monk) was smiling with appreciation.  The second set was reserved almost exclusively for Romance.  Who woulda thunk that Julius Hemphill would inspire such “conventional” beauty.  Early on there were dance lines that brought to mind Chick Corea and sometime later the glorious pianism of Tommy Flanagan.  Nothing, of course, that either of them would have played.  Throughout the set one could not avoid being impressed by her chops.  For a number of reasons I hate to make reference to a musician’s technical facility.  There is too much emphasis in music performances on technique.  That emphasis is a distraction from the music itself.  For example, to this day among some musicians and fans there is an assumption that Monk is not a great jazz musician because of his “lack of technique.”  The problem is not technique; it’s small ears.  But I will say that Kris Davis’ technical skills are impressive.  Her left and right hand independence are enough to distract a listener from just how good the sonic results are.  So that’s my recognition of the obvious and my suggestion that maybe closing one’s eyes once in a while might offer an assist to the ears.  And what a jolt the remarkably straight-forward “Prelude to a Kiss” was.  Conventionally beautiful and filled with surprises.  Whether it was the product of set lists or intuitive on-the-spot decisions, the closing material also completed a fine programming arc.  Monk, who adored the music of Ellington, closed out the first set, and Duke’s music closed out the second.  Almost.  The final offering of the evening was music developed from one of Kris’ tone rows, recalling the tone row that opened the first set.  What a fine hello to Boston… 


September

Two of the members of the septet arrived late because of “T” mishaps, one the result of a Red Line problem and the other because of an Orange Line screw up.  Eric Hofbauer and Jeb Bishop arrived at the end of “The MBTA Blues” opener and during the second offering respectively.  I’m a big fan of mass transit rail systems, but only if they function competently.   All seven of the Explorers--also including leader Charlie Kohlhase, Seth Meicht, Brian Price, Tony Leva, and Dylan Jack--finally got rolling 9/19 at the Outpost, but not without one more mishap.  During the first set the frames of Jeb’s eye glasses broke, causing some difficulty as he attempted to read the charts.  At the half he went to a local convenience store and bought super glue.  From the audience the repair seemed to work well.  As the second set opened, I somewhat tongue-in-cheek asked myself, “Will I notice a difference in the performance of Jeb before and after the repair?”  The answer was easy.  The duress made no difference.  As silly as that game was, because it altered my thinking, also it altered my perception of Jeb’s playing.  Inadvertently, my attention to detail was altered sufficiently that I gained a slightly different perspective on his originality.  Anyone familiar with Jeb’s work knows that he is a giant of post-Ayler jazz and certainly a treasure as an improvising trombonist.  He never ceases to surprise.  And for me on 9/19 the surprise became a constant event during his solos.  I saw and heard the extent to which his inventions are not merely stunningly creative but also constantly new.  The way he improvises involves the ongoing creation of new sounds and new ways to make sounds as a basic approach to putting together the larger detail of the complete improvised statement.  It’s the ideal approach to improvisation that everyone talks about.  But for Jeb it is what he does.  In general it was a fine night of music for many reasons.  Tony Leva and Dylan Jack came to the group a few months ago, initially as substitutes I believe.  But they have worked so well within the group that each of them is establishing a functional personality within the ensemble.  Also the extent to which they work together as a rhythm section is impressive.  It seemed to me on 9/19 that they were of such a single mind that drums and bass became two manifestations of a unified force.  Telepathy.  The  band included three reed players, three tenor saxes simultaneously at times.  Or “four tenors,” as Jeb noted, making a reference to his tenor trombone.  Although Brian Price (tenor sax and clarinet) has performed with the Explorers before, this was my first chance to catch his work.  With his presence the band now has two “power reed players.”  Fortunately Brian and Seth are very different incarnations of that kind of attack.  Seth’s tenor sax is a wonderful amalgam of Lockjaw, Shepp, and Brötzmann--shimmering, weaving, a dissertation of force in the detail.  Brian’s instruments bring forth three dimensional solid, sonic shapes--rolling large chunks of granite from the tenor sax and cubes and pyramids of crystal from the clarinet.  In other words, now there are two different ways in which Explorer fans can be blown out of their seats via hurricane reeds.  By the way, these guys can play ballads also.  Of course there is another reed player in the band.  Actually Charlie works with two sets of instruments--a group of saxophones and the band itself.  He is the band’s person of greatest tenure in Boston, and therefore not surprisingly he is the master reed man of the Explorers.  For example, who else would you rather hear play the lead (and solo) on “I’m Through with Love” than Charlie?  But perhaps it is the other “instruments”--his band mates as an “exploring” ensemble--that offer the best evidence of his musical brilliance.  Even if you never have led a band, try to think of all the loose ends you must tie together as the seasons and the band personnel change from year to year.  That’s impossible enough of a task.  But then consider how terrific this September 2019 version of the Explorers is, and ponder what leadership that requires.  As a bonus we got to hear this current version of the band perform a septet arrangement of John Tchicai’s composition/arrangement of “Quintus T” originally recorded by the New York Art Quartet.  In spite of the MBTA Eric Hofbauer did show up and perform superbly.  But the biggest news about Eric (after the birth of daughter Ondine) is that he is the point man for major changes at Longy.  As some fans know, Peter Cassino put together and headed the Jazz Performance Department at Longy, bringing in a terrific faculty of teachers who (and this is vital) perform locally on a regular basis.  The results (to my ears) are that the jazz program students in recent years perform at a higher level than students in the “classical” music departments.  A few months ago the name of the department was changed to the Jazz and Contemporary Music Department.  Then Peter retired (almost).  He stepped down from his chairmanship but continues to teach at Longy.  This departure left a significant hole in curriculum management.  The powers that be at Longy were smart enough to invite Eric Hofbauer to take over the department.  The challenges are great, but Eric is aware of most of them.  It is significant that he is an outstanding teacher (e.g., check out his multimedia guitar techniques tutorial online) and an active musician who for years has provided his students with opportunities to witness what it means to create music spontaneously at a very high level.  And they do show up to witness such music (as in the case of the 9/19 gig).  So it was an evening of fine music and optimistic prospects for the Explorers and Longy…

Perhaps because only the mega-farms will survive, it is the small and moderate-size family farms that are being sacrificed for Trump’s trade war with China.  According to The New York Times and The Week (9/6, p. 31), from 2014 to last year U.S. agricultural exports to China dropped from $24 billion to $9.1 billion.  That figure for the first half of this year is $1.3 billion.  One of the results of the situation is, “Farm bankruptcies are up 13% over last year.”  Since at least my childhood the Republican Party has been supportive of farmers (and vice versa).  Is the current economic situation enough to change all that?  Not yet.  But there are many months until the next presidential election…

Maybe the farm mess is one of the factors affecting employment.  Even before the last U.S. Presidential election, I was critical of both the Congressional candidates and the Presidential candidates for making a fuss over their promises to create more jobs.  During the last term of President Obama unemployment rates hit what many economists claimed were “ideal” lows (i.e., just below 5%).  What we needed, I felt (and still feel) is not more jobs but rather higher (i.e., livable) wages for the average American.  And, while average salaries have risen during the past year, those gains have been more than nullified by the absurd income gains for corporate executives and stock holders.  (If what I have just written does not make sense to you, imagine that you have $100 to use for shopping and I have $100K for shopping.  I’m better off than you are.  Now let’s assume your shopping money grows by 1%, and over the same time period my shopping money grows by 3%.  Therefore, you have $101 for shopping and I have $103K for shopping.  You have more money to spend, but you are $2,999.00 farther in the hole than before we both received increases.  The picture gets worse as you consider what this income imbalance does to the cost of what you and I are trying to buy.)  On the other hand, although I believe the economic disparity between the greedy and the front-line worker is a major problem in the U.S., I find that maybe I should rethink my position on unemployment.  According to The Week (9/27, p. 32), “President Trump’s trade war with China has cost the U.S. economy 300,000 jobs, reports Moody’s Analytics.  The figure is expected to rise to 450,000 by the end of the year and to 900,000 by the end of 2020.”  While it is true that voters get what they deserve, does anyone deserve something below a livable wage exacerbated by the downward pressures on wages created by higher unemployment?  Vote early and vote often…

It was scheduled as a trio, but a quartet--Dave Bryant, Tsuyoshi Honjo, Jacob William, and Miki Matsuki--showed up.  One of the pleasant surprises 9/2 at the Outpost is that Dave pretty much abandoned the pursuit of the interpretation of composed music.  The bad weather prevented him from bringing his electric keyboard to the gig.  And perhaps that switch caused him to pursue free music.  Therefore we had the double treat of hearing Dave play acoustic piano and the entire ensemble take on completely free music.  Reedman Honjo employed both alto and soprano saxes.  The former pupil of Dave has carved out a career performing a variety of music with particular public success internationally as a musician in the so-called classical realm.  I did not know about that success until the end of the evening’s performance.  For much of the evening I found myself having trouble with Honjo’s pure “classical” intonation.  Now I realize that he was experiencing a not unusual problem for musicians (particularly wind instrumentalists) of mentally switching completely from one form to another.  On the whole, his performance was fine.  Also there were a couple highlights of his work.  The first occurred during the second improvisation.  The hand-in-glove work of Dave, Jacob, and Miki at one point offered the slightest hint of late John Coltrane Quartet.  Tsuyoshi Honjo heard the hint and unleashed his soprano sax quite convincingly, sans classical intonation.  Later, during the next-to-last improvisation of the evening, Dave brought up a repeated pattern that he later claimed was a theme used in a Mannix TV show soundtrack.  The reed man picked up the theme and ran it through compelling permutations.  Jacob has been busy off the bandstand with a variety of time-consuming challenges.  And soon he will be off to India for weeks.  In other words, the worst aspect of Jacob’s music is that we get too little opportunity to witness just how brilliant his work is.  He was a machine 9/2, working particularly well with Miki.  The spaces they left for each other were among the highlights of the evening.  Miki primarily performs in what may be thought of as “more conventional” settings, music with chord changes or fixed keys and straight time signatures.  She’s terrific working with that kind of music; her studies with Alan Dawson and Bob Gullotti decades ago did not go to waste.  Significantly, both of those teachers are known to offer paths to help students into new music directions.  I thought of such things as I witnessed Miki’s--often sparse--work on drum heads and cymbals, always feeding, always challenging the other musicians to push farther or to push back at her.  In a town filled with outstanding percussionists, I cannot think of any one of them who would have performed on that 9/2 gig in the same general way Miki did.  That fact is all positive about Miki and the other drummers.  But I was particularly knocked out by Miki’s work because of its uniqueness--and I knew it might be an awfully long time before I’d get a chance to witness her doing it in such a free context again.  Then there is the drink meister, Dave Bryant, turning the contextual lemons (last minute problems) into lemonade (outstanding free music).  Yes, we all show up to witness Dave’s mix of Bryant/Coleman harmolodics.  Bur how nice it is to see a leader take four musicians into a significantly different direction and make it all fly.  Really high…

Recently I was walking to my car in the parking lot of a nearby shopping mall.  It was a bright, sunny afternoon.  I heard a loud bang and witnessed the conclusion of an auto accident.  The person driving the car managed to cause the car to go up onto a raised traffic separator and knock over a substantial metal post that had supported two directional signs.  Fortunately the vehicle was not moving fast, and no one was injured.  At the completion of the incident I saw the driver next to the car and wearing an expression of confusion and dismay.  The driver seemed to be thinking, “How did that happen?”  I did not witness the beginning of the accident, but I’m pretty sure what caused the accident.  According to the Los Angeles Times earlier this month, 2018 was the worst year for traffic deaths of pedestrians in about 30 years.  The estimated 6,227 pedestrian deaths are blamed on “cellphone distraction and increased traffic on arterial roads where motorists often exceed 40mph.”  Given the accumulating data, we need politicians with enough integrity to ban all forms of cellphone use by civilian drivers in motor vehicles.  As soon as possible…

I had been delayed and arrived about halfway through the first set.  Nevertheless, the impact of the music was quite apparent in medias res.  The musical connections among musicians 9/29 at the Lily Pad were obvious and remained so throughout most of the evening.  I had witnessed the David Haas Ensemble performing over a span of years, but this evening’s music exhibited a special level of communication for these fine folks.  There were remarkable duo conversations involving the wonderful clarinets of Glenn Dickson and Todd Brunel and the cross-stage links between drummer Joe Musacchia and leader David Haas at the piano that gave the impression they were sonic Siamese twins.  In some sense Scott Getchell, Kit Demos, and Kevin Frenette acted as play-by-play commentators regarding the pairings and trios soaring around them.  But it was integral commentary.  Scott certainly is heard too infrequently in the Boston area, and his current trumpet work is his most brilliant that I’ve witnessed.  Kevin also is heard too infrequently in these parts.  It is a shame because he is one of the most compelling post-Ayler guitarists on the planet right now, as he has been for years.  We are more fortunate in the case of Kit, who is fairly active locally, bringing us his marvelous mix-and-match Dark Matter series each month.  Nevertheless, his performance 9/29 was a special one in that we got a whole evening of terrific acoustic bass and analog synthesizer.  He seemed to be having a particularly joyous time with the latter, “pushing the synth” into new sonic territory.  Everyone in the band must have felt the impact.  Everyone heard the impact.  All of these fine people, veterans of this ensemble and many others, brought a higher level of sonic attention to this gig than I ever witnessed before.  Never before had I experienced everyone in the band hearing everyone else quite so well.  Over the years these men have been hammering away at this improvised ensemble, and with much success.  But never to my ears at such an exhilarating, high artistic level.  Applause…



August

Boston is the fifth most vulnerable coastal city to flooding from sea level rise in the U.S.  “Wicked High Tides” is a feature article in the 8/17 Science News (pp. 16-21) about the global warming threat to the city, including a projected cost of hundreds of millions of dollars annually if nothing is done to minimize the impact of sea level rise.  Even if you do not live in Boston, the article is sobering and constructively provocative…

It was the first gig for vocalist Melissa Kassel and sound engineer Steve Barbar since their marriage in June (followed by an extended tour-of-Europe honeymoon).  Not surprisingly, people in the band--Tom Zicarelli, Phil Grenadier, Max Ridley, Gary Fieldman, and Melissa--and the audience were still in a celebratory mood.   It showed in the music, filled with originals by Tom (music mostly) and Melissa (lyrics mostly) and a few perfect standards.  As always, the solos all around were searching, revelatory, ear-grabbing.  Few “mainstream” bands anywhere include instrumental talents whose solos get so far inside the music and ultimately bring out so much on each song as Phil, Tom, and Gary.  There were a couple differences in the 8/18 Lily Pad performance.  They were bonuses.  The first bonus, a substantial one, was bassist Max Ridley.  I never had heard his music.  It was a tough assignment.  The band leaders consistently call upon some of the finest bassists anywhere for these gigs.  Because of scheduling problems, the “usual suspects” were unavailable.  On the suggestion of Gary, Max Ridley was the sub.  No doubt it was a daunting assignment for the young--unless my eyes deceive me--bassist, but he brought enthusiasm, chops, ears, wonderful timing, and an ensemble sound that (without mimicry) called to mind the work of Scott La Faro.  It was a fine Kassel-Zicarelli debut, and his future is yet to reveal itself.  The other surprise was the opening of the second set by Sammy, a long-time student of Melissa who is on the way to take his performance skills to Syracuse University.  The freshman, with solid band support, gave his rendition of “Fly Me to the Moon,” a work that is deceptively “simple,” easy to screw up.  He’s a trooper, marching right through his nerves, nailing the notes, and (most important) convincing us of the story he sang.  And with no gimmicks.  The fundamentals--the hard part--are there.  If Syracuse gives him a bit more stage presence coaching and opportunities in front of audiences, Sammy may find that his biggest problem is handling the groupies.  The set continued until an upbeat ¾ “dance” closer suggested by Phil.  The superb performances all around would have had the audience humming and dancing on the way home.  But instead Melissa chose to follow that with a more poignant closer, a rhyming song she wrote for her now-deceased father.  It became the final statement of a “family” catalog of birth (i.e., young musicians), marriage (Melissa and Steve), and the passing of family members and friends.  The life cycle.  The band cycle continues at the same location in October…

Several years ago I had a subscription to that salmon-colored newspaper known as The Financial Times.  It was one of those trial subscriptions.  There were some good articles now and then that had nothing to do with economics, but the focus of the publication was Wall Street and other elements of international economic developments.  I did not enjoy the publication in general, mostly because of being in one of the two countries “separated by a common language.”  Economic specifics (e.g., “McDonalds” had nothing to do with the fast food franchise) and language peculiarities (not merely the absence of collective nouns) meant that I could not scan the paper as fluently as I would like to find what I might be looking for.  But there was one thing the paper did have that kept me as a loyal (at least for a time) subscriber.   Once each week (if memory serves) there was a brief feature strip at the bottom of an “arts” page that offered observations on the history of cinema by Peter Bogdanovich.  It was wonderful.  The paper dropped the feature eventually, and I dropped the subscription.  For my birthday this year my older son gave me gifts including This is Orson Welles, a book of interviews with Welles by Bogdanovich.  Marvelous.  One of my favorite (and most fascinating) Welles productions is his film version of Othello.  So one of my first pursuits upon receiving the book was to find out what the Q&A about the film might reveal.  The words on page 233 offered great insight about the film and much more.  In discussing the character of Othello, Welles and Bogdanovich point out that Othello is so easily manipulated by Iago because he can’t conceive of someone like him.  Othello is a warrior and leader of armies.  In that capacity he has had no experience with the specific dark reality of Iago.  Therefore he is vulnerable to Iago’s manipulations.  As they discuss Iago we readers discover the true nature of Donald Trump:  

Peter Bogdanovich: [Othello] could not imagine a person like
             Iago.
Orson Welles: No, and neither could a lot of Shakespeare’s
             critics.  As a result of which we have
eight libraries full of idiot explanations of Iago--when everybody has known a Iago in his life if he has been anywhere.
Peter Bogdanovich: There are several moments in the movie
             which give the impression that Iago
does what he does because it’s in his character, rather than that he he’s plotting for some particular reason.
Orson Welles: Oh, he has no reason.  The great criticism
             through all the years has been that he’s an
unmotivated villain, but I think there are a lot of people who perpetuate villainy without any motive other than the exercise of mischief and the enjoyment of the power to destroy.  I’ve known a lot of Iagos in my life.


One of the key topics of the traditional warm-up on-stage conversation of the Steve Lantner ensemble 8/27 at the Outpost was mnemonic devices.  Most of the musicians seemed to pinpoint significant local and international events chronologically via significant family moments such as births and weddings.  I found the subject interesting because psychologically (I think) I have pretty much erased my own birthday from my memory because of school.  Whenever my birthday arrived I knew the summer was almost over and I would have to return to school.  Among other subjects examined: Eddie Harris’ comedy album consisting of bandstand comments to audiences over a span of years, each remark lasting for a few seconds to several minutes long.  Apparently the often acerbic recording was released posthumously.  For the last time this summer Ellwood Epps joined the trio of Steve, Allan Chase, and Luther Gray in front of an appreciative audience.  Early in the evening the music was carefully chiseled, consistently pensive as the musical conversation moved around the stage until there was a leap into higher energy harmolodics that Ornette would have enjoyed.  Thoughtful sonic eloquence rounded out the first set.  Much of the second set was a celebration of sound.  Yes, there were sentences, paragraphs, and even fine short stories.  But the music came in different forms--layers of sound, three or four sources of argument simultaneously and yet somehow working together, solos challenging others on stage to an encounter.  In the middle of all this there was one duo in particular that lifted the bandstand.  Allan on baritone sax “confronted” Ellwood who had taken up the trumpet, and they faced each other making sounds as each slowly bobbed and weaved, as two wrestlers might at the beginning of a match.  In some way the encounter looked confrontational, and the magnificent torrents of sound coming from each side of the stage (Allan to the left and Ellwood to the right) added to that image.  But the focussed composure of each musician and the remarkable beauty they generated brought to mind primarily ecstasy.  To the pleasure of ear and eye, the forefront duo was not brief.  Eventually Steve and Luther got caught up in it all to create a stunning audio-visual sendoff for the audience.  And for Ellwood who vowed to return…

All of us can use some good news, and here is some about a superb pianist.  Kris Davis is one of the most extraordinary post-Ayler pianists working today.  On 8/12 Berklee officially announced what should be great news for music fans and students in the Boston area.  During this fall semester Kris will begin teaching at Berklee.  She has a fine reputation as a music teacher.  That means her students will be lucky.  Selfishly I’m hoping that her responsibilities mean we will get more opportunities to witness her music, particularly after she makes the transition from commuting here to living here.  Apparently in October we will have the first chance to witness Kris playing solo piano in the Boston area since February 2018…

The Fed prime rate is low and keeps dropping.  But, as The Financial Times points out, “the average interest rate consumers pay on credit cards topped seventeen percent in May, according to the Federal Reserve.”  It is a type of decades-old unchallenged form of usury.  But we have not demanded better.  U.S, citizens have a right to be alarmed about the national debt, but it is somewhat hypocritical to wag fingers at fiscally irresponsible law makers when there is “$850 billion in outstanding U.S. credit card debt.”  After all, we must share the blame with the banks for that debt…

Charlie Kohlhase continued to perform frequently throughout the summer as a leader and as a sideman.  There were Explorers gigs, but some of them had interesting and occasionally quite productive personnel shifts.  A sextet version of the Explorers--Charlie, Seth Meicht, Dan Rosenthal, Josiah Reibstein, Aaron Darrell, and Curt Newton--showed up 8/28 at the Lily Pad.  It was a fairly “normal” version of the band.  Some musicians had been out of the Boston area for more than a month.  So the atmosphere felt something like a band camp reunion.  Perhaps because of the summer juggling Charlie kept the music mostly in the realm of the familiar--to band members and audience members.  It opened with the now-traditional blues and continued for an hour-plus single set of music by long-time favorites such as John Tchicai, Roswell Rudd, Elmo Hope (“Eyes So Beautiful as Yours” for Bertha Hope), and others.  Of course, there was a good bit of music written by the leader.  There were, however, two somewhat unfamiliar works.  As fans may remember, Charlie rehearsed John Tchicai’s “Quintus T” for the first time with the band on 7/18.  Josiah Reibstein and Aaron Darrell were not on that gig.  So performing the piece for the first time since 7/18 was a challenge--with impressive results.  The other work--new to me--was Ornette Coleman’s “Man on the Moon,” a contemporary celebration of the Apollo XI mission.  Charlie and the guys performed the wonderfully raucous work in celebration (belatedly) of the 50th anniversary of the event.  As long as the Explorers do their thing, we have much to celebrate right here on Earth…

After World War Two with financial help from the GI Bill Sam Rivers studied music in Boston during the late 1940s and early 1950s.  Years later he offered praise for the education he received, suggesting that his experiences here in schools and local bands gave him significant advantages over other jazz musicians.  As Cohen and Fitzgerald quote Rivers in Rat Race Blues: The Musical Life if Gigi Gryce (p. 60), “Boston musicians… had a better musical education than New York musicians.  We sort of looked down on the musical knowledge of the New York musicians because they were all there before they were ready.  We all knew that.  They got on-the-job training.  We waited and got ourselves together first and then we went to New York.”  Sam Rivers has left all of us a remarkable musical legacy.  And now, according to Downbeat (September, p. 66), his daughter is looking for a home for his memorabilia and recordings, more than fifty storage containers of material.  Monique Rivers Williams has called upon the services of jazz journalist Ed Hazell to curate the trove.  Previously unreleased recordings are being made available.  Ms. Williams hopes an educational institution will provide a home for the materials.  Let’s hope that home will be in Boston.  Information about the recordings can be found online.  As of August the site had no way for people to do a search on a specific musician to find recordings, but there is a list of musicians that you can click on.  At this time Sam Rivers is not in the list (even though the site has a trio recording available)…  

Yuka, wife of Joe Hunt and superb pianist with Joe’s groups, was visiting family and friends in Japan on 8/25.  Therefore Yuka could not perform on the monthly Lily Pad gig in August.  Joe Has been working with John Sullivan for a while and asked the bassist to recommend a pianist replacement.  He suggested Dan Pappas.  During the warm-up and sound check the pianist displayed his affinity for Bill Evans, thus indicating affinity for the music of the band leader.  That was good news for audience members (and perhaps band members) who may have had some anxiety about the prospects for superb music coming from a mainstream trio that never had performed together before.  Seeing a potentially fruitful way to begin the evening, Joe decided to open with an Evans tune I associate with a 1962 Evans-Israels-Motion recording, “Very Early.”  The three men seemed right at home with the material and each other, but Joe’s prodding and the pianist’s own initiative made sure that this trio would not be mistaken for the Bill Evans Trio.  There was more Evans material to come during the substantial single set of music.  The compositions of other jazz giants (e.g., Monk, Sam Jones, Herbie Hancock, and more) were offered among a set list of mostly standards.  For a first time outing the trio worked well.  There were scattered instances of the pianist missing the leader’s hand signals and other body language, but a single rehearsal might be enough to take care of that.  And the audience reaction was enthusiastic.  It was the first time I ever had seen Joe Hunt groupies, leading the cheers between tunes.  At the end of the evening one woman (joking, of course) came up to Joe and asked “Will you marry me?”  It was all in fun and all about the music.  No one can replace Yuka…

Just when you thought we are on the bus to Hell, ever downward without brakes, there is news of an act of genuine intelligence and heart.  According to Agence France-Presse, two California-based college professors “have installed three pink seesaws across the U.S.-Mexico border wall at Sunland Park, N.M. and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.”  The setup allows children on both sides of the border to play with each other.  Ronald Rael, one of the designers, points out that as in the case of current politics, “actions that take place on one side have a direct consequence on the other side.”  Of course the whole idea, although received favorably by most of the media (via google) and seesaw participants on both sides of the border, was too good to last.  The designers were asked to remove the “Teeter-Totter Wall” by Customs and Border Patrol officials and did so.  According to one such official, “There is no playground along the U.S.-Mexico border in New Mexico…  Agents ensured that no people/goods were crossed during the encounter.”  Think of the too-brief event as a single candle…

They called it the BONYCH Festival because it featured musicians from three cities--BOston, NYcity, and CHicago.  There were four sets of music and way too much barbecue (quite delicious) at the Ride Headquarters in Sherborn 8/31.  Steve Marquette brought two guitars with him from Chicago to open the event.  He has the techniques down--plucking, strumming, bowing, sliding, peg-twisting, and more.  But the musician/alt-music festival producer was not really about impressing with technique.  The range of what he performed--folk to traditional jazz to completely free--was noteworthy in itself.  But what impressed me most is that he made the mix logically connected.  Anywhere you “looked” there was a “somewhere else” that made perfect sense within the preceding “place.”  A fine beginning to the celebration.  Cinghiale--a duo going back to the mid-1990s and continuing off and on through today--presented new works by reedmen Mars Williams and Ken Vandermark that obviously were the current incarnation of the ongoing project.  What struck me about the performance is the sonic identity of their work.  Any fan from the 1990s taking a time travel to the 8/31 gig in Sherborn would know immediately (even blindfolded) that it was Cinghiale.  And yet, this was not the Cinghiale of old.  When the set was over, struggling to come up with my own assessment of the nature of the difference, I asked Mars what he thought the difference was.  I was surprised to discover that the question caught him off guard.  He agreed that the duo 8/31 was different from the earlier incarnations.  But he (like me) could not quite put his finger on it.  We wrestled with it and came up with something like “surety.”  In both time frames most activities were the same--rehearsals and other preparation, passion, technical pursuit, creative drive, communication, and more--but these were two different sets of “Cinghiale people.”  The difference was, along with all the things they took to the gig, the confidence that--no matter what happened in the moment--they would make the music soar.  And they did.  There is no question that the biggest draw of the festival for those who chase “names” was Ikue Mori.  Oddly, even though she is a name, the drawing is warranted.  During a conversation with her after the gig I mentioned that I had witnessed her performances previously three times.  Somehow I had confused in my mind times of events with times of locations.  I have caught her performances at the Stone twice--not once--and remember how affected I was by her music both times.  She is one of the most brilliant creative musicians I’ve ever known.  Walking away from being the most influential underground rock/pop drummer in New York to become the most innovative drum machine performer in that city simply because she got tired of carrying her drum kit up so many flights of stairs to her apartment.  And then later she switched to laptop/electronics because it was even lighter physically than the drum machines.  That brings us to today.  Think about it.  Most potentially creative musicians struggle to say something of substance on a single instrument or single set of instruments, but she changes (discards) instruments in a way that suggests the instrument itself is irrelevant.  We all know people who play a whole range of instruments at a high level--superb musician Jerry Bergonzi, for example--but how many great musicians do you know for whom choice of instrument is--and has been for decades--simply a matter of physiological assets?  In other words--as all of us listened to Ikue Mori 8/31--we were witnessing a musician (in the purest sense) for whom the music is the whole point and the means is irrelevant.  The amazing thing for someone such as myself is that whatever the “instrument of convenience” happens to be is quite sufficient for her purposes.  And--more amazing in that instrumental context--is the transcendent music she creates with her current “instrumental convenience.”  Yes, her set of music in Sherborn was the most astonishing I had heard from her.  Impossible but true.  And finally, after and during hours of music and food, we heard from the largest ensemble of the day, a trio of Curt Newton (BO), Ikue Mori (NY), and Ken Vandermark (CH).  They came out on fire--fully connected and on the same page--in the first improvised piece.  The second improvisation continued the search into a fascinating range of terrains.  Then, about 3/4 of the way through the piece it seemed that the musicians were thinking too much, eventually searching for the closing statement.  First Ken tried the final note while Curt pushed farther and eventually brushed his way toward conclusion with Ikue letting us know emphatically that we had reached the end.  A short encore with Ikue defining the conclusion again signaled the end of a terrific festival that continued for a while gastronomically.  But the fine music lingered in the air--in isolated memory and in conversations for several hours.  Maybe it will return.  Or something like it…


July

An eight-piece Leap of Faith Orchestra--PEK, Glynis Lomon, Bob Moores, Duane Reed, Eric Dahlman, Devin Lomon, Eric Zinman, and Yuri Zbitnow--showed up 7/6 at Third Life Studio.  Recent months have been emotionally up and down for many people in the band and the audience.  The most obvious downer for people at the venue is that this likely would be the last gig ever for most (if not all) band members at Third Life, which is scheduled to close down its performance offerings at the end of the month.  Nevertheless, this evening was one of the most upbeat LoF gigs I’ve ever witnessed.  And it was found in the quality of the music.  People had good reason to be upbeat.  Eight musicians and an enthusiastic audience showed up in spite of one-inch-per-hour rain and flooded roads.  There was instrumental joy with brass men comparing notes on instrument repair and manufacture and a percussion party at the rear of the bandstand.  Yuri joyously was “still discovering sounds” in his still-new drum kit.  Also, PEK has been investing in sonic sculpture that Yuri and other band members had a ball with throughout the evening.  Unlike Harry Bertoia’s works which generally are fairly large--typically larger than the one in the MIT Chapel and seldom as small as the ones in the compact sculpture room of the Milwaukee Art Museum--these sonic sculptures created by Pete Englehart are intended to be attached to a drum kit the same way a cow bell might be attached.  PEK has put together a metal support that is designed to hold as many as a dozen of these delightful sonic creations.  It is fun to look at and to hear.  Of special note is the appearance of Devin Lomon (son of Glynis) with the group.  I had no idea that Devin had musical talent (perhaps to complement his visual art).  He told me that as a child he began studying the saxophone.  No longer.  But he has found a voice in the harmonica.  He impressed in one of the sub-group performances, particularly with his feel for abstract time--the when and where of sound that is essential for successful improvised music.  PEK programmed the evening with three twenty-minute sets of sub-group combinations from the eight musicians and then the full orchestra.  One of the problems (if that is the right term for it) of LoF Orchestra gigs is the number, content, and total lengths of the sets of music.  In some ways it is an absurd complaint.  After all, one of my complaints about the current obsession with LPs among music fans (and it certainly is not my major complaint) is that CDs gave us longer playing time.  You know sonically superior LPs were pushing the boundaries with twenty minutes per side.  With the CD musicians were unfettered from the clock at least beyond seventy minutes of clean reproduction of a truly ambitious music project.  But I must confess that I agree with Phil Woods who once said about the release of a double-LP set, “I’m not a fan of music by the pound.”  Then he justified the release of the two-LP album.  On the other hand--if you are serious about your listening--some music is more wearing than other music.  And I’m not talking about bad music.  Thirty seconds of bad music is too long.  But I’ve sat through many operas in the three to four hour range, all of them of high quality.  But some of them are more taxing than others--not necessarily better or worse--but more taxing.  I’ve witnessed a superb five-plus hour performance of Morton Feldman’s String Quartet No. 2 and (not surprisingly) it took its toll.  But it never lost my focus.  Part of the reason is that it was a single work by a genius and a unified whole.  I had to be there not just for the resolution but also for the journey.  At Third Life 7/6 we witnessed three twenty-minute sets of music--each different, each challenging in its own way.  That’s a lot to digest.  THEN the “music” began.  The big deal was the full eight-musician orchestra scheduled for fifty minutes.  I had to ask myself, “Will I recover in time on the break for a whole set of new music going somewhere else?”  The music is challenging, and it is not like four sets of Blakey or Cecil.  It’s four sets of differently demanding music in a single evening.  In spite of what I’ve just described, as far as I know, everyone in the audience--myself included--stayed around for the fifty-minute octet improvisation.  And no one left until the last mother and son conversation was over and the gongs told us that it was time to say goodbye to Third Life Studio.  And now we anticipate a rebirth of Leap of Faith in the fall in some other environment for remarkable creativity…

Six relatively short sets of solo performances by six different improvisors.  That was the idea, something potentially problematic for the musicians and the fans in attendance.  Standing alone, attempting to create high quality improvised music--music from scratch--is one of the most difficult challenges a musician can tackle.  Two of the six sets of music 7/16 at the Outpost incorporated composed music, but all of the sets were challenging for musicians and fans.  Forbes Graham opened the evening with some musique concrète projected from the back of the room.  He answered the sounds with trumpet improvisations from the front of the room.  A combination of factors, including the separate locations of the sources of the sounds and the extremely different timbre and patterns of the recording and the trumpet, created marvelous ambiguity about the nature of the music.  There were times when briefly there seemed to be something conversational going on in the manner of synchronicity or call and response.  On the other hand, the performance was at least partially Cagean--the recording and the improvised trumpet work taking place simultaneously but independently.  Unlike Cage, Forbes apparently did not use clock time as a structural element.  Forbes made his last statement on the trumpet while the recording “played on.”  Then he turned off the recording.  Whatever people in the audience thought of the performance, there is no denying Forbes’ trumpet virtuosity as a creative musician.  Bassist Brittany Karlson was up next, offering the only sound sculpture of the evening.  I had witnessed her work before, but always in a post-Ayler jazz context, a context that apparently tended to hide her natural sound sculpture inclinations.  Her post-traditional array of bass techniques 7/16 was put to use in the pursuit of sound as an adventure in itself, as opposed to the jazz perspective of sound as a means to an end.  Also, unlike post-Ayler jazz (and all jazz for that matter), her sonics were devoid of a sustained or evolving pulse.  With one exception.  Near the end of her performance Brittany Karlson recited a poem, and that poem inevitably provided a pulse for the bass sonics.  Most of the time during the recitation her voice was quite soft, and therefore inaudible.  I do not know whether the “ghostly” recitation was a miscalculation or intentional.  In any case, the focus and aesthetic impact of her set was quite effective.  Ellwood Epps, who seems to be evolving into some sort of honorary Bostonian, presented the third solo set.  The Canadian trumpeter has been spending much of his summer performing in New England, frequently in Cambridge and Somerville.  Understandably, I have heard no complaints.  It was a delight to have such fine--and wonderfully different--trumpet players on the first half of the evening.  Yes, both Ellwood and Forbes have remarkable technical facility, but their aesthetics and where they take the music are quite different.  I am not suggesting incompatibility.  In fact I could not help feeling disappointed that there was no place for a trumpet duo on the gig.  Ellwood is an almost conventionally melodic trumpet player.  It is as if he relishes the beauty of “If You Could See Me Now” or “Day Dream” even as he’s taking his sonics quite removed from chords.  Unlike the music of the first two sets of the evening, Ellwood’s offering came across almost as if it were through-composed.  But of course it wasn’t.  It was simply engaging story-telling that happened to evoke conventional melody through completely disarming improvised lines.  Like his personality, the music is non-threatening, energetically positive.  There was a break during which musicians and fans caught up with what has happened “since when.”  Bassist Damon Smith presented a fine set of music to open the second half of the evening, one of his last gigs before taking off for St. Louis.  It was a fascinating demonstration of jazz bass after the sound sculpture of the first set.  Both Brittany and Damon are quite familiar with non-conventional bass performance techniques, but the ends to which they apply those techniques are different.  Because his roots are solidly in the jazz tradition, Damon evokes the spirit of everyone from George Duvivier to William Parker (as presumable influences) to articulate his own jazz voice on the bass. And to anyone with ears at the Outpost that voice is a beautiful one.  As I’ve said before, I will miss Damon Smith when he leaves.  His performance 7/16 is one fine explanation why.  I did not know it, but Jorrit Dijkstra is pursuing a document of note regarding Steve Lacy.  Jorrit has acquired a good number of copies of unpublished Steve Lacy soprano sax etudes, and he’s working to have them published for Steve Lacy fans and for musicians who want to challenge their soprano sax chops.  As in the case of the Ligeti etudes for piano, Steve Lacy’s etudes are wonderful music as well as learning aids.  To give us a taste of the unpublished works, Jorrit performed two of them embellished with improvisation.  The first etude performed, “Porcupine,” is a tribute to Elvin Jones.  The second, “Whoops,” was written for Peter Sellers.  Although Jorrit did not spell the dedicatee’s last name (i.e., Sellers vs. Sellars), because of the title I’m guessing it is the movie actor.  No doubt it was a combination of the compositions and the performance itself, but there were times during the set when the sounds brought images of Steve Lacy to mind, emphasizing how much I and so many other people miss his contributions as a teacher and performer during his last years in this city.  Free form Pandelis Karayorgis piano work always is a treat, and the sixth set was a fine closer for the evening.  I think it might have been something to do with how relaxed the performance was, but this very now improvised music brought to mind something “ancient” in the history of jazz.  As Pandelis tore through the keyboard, reconstructing and deconstructing the instrument with “everything you wanted to hear on the piano,” I had visions of some joint in the 1930s, crowded, a bit noisy, with a piano at the center of it all and a pianist, perhaps with a cigar out of the side of his mouth.  Sights and sounds of people such as James P. Johnson and Willie “The Lion” Smith.  Psychologically anachronistic but sonically wonderful…

Eric Rosenthal and Taylor Ho Bynum brought Junko Fujiwara, Nathan McBride, and Mali Obomsawin with them 7/11 at the Lily Pad to help them celebrate two decades of music from the two leaders.  About a decade ago there was an explosion of minimalist, slow-pulse activity in the jazz world (in the U.S. particularly).  I could not wait for it to depart.  Charlie Parker sparked a plethora of terrible up-tempo “bebop” followers.  Mediocre bebop is almost bearable.  But the first and last great minimalist/slow-pulse composer, Morton Feldman, has given birth to countless inept composers out of the European “classical” tradition and jazz musicians who fail to inspire also.  I have waited patiently for the “fad” to die in the jazz world.  As bad as inept bebop is, it is terrific compared to almost all minimalist/slow-pulse jazz that has “flourished” during the last decade.  If you are going to compose or improvise, SLOW is much more challenging than “Indiana” at 150.  That is why throughout the history of jazz the best soloists on slow ballads have been veteran giants.  They don’t seem to explain that to you in music school.  So I was at least a bit surprised when Taylor Ho Bynum--mentored by the man of complexity and speed himself, Anthony Braxton, and Taylor being a fine composer/arranger of intricate, challenging music in his own right--showed up with one of his slow-pulse works.  My reaction is mixed.  On the one hand the performance displayed characteristics of the “hip” slow-pulse music that bores me.  He presented three works, each one with the same time pulse to the ear.  It reminds me of a friend who not long ago attended a post-Ayler gig in another U.S. jazz center and complained to me, “The works individually were fine, but each piece was performed in the same time as all the others.  I was ready to scream.”  Taylor reduced the boredom factor by presenting the three pieces without a break.  So it was not quite so obvious that there was no variety of pulse from one piece to another.  It came across as one piece of a given tempo.  But it was three pieces without a break.  At least it was a “suite” of three pieces, but a suite without tempo variations.  Rare if not unique.  Again, it is not a problem of any one piece.  A set filled only with up-tempo rondos would not have been a problem solver.  The trick here, unfortunately for those of us who have to put up with lesser lights, is that Taylor generally succeeded.  In spite of the monotony in time, his works and the performance succeeded.  The three works--presented as a unified whole--did come across as a single work with effective evolving chords, lines, and “heads” with forward motion that acted as supports for the fine solos (particularly by Junko and Taylor).  The composed “themes” and cushions--performed superbly by Nathan McBride, Mali Obomsawin, and the spot on Eric Rosenthal--meant that the solos soared and the ear was tricked into hearing a single, fine slow-pulse work.  Of course, this praise for the end result is troubling to me as I write it.  Because the slow jazz “fad” has been around for a decade, and almost all of it is unbearable, I complain.  Because this performance worked it gives more life to a dead end.  Speaking of an endless fad, how about twenty years?  Yes, Eric and Taylor used this gig to celebrate the twentieth anniversary of their first performances as a slow-pulse duo specializing in jazz standards, fake book fare.  The duo was both ahead of its time (regarding the slow-pulse jazz fad) and behind the times (i.e., playing dead slow ballads was part of the standard swing era repertoire).  I remember being puzzled by the duo two decades ago.  Why would any jazz musicians at the end of the twentieth century want to specialize in slow ballads when the masters defined the terrain so wonderfully at a time when the music was brand new?  We even have recordings of a nineteen year old Billie Holiday performing “Saddest Tale” from the brand new Symphony in Black with the Ellington Orchestra and a few years later now legendary soloists performing on the brand new “Blue Light” with the same orchestra.  And that’s just two examples of music from the same decade and the same orchestra.  Comparisons are unavoidable.  Do you really want to go up against Billie Holiday and Barney Bigard?  It’s not that playing tunes from the 1930s and 1940s in 1999 or 2019 is somehow “illegal.”  But you’d better be doing something very different from performances by the giants of the swing era--something now.  Over the years generally I have been less than enthusiastic about the duo’s slow-pulse take on standards.  To me the compositions came across as too religiously proper and the improvisations were--rather than ear-stretching--so minimalist as to be “invisible.”  Psychologically I approached the second set of the evening with caution.  But Eric and Taylor caught me off guard by abandoning just about everything I had been complaining about.  The heads were not spare results from some cookie cutter.  Usually on the second set Taylor took some sort of circuitous path to the melody while Eric’s busy work under it all--a productive attempt at obfuscation no doubt--made sure that the results could work for listeners only.  They even refused to play the bridge of the first piece of the set.  At the time I thought it was a slipup, but now I’m not so sure.  Yes, I’m tired of pianists who think that the key to playing Feldman is to play SLOWLY.  And, yes, I’m tired of slow-pulse versions of standards by jazz musicians--and, even more, inept minimalist compositions and improvisations by jazz musicians.  I’m hoping the fad finally is ending. Unfortunately, the two sets of quality music 7/11 at the Lily Pad may result in a further delay of the demise.  On the other hand, the unrehearsed full quintet encore was a train wreck.  So there is hope that something new and challenging may yet catch the fancy of creative jazz musicians… 

During the first few minutes of the trio’s performance 7/17, the surprising (to me) interaction of the musicians brought to mind the early Nat Cole Trio with Oscar Moore and Johnny Miller.  The compositions certainly were not those associated with Nat Cole’s World War II repertoire.  But the engaging technical facility of Dave Bryant, chordal jabs of Eric Hofbauer, and rock solid footpath sustained by Jacob William evoked the music of the earlier groundbreaking trio.  It was a more than pleasant surprise, a bonus to start off an evening of Secret Handshake music.  The Secret Handshake Trio was created by Dave in 2017 and first presented to the public at Pickman Hall on 2/10/17 (if my memory is correct).  Its purpose was to celebrate the music of Charlie Parker and Ornette Coleman, demonstrating links between the two jazz giants along the way.  There have been several trio reunions since that event, the 7/17 gig at the Outpost being the most recent.  After the opening surprise, the three of them got down to business, playing usually “hang on for dear life” versions of music by Parker and Coleman, frequently offering back-to-back medleys.  Sometimes there were charts.  Sometimes there were (too brief to substantially help the bassist and guitarist on occasion) melodic runs, hints to suggest a work.  There was one “ancient” work (from Shock Exchange’s first LP I believe) Dave’s piano alluded to so briefly that, unless Eric and Jacob owned the album, there was no way that they could jump in with confidence.  To make matters even more challenging, Dave spent most of his time apparently performing an essay about the composition rather than the work itself.  It’s the kind of thing that would make mortal sidemen put down instruments and run off the bandstand screaming.  Not Jacob and Eric.  Apparently for them being lost is just a chance to plug in another compatible piece of conversation.  And solid ground always surfaced.  Maybe the group should change its name to The Bullet-proof Trio…

It had been more than a month since I had caught an Explorers gig.  A quintet version of the band--Charlie, Daniel Rosenthal, Seth Meicht, Kit Demos, and Curt Newton--showed up 7/18 at the Outpost and the long wait was healed with an evening of wonderful music.  At one point Charlie said, “One of the nice things about a quintet is that everyone gets to solo.”  And solo they did, one killer sonic commentary followed by another.  All evening long.  Of special note was the rare appearance with the band of Kit on acoustic bass.  I never had witnessed Kit with the Explorers before, and it was quite a treat because I never had caught anyone play harmolodic bass with the group before.  His playing was supportive in a fairly straight forward manner during heads and most full ensemble work.  But during the improvised work of others, Kit both supported the solo and offered his own envelope-pushing improvised solos at the same time.  That work and all of his support work had had such a strong, enhancing personal stamp that he inspired band members to push their solo voices into places that to my ears were not articulated previously.  And all of that came out of Kit’s typical self-effacing persona.  Perhaps the highlight of the evening for me was the rehearsal and eventual performance of “Quintus T.”  As I’ve said elsewhere in this Journal, art is a process.  The Starry Night by Van Gogh is a celebrated work of art, but it is an amazing byproduct of the art process.  There are many activities involved in the visual art process.  And that is true in the case of jazz performance.  Two of the more well known activities in the process of jazz as an art form are jazz recording sessions and rehearsals.  Although I have been fortunate enough to witness many recording sessions and rehearsals, few jazz fans are lucky enough to have the opportunity to witness those two activities.  On 7/18 other audience members and I were fortunate enough to witness a first rehearsal and performance by the Explorers of “Quintus T” by John Tchicai.  The tune originally was written for the New York Art Quartet and recorded on July 16, 1965 on the Mohawk label and reissued on the Fontana label.  I’m guessing that (except for Charlie) everyone in the band either never had heard a recording of the work or hadn’t heard it in a long time.  So, for practical purposes, everyone in the band other than Charlie was coming to the chart as if it were brand new.  The original chart is written for alto sax, trombone, bass, and percussion.  It was a relatively simple process to “replace” the trombone with Dan’s brass and the bonus of tenor sax.  But the great part--about which my memory is too limited to recall the wonderful details--was the directions from Charlie, subsequent questions, discussions, the stops and starts, and the final decision to play the piece through completely.  All of it low key and carried out by fully engaged, curious, and passionate musicians of superb resources.  And the performance was a solid statement of “this is what we resolved in the rehearsal.”  There may be other rehearsals and performances of “Quintus T” by Charlie and his Explorers.  But there always will be only one first rehearsal.  And we lucky witnesses were there…

During the first week of this month a Washington Post-ABC News poll of registered voters was released, telling us that President Trump’s approval rating is the highest since he’s been in office (47%).  Joe Biden is the only Democrat who is ahead in a matchup with Trump (53%-43%).  The other leading Democrats are within a single percentage point of the president.  As the most recent presidential races have demonstrated, winning a majority of votes is not enough.  The winner needs the Electoral College victory.  Because the Supreme Court recently ruled that the states should do whatever they want to about gerrymandering, we are likely to be looking at another Electoral College victory for Trump who once again may miss out on the popular vote.  In any case, right now the outcome looks close.  So no matter what your wishes are, get off your butt and work for or against whoever you want.  And VOTE.  Remember the truism:  In our democracy you do not get what you want; you get what you deserve…

Since at least the late nineteenth century New York City has cast a long shadow toward Boston as far as proto-jazz and jazz are concerned.  During that time Gotham established a reputation--and for the most part justified--as the primary cultural center of Western Civilization.  During the last quarter of the twentieth century the luster has faded somewhat, due primarily to the fact that art and artists have been priced out of the city.  For example, sculptor Richard Serra grew up in New York, began his career there, and--because he can ask for and receive six or seven figures for one of his works--lives in Manhattan today.  If a young “Richard Serra” today wants to build a career as an artist, he cannot afford to live in Manhattan or probably any of the other boroughs of the city.  The few post-Ayler jazz giants living in Manhattan today do so because of rent control, an option no longer available to a would-be “Albert Ayler” today.  In other words, New York no longer is an art center.  A city cannot be the art center of Western Culture without any residence for actively practicing artists.  Manhattan is a Museum, a place in which tourists can pay too much money to witness jazz and visit some of the great museums and galleries of the world filled with works created by dead people and out-of-town artists.  I’m complaining about what New York has become.  I do so because I love New York.  I was born there and spent most of my childhood living in Brooklyn and Queens.  As readers know, I have complaints about Boston and Cambridge as well.  And for many of the same reasons.  I focus on New York City here because, although the shadow of New York remains long in terms of perceptions in Boston among fans and too many musicians, the serious post-Ayler jazz fan is better off in Boston than in New York.  That is one of the reasons I choose to live here.  As I write these words, I can see a look of horror on the faces of most people reading those words.  “New York and nearby other cities include more world-class post-Ayler jazz musicians than any city in the world,” you say.  True.  Although the numbers gap is narrowing, New York certainly has immediate access to more of those artists.  Although I never have done the work to come up with some sort of accurate count, I suspect there are only about two or three dozen world-class post-Ayler jazz musicians in the Boston area.  But.  And it’s a big BUT.  The dozens of world-class post-Ayler jazz musicians in the Boston area perform week in and out AND they perform with each other.  I say all this as background to comments about the 7/20 Lily Pad gig featuring out-of-towners Paul Flaherty and Chris Corsano in a quintet with Jeb Bishop, Forbes Graham, and Damon Smith.  When they walked up to the bandstand Forbes, Jeb, and Damon did not shake hands.  They were thoroughly familiar with each other’s work because they are each other’s work.  In the Boston post-Ayler jazz scene the giants perform with the giants.  That’s why I spend a lot of time in music venues.  As a lead-up to the Saturday gig at the Lily Pad I caught post-Ayler gigs featuring Bostonians exclusively on Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday.  All of them featuring musicians of the caliber of the 7/20 gig.  That’s five gigs in seven days.  That’s busier than usual for me.  At my age I cannot sustain such activity and maintain the rest of my life.  And even though the week was filled with solo and ensemble performances by world-class musicians, some evenings were better than others musically.  But at least I knew that, because of the personnel involved, there was a very good chance that each gig might be superb.  I go to New York a few times each year, but I go mostly for “museum” New York.  I know it is unlikely that the quality of works of Van Gogh, Picasso, and Kiefer will deteriorate since my last visit.  On occasion I go to a jazz gig, but rarely.  Every once in a while when I am in New York there is a gig featuring a post-Ayler ensemble consisting of world-class musicians, and I will try to be there.  But most New York post-Ayler gigs that include world-class improvisors consist of one or two terrific musicians and some very nice people whose abilities are in the range of mediocre to terrible.  I’m not interested.  To the best of my knowledge the problem is rooted in either economics or politics.  I suspect it is both.  So here we are on a Saturday and I’m spoiled going to terrific gigs all week at which a normal audience is in the range of three to eight people.  It’s the New York shadow:  “This is Boston and these are Boston musicians.  The music can’t be that good.”  I look around the Lily Pad 7/20 and basically every seat is taken.  People come out of the woodwork.  I say hello to people who a decade or more ago were discerning regulars.  More than one such person says to me, “Wow.  It’s been a long time.  Where have you been?”  As if they have been catching all the great gigs, and I’ve been home tending goldfish.  And Alex Lemski who produces these “import gigs” helps sustain the shadow from New York.  The wording of his writeups suggests that he brings musicians to Boston who never have performed here (“unknown musicians to the Boston area”) when in fact most of the best-known New York area musicians have performed here or even gotten their music together here.  I can live with hype, but billing the gig as the “Legends Quartet Plus One” causes confusion at best.  Paul Flaherty is the only person on the gig old enough to qualify as a “legend,” and who is the “plus one”?  In other words, four of the guys on the gig are really good (i.e., legends) and one guy is just a so-so musician.  Who is the guy who is not quite as terrific as everyone else?  Given Alex Lemski’s perspective on recent Boston jazz history, one of the Boston-based musicians must be the “plus one.”  On the other hand, I applaud Alex Lemski’s desire to bring out-of-town musicians to perform here.  His productions are an attempt to deal with the “lack of invitations being extended” to out-of-town musicians.  That is a great idea, and up to five or ten years ago visits from great musicians based in New York, Chicago, and Europe were common.  I believe cross fertilization artistically is an important idea.  The Cedar Bar in New York was such a place for aesthetic exchanges, as was W. Eugene Smith’s Sixth Avenue Jazz Loft.  Not so many months ago Joe McPhee was visiting my home.  We talked about many things.  He asked about jazz in the Boston area.  As part of my answer I put on a CD of a live gig, one of the late Raqib Hassan’s fine sessions.  Joe listening to a CD is not the same thing as performing on stage with someone you do not know.  But Joe really enjoyed the music.  He raved particularly about the solos of Raqib and trumpeter Forbes Graham.  Not too long after that Joe found himself at gig on Church Street in Cambridge performing with Forbes.  So, yes, I applaud Alex Lemski’s efforts to bring outsiders to the Boston area.  Not because the outsiders will demonstrate to the Boston-based musicians what high-quality jazz is all about, but because it is good for both outsider jazz giants and Boston based jazz giants when cross fertilization happens.  Another potential positive result from Alex’s efforts is that events featuring highly-regarded visitors performing with Boston’s best gives fans dwelling in the shadow of New York a chance to witness just how amazing Bostonians of the caliber of Jeb, Forbes, and Damon really are.  And when top shelf outsiders and top-shelf locals actually connect on stage--as they did 7/20--then the question of better or best becomes irrelevant.  Or it should be irrelevant.  I’m hopeful the 7/20 gig may have brought some of the New York worshippers out of the shadow.  But not too hopeful.  If they had ears in the first place, they would have been packing the venues of Cambridge and Somerville all along.  But you never know…

It was “déjà vu all over again.”  A few days after the outstanding performance at the Lily Pad which was attended by a large number of “it’s hip to be here” jazz fans, I ran into an Outpost version of the same thing.  After witnessing months in and months out of extraordinary performances by various Steve Lantner ensembles for several years--presented before typically fairly small audiences--I entered that venue for the first set of music 7/23 at the Outpost to discover a Lantner group facing a full house.  Packed.  Although the weather outside was cool, the air conditioning was off inside.  The results were a warm somewhat claustrophobic atmosphere.  But what’s to complain about?  The crowd was there to witness the music of the Steve Lantner Quartet.  Well, not exactly.  Listed as the Steve Lantner Quartet, the group really was the Steve Lantner Trio--Steve, Allan Chase, and Luther Gray--plus guest Ellwood Epps.  Ellwood has been visiting the Boston area a good deal this summer.  So he has gotten a fine chance to observe and perform with local musicians.  That experience showed itself 7/23 with a constructively integrated quartet performance.  On the other hand, Elwood’s appearances with Boston area musicians have not been frequent enough that he has become a “Boston local”--and therefore, as in the case of all locals, should be ignored.  He retains his Canadian (or Montreal, if that suggests greater savoir faire) “guest glitter.”  That is not a slam at Ellwood.  He is to be applauded for getting the word out to people looking for something special, in this case a celebrated musician from Canada.  And he is good and capable enough to fit in effectively with Boston area monsters.  And, as I’ve said before, if people come out to jazz gigs--for virtually any reason--there is always the chance that truly extraordinary music will pierce the ears, brains, and hearts of the glitterati; causing them to notice--as certainly was the case on 7/20 at the Lily Pad and 7/23 at the Outpost--that Boston’s best stand with the best from anywhere.  And maybe something like that did happen.  In any case, all members of the band seemed to feed off the audience response.  The current Steve Lantner ensemble fan base was shaking its heads in disbelief, as it does every month.  And did I spot some genuine amazement on the part of some of the out-of-the-woodwork folks (as a reaction to the whole band)?  Perhaps.  But maybe I’m too optimistic.  The quartet returned for the second set with a bonus.  Damon Smith showed up with acoustic bass to sit in just one last time before he departs for a new life in St. Louis.  He made sure we would miss him.  I believe a return visit in the not too distant future would be terrific, perhaps a duo gig featuring Damon and Luther.  The connection among the five 7/23 was so solid it was difficult to imagine they were not a working band.  Even after such a superb first set, the second set gave us a new look at the stratosphere.  And we lucky few--after all, thirty people cannot fit in available chairs at the Outpost--were lucky enough to be there.  The only question is: How many of the lucky ones know how lucky they were?  Lucky enough to return?  For the sake of the musicians and the fans, I hope so…


June 

The 2019 incarnation of the Driff Records Festival took place 6/8 at the Lily Pad.  The seven sets of music began at 7:40 p.m. and presumably continued well past midnight.  I caught all the sets except the last two.  The evening opened with a solo improvisation by Andria Nicodemou.  It struck me as a fine gesture, something like a herald calling the public to an important event.  Her clarion call was much more than heraldry.  One of the great joys of following the music over a span of decades in a major jazz town is witnessing the development of a few young musicians into real artists.  Andria seems to be such a musician.  When I first saw her and local musicians were enthusiastic about her work, I was slow to get on the band wagon.  I had seen countless wunderkinder manufactured in academic or music institutions, all of them “brilliant” and almost exploding with possibility.  Unrealized possibility.  Andria reminded me of such youngsters, enthusiastic and with technique in abundance.  I watched, listened, and waited.  As I’ve mentioned before, during the past couple years, her tenacity and focus are paying off.  Yes, her chops are obvious and she keeps pushing the technical possibilities.  All of that is fine, but the key to her development is that more and more she exhibits technique as a resource rather than an end in itself.  Her content-driven intuition is taking over her work, and with wonderful results.  Her solo performance 6/8 is a fine example of how much she has grown.  It was not completely improvised.  She did her groundwork before the gig, and no doubt she had done more than “prepared” aluminum foil as part of the instrumental setup.  Certainly there was an overarching plan to it all.  So “totally free” purists might complain.  Not me.  Within the architecture Andria was completely in the moment, propelled in solid instinct.  Really fine stuff.  Then Damon Smith joined her for a simpatico duet.  Damon has been an Andria Nicodemou fan for some time, and the performance demonstrated that the musicality is quite mutual.  The Cliff Trio--Pandelis Karayorgis, Damon Smith, Eric Rosenthal--is a completely free ensemble.  With complete freedom, particularly when improvising musicians of such high caliber are involved, part of the engagement for the audience is the risk involved.  The potential for complete failure.  If there were no such risk, then the musicians would not be “doing their jobs.”  The results would be not much better than a clever random note generator.  And sure enough, these top shelf musicians did run into creative dead spots in all their risk-taking courage.  There was a fortunately brief period in which there was volume, energy, and busy chatter (no doubt in attempt to break through the “wall”) “signifying nothing.”  Not to worry.  In the balance of things the creative fog turned out to be a hiccup.  The music became clear, and the conclusion demonstrated why improvisational risk is important.  No.  Essential.  The next set presented both music and dance, the only set including dance.  Jessica Roseman and Jorrit Dijkstra (sometimes known as Buzz) performed at the Lily Pad on 5/8, taking part in the Boston tradition of the integration of improvised music and dance (Joe Burgio’s InEdit ensemble perhaps the best-known example of that today).  The duo 5/8 came across a bit too theatrical; perhaps they were trying too hard.  But the duo 6/8 came to the gig prepared, in control.  It was something like Andria Nicodemou’s contextual preparation only more so.  One had the feeling that Jorrit and Jessica had worked out not so much “composed routines”--but rather language and syntax forms that they plugged into their routines.  The opening loud stamping with soprano sax response did come across as pre-conceived “composition.”  However, most of the remainder of their set was closer to what might be described as the implementation of “comfortable” syntactical conventions.  But in the middle of it all was “compositionally driven” improvised dance and sonics.  And the improvisation--much better than the 5/8 improvisation--was what made this effort so successful.  The Steve Lantner Trio (featuring Allan Chase and Luther Gray) was scheduled next.  Steve has had some physiological problems involving his right hand that have been discussed here.  In addition he had injured his shoulder not long before the 6/8 gig and was unable to perform at the Festival.  Make no mistake.  The Steve Lantner Trio is one of the great post-Ayler treasures in the Boston area (or anywhere else).  The question arises: What do you do when the leader of the Steve Lantner Trio is unavailable?  The most obvious answer is to replace the pianist with one of the amazing bassists on the gig, and go from there.  Well, fuggedaboudit!  One of the main reasons the Steve Lantner Trio and all the other Steve Lantner groups are so amazing is that most of the most creative improvisors in Boston want to perform with him.  I’m speculating that rather than turn the duo portion of the Steve Lantner Trio into something completely different by adding an “outsider,” it just made sense for the two of them to pursue the music with what was left of the trio, i.e., Allan and Luther.  Allan brought his alto and soprano saxes and Luther sat at the trap set.  Then they created music--both completely improvised and calling upon themes in the Luther Gray “song book”--and they gave us all a breathtaking lesson on the meaning of “coming to play” and “leaving it all on the bandstand.”  I never got to hear the music of the last two sets of the evening, both filled with some of the most extraordinary musicians of the Boston area.  I expect there would have been wonderful music on those sets.  But, given that reservation, of all the music I heard that evening--fine music--the fix-a-problem duo offered the most impressive set.  Maybe it was the challenge of limited musician resources.  Certainly it was a matter of extraordinary creativity.  But it was the highlight of the evening.  Cutout--Jeb Bishop, Pandelis Karayorgis, Jorrit Dijkstra, Jeb Bishop, Nate McBride, and Luther Gray--was up next.  The group has been one of the premiere ensembles in the Boston area during the past couple years.  But, make no mistake, the group had some repair work to do after the 5/8 gig at the Lily Pad.  On that evening Luther Gray could not make the gig.  So the leaders decided to drop the charts and become a completely free improvisatory ensemble.  Not a bad idea.  All of the remaining band members have solid track records in that area.  Nevertheless, the conceptual switch was potentially quite a challenge.  But the nail in the coffin was the decision to make a game changing switch in the instrumentation.  I could not bear the results and left the gig.  But now on 6/8 the full ensemble with original instruments had returned, and hope was in the air.  Certainly the music was better than on 5/8, but much of the material consisted of new compositions/arrangements that either were under-rehearsed or--more troubling--just as ineffectual as they sounded.  But instead of recovering from the sonic failures of 5/8 with tangible evidence that Cutout “was back,” we were stuck with music that caused some of us to come up with excuses for this “sluggish” outing.  Well, not entirely.  The band closed out the set with an “ancient” Luther Gray composition.  Yes, “Jowls” is familiar to fans and even superficially engaging.  But I cannot fault the audience for reacting so enthusiastically, as if saying, “This is what we showed up for.”  I hasten to add that it is nothing specific to “Jowls.”  Each member of the band in recent years has contributed music that challenges and engages.  But the band has the summer off to figure out where it is going--or to simply get back on track.  I’m sure the two final sets of music I missed were quite fine.  And even what I witnessed was something to celebrate.  Likely the best Driff Festival ever…

When leaders of the U.S. and the Soviet Union were sitting next to the red phones and red buttons, hoping never to have to use either, some young married couples were deciding not to have children.  After all, it would be insane to welcome new life into a world of nuclear holocaust.  So let’s zip ahead to today.  The prospect of nuclear obliteration is as real as ever--maybe more so--but we have become numb to the threat.  At the same time there is another “end game” threat on our doorstep--climate change.  Yes, we absolve ourselves of responsibility for the problem by blaming “Republicans.”  That is a very simplistic and ineffective way to deal with that problem.  But the sluggishness of the response is somewhat understandable.  We Americans have a history of doing nothing effective until it is almost too late (e.g., our reluctance to stop Hitler).  And this climate change problem is particularly daunting because the progress of the threat is glacial (pun intended).  There likely will come a time when the tardiness of U.S. entry into the fray will prove to be too late.  In the case of global warming--if that is the nail in the coffin--it will not be only the end of the great “democratic experiment” in North America but also the end of the ICP Orchestra, Nigeria, daylight savings time, Fendika in Ethiopia, Vladimir Putin, walks in Central Park, people who have been saved from River Blindness, gigs at the Outpost, and Gerrymandering (among other things).  This cautionary vision has been inspired by a The Week (6/7, p.21) article, “CO2 levels reach 3 million-year high,” in which we discover recently, “Sensors at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii recorded that concentrations of CO2--the greenhouse gas most responsible for climate change--reached 415 parts per million.”  The article goes on to point out, “The last time there was this much CO2 in the atmosphere was during the Pliocene Epoch, between 5.3 million and 2.6 million years ago, when sea levels were about 50 feet higher than they are now.” Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, says that as conditions deteriorate, “We are putting our foot on the accelerator of climate change, and impacts and damage will continue to rise.”  At the same time it is a slow demise.  Glacially slow…

During a mostly rainy several days in Newport this month I was walking by a hotel parking lot 6/18 and saw a couple vehicles used in support of someone named Matt Fraser.  Possibly he was performing in the hotel.  As the photo below shows, he has his own limos with at least one of them displaying the entertainer’s beaming face.  Apparently he makes his living as a psychic.  As you may make out--in spite of the fence blocking a clear view on the periphery of the parking lot--Matt Fraser is a “Television Psychic Medium.”  Television is not my first recourse for entertainment.  So I never had heard of the man.  But I’m guessing that with at least a couple touring limos he’s probably doing OK.  I include the photo here because the information on the vehicles suggests something odd is going on with Mr. Fraser.  Notice that one of the black limos is a “Matt Fraser Private Security” vehicle.  Why would a psychic need a security detail?  Any decent psychic would know well in advance if his well being is going to be threatened.  You know, a simple call to the Newport Police Department: “Hi.  This is Matt Fraser.  A man in a pink hoodie is going to attempt to rob me at 4 p.m. on the corner of Spring and Dixon Streets.”  As an alternative, Matt Fraser could avoid the corner of Spring and Dixon between 3:45 and 4:15.  Or if he really were any good at his job (he’s on TV for goodness sakes) he would know of every mugging he might encounter during the next twelve months (or more) and plan his schedule accordingly.  It seems to me--regardless of everything else--being on the Matt Fraser security detail should be one of the softest jobs in Newport or anywhere…

I never had been to the Metropolitan Waterworks Museum in Boston.  As a museum--minus docents at night--it was impressive.  The water works machinery alone--in near pristine condition--is more than impressive.  The entire museum was not open to guests for the music, but the pump house equipment was on display and well worth the visit.  What is in the main building is at least three times the size of the mill powerhouse art exhibit at Mass MoCA (minus the audio poetry and sonics of the North Adams exhibit).  To be fair to Mass MoCA, the art exhibited in the many medium to large buildings of Mass MoCA dwarf the Metropolitan Waterworks facility.  But the museum near the reservoir is definitely worth checking out if you are interested in the history of why and how all of us in eastern Massachusetts have clean drinking water today.  And the machinery is quite beautiful.  But the 6/14 gig was only peripherally about the nineteenth century context.  Event sponsor Non-Event had paid for the gig.  They had the right to inform the musicians that the music is about to start, particularly when the musicians are standing on the “band stand” at the posted 8 p.m. start time and ready.  The music did not kick off until 8:20.  Steel pedal guitarist Susan Alcorn was in town, and it had been almost a year since I had had a chance to witness her unique sonic voice.  The evening was split between her solo work and improvisations in the second set with two remarkable Boston-based musicians.  Susan offered useful introductions to each of the works she performed.  Her modesty was disarming. Time and again she would complain about her failures in attempting to transcribe and perform works by others to the steel pedal guitar.  Looking at the task of coming up with an “exact” arrangement of a work composed for different instrumentation (i.e., both different instruments and different numbers of instruments) is a more than daunting task.  For example, none of the instruments in Messiaen’s Quartet for the End of Time (clarinet, cello, piano, and violin) sound like any kind of guitar.  The same thing with the same composer’s Et exspecto resurretionem mortuorum, a work with even larger instrumental resources.  But she succeeded in performing those two works as well as others by Piazzolla and music out of a Spanish tradition.  When I say “performing” I refer to the music she calls failures as being central to her art.  Susan Alcorn takes composed/arranged music that is impossible to perform exactly on the steel pedal guitar and transforms the music into something that is both true to the original work and a unique personal statement of the artist.  One might say that those transformations are central to defining who Susan Alcorn is as a musician.  For me one of the most affecting works of the first set was her performance of a Catalan Christmas carol which became the theme of Spanish refugees.  The work, known as “Song of the Birds,” is most closely associated with political activist Pablo Casals, perhaps even more than the Bach Cello Suites.  As transformed as the piece was 6/14 somehow I heard the music of the greatest cellist coming out of the steel pedal guitar.  The second set consisted of completely improvised music by Susan, Jeb Bishop, and Damon Smith.  The set opened with a trombone statement from the the upper portion of the powerhouse wheelworks in front of the stage.  It was a fine visual and sonic device leading to call and response among the three of them until Jeb came down to “earth.”  There were hints of classic jazz tunes on occasion, but not surprisingly, the improvised music of the second set was unlike Susan’s compositional transformations of the first.  While much of the first set experience was political and cautionary, the second set was a playful “mealtime” conversation among friends who had a lot of catching up to do.  And we lucky people in the audience were privy to it all.  As I think about how fine the music was, I believe something should be said about the context.  As beautiful as the surroundings are, there are practical problems with the space.  More significant problems than at the concerts on Church Street in Harvard Square, for example.  If you are not fortunate enough to be among the 15 or 20 people closest to the “band stand,” your visual (and I’m guessing your sonic) experience is significantly limited.  There was a good-sized crowd for the event; so most people in the audience probably did not see more than the top of Susan’s head in the first set and the upper body of her partners in the second set.  Not being four or ten rows back, I did not share that negative experience, but the room is all metal with some potentially absorbing brick.  There was a lot of natural reverb audible on the breaks.  It is a room that would be perfect for certain kinds of solo and/or ambient music.  But, in this case, picking up detail sonically and visually in most seats would have been impossible.  But maybe those folks didn’t care.  The Non-Event team does an excellent job of getting folks out to gigs, and this was one of their greatest promotional successes.  The downside is the success is non-selective.  There is no question in my mind that the majority of the people in the audience were there for the “Non-Event” rather than the music.  You know, “Hey, it’s hip to be here.”  And generally that’s OK.  It is good to expose non-fans to challenging music.  However, I’ve been to gigs when I’ve been bored, but I’m polite anyway.  It’s the civilized thing to do.  Most of the folks who showed up for the gig were civilized.  It’s the rude few--talking and clicking--that made it difficult to enjoy the music.  The clicking was even more disturbing than the talking.  It is not surprising that several people brought cameras to the performance.  But almost nobody uses a film camera these days.  So there is no reason to hear a shutter click when an image is taken.  For reasons that make no sense in our “high tech” world camera manufacturers still give cameras a “click” option that can make a sound when you take a photo.  But--except in the case of a couple obsolescent digital cameras--the click sound can be turned off.  But the “photographers” at the Waterworks Museum chose not to turn off the sound.  So we sat through the noise.  Sitting in the middle of a large typewriter was particularly painful during the solo set, but it continued all evening.  Perhaps the welcoming comments at the beginning of the evening could request people to “turn off your cell phones and shut off your digital camera clicks.”…

In an article titled “The religious right: Reconsidering democracy” The Week (6/28, p.18) examined the rhetoric of Catholic writer Sohrab Ahmari who claims that Conservatives must “fight the culture war with the aim of defeating the enemy… to serve the Highest Good.”  Against that view, the magazine quotes Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times who notes that although Conservatives control of the White House, Senate, and the Supreme Court, “social conservatives feel apocalyptically embattled.”  But the final Goldberg punch line is the best line: “When one is accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.”

Mr. Lantner brought his big band to the Outpost 6/25.  Just kidding.  But I wonder what a Steve Lantner big band would be like.  I have a feeling that he would want nothing to do with such a “train wreck.”  But we did get to witness one of Steve’s basic jazz combos (i.e., one step up from solo).  As I’ve suggested before, one of Steve’s great skills is that he causes brilliantly creative musicians to want to perform with him.  There’s no better example of that than Luther Gray, one of the most important jazz percussionists of his generation.  It’s not the technical chops or the fact that he can move convincingly throughout an array of jazz forms/genres.  It’s that he always brings who he is as a musician to every gig.  No.  That’s not explicit enough.  There are many fine musicians who bring their stamps/personalities to a gig.  And the better examples of that are special.  But what Luther brings to a gig is far beyond that.  The way he hears music is unlike any drummer I’ve heard.  And that reality is fundamental to who he is as an original artist.  Over the years I have tried to suggest how he hears and how he acts on what he hears in a way unlike any other drummer.  A few times I have mentioned the late pianist Mal Waldron as someone working within a similar aesthetic.  True, both are percussionists.  And that link is significant because I believe both of them have a profound “percussion” link as soloists.  But they are different people from different times and perspectives.  Unfortunately, one of the most obvious links between them is how brilliantly unique they are and how deaf the pundits are.  It is not anything new for jazz.  Such deafness goes back to the beginning of the twentieth century.  Who in white America had a clue as to how amazing the early giants were until the 1920s?  But the aural ineptness of the “critics” of the slick jazz magazines is far worse than it was when I was a teenager, and “Leroi Jones’” Apple Cores commentary was commonly vilified.  But I digress.  There was a gig 6/25 at the Outpost, and two superb musicians showed up to make profound sounds.  Steve Lantner, the man who brings these monthly gigs together, has been afflicted by physiological problems (as most of the local fans of the music know).  Before the music began he addressed the obvious questions that fans in the audience had.  His right hand/thumb is about the same.  Functional somewhat, but amazing in terms of what he is able to accomplish.  The left shoulder is improving with therapy.  Not long after he had the accident, Steve had “no more than 10% mobility.”  He demonstrated that he could move his arm well above his head now.  Good news.  The music of the first set opened pensively, slowly.  The duo conversations were deep and superficially deliberate in progress.  Like some sort of stop-action cinematography of a blooming flower, the solos and interplay gradually evolved into something with more propulsive tempo and expanding energy.  The final offering of the first set mostly featured intense forward motion and room-filling fireworks.  Then there was a short break (well, short by Lantner ensemble standards).  Much of the second set was a fascinating travelogue through different “places” melodically and energetically, with fine duo work interspersed with compelling solos from each of them.  It was some of the most varied material presented by any Lantner group in such a compact set of music.  Finally, the two of them--initiated by Steve--completed an architectural arc by finishing with a wonderful pensive sonic essay.  The applause was--appropriately--enthusiastic, and the two of them seemed quite happy with the way the music evolved.  The only hitch was Steve’s shoulder.  As the dust settled, he rubbed his shoulder and said that he thought he overdid it a little bit that evening…

Equity anyone?  As some people may know (Hey, it’s sports, not jazz), earlier this year 28 members of the U.S. women’s soccer team filed a lawsuit alleging that the U.S. Soccer Federation pays them less than the men’s soccer team.  You also may know that the U.S. soccer establishment has used economics as the basis for salaries: Men draw more fans, so they get paid more.  Well, now those power brokers need to come up with another argument.  According to the Wall Street Journal, the women’s national soccer team “generated about $50.8 million in revenues compared with $49.9 for the men’s national soccer team from 2016 to 2018.”  Given the coverage and ticket sales in France for the women’s pursuit of the World Cup, I suspect the gap between women and men has grown.  The cup victory and Proctor & Gamble’s $530,000 political statement adds fuel to the fire.  Things will change…


May

Andrew Neumann and Damon Smith have been busy this month, significantly both together on 5/8 and 5/10, the latter gig at the Outpost with Forbes Graham and guest Sandy Ewen.  Even though 50% of the personnel 5/10 was the same as on the 5/8 gig, the results were quite different.  Some of the difference no doubt was due to instrumentation.  No cello or drum kit at the 5/10 performance.  But perhaps the biggest impact was the result of the hearing and the responding of the musicians in each case.  We saw a specific side of Forbes working within the context of two quite different electronics monsters.  Sandy uses a horizontal guitar.  To call it a laptop guitar would be to offer a confusing connotation.  She has the guitar on its back on her lap, and she uses a variety of electronic and magnetically dead tools to squeeze out all sorts of raucous, guttural sounds.  Nothing like your typical laptop work.  These are really good sounds, the kind of sounds that challenge anyone she’s playing with to reach down and pull up something they had not left on the night table.  So Forbes responded with a variety of spare tones, machine gun fire, and sputters.  Eloquently.  Damon gave us pure arco, kitchen sink toys in the strings, and volcanic sonics as needed.  Never to impress.  Always making the other three musicians sound newly born.  And how fine it was to hear the sounds of the guitar bump up against the ultimately tonal chirps and samples of Maestro Neuman’s synth self.  In some ways the play off each other of guitar and synth was the highlight of the evening for me--the fact that the two became one sonic animal with an unimaginable range of sounds and ideas.  At the same time, how nice it was to have giants Forbes and Damon grounding it all--an amazing context that was of course much more than context.  A heck of a quartet…

It’s Sunday morning and I have a whopper of a hangover.  Gradually some synapses begin to fire in a constructive manner and I am able to sit on the edge of my bed--just barely.  It is a good thing the wife and kids are in church.  I look at the drawer in the cabinet next to my bed and I realize that I do not know where my gun is.  Soon I plan to get a lock for the drawer.  I try to think.  I vaguely remember sitting in my recliner really buzzed and bored with whatever was on the TV.  I decided that cleaning my gun would be a really great thing to do.  I remember sitting there with the gun in my lap, and that’s it.  The rest is all fog.  What I didn’t know is the only people on the planet other than my wife and me who knew that I keep the gun in that drawer are my four-year-old son and the Federal Government.  Yes, 9/11 changed everything with a blanket of super surveillance technology and metadata storage and processing, all enhanced during the Obama administration.  That began almost two decades ago.  Today the pundits casually throw around 393,000,000 as the number of guns owned by civilians in the U.S. (i.e., more guns than people), a nice round figure.  But somewhere there is an organization as part of the Homeland Security matrix that knows exactly how many guns there are.  No round figures.  And exactly where each gun is.  After all, security geeks have had almost two decades to build a “Domestic Weapons Database.”  Think of the income Washington could take advantage of with a for-fee “Weapons Hotline.”  With such a resource all I would have to do is dial-up or go online and enter “Where is my gun?”  That’s all it would take.  The system knows who and where you are and everything else.  Before I could take a sip of coffee, I’d get my answer: “You put the gun on the second shelf of the refrigerator last night while you grabbed the last beer, a mind-numbing night cap.  Oh, by the way, you are out of beer.”  Of course, Homeland Security never would create such a hotline.  The organization prefers that the leaders of the NRA remain confused.  Think about it.  The militia-driven leadership of the NRA is concerned about the evils of the Federal Government.  For them being armed to face Armageddon is essential for survival.  And so they spend time, money, and energy working to make sure there are no background checks and no laws to prevent us all from having access to de facto automatic weapons.  And all of that is useless for their purposes.  Because by now Homeland Security knows where all the weapons are, if the balloon goes up, U.S. military forces will be into your bedside drawer, bomb shelter, fake tree stump, or you name it so fast and effectively that all your fire power will be gone before you can start a campfire.  And the great irony is that, while the NRA leadership distracts us all with their ultimately ineffectual “gun rights” dance, our children are dying.  An old college buddy shared with me the image below.  I share it with you… 

Kit Demos booked a quintet Dark Matter performance 5/25 at the Outpost, but only four musicians showed up.  However, the four--Kit, Todd Brunel, Eric Hofbauer, and Curt Newton--are such fine improvisors that within a couple minutes of the first tones you knew that these guys were ready for a tour.  Of course, it is likely that the only traveling these folks will ever do as a quartet happened on the 5/25 gig.  Lucky for those of us in attendance 5/25.  Even though each musician was familiar with the work of the others, this specific combination of people and instruments was not familiar.  Perhaps that is why the first improvisations, though quite successful, were relatively brief.  It was almost as if the four of them were saying, “OK, this is quite nice.  Let’s finish and try something else.”  And without further “tests” the music did travel to a good variety of places throughout the substantial single set (with a delightful encore).  I found this ensemble to be particularly fine at exploiting timbre and instrumental character in general--primarily in duo conversations.  There were the strings of guitar and brushes on drum heads.  The bass clarinet and acoustic bass were as one.  A highlight was the woody connection between the thuddy tones (without decay) of Eric’s guitar and Todd’s bass clarinet, supported beautifully by Kit and Curt.  And that was a signature of the evening’s music.  As special as the duos were, the other two musicians on stage made those duos sound so inevitable by throwing amazing sonics at the fine interplay.  It is unlikely that this creative quartet will be doing much traveling geographically, but all of them have been going through significant journeys recently in their personal lives.  Some stressful and some joyous.  As a member of the audience I have been going through the jolting and painful loss of a dearest friend.  The healing music of the evening caused me to think of better tomorrows.  On the drive home thoughts of the evening’s music remained as I recalled a poem of Robert Frost.  For me certainly it was a “Dust of Snow” experience at the Outpost…

Everyone knows that sometimes art imitates life, and sometimes life imitates art.  I came across a rather disturbing variation on that relationship recently.  The suspense film, Mercury Rising (1998), stars good guy Bruce Willis and bad guy Alec Baldwin.  The premise is that a puzzle book contains a puzzle that is designed to confirm that a U.S. Government “unbreakable” code is indeed unbreakable.  An autistic child breaks the code, and Baldwin’s character sends agents to kill the child to protect the code.  The agents kill several people in their quest as Willis’ character attempts to save the boy.  If you are familiar with the film, you know that the code test puzzle page consists of rows and columns of letters, something like the image below.  Disturbingly like the image below.  The image below is a reproduction of page 25 of the 5/11 issue of Science News.  It is an ad published by the NSA challenging potential recruits to break the code, showing that they presumably are “smart enough” potentially to create super secure code for the NSA.  Or maybe not.  I’ve seen the film, and there is no way I would ever think of trying to break the code.  And if I did, I’d never be crazy enough to send the NSA my code-breaking answer…
  
The trio returned to the Outpost 5/21, and the first question during setup was about Steve Lantner’s right hand thumb.  Steve said that the right hand pretty much is in the same shape it was on the April Outpost gig not long after the cortisone shot.  He said that he could use the thumb without too much pain in playing certain note combinations.  But, for the most part, he is a nine digit pianist.  This state of affairs hits even the casual fan with two significant facts.  The first is troubling to ponder.  Steve is a pianist of remarkable creativity and skill, but now his performance skills are limited.  It is as if, as I write this, every tenth character I type disappears from the page--or fails to land on the page in the first place.  Oh, I might be able to make some kind of adjustment to produce readability.  But--no matter what--there’s a problem.  Steve mentioned that he has been developing functional work-arounds.  His efforts bring up the second significant fact: Steve’s work-arounds--to my ears at least--are working.  Astonishingly.  No doubt he is aware of the technical obstacles as he performs, but the gallery all night was littered with ineffectual, failed obstacles.  As they always do, Steve, Allan Chase, and Luther Gray played inspired music.  As if to celebrate the continuation of the trio’s monthly adventure, the opening improvisation was a joyous dance in sound.  The high-energy first work began with the direction defined by Steve and soon picked up by Allan and Luther.  A party with plenty of piano fireworks.  It was the kind of technical display (but certainly much more than that) that back in the two-fisted contests of the 1930s might have caused a “hip” observer to comment, “The piano player had six fingers on each hand.”  The second improvisation of the first set was a pensive ballad.  Again, the piano opened the door to the work with Allan and Luther entering soon after.  Allan’s beautiful performance on soprano sax brought to mind Dexter Gordon’s ballad work on that instrument during the second half of the 1980s.  Luther stuck with mallets and brushes for the most part--all ears.  After the break Steve gave us a keyboard sound sculpture, and the trio did not need John Butcher to run with the idea.  Allan’s soprano sax joined the construction party, and the two of them sculpted while Luther watched and listened.  A couple of saxophone fillips to create a perky line resulted in Luther’s entry, leading the trio into a romp over (and through?) hill and dale to a superb conclusion.  But not before Luther’s most stunning solo of the night.  The final improvisation of the evening took the music in a completely different direction.  Jagged lines from the piano led to a trio of angles, twists, and turns until the final music became the creation of “a single guy” with six arms and six legs making great sounds from a complex instrument of boundless art…

Television has changed over the years.  There always have been commercials, many terrible shows, and a very few outstanding shows.  But the details have changed considerably.  For example, most talk shows featured music typically without vocals both as a segue device for commercial breaks and during the show as part of the entertainment.  It was as a child that I would come home from elementary school every day to witness Tyree Glenn leading a small combo (with occasional guest Johnny Hodges) as a featured component of a daytime talk show.  Night time talk show host Steve Allen played the piano and enjoyed performing with jazz musician guests.  He also played the role of the clarinetist in The Benny Goodman Story.  But such things are history.  Late night talk shows today use bands as the functional equivalent of sonic fade to commercial.  However, in the midst of the plight of live music on talk shows there is at least one bright light.  I could go into Jon Batiste’s musical contributions during Stephen Colbert’s monologues (particularly his Monk quotes) and other pleasures, but the main things are his special musicianship and his love of jazz.  My impression is that he is into adventuresome rock music more than jazz, but what he does with his late night band shows that he knows more about jazz than almost all mainstream jazz band leaders working today.  I was surprised to see the great Benny Golson in a band on late night television 5/7 (and into 5/8), but he certainly was playing in the right band.  On commercial breaks they played such Golson classics as “Killer Joe” and “Blues March” as if the guys had rehearsed passionately for a week.  But you know that they didn’t have to.  They and their leader are that good.  When Stephen Colbert announced that Benny Golson was a guest in the band, his statement was appropriately respectful, but you could tell he did not know that jazz royalty was on the bandstand.  No one had to explain such things to Jon Batiste…

Early in the first set Phil Scarff performed a too brief Darrell Katz work for soloist, “Sonata for Sopranino.”  It was the only work of the evening for a single musician, and it was performed beautifully.  It was a rare occurrence 5/9 at Third Life Studio to hear a work incorporating something other than the work of five musicians.  There are two versions of OddSong, one employing violin and tonal percussion along with four saxophone voices.  The other--the one performing 5/9--employs just the saxophones.  Both versions of the ensemble take advantage of the fine vocal efforts of Rebecca Shrimpton.  I confess that I prefer the quintet version of OddSong.  There is nothing lacking in the septet instrumentation or any of the musicians involved.  I’m not entirely certain of the root of my preference for the quintet, but I suspect it has to do with my appreciation of the challenge of making a saxophone “choir” work.  Like some older fans of the music, I remember the less-than-terrific excesses of the fad of sax ensembles.  There was Alto Madness prompting endless variations on that idea.  Certainly the best tongue-in-cheek commentary on the situation was the name of our own fine saxophone quartet, Your Neighborhood Saxophone Quartet.  Most such outfits were not quite so good.  It’s sort of like all the terrible (100%?) vocalese type groups that tried to build or “improve” on the work of Lambert, Hendricks, and Ross.  Godawful stuff.  In other words, to witness such fine performance of arrangements for four saxophones and voice operating at such a high level at Third Life was a superb antidote to all those bad memories.  The instrumentation was the same as the group that performed at Jazz Along the Charles in September last year.  But 50% of the reed section was different.  The 5/9 lineup was vocalist Shrimpton and (left to right) Melanie Howell Brooks, Rick Stone, Lihi Haruvi, and Phil Scarff.  The change caused no one to miss a step.  Also, I counted performances 5/9 of at least five of the arrangements used at the event in September.  The performance of “Sweet Baby James” received the most applause of recognition from the audience.  I found the ballads, particularly “I Cover the Waterfront” and Horace Silver’s “Peace,” to be the most affecting.  The performance of the latter was perhaps the most moving version I’ve heard since the Tommy Flanagan recording of the work (a jazz sound that became iconic in the Boston area).  For reasons not completely clear to me (after all, the arrangements involved are quite different), the performance of “I Got it Bad (and that Ain’t Good)” brought to mind Maestro Ellington’s use of voice and sax section on the work.  “Ye Watchers And,” a paean to Boston sports, fans, and other matters caused the most audience chuckles particularly with the reference to Boston Garden’s Jumbotron, evoking self-conscious self-awareness no doubt.  A major surprise instrumentation shift occurred near the end of the evening.  Rick Stone and Phil Scarff. remained on stage and were joined by ensemble director/arranger Darrell Katz with guitar in hand for a stunningly potent musical version of “Like a Wind” from Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg Ohio.  The combination of Anderson’s poetry and the emphatic performance is the kind of thing that knocks the wind out of you.  In the middle of that work Phil’s soprano sax solo was worth the trip to Union Square all by itself.  The closer of the evening brought the OddSong five to the stage for a fine performance of “The Red Blues” in tribute to Julius Hemphill.  It was a superb evening in which writing, reading, and improvising came together as beautifully as one could hope for… 

This Journal is about music events in the Boston area, but it is that time of year when people go on vacations.  New York City is an obvious target of such adventures.  Recently I spent a week in Manhattan and found some arts events and developments of note.  The new Shed and nearby Vessel/Honeycomb have potential but are getting their sea legs.  Nevertheless, their biggest problem is that whatever aesthetic joy they might offer is smothered by a huge, godawful shopping mall.  It’s sort of a commerce dog wagging an arts tail.  But there is good news.  The Neue Galerie on Fifth Avenue offers a wonderful exhibit of early 20th century self-portraits of German and Austrian artists through 6/24.  The portraits visually talk to each other.  MoMA is closing in mid-June for the rest of the summer.  So catch the Miro exhibit while you can.  Not far from the Neue on Central Park the Met features an improved rearrangement of their abstract works, Epic Abstraction: Pollock to Herrera, available at least to the end of the year.  If you are into Japanese culture and art, you will not be able to beat the Met’s Tale of the Genji: A Japanese Classic Illuminated (on display through 6/16).  New York is expensive.  That’s a given.  Therefore, free events of quality are particularly welcome there.  The Gagosian Galleries, scattered uptown on the east and downtown on the west, always show visual art of interest.  The exhibit of perhaps broadest interest, Picasso’s Women: Fernande to Jacqueline, is at the 980 Madison Avenue facility through 6/22.  A few of the works demonstrate that the master had his off days, but the 36 paintings, drawings, and sculptures are thoroughly engaging.  The main facility of the New York Public Library on Fifth Avenue is a remarkable cultural resource for letters, art works, and recordings.  Our good fortune is that its ongoing exhibits invariably are provocative, and they are free.  Two relatively small but wonderful exhibits on display through 7/14 are Love and Resistance: Stonewall 50 and Walt Whitman: America’s Poet.  They are as superb examples of why libraries are treasures as great as any you’ll encounter this year…


April 

It was a fascinating prospect.  Phil Grenadier, one of my favorite trumpet players, was scheduled to perform 4/7 on two very different back-to-back gigs at the Lily Pad and the Outpost.  Except for one piece near the end of the evening, the Lily Pad audience was respectfully quiet.  The band--Melissa Kassel, Tom Zicarelli, Phil Grenadier, Bruce Gertz, and Gary Fieldman--was its superb self, even though Melissa claimed she was recovering from pneumonia.  The group now is at the point at which almost everything is telepathic.  Phil split his time fairly evenly between trumpet and flugelhorn.  All solos from everywhere on the stage were outstanding.  As people were packing up, I told Phil that I was looking forward to seeing him on the gig at the Outpost.  He said that he’d see me there.  The band at the Outpost 4/7 was well into its music--apparently a program of Ornette and Dave Bryant classics--when I arrived.  The lineup consisted of the original trio Shock Exchange--Dave, John Turner, and Chris Bowman--and guitarist Eric Hofbauer.  It was a bit strange.  The music was so inspired and authentic I had the feeling that the three of them had engaged some form of time travel that transferred them mid-sentence at a 1980s gig to the Outpost 4/7.  To enhance the illusion, several former Willow-era fans were in the audience.  The almost superhuman percussion engine propelled stick bass and electric keys right up off the bandstand.  Creativity soared all around.  Eric had his solos here and there.  But mostly he seemed to be in charge of a spiky running commentary of metal and sparks.  All in all, a fine harmolodic stew.  But no Phil Grenadier.  At some point it seemed obvious that he would not be on the gig.  Initially I was concerned, but I was pretty sure he would not run into any problems on the short walk from the Lily Pad.  Phil is one of the most in-demand musicians in the Boston area.  Maybe he felt that two gigs on the same evening 4/7 was just one gig too many.  Too bad.  I did not perform 4/7.  I am no musician.  But I was lucky enough to witness two stellar gigs on the same evening…

Stephen Moore, President Trump’s nominee for the Federal Reserve Board, was “found in contempt of court in 2012 for failing to pay $340,693.44 in spousal support, child support, and money owed in a divorce settlement…,” said The Week (4/12, p.32).  Also, Stephen Moore owes $75,328 in back taxes to the IRS.  Does the president know anyone outside his immediate family who is not a scoundrel?...
Update 5/6/19: As a result of the above information (and other problems) Moore withdrew his name from consideration on 5/3…

Charlie Kohlhase’s fine Explorers outfit over the years presents him with a sometimes daunting juggling act.  For example, I got my first chance to catch the scheduled Dylan Jack with the band, replacing the buried-in-home-purchasing paperwork Curt Newton.  Also on the 4/18 Outpost gig Bill Lowe (trombone only) was a last-minute sub for Josiah Reibstein.  By now Daniel Rosenthal and Tony Leva are familiar faces to Explorers fans.  It was a quintet inversion of the 3/21 quintet at the Outpost with two brass rather than two reeds and single brass.  The arrangements the Explorers use--original and otherwise--are not simple, conventional charts.  The time moves all over the place, with an occasional accelerando or decelerando thrown in for spice.  Even the basic AABA form usually contains some kind of booby trap for uninitiated musicians.  But the discussions among musicians before performance of a tricky chart usually are quite informative and entertaining for audience members.  The results are convincing performances by musicians trusted by Charlie.  As if to emphasize the evolving juggling act, Charlie brought with him copies of a brand new LP/CD release--Impermanence (Creative Nation CNM034)--that is essentially retrospective.  First, the album is a tribute to three recently-deceased creative friends--John Tchicai (2012), Lou Kannenstine (2014), and Garrison Fewell (2015).  Second, all the music on the CD I acquired was performed by two different Explorers ensembles at studio sessions in 2013.  To my understanding approximately half of the people on those sessions have not performed with the Explorers during the past six months.  But there is continuity.  Charlie, Eric Hofbauer, and Curt Newton--who perform on the CD release--certainly are among current “regulars.”  In other words, even in retrospect, there is continuity.  For example, more than half the compositions performed on the CD are part of the ongoing current Explorers repertoire.  Also there is continuity in the ongoing “interchangeable components” approach to month-to-month instrumentation.  I use the words “interchangeable components” as broadly descriptive rather than explicitly accurate.  Bill Lowe is no more a clone replacement for Messrs. Bishop and Reibstein than either of them would be for him.  If anything, the interchangeable uniqueness of musicians who wear the metaphoric pith helmets is what makes the Explorer charts morph so exquisitely on each gig.  The compositions always are recognizable (to fans who know the material), and yet the specific set of musicians who show up at the Lily Pad or the Outpost puts its stamp on that performance.  Which stamp is best?  When Tony and Dylan spend the night sharing, twisting, and pushing each other (and the whole group), that’s the best bass-drum Explorer team.  And next time I will be knocked out by perhaps two other interchangeably unique musicians tackling the bass and the drums.  Maybe that’s the true nature of the Explorers: Charlie’s genius in discovering people who get it and can make it their own.  Just a few days after this fine gig there was more cause for celebration.  Explorer regular Eric Hofbauer was absent from this gig, but no doubt he and wife Elizabeth were busy making space for daughter Ondine Elizabeth who arrived 4/22...   

Louis Armstrong is the greatest musician of the twentieth century.  Because I spent my youth as a jazz fan in the 1940s and 1950s, I felt a special connection with the major musicians of that time.  Thelonious Monk was and remains my favorite musician.  As I grew into adulthood I became incensed that newspapers and magazines so often misspelled the man’s first name, most commonly as “Thelonius.”  For example, Ludwig van Beethoven’s last name is potentially just as confusing to an English-speaking person as Thelonious, but it never is misspelled.  During the early 1990s I decided to document each instance of running into a misspelling of the jazz master’s first name.  There were many more instances than I expected, and so I stopped building the list after about year and half.  Almost as troubling as the length of the list is how common it was for jazz journalists and jazz publications such as Downbeat to make those gaffs.  In any event, because I trust the words of musicians more than I do critics (with a few exceptions), I seldom have a chance to bump into the misspellings.  However, as luck would have it, recently I acquired a copy of the recording of Monk as a guest with the Jazz Messengers in 1957.  It is the Japanese CD reissue with the three alternate takes added.  Because the original liner notes reproduced on the back of the CD are near impossible to read, I thought I’d look online for the original liner notes or the ones by Nat Hentoff.  I did find many comments about the recording online.  One writeup in particular by Doug Ramsey caught my eye.  It was published by JazzTimes in 1999.  The headline for the article misspells the pianist’s first name twice: “Art Blakey/Thelonius Monk: Art Blakey’s Jazz Messengers with Thelonius Monk.”  Knowing how writers and editors work, I suspect that Mr. Ramsey handed in his copy and an editor came up with the insulting headline.  Nevertheless, the article was published almost two decades ago and at some point was posted online by the publication (without editing again?).  I realize that this concern is relatively minor compared to the fact that politically we are trapped in an elevator and the building is on fire.  But, we who revel in the power of art--and those people who raise important aesthetic and cultural questions and ideas through art--need to demand more respect for art and artists from the people and institutions that lay claim to supporting the arts.  At least that…

Lightning did strike twice.  Well, almost.  Jeb Bishop, who did not make the 2/23 gig, replaced the drummer on 4/27.  Everyone else--leader Kit Demos, Charlie Kohlhase, and Pandelis Karayorgis--was back for a transformation of the 2/23 quartet into a drummerless one.  The only other change was that Kit brought along both bass and electronics.  In this Journal I raved about the 2/23 gig.  I almost feel that I have nowhere to go in trying to write about the 4/27 gig at the Outpost.  When a performance warrants superlatives (as the 2/23 event did) it does not leave much room for qualitative assessment when the subsequent gig leaves the former in the dust.  It did, from the first note to the last.  The band never touched terra firma.  Every note from every instrument for every second of the evening was cause for wonder.  But there was more than constant excellence in detail.  Each improvised work was completely different conceptually and in terms of surface impact.  When I entered the Outpost 4/27 Kit, Charlie, and Pandelis were setting up.  I noticed that Kit looked like he had driven all night and all day from somewhere west of Cleveland to make the gig (rather than merely from Maine).  Somewhere in the back of my head I heard “Uh oh!”  Then Jeb showed up.  He had spent the entire week performing on 250 (I exaggerate slightly) jazz gigs.  The voice repeated, “Uh oh.”  Let that be a lesson to all would-be performance artists.  The true artists somehow make it work anyway.  Did they ever.  If I were to come up with a list of top five jazz gigs of 2019, I’d be down to four--and it’s only April.  Some thoughts.  Maybe it was the lack of a drummer and Kit relished the prospect of carrying the whole rhythm section.  Whatever it was, when he opened the first improvisation on acoustic bass, the sound alone transformed the room.  The other musicians soaked it up and played their butts off.  At one point Jeb and Charlie (on baritone sax) were going at it and to my surprise it brought to mind the work of Brookmeyer (on valve trombone) and Mulligan--even though Jeb and Charlie were pursuing the freest of sonics.  At the end of the piece I mentioned my reaction, and Charlie recalled the story he heard about Chet Baker and Stan Getz on a beach in California improvising totally free music in the middle of the night.  Maybe Brookmeyer and Mulligan were cheering on the quartet in the Outpost 4/27.  It was great to see and hear Kit pursue electronics.  It’s been a while since I’ve caught him making music that way.  He opened the piece alone, everyone else no doubt trying to gauge the general direction of the instrument’s infinite sonic possibilities at the hands of the leader.  Charlie and the rest, one by one, tiptoed into the improvisation.  Gradually the ensemble grew and evolved into a chamber group that would have worked beautifully in a modified version of Forbidden Planet, one in which Morbius had been a gregarious host.  The sonics would have fit perfectly in a soiree of surviving fellow scientists featuring music provided by ancient and new instruments in the cozy environs of Altair IV.  Another piece opened with a dead slow “dirge” by Jeb, digging well below the surface of the soil and the protective veneer we humans are wont to wear.  Nudity in the most profound articulation we associate with the greatest of artists.  Kit and bass fell in with the trombone, not so much “walking” with the sonic line as crawling.  It was an extraordinary duo pursuit that no one in the room, perhaps including Charlie and Pandelis, wanted to disturb.  To never break the spell and have it continue infinitely.  At least that is what I was thinking.  Terrific musicians that they are, how could Charlie and Pandelis ultimately not be compelled to participate?  And they did.  In one of the most extraordinary improvisations I’ve witnessed.  Of course, that was the best completion of an evening of music imaginable.  But it wasn’t.  We all began breathing again, and band mates agreed to one more.  Thunder from the bass.  A closing celebration of an extraordinary evening?  A statement such as, “We’ve got to go somewhere else.”?  Maybe something else entirely.  Whatever it was, the thunder was a stunning opening to the final work--the manifestation of a wonderful 21st century trad band.  Raucous.  Joyous.  And why not?  It was the only part of the post-Ayler improvised music spectrum that the band had not touched upon all evening.  These words do not suggest clearly what happened 4/27 at the Outpost.  But I am extremely fortunate that at least I am able to suggest that I was lucky enough to be there…

This month the Wall Street Journal noted that “the FCC has fined robocallers $208.4 million since 2015 but has only collected $6,790.00.”  Apparently the FTC is no better than the FCC as a crime buster.  The WSJ tells us that the FTC has been awarded $1.5 billion through court judgments “involving civil penalties for robocalls since 2004 but has collected just… $121 million.”  Maybe the people in those agencies should have the difference taken from their salaries…

The Aardvark Jazz Orchestra performances at MIT’s Kresge Auditorium are events that justifiably have been anticipated with enthusiasm for decades.  Often there is a guest of note with the ensemble; always there is music of pointed political significance; and the loyal and talented musicians nail the music.  The 4/6 gig at Kresge had all three components in solid form.  Everything one could ask for was there--except a functional sound system.  Although there have been sound system problems with jazz gigs at Kresge before, it is the only time in my many experiences in that fine venue in which the sound system was frustratingly ineffective for basically the entire evening.  The audience could hear the vocals, solo instruments not requiring mics to be heard (such as tenor trombones and guitar), and the full ensemble.  Everything else was in serious trouble or completely inaudible.  It was not merely a matter of volume balance but also equalization.  For example, if there were no sounds from the stage or audience, we could hear Mark Harvey’s announcements.  They were muffled rather than crisp, but decipherable.  On the other hand, it was impossible to hear what the music director was saying during any audience applause.  The music began with Harvey’s “Carry On,” a big band blues piece featuring some nice rhythm section work and horn solos (at least it looked that way).  The Second Sacred Concert version of “Come Sunday” was presented beautifully by Grace Hughes.  Then with completely different Ellington material, she brought us back to the big band era of “girl singers” and “boy singers” with a terrific version of “I’m Beginning to See the Light.”  We remember the great girl singers of that era, such as Ella and Billie, but we also forget the vast majority of them, singers who would not be good enough to approach Grace Hughes’ rendition of this piece.  Fine work.  Over the years she has been identified as Grace Hughes, and she was announced as such 4/6 by Mark Harvey.  But the program booklet for the event claims she is Grace Brockmeyer.  Oh, well, “A sonic rose by any other name would sing as beautifully.”  A convincing spoken/sung version of “In My Solitude” by Jerry Edwards followed.  It was wonderful storytelling.  On this night Mark Harvey offered Jerry a certificate of gratitude for seven decades of contributions to the music and celebration of the vocalist’s 90th birthday.  A much warranted and joyous standing ovation followed.  The rest of the first set of the evening featured the improvisations of special guest Ricky Ford.  The tenor saxophonist is one of the few great living mainstream soloists.  He came out on fire in his solo on Ellington’s “Chinoiserie.”  Or at least it looked that way.  He was so far down in the mix that only an occasional note from his tenor cut through the ensemble arrangement.  I was witnessing the sounds of a superb improvisor buried in a failed sound system.  It was the first of four Ellington/Strayhorn works offered in recognition of Ricky Ford’s tenure as a featured soloist in the band directed by Mercer Ellington.  I could not imagine missing what the saxophonist had to say about the remaining three works of the set.  When “Chinoiserie” was over, I went to the sound board and said to the sound engineer, “Please turn on Ricky Ford’s mic.  I’d like to be able to hear his solos.”  The man acknowledged that he heard me.  I went back to my seat and prayed.  Ricky Ford’s solo on “Blood Count” was quite audible--and therefore magnificent.  I felt so happy that people in the audience who may not have been familiar with his work--underrated as he is--got a chance to hear the man’s improvisations.  The last two works of the set, “Praise God” and “Praise God and Dance,” were presented as a medley with segue.  The quality of Ricky Ford’s solos simply reinforced the “first impression” offered by his “Blood Count” solo.  As a bonus, for some reason, Arnie Cheatham’s too brief solo during the same work was audible.  One of the highlights of the night.  He stood neither for solos nor for acknowledgement of applause.  A smile and a wave sufficed.  Arnie obviously is having some difficulty getting around, but his solo was full of positive energy.  The set ended strong, and guest Ricky Ford packed his horn and left at half-time.  The problem of soloists’ mics being off or too low in the mix continued.  Nevertheless, I was able to hear much of Phil Scarff’s fine solo on the opening “Of the People,” one of four Mark Harvey political sonics to close out the evening.  For whatever reasons, during cool weather the school’s building management usually turns off the heat in the building about half-way through the concert.  In such cases typically I just shrug my shoulders and ignore it.  At first I was puzzled by the fact that I was noticing the temperature drop.  Then I remembered how warm it was in town during the afternoon.  When I entered Kresge, the temperature had dropped about fifteen degrees (F.) during the day.  And now we were starting to really feel the temperature drop inside the building.  People near me were putting on their jackets and coats.  On stage the soldiering vocalists with no musical role in the second set enthusiastically cheered on the rest of the band.  But Grace Hughes had to pause to rearrange her scarf and three-quarter sleeve jacket to give her maximum insulation from the chill.  Nevertheless, a vast majority of people in the audience remained until the last work of the night.  “Lament for the City” was offered as a fine memorial to Leonard Brown, one of Boston’s musical movers and shakers who may be best known as a founder of the annual John Coltrane Memorial Concert.  “Faces of Souls” is inspired by another inspired work, Charles Ives’ “Col. Shaw and His Colored Regiment” (inspired by Saint-Gaudens’ sculpture commemorating the 54th Regiment) from Three Places in New England.  The performance featured a terrific Arnie Cheatham solo, his best of the evening.  For more than a decade, Mark Harvey keeps returning to “No Walls,” presenting it at these concerts time after time.  It is a work that never loses its meaning, even though over time the most prominent and painful wall keeps changing.  Although long a perennial offering, it might have been composed specifically in response to the Trump administration.  It was something to take home from the concert.  Along with the hope that Maestro Harvey and his fine Aardvarkians keep on bringing us their music, prodding our brains and our hearts…

According to WashingtonMonthly.com, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a Fox TV superstar.  I say that with tongue in cheek, of course.  The young House attack dog (I say that with admiration) is the focus of scrutiny by Fox News and Fox Business to appease all the Trumpsters who hate her.  Fox mentioned her name “every single day between February 25 and April 7 for a total of 3,181 times” an average of 75 times per day.  I wonder if anyone at Fox is considering whether all that negative coverage might backfire.  After all, many Trump worshippers are not stupid.  They merely are very hopeful but confused.  Even though she is presented in as poor a light as Fox can provide, some Trump fans eventually are likely to discover that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is very smart, articulate, and passionate about helping people in the middle and lower parts of the economic ladder--a big chunk of Trumpsters…

The Steve Lantner Trio is the essential core of all the different Steve Lantner ensembles that have performed at the Outpost in recent years.  Steve, Allan Chase, and Luther Gray show up every month because it is unthinkable that they wouldn’t.  But this year the continued activity of one of Boston’s true jazz treasures has been in doubt.  The pianist has been suffering severe pain in his right hand, raising questions about months of operations, recovery, and physical therapy.  The thumb of his right hand is the most painful digit of that hand.  There is no upside to the problem.  Disable one or more digits, and any professional pianist suffers more than physical pain.  A month-long hiatus (or worse) takes away an important sonic oasis for Allan and Luther.  And, yes, those of us in the audience--although a smaller part of the big picture--would suffer along with the musicians.  If that’s not enough, Steve mentioned in passing that he has arthritic joints in his left hand, limiting flexibility there.  About five days before the 4/23 gig, Steve received a cortisone shot in his right hand.  He said that the positive effects were just starting to kick in and were a bit helpful.  And so the first set at the Outpost began.  If you had not heard this preceding discussion, I doubt that you would notice anything amiss.  And, if you were not in the audience but listening to a broadcast or recording of the evening’s music, you would recognize the trio playing perhaps better than ever.  There was no sonic impairment at the piano or with the percussion or reeds.  It simply was extraordinary music, music that I was hoping for when I entered the Outpost.  Throughout the two sets of music I never saw Steve strike any keys with his right hand thumb.  And he altered the configuration of the fingers of his right hand to strike notes fluently that normally his thumb would strike.  It was an astonishingly brilliant and effective adjustment.  At the end of the evening Steve mentioned that he did in fact use his right thumb on occasion during the performance.  Ellwood Epps, who was in town from Montreal for several days performing on a variety of gigs, sat in throughout the second set.  The trio continued playing beautifully, but it created space for the trumpet to offer a very effective quartet.  The pairing of Allan’s alto and the guest’s mutes was particularly engaging.  At the end of the evening people in the audience who were aware of the condition of Steve’s right hand no doubt were concerned about the impact of Steve’s typically energetic keyboard work on that hand.  After thanking members of the band and audience members for their enthusiastic applause, the air pressure in the room seemed to drop when Steve announced that the performance suggested to him that the cortisone is working and he hoped to be able to continue playing without an operation.  Question marks remain, of course.  But Steve’s optimism probably affected other audience members as it affected me.  Walking to my car, my step was much lighter than it was on the break…

Iain McGilchrist probably has sifted through more studies about the functions of the right and left hemispheres of the brain than any other scientist.  His research and conclusions while seeming superficially outrageous have garnered a good deal of support of the scientific community.  He claims that the functions of the brain’s hemispheres are for the most part distinct.  More important, he claims that those functions are mutually essential for effective brain function.  In other words, if you block or impair the functions of one hemisphere, the other hemisphere does not function properly.  Fine.  But there’s more.  Perhaps too simply stated here, a variety of factors has caused the left hemisphere to become more and more dominant in the lives of contemporary humans.  That is not good.  The left hemisphere (among other functions) gives us the focus to pounce effectively when it is time to go in for the kill.  That focus is essential in some circumstances.  On the other hand, one of the key strengths of the right hemisphere is that it provides context.  For example, it is essential for a hunter to attack a deer or other food source with great focus.  But ignoring the context--e.g., the fact that a pride of lions is focussed on attacking the same deer--could prove fatal for the hunter.  McGilchrist claims that we in our cozy Western civilization have been ceding more and more of our authority to our left hemispheres.  The results for our political leaders and the voting booths, he claims, are very disturbing.  If we look at recent U.S. political administrations, there is some evidence that the left hemisphere has been guiding us.  People in and near the Executive branch of government manipulated CIA data to make an invalid case for the invasion of Iraq.  The belief in quick victory through a “shock and awe” blitzkrieg was certainly “pounce” thinking devoid of any meaningful assessment of Middle East history and status (i.e., context).  The result is that your great great great grandchildren will be paying the price for a left-brain course of action.  Then, in spite of negative polls, the left hemisphere voters chose to re-elect the man who led us to the disaster.  (“You can’t change horses in mid-stream.”)  The problem is bi-partisan.  After one disaster, the U.S. public elected a president who was bright, articulate, and well-liked but inexperienced.  He hardly knew what it meant to be a senator.  There were many reasons to vote with left hemisphere thinking--a charismatic young black man, an idealistic political campaign that the candidate would be too inexperienced to champion when he faced the challenges of office, and a disastrous previous administration (and voters were incapable of seeing the problems inherent in voting for one president with left hemisphere problems and replacing him with another left-hemisphere choice).  And there were other related resultant problems of left brain voting.  The new President turned out to be a left-brain incumbent--brilliant at parsing the peculiarities of discourse in legal journals but incapable of seeing the many faces of “pounce” thinking in his day to day operations.  Those problems were evident in everything from his avoidance of taking on the difficult challenges of plodding through working with Congress to shut down Guantanimo or to shut down metadata surveillance or…  Instead, he took the left brain simple path of publishing countless Executive Orders and Memoranda, actions that completely ignored context and consequence, including the simple fact that any subsequent president with a pen could wipe out everything he’d “accomplished” with a pen.  I build these arguments about the effect of left hemisphere bias on the leaders and the public in Western Civilization.  But these arguments are based accurately (I believe) on the first edition of McGilchrist’s book (published a decade ago), The Master and His Emissary.  And now he returns with a revised publication of the book.  As you might imagine, the author is even less optimistic about the degree to which we and our leaders have succumbed to the growing influence/dominance of the left hemisphere.  Not surprisingly, our current President takes joy in erasing his predecessor’s Executive Orders and Memoranda and destroying anything else the former President set in place.  We are in the presence of a man with a brain devoid of context pouncing on the left hemisphere actions of his predecessor.  There is a way out of this left hemisphere cycle--education, subsequent awareness, and relevant action.  Gilchrist is a doomsayer with a final note of optimism.  Perhaps.  Nevertheless, I say good luck to us all…

The first set opened with a barely audible simple line featuring mute.  The line slowly was repeated, gradually increasing in volume.  It became louder, more complex, and raucous.  Components (including mute) were removed as the line was replaced with long tones with a variety of embellishments.  Eventually the piece was completed as the trumpet was reassembled including mute, and the opening line returned.  The line was repeated, gradually becoming quieter, until the last sound, an emphatic gasp of a breath.  Depending on your perspective (or sense of humor), Nate Wooley had just set the table or the bar for Ken Vandermark and his reeds--Bb clarinet, tenor sax, and baritone sax.  By way of introduction, Ken explained that witnessing local and visiting giants in such haunts as Charlie’s Tap, Lulu White’s, and the Willow were great influences on his development.  Another great influence was international film.  To emphasize the point he dedicated three works (one on each instrument) to The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, The Seven Samurai, and 8 ½.  Because of serious damage to his baritone sax, Ken no longer brings his horn anywhere via air travel.  Because UPS handles such music cases effectively (for a hefty fee) in the U.S., Ken is able to use the baritone sax on his current tour.  The first half of the evening was a fine set of sonic monologues to help the audience get to know each musician as distinct instrumental voices.  The second set featured composed music for trumpet and reed duo.  Each piece presented superficially simple lines played off each other and embellished by improvised narrative lines.  It was almost as if the protojazz of Boston or Memphis and other mixed race cities during the first decade of the twentieth century had not been trampled to death by the popularity of the Original Dixieland Jazz Band and nailed in the coffin by New Orleans monsters Armstrong and Bechet.  No records exist, but it must have been a fine type of written and improvised polyphony, pretty much devoid of any hint of counterpoint.  I happily speculate.  I’m guessing the music of that time would have been--no doubt out of necessity--more structured than the somewhat architecturally freewheeling sentences and improvised comments exhibited 4/26 at the Alternate Space in Watertown.  I suspect the protojazz music of more than eleven decades ago--featuring such musicians as Tom Whaley, Charlie Dixon, and Kaiser Marshall when they were not doing "society" jobs--might have been louder and more raucous, good for dancing.  Somewhat minimalist and seldom jolting, the music of Messrs. Wooley and Vandermark was intended for listeners rather than dancers.  Good thing.  There was a lot of serious listening going on.  And the brief improvised encore may have been too brief but apparently appreciated…

It may be too early to refer to the improvements as a miracle, but The Week reports the government in Quito is coming up with successful approaches to Ecuador’s ridiculous homicide rate.  More than 2,600 people were killed in Ecuador in 2010.  That’s 18 per 100,000 residents, twice the rate that WHO considers to be “an epidemic.”  In 2018 that rate had dropped to 5.6 per 100,000.  The government has implemented a two-part attack on the problem, fixing the behavior of police and of gangs.  Law enforcement reforms include higher pay for officers, more training, and a focus on community policing.  Also the government has implemented a “gang legalization” program which “lets gangs operate openly as long as they give up crime.”  As part of that program gangs get training in useful job skills such as computer operations and food service.  The punch line (no joke): The Latin Kings now run a business called King’s Catering…

The members of the quartet are jazz historians.  Some of their knowledge is from books and records.  Some is from music they have witnessed or from the words of musicians now passed on.  But the passion about the music and its creation was obvious onstage before the first notes were played, during setup.  Names and dates and “authentic” changes or melodies were bandied about as in a volleyball warmup.  The Allan Chase Quartet--Allan, Rich Greenblatt, Gregory Ryan, and John Ramsay--came together as a special unit to perform music of the jazz masters from 1947 to the mid-1950s and subversively into the 1960s.  Before the event I had assumed Rich Greenblatt was on the gig simply for the fact that melodic percussion is used too infrequently on jazz gigs these days and he is a highly regarded veteran on the vibes.  Good reasons, but Allan was way ahead of me. The period of jazz investigated 4/2 at the Lily Pad was exactly the time in which the dominance of Lionel Hampton was being challenged by Milt Jackson and his post-swing aesthetics.  What better way instrumentally to evoke the period than having Mr. Greenblatt on the gig?  Gregory Ryan is one of those rarities, a high-quality jazz bassist who moves from New York City to Boston.  He brought insight into the music with him, both in performance and in New York-based anecdotes about the music.  John Ramsay for decades has been one of the most highly regarded jazz drummers and teachers in the Boston area.  If my historical notes are correct, John and Ralph Peterson are the only drummers to take on the role of second drummer in Art Blakey’s big band version of the Jazz Messengers.  To my great joy, time and again 4/2 I heard and saw Blakey advice exhibited in John Ramsay’s playing.  Wonderful, and always in full support of the band’s purpose.  The quartet performed a single, healthy set of music to a crowd of fellow musicians and fans who obviously miss witnessing this music performed at such a high level.  The evening concluded when Allan invited Andy Voelker and Peter Kennagy to join the band to perform “Half Nelson/Lady Bird,” “Epistrophy,” and “Night in Tunisia.”  One of the pleasures of the evening for me was hearing Peter Kennagy perform for the first time.  There is nothing fancy in his trumpet work.  He just plays lines that get to the core of the work at hand.  Andy made the right decision to bring his tenor sax to the gig.  It fit perfectly between Allan’s alto and baritone.  Andy lit up the room with the most “insane” (in the most positive sense) solos of the evening.  One of his great strengths--when appropriate--is no-holds-barred improvisation.  His first opportunity came on Monk’s “Epistrophy.”  He probably would have surprised even the composer.  The evening belongs to Maestro Chase.  He had the idea and brought just the right people to make it all happen.  If that were not enough, the best head and solo of the evening came from Allan’s baritone sax on Tadd Dameron’s “If You Could See Me Now.”  I swear I could see Serge Chaloff whispering applause into Allan’s ear…

In previous Journal entries I have written about Musicians Union influence in the creation of ridiculous barriers to visiting musicians who attempt to obtain temporary work visas in the U.S. (e.g., see the March 2010 issue of this Journal).  Most people from foreign countries (other than the ones our President does not like) get a pass (i.e., no problems) when they come here on vacation or to sell widgets.  If you are a free jazz musician, you cannot afford the costs--financial and otherwise--to visit here and perform.  As readers know, musicians have developed a wide range of tactics--everything from disarming honesty to pure chicanery--to get through customs successfully.  Recently I heard of a tactic that I never encountered before.  It is brilliant but perhaps not for everyone.  Also, the practice undoubtedly is best initiated early in the career of the musician.  Here I offer a completely fictitious scenario (to protect the “innocent”):  John Smith is a young musician born in Slobolivia.  He studies his improvised art and begins performing locally in his home town.  For any number of possible reasons, John Smith decides to bill himself as Sears Roebuck.  From that point on, wherever he travels in Slobolivia he is known as Sears Roebuck.  The thought never occurs to him to change his name legally to Sears Roebuck.  So he has two names, his professional name and his legal name.  Because he is very good at his art (or more likely in spite of that fact) he becomes successful.  So successful that he travels internationally and he uses his John Smith passport as a touring citizen of Slobolivia.  But, as he travels and performs, his Sears Roebuck name is on all the gig posters.  As Stan Laurel would say, “And no one’s the wiser.”…



March

In spite of juggling responsibilities in an unusually busy life, Glynis Lomon almost never is late for a gig.  But that odd occurrence took place 3/16 at the Outpost as four Leap of Faith band mates waited at eight p.m. for her to show up.  Someone in the group suggested starting without her and playing “Waiting for Glynis” until she showed up.  Elsewhere from the stage was the echo, “Waiting for Godot.”  And play they did.  Dave Peck (AKA PEK), Yuri Zbitnov, Jim Warshauer, and Eric Dahlman dove into the music, a beautiful few minutes of improvised music until everyone looked to the back of the room to see Glynis applauding and cheering in appreciation.  Soon the big clock at the back of the room was set to sixty minutes, and the group was filling the space with a fine array of reeds and percussion (PEK and Jim), strings, a bow, and Aquasonic (Glynis), brass and an array of “toys” (Eric), and brand new percussion (Yuri).  Yes, brand new percussion.  This seems to be the week for new instruments for very happy musicians Junko Fujiwara and Yuri Zbitnov.  In Yuri’s case the instrument is new in a number of ways.  It was custom made for him in Austria.  But the most remarkable aspect of the kit is that the shells are made of brass, bright, shiny brass.  And as Yuri confirmed, the toms do have a symphonic Kettle drum timbre.  So the sound is both powerful and unique.  And Yuri is ecstatic.  Of course, he played beautifully, and most of the time he was floating about a foot above the drum seat.  And everything else during that hour went quite well.  Eric offered everything from clarion calls to abrasive rasps from his trumpet and even an offering at the piano.  It was good to witness Jim’s music in such an intimate setting.  Hearing the range of influences transformed to his own voice was one of the highlights of the evening for me.  Glynis gave us Aquasonic, cello, tons of shredded horse hair, and superb vocals all evening.  On the one hand, Dave Peck’s Leap of Faith performances might be mistaken for a wind instrument demo for a music shop.  But that would be to miss the point.  Every time there is a Leap of Faith gig, PEK hauls along (and it’s no easy burden) this remarkable rainbow of sound.  One of the pleasures of the intimacy of a small group Leap of Faith gig is watching Dave search through the vast array of horns (sometimes quietly with his eyes and sometimes physically like a gardener searching for the perfect head of lettuce of the moment) to find the instrument that will contribute the most effective sonics in the evolving musical context.  During the last ten minutes (according to the big digital clock) we were serenaded by a throat-singing trio.  The write-up for the performance called it “overtone voice,” but the rest of us know it as “throat singing.”   First Eric began the drone, and soon after Yuri joined in.  Glynis was doing her well-known vocal sounds, but she was inspired to join the duo with her own throat sonics.  It was a special threesome to help bring a fine evening of music to a delightful conclusion.  Dave claims this ensemble is the same one that performed one of the short sets on the gig that featured the full Leap of Faith Orchestra at Pickman Hall last year.  The full band is due to return to Longy in April…

It probably will not be a shock to anyone reading this Journal to discover that a recent Stanford University study (NBC, The Week) of 100 million traffic stops found that black and Latino drivers were stopped by the police more often than white drivers.  After all, racism is alive and sick in America.  But here’s the punch line: Illegal contraband (e.g., guns and drugs) were found in 36% of searches of white drivers, 32% of black drivers, and 26% of Latino drivers.  Maybe the cops are just better at searching vehicles driven by white people.  Or maybe something’s wrong…

Near the end of the evening at the Outpost Charlie Kohlhase paused to talk about his friend and mentor, John Tchicai.  Recently Charlie had a chance to hear for the first time a cassette of a 1983 solo Tchicai performance in Hiroshima.  Charlie described the music performed and then said that there was silence on the tape followed by the sounds of Tchicai working out the details of a brand new piece of music.  That “practice session” took place during the week the work was composed.  The cassette represented history in sound.  Charlie heard the tape because of communication from Margriet, the wife of the late master musician.  It seems that John Tchicai had left her a legacy of material including more than one hundred cassettes of similar documentation over years of performances and practice sessions.  Margriet asked for Charlie’s advice regarding what to do with the tapes.  Perhaps he could preserve and curate them.  Charlie has neither the time nor the resources to take on such a challenge.  At this writing it seems a musician/conservator in Denmark will take on that challenge.  I hope the results will be made available to historians and musicians.  All of that amazing information was revealed in the middle of an evening of living and breathing music built on the shoulders of such giants as John Tchicai.  The evening began as a quartet version of the Explorers--Charlie, Seth Meicht, Tony Leva, and Curt Newton--because the trombonist was delayed.  Seth and Charlie chose to use their tenor saxophones.  So we were treated to a 21st century transformation of the “Boss Tenors” or the “Tough Tenors.”  A fun trip.  When Jeb Bishop showed up, the explorers became a quintet.  The challenge here is that, although everyone in the band (and in the audience) knows the music, the charts are written for seven or more musicians.  And the really tricky part is that the top end (trumpet) and the bottom end (tuba) of the brass in the charts had no such instruments on stage to carry out the musical intentions.  The five musicians who showed up 3/21 were quite capable of coping with the problem.  But the fact that there was a need for problem-solving turned out to be engaging for both musicians and fans.  Looking at the charts in a somewhat skewed light resulted in a few interesting bandstand discussions, such as the sonic meaning (if any) of odd graphics employed by John Tchicai on one of his charts.  My favorite exchange occurred when Jeb looked at a chart (and no doubt considering the absence of Josiah Reibstein) asked Charlie whether the trombonist should “play the trombone part or the tuba part.”  Charlie encouraged him to play whichever part he wanted to.  The key effect of the chart analysis and discussion was the entire band’s approach to the music.  The analysis and give-and-take resulted in an open workshop aura for the gig.  The entire evening was one of exploratory fun.  We in the audience witnessed the joy of creating music of now with a legacy for tomorrow.  Shoulders for tomorrow…

Early this month I noticed two big changes in Inman Square.  The first and most obvious is the decimation of Vellucci Plaza.  It was quite a shock.  In a part of the city with its aesthetics defined by the facades of banks and emergency medical clinics, Vellucci Plaza was an oasis of green and repose.  My first response was confusion.  Why would any city group or individual want to destroy such a local gem?  The second big change was the posters in shop windows saying “SOS” and “Save Our Square.”  At first I did not link the two changes, suspecting that the signs might refer to a projected Starbucks or Stop n Shop in the square.  Not so.  Apparently the City Mothers want to “improve” traffic flow at the intersection of Cambridge Street and Hampshire Street.  I thought that traffic in the area already was bad enough, particularly since the city recently had turned the stretch on Cambridge Street starting at Memorial Hall and entering the square from the West into an ugly obstacle course for automobiles.  The current plan is to destroy and eventually cut in half Vellucci Plaza to re-route Hampshire Street for “improved” traffic flow.  Looking at the map, one gets the impression that the plan is to move as many cars as possible from Inman Square and into Somerville.  The destruction and eventual reduction in size of the Plaza is merely a bonus.  In light of all this, the “Saver Our Square” movement is significant.  Local business operators are concerned about the destruction of Vellucci Plaza and about the negative impact all of this work will have on local businesses.  It is about time (but maybe too late) that the businesses are seeing the damage that the City Mothers have been doing (and are continuing to do) to local businesses.  During recent years (e.g., the September 2017 Journal) I have complained about Cambridge politicians’ hatred of automobiles and the implications of eliminating dozens of parking spaces on Cambridge Street--particularly the negative economic impact on Inman Square businesses.  The SOS movement has articulated its concerns about the damages in Inman Square.  Online the group describes who the SOS group is, the safety flaws in the plan, the costs of the plan, and the less expensive and more effective alternatives to the plan.  For example, the online “Costs of the current plan for Inman Square” statement lists eight ways in which the plan hurts the people of Inman Square financially.  Item number one in the list is: “Nearly half of street parking spaces will be gone.  This means less parking for customers.”  (The bold face type is theirs.)  Welcome aboard, and good luck.  If the plan is implemented, the streets of Inman Square will look like London during the blitz through at least the end of this year.  Then the aesthetic and economic damage continues as a planned improvement.  For more information and suggestions on how you can help Inman Square, go to Save Inman Square

One of the inadvertent misconceptions that may be created by this Journal over the years is that venues such as the Lily Pad, Third Life Studio, and the Outpost are jazz venues.  They certainly have offered some fine jazz performances, but they also present poetry, classical music, dance, and all variety of performance art.  This Journal focusses on jazz performance, but other things also happen at these places.  A good case in point is the double bill 3/15 at the Outpost, a non-jazz duo and free jazz quintet.  The booking presented an informative contrast.  Wayfaring (think “wayfaring stranger”) might be described as a folk cabaret duo featuring the acoustic bass and voice of Katie Ernst and clarinets of James Falzone.  The vocals were handled by Ms. Ernst with one vocal offering from Mr. Falzone.  Aside from one instrumental solo statement in tribute to John Carter (one of the three great influences on post-Ayler clarinetists, the other two being Messrs. Russell and Giuffre), there was little hint of James Falzone’s jazz roots.  The music performed by the duo adhered to the cabaret norms of faithful and consistent performance of well-crafted (at best) arrangements of songs.  In this case the folk-oriented material featured deceptively “simple” lines and phrases articulating subjects dealing with the substantial weight of life.  They are very good at what they do effortlessly and with carefully-measured and effective doses of theater.  Unprepared jazz fans may have been disappointed, but those who paid attention may have appreciated the accomplishment.  Those who showed up in the audience specifically to catch the duo may have been as disappointed in the second set as the “jazz snobs” were with the first set.  Jeb Bishop’s quintet (minus the violin from the scheduled sextet) was a reunion of completely free musicians who according to the group’s trumpeter had not played as a unit in more than a year.  The ensemble--Jeb Bishop, Forbes Graham, Junko Fujiwara, Brittany Karlson, and Andria Nicodemou--are all fine musicians and adept improvisors.  They performed two “identical” improvisations at a very high level.  Individual statements were fine and interactive “conversations” may have been even better.  But I use the term “identical” only for effect rather than as an explicit description.  When you have so many musicians of such terrific ability offer one fine improvisation, it makes no sense for them to rework the same pace, dynamics, themes, and arc in the second improvisation.  I don’t think what happened in the second improvisation was a conscious decision on anyone’s part, but going somewhere else in the second offering of the set should have been someone’s decision.  Please do not misunderstand me; the detail of the music within the larger context was quite fine.  Brittany Karlson has a lot of technical resources, and I particularly liked the sonic conversations she had with Junko.  But considering that the ensemble has no percussionist, perhaps she could take advantage of her potential to evoke pulse, staccato energy, or some other instrumental resource to take the music someplace else.  It has been quite fine to witness the growth and evolution of the work of the talented and creative Andria Nicodemou over time.  Her chops and energy always have been ear-catching, but it is her work during the past year or so that has been most impressive.  To state it simply, she has exhibited that too rare capacity to make the other people around better.  She at least attempted to do that 3/15, first with one of her signature explosive power runs in which the notes explode off the instrument almost as visible metal shards.  The result was effective but brief.  Then, seeing that something more sustained was needed (I’m speculating here, of course), Andria employed her four mallets to prod and jolt the time feel and energy in a new direction.  It was a great idea, but the rest of the group used her offerings as an ongoing counterpoint to their restrained wanderings.  A nice effort, though.  Junko has been away from the fray for quite a while.  Disability in the hands and fingers (both hands) is a nightmare for a cellist.  Junko was all smiles and positive energy 3/15 in her return to action after successful operations and a brand new cello to replace a cello that in part was the cause of her disability.  The new cello sounds great, enough so that I joked to her that her arco work sounded like that of János Starker.  She was having a great time going along for the ride on this return but also throwing some hi-test gas in the tank along the way.  Also, of course, she was one of the “horns” on this gig, neither percussionist nor bassist.  Jeb and Forbes were the two highest-profile musicians on the gig, and justifiably so.  Their solos and interplay were worth showing up for all by themselves.  Of the two of them, Jeb was the leader and had the best opportunity to change the direction of the music, but he made the attempt too late.  During the first improvisation there was a brief section in which the “horns” manipulated long tones in an effective way that set the contextual tone--slow-moving evolution of sound--for the rest of that improvisation.  Inexplicably, given that the improvisational palette open to the ensemble was potentially limitless, Jeb (with the help of Forbes) opened the second improvisation with an extended manipulation of long tones.  It was undeniably beautiful stuff.  But it was also the door to Groundhog Day.  To his credit, Jeb apparently discovered the problem and pursued a completely different direction with a terrific solo that employed what appeared to be a plastic margarine container.  Wonderful but too late.  As fine as it was it was not enough to change the direction of the ocean liner.  My complaint about the music is too harsh.  I see what was and know what could have been.  Here I am in a beautiful living room and am having a great time.  Everyone gets up from the chairs, and I am enthusiastic to go with them to relish whatever is in another room or even in another house.  But, after everyone gets up, all of them move the furniture around a bit and sit down.  It’s disappointing, but it’s a heck of a living room even with no more than rearranged furniture.  Amazing furniture…

According to Vox.com early this month, the FDIC reported that banks in the U.S. made a record $236.7 billion in profits in 2018.  “Of that, the FDIC says $28.8 billion can be directly linked to the 2017 tax law” (i.e., the heralded Trump “Tax Cut for the Rich” bill).  According to other data posted by Vox.com, “The top 1 percent of U.S. earners got 34 percent of the law’s benefits.”  What’s in your wallet?...

One of the great things about the Makanda Project is that the band serves the community of the ensemble’s namesake, Makanda Ken McIntyre, with several free concerts each year.  Every once in a while music director/arranger John Kordalewski brings the band uptown so uninitiated Bostonians can get a taste.  Thanks to help from Yoron Israel and other folks at Berklee, the fine 3/28 event took place at Berklee Performance Center.  The bonus on this night was the percussion trio of Yoron, Warren Smith, and Thurman Barker.  The fact that these are three of the finest jazz percussionists alive made the small percussion student turnout in the audience disappointing.  I guess young musicians today prefer to learn from recordings rather than from real music.  The opening piece, “It Takes A While,” did take a while to get off the ground.  It began with the percussion trio shaking brushes in the air for some “quiet” percussion.  Then the volume of trio activity increased until what they were doing was barely audible.  I suspect there was a problem with the sound system that should have been fixed at the sound check.  I was sitting in approximately the twelfth row, usually a near-perfect location for sight and sound.  More than once I have heard a drummer shake brushes with quiet but audible results.  Not here.  Gradually, as the band entered, the volume of the percussion trio increased to functional levels.  The big bonus on the opener was the solo and duo trumpet work of Jerry Sabatini and Haneef Nelson.  Resourceful, creative, beautiful.  “Caribe” was notable because the Caribbean time gave everyone a chance to “dance.”  And the volume balance between percussion and horns really hit its stride.  The simultaneous time-keeping and improvisation--as well as drum breaks--was the lift-the-bandstand element of that piece.  There was very effective use of vibes and marimba on “Playtime.”  The odd thing about the arrangement for me was the lack of participation on those instruments from Thurman Barker.  Maybe he no longer plays melodic percussion.  “Sphere” may or may not be a reference to Monk, according to pianist/leader Kordalewski, but it certainly was a fun ride.  The percussion trio set a 5 ground for the rest of the band that seemed to be playing in 4/4.  Maybe they met at 20.  But I’m not sure.  I should ask one of the band members.  The evening closed with the blues-oriented “You Know What?,” a fine piece that gave almost everyone a solid opportunity to solo.  Not surprising, with jazz musicians of this caliber, the solos were quite fine all night long.  The only obvious flaw of the performance was the series of false endings of “You Know What?,” the evening’s final offering.  Not a great device, and it tended to make the work seem to be too long.  But this evening of such fine music certainly was not too long.  The Makanda Project always is a great pleasure.  At the end of the evening John Kordalewski made special note of Thurman Barker, stating that he hoped the percussionist would play with the band again.  That return may well happen.  After all, Thurman Barker has some pretty significant Boston connections.  Among them is his work in the terrific Boston-based Joe Morris Trio of the mid-1980s, performing on Joe’s second trio LP at that time (Human Rites, Riti 02).  Among his visits to Boston, he returned in 1987 for his fine contributions to the Percussion Masters gig at Brandeis University as a member of one of the most impressive all-percussion lineups of all time (also including Dennis [AKA Denis] Charles, Beaver Harris, Gerry Hemingway, and Laurence Cook).  Yes, I’m sure fans would like to see more of him with the Makanda Project, one of Boston’s great ensemble treasures…

Too many politicians on either side of the aisle apparently fail to understand that the major economic problem for the average American is not unemployment, which has been remarkably low since the last years of the Obama administration.  The problem is lousy wages and the increasing income gap between the rich and the bottom half of the economic spectrum.  As The Week (3/8, p.16) notes, “Employee pay and benefits fell to 52.7 percent of the nation’s economic output during the third quarter last year--down from 57 percent in 2001.  If the workers’ share were still 57 percent, they would have $800 billion more in their pockets, or $5,100 more per worker.”  To understand how bad things are, you may remember that things were not great for the average worker in the third quarter of 2001.  Increasing the average worker’s salary today by $5,100 would serve merely to give him a salary as bad as it was in 2001.  In other words, the income gap is terrible and getting worse…

Dave Bryant is a master of keyboards.  (Someday I may have the pleasure of witnessing him at the harpsichord.  Who knows?)  But I most relish his work at the acoustic piano.  There is something especially organic about that experience.  I was in luck 3/12 when he showed up at the Outpost with his Secret Handshake Trio.  Dave and partners Jacob William and Eric Hofbauer pursued everything from “One for My Baby” to Ornette and Bryant originals.  Through it all we heard Dave bring out delicate sonics, lightning single-note runs, and stunningly “melodic” clusters.  The three of them marvelously blurred the line between composition and improvisation.  Even though people in the audience were fans and knew all the material, the three of them were so astute and comfortable with each other that one of the great joys of the evening was hearing the familiar made seductively unfamiliar.  It should be noted that for the first time in my experience I saw Jacob perform using his custom-made stick bass.  It is probably the most convincing (in comparison to an acoustic bass) stick I’ve ever heard.  Nice.  As the due date approaches (first half of May?), father-to-be Eric is really getting into the upcoming challenges.  The guy really lights up when he talks about the event.  Ain’t new life grand!  Even though Jacob will be traveling a lot during the next few months, it sure would be fine to be able to catch the Secret Handshake redux in the not-too-distant future…

NPR.org reports this month that green spaces are good for you--everything from hikes in the White Mountains to walks in a city pocket park.  Researchers at Aarhus University in Denmark found that children “who grow up with greener surroundings, even just a city street near a park, have a significantly lower risk of developing mental illnesses later in life.”  Considering how off-the-rails I sometimes am these days, I can’t help wondering what terrible things childhood walks with my mother in Prospect Park prevented.  Children raised “near high amounts of green space have up to 55 percent lower risk of developing disorders such as schizophrenia and stress-related conditions…”  Dr. Kelly Lambert of the University of Richmond believes the research is very important, claiming the study “suggests that something as simple as a better city planning could have profound impacts on the mental health and well-being of all of us.”  And for three seasons of the year, Boston’s children get the bonus of the terrific flowers in the Public Garden.  That must be sufficient to push the reduced risk to at least 60 percent…

Eric Rosenthal’s Point01Percent series at the Lily Pad continues to be one of the most important ongoing music arts events in the Boston area.  In recent months the series has expanded to twice per month.  I can think of no evening that better demonstrates the virtues of the series than the double bill on 3/26 consisting of two dramatically different music forms presented in engaging and compelling ways.  Initially the evening was scheduled to start with music out of the classical tradition and finish with an improvising jazz trio.  Some logistics problems meant that the evening began with the jazz and that the music was delayed a few minutes.  On the plus side, my impression is that the programming switch was beneficial in this specific case.  After the trio was finished destroying the space, the selections offered by the vocalists seemed particularly powerful in the debris left behind.  I am making metaphorical references, of course.  Pandelis Karayorgis, Damon Smith, and Eric Rosenthal hit the ground running.  And, although the music carried us through a range of experiences from thunder to whispers, the energy level never dissipated.  All of the music was improvised, but it’s the type of stuff that students and lesser lights transcribe from recordings as a substitute for trying to be original.  The virtuosity was stunning in itself.  I found myself watching audience members shifting focus all over the bandstand, trying to figure out which music was the most amazing.  The thunder and lightning coming from the piano, as if Pandelis had some kind of genetic communication with Zeus.  Sticks and chains and bows woven through bass strings, seemingly interfering with the instrument’s potential but driving the music relentlessly forward.  A drummer with six arms and countless toys to conjure fire and sonic conversation.  You really could not see all of it in one focussed viewing.  Even watching Damon go silent--statuesque and listening--was compelling.  One of my favorite sequences occurred when Pandelis attacked the piano in a torrent of percussion dance notes, a continuous cycle, while Eric danced with the pianist, sticks rat-tatting twin sounds with the piano but hitting a range of metal and wood on drum heads.  Two instruments, but a single, unified joyous result.  In short, the first set was a “textbook” demonstration of improvised music at its highest level.  Music far too good to be found in a textbook.  The second set presented vocal works composed during the past half century and presented by the Peridot Duo (Rose Hegele and Stephanie Lamprea) and Katherine Growdon.  Three of the works were composed by New Englanders, including Cambridge’s own Julia Werntz.  This Journal focusses on jazz; so I will be brief about the performance of the three vocalists.  Each of the works was presented with technical skill, insight, and convincing commitment.  Just as important (and, considering the aesthetic context, perhaps more important), the music selected for the set was for the most part challenging to the ear and even provocative.  It is an elixir much needed in the classical music world of eastern Massachusetts.  The Boston area never has been a haven for ground-breaking or ear-stretching classical music of quality--well, not since William Billings at least.  There have been moments of light.  During the 1980s and 1990s music school students played such music and music departments and new music ensembles gave us more of the same.  We lucky audiences witnessed performances of the music of Carter, Cage, Babbitt, Lutosławski, Varese, Xenakis, Wolpe, and more, not to mention the Second Viennese School and late Stravinsky, (often with active composers in the audience).  The new music ensembles performed music of that quality on a regular basis but seldom do today.  And there were champions of such music including Mario Davidovsky, John Heiss, and Martin Brody working at local music schools and colleges that gave them rein to make great concerts of challenging music happen.  Such activity among schools, colleges, and ensembles today is diminished significantly or missing altogether.  That is why the commitment of the Borromeo String Quartet (complete Bartók quartets annually and Ligeti’s Second in January) and the Parker String Quartet (quartets of Kurtág and Xenakis since October) is so important in these aesthetically dull times.  And that is why the local vocal threesome that performed 3/26 at the Lily Pad is so important now and we hope in the future.  Curator Eric Rosenthal pulled off a winner of an evening…

According to Bloomberg.com the U.S. government produced its largest monthly deficit in February--$234 billion.  Also, the deficit for fiscal 2019 so far has grown by 40%.  As you might guess, the Republican tax cut has contributed significantly to the problem because corporate tax revenues have plummeted by 32%.  Don’t you wish you were a corporation?  Then maybe you could do something constructive with all the extra money.  Maybe fix the infrastructure near your corporate offices or raise the salaries of workers or put the money into real R&D or…


 February 

The Metro, a free daily publication found in most fairly large cities in the U.S., has a Boston edition.  Understandably, the paper gave a good deal of coverage to the success of the Patriots in the Super Bowl.  On 2/5, the day of the downtown parade, contributor Jimmy Toscano wrote an article (p. 9) about the locals, stating that the Patriots dynasty is the “most impressive in the history of sports.”  It’s the kind of offering that produces loud arguments in sports bars.  About two-thirds of the way down the first column of the article, there was a sentence that included an eye-catching typo.  The significant thing about it is that the sentence with the typo made more sense than if there had been no typo.  In making his case for the greatness of the Patriots, Toscano and his typo light up his contention with a larger NFL observation: “In a league designed to create parody and give more teams a shot at the title, the Patriots have won 33% of Super Bowls since 2001…”  I doubt that Roger Goodell would understand…

In the post-Ayler era of jazz in surviving/thriving centers for the music we fans are spoiled for a variety of reasons, among them the quality of new music (as opposed to most of the quality of the current straight-ahead stuff) and the seriousness of audiences.  A lot of fans and even musicians (accustomed to quiet and rapt audiences at hangouts such as The Stone in New York or the Outpost here) are skeptical whenever I bring up the fact that audiences for new jazz today may be smaller than at mid-century but are far more serious listeners than their ancestors.  If you think I’m exaggerating, pick up a recording of one of those early 1950s live gigs--before the advent of tight micing--and listen to the clinking glasses, ringing cash registers, chatter, and incongruous laughter taking place in front of the stage.  Yes, there always have been serious listeners at clubs and dance halls, but a vast majority of those fans were other musicians dropping by to see where the music was going.  And their numbers were few.  Today the numbers still are few, but people looking for sonic wallpaper do not show up.  Thankfully.  Therefore my experience with a couple guys chattering in back of me at the Lily Pad 2/10 was particularly annoying, perhaps to some extent because I was not sure how to handle it.  I tried giving them the “Hey, be considerate of the rest of us” look.  Nothing.  I suspected that alternatives probably would have resulted in even greater interference with the music.  I did enjoy the music provided by Melissa Kassel, Tom Zicarelli, Phil Grenadier, Bruce Gertz, and Gary Fieldman, but at times I strained my auditory system to catch it all.  Fortunately the loud talking duo did not hang around for the second set.  But the incident caused me to think about the problem and why it might occur with this band.  I’m not sure, but I think it might have something to do with the fact that the band’s music includes several “older music” hooks, such as chord changes.  On most gigs the band even includes a few jazz standards throughout the evening (although not on 2/10).  Of course, that’s not a slam at the music.  There is nothing wrong with straight-ahead jazz, except for how poorly it is played by most bands these days.  My complaint is that the “conventional” elements of the band’s music tend to bring out good-sized audiences and--unfortunately--a few people in need of sonic wallpaper.  The problem has occurred before with this band over the years, even as far back as gigs in the late 1990s at Sandrina's in Somerville, but rarely.  The strength of the band is how far it pushes the jazz conventions into challenging sonics.  Superficially it brings to mind some sort of fantasy amalgam of the mature Abbey Lincoln ensembles and Joe Maneri’s composed microtonal vocal works.  It is a terrific combination of story-telling--both verbal and melodic--and ear-stretching music.  All band members participate during solos and during instrumental polyphony/heterophony.  On 2/10 Melissa was pushing the band as a unit farther in that direction.  At times there were unison voices and at others each band member was taking an independent (but contextually coherent) improvisation.  Something like early polyphonic jazz before Louis changed everything and including a nod to Ornette’s harmolodics.  It’s that kind of band--telepathic, supportive, and superbly creative.  I show up for the sonic challenge and a few show up for the wallpaper.  Maybe the best part is that most people who show up seem to like the music

The Cambridge City Mothers are so stupid that, if someone convinced them global warming is caused by human activity, they would slaughter everyone living in that city.  I use the term City Mothers with a tip of the hat to “MF” of street slang and recognition that the city’s power brokers at least feign support for feminist causes.  But here I will try to keep my focus on the city’s misguided war on automobiles and some implications.  In previous issues of this Journal (e.g., see the September 2017 issue) I have complained that the elected officials of Cambridge hate automobiles.  I was not serious, of course.  No sane person would want to eliminate a necessary means of transportation from any town or city.  I used what I thought was hyperbole to get my point across.  Because I do not live in Cambridge, I do not keep up with that city’s politics.  But I saw Adam Vaccaro’s “Cambridge wanted a big drop in car ownership by 2020.  That hasn’t exactly happened” in the Boston Globe (2/18/19) and found out that my hyperbole was fact and was a city mission since at least 2014.  The article, mostly supportive of the Cambridge policies, claims that the city “took up the anticar cause decades ago to oppose a proposed interstate highway through the heart of Central Square…”  I had misinterpreted the anticar policies, believing that removing street parking spaces to make room for bicycle trails, for example, was merely an inept attempt at creating safer roads for bicyclists.  As Adam Vaccaro points out, “the target, set in 2014, was to lower ownership to about 0.8 cars per household…”  Because the city leaders apparently do not understand the problem--the day-to-day clogging of transportation routes and environmental damage--they put in place laws that make owning and using an automobile as prohibitive as possible.  It may be an easy stroke of the pen, but it does not solve the problem and it creates new problems.  Fixing the transportation mess and cleaning the environment are challenging problems that require local and state governments to implement unpopular but effective policies, policies that involve a lot more than passing laws that restrict behavior without a compensatory payoff for the individual citizens.  I interject here that I do not like to drive a car.  I never have been enamored of “the road.”  And since the lead-up to the last presidential election through this very moment, I am genuinely frightened to drive anywhere.  I’m assuming that the political stresses for both pro- and anti-Trump drivers cause them to do insane things on public roads.  And drivers using cell phones only make the situation worse.  I would love to abandon my car.  But I can’t.  I live in the suburbs and would be trapped at home without a car.  If I lived in downtown Boston or Manhattan, I gladly would get rid of my car.  Not so for suburbia or Cambridge.  There is not functional mass transit in those places as there is in Boston or Manhattan (or most of New York City for that matter).  When I say “functional mass transit” I am referring to rail transport.  New York has (in my years of experience) an effective subway system.  In most cases I can get where I am going faster via subway than by taking a cab.  As we locals know, the MBTA subway inside Rte. 128 is not an effective subway system.  It is better than taking a cab (unless you live in a hotel) or buses, but incompetence in design and operation make the subway system a necessary evil rather than the fine public service it should be.  The problems with the system are so numerous and interconnected that they would require me to write a separate article.  The fact that the MBTA subway is superior to all the other local public transport systems is an indication of how bad all the other local transit options are.  Given that I live in the suburbs means that I need to drive for a half hour or more to get to a subway station to get into Boston or Cambridge.  I eat and attend music performances in Inman Square at least twice per week.  The only functional alternative to driving there for me is to take the “T” to Central Square and walk.  In other words, if the City Mothers have their way and remove all parking in the Inman Square area, I will miss all the great gigs in that part of Cambridge.  I will not walk from Central Square to Inman Square.  I realize what I am describing sounds selfish.  But I believe it is a very real and personal way to describe at least part of the problem created by City Mothers incompetence.  Instead of making Cambridge a city that is so well run and uses its political clout so effectively that anyone living there would get rid of his or her car because it is not necessary to take advantage of the city’s geographically diverse resources, the City Mothers penalize citizens who seek  functional mobility.  The decision-makers seem to be the same people who run the “T,” the ones who think that raising parking rates is the way to reduce lot overcrowding when there is no parking option to such locales as Alewife and Riverside.  Oddly, the Adam Vaccaro article shines light on the most productive solutions to the problem.  He quotes Gina Fiandaca, Boston’s transportation commissioner, as saying “I’m not sure that’s the role of the city, to restrict car ownership, as much as it is to create an environment where people aren’t reliant on a car.”  Wow.  Intelligent insight.  Further, the article considers the experience of Pittsburgh chief resilience officer Grant Ervin who claims that “car ownership rates mostly serve as a useful indicator of whether the city is achieving broader goals, such as vastly increasing transit ridership.”  Vaccaro quotes Ervin to conclude the article, “There would be a host of factors that would go into a number like that--people reducing the number of cars they own because there are other valid options available.”  In other words, if government officials are willing to think through the problem and do the hard work involved in implementing functional solutions, then the problem can be dealt with effectively.  All Cambridge needs is replacement of the City Mothers with competent officials from other cities…

The first of two February Eric Rosenthal creative music series events opened 2/13 with a performance by Cutout, a quintet that performs every month in Inman Square.  The band--Jeb Bishop, Jorrit Dijkstra, Pandelis Karayorgis, Nate McBride, and Luther Gray--is in top form.  In previous editions of this Journal I have discussed how good the quintet is and how fine all the contributions of band members are.  I will skip such comments here to avoid redundancy.  However, there are observations about the Lily Pad performance on 2/13 that may be useful.  The most important point to make is that the band continues to operate at a very high level.  It has been and continues to be part of a small group of world-class post-Ayler ensembles working in the Boston area.  One of the great challenges for band leaders since the earliest days of jazz is preventing ensemble fatigue.  Avoiding or overcoming that fatigue is one of the great achievements of men such as Duke Ellington and Art Blakey.  One of the keys to that success is pushing the skills of band members with the challenge of new material.  Ellington (and other band members, most notably Billy Strayhorn) wrote charts for the band on an almost daily basis.  Blakey typically had musicians in his band write charts and gave someone in the band music director responsibilities.  The result is that each band member in those ensembles had to be alert and involved.  Therefore, a major reason Cutout has grown and sustained its level of performance over the past several months (offering its first performance 9/20/17 at the Lily Pad) is that by necessity band members created and performed original new material.  Now the band is at a critical moment.  It has a functional book, people know how to read/interpret the charts, and the musicians have been working together long enough that interpersonal communication on and off the bandstand is operating at a high level.  In other words, this is the perfect time for ensemble fatigue to set in.  The happy news is that I saw no evidence of ensemble fatigue 2/13.  They handled the charts--tricky turns and leaps included--with ease.  But, more important, each musician tackled the music with enthusiasm and intensity.  It had the kind of focus and commitment that you expect at a peak moment.  If that wasn’t enough, there was another bit of evidence that at least for now the band is on a tear.  Quick question: What is one of the best ways to find out if a band is entering the realm of ensemble fatigue?  I’ll wait…  Good guess!  Yes, older charts.  If a band is going to fall asleep, it is most likely to happen while attempting to play one of the older pieces in the book.  I can remember Herb Pomeroy telling me that each chart has a lifetime.  He claimed that his band would play a long-time successful piece on a gig and, because of the lack-luster performance, Herb would remove the chart from the book.  Cutout had its chances to sleepwalk 2/13 but didn’t.  In fact, “Jowls,” a seasoned Luther Gray flag-waver, closed out the evening with the best performance of a superb set of music.  The second set of three consisted of an improvising trio--Andrew Neuman, Damon Smith, and curator/percussionist Eric Rosenthal--that was something of a good-fortune pickup band.  I’ve never caught the three musicians in this configuration before.  In any case, a re-match would be a great idea.  Andrew Neuman has pursued the electronic muse since Ben Franklin’s original experiments.  Therefore, he shows up prepared--when the set starts, the equipment and the musician are ready.  No mid-set stops and starts or dead spots.  And over that span of time Andrew Neuman did not waste his time aesthetically.  He’s one of those special musicians--electronics or otherwise--that you can drop into any improvising ensemble with predictable results.  Top shelf creative music.  If that was not enough, two improvising pillars joined him onstage.  I cannot think of thirty seconds of even mild disappointment in all the gigs I’ve witnessed Damon Smith participate in.  Every string selection, choice of toy, or arco statement is on target.  And always without empty show.  He invariably makes the music better.  Normally when the producer of a gig walks on stage it is time to groan.  When Eric Rosenthal sits at the kit, it is time for happy anticipation.  In other words, the deck for the second set of the evening 2/13 was stacked.  With three such fine sets of ears, how could anything go wrong?  Well, it didn’t.  The music was every bit as good as one would hope for.  But, of course, you had to be there to witness just how good it was.  Yes, the ears were working all the time.  The solos were superb, as were the duos.  And most of the time we in the audience were treated to a joyous trialogue.  There are many different kinds of music and as many different ways to experience music.  The second set was one of sheer joy.  I’m guessing that I was not the only person in the audience who felt honored to be invited to the party.  Recently Forbes Graham told me that bassist Damon Smith will be taking advantage of an opportunity in St. Louis, likely in June.  It always is positive to find out that there is happy news for a good person.  On the other hand, I confess selfishly I am not completely upbeat about Damon’s departure.  In the relatively brief time he has lived and performed in the Boston area Damon has been nothing but a force for good on the new music scene, creating ensemble opportunities and offering such a fine model of what an exemplary performing artist can be.  I wish him the best, and I hope that the good people of St. Louis will appreciate what a gift they are receiving.  The third set of the event featured Eric Rosenthal at the kit in a duo with Jorrit Dijkstra who left all his fine music in the first set behind.  He chose to tackle the Lyricon and lost…

A fortunate step backward for Big Brother occurred recently when Amazon shareholders told Jeff Bezos to stop selling face recognition software (i.e., Rekognition) to the government. According to The Week (2/1. p. 19), “five shareholder groups with $1.32 billion worth of Amazon stock filed a resolution to pause sales of the technology… until Amazon can prove that it is ‘effectively restricting the use of Rekognition to protect privacy and civil rights.’”  The shareholders plan to try to pass the resolution at the shareholders meeting this coming summer…

One of the great gifts to fans of improvised music is Kit Demos’ Dark Matter Series of monthly performances at the Outpost.  There are a few musicians who show up to play with some frequency, but Kit tends to put these musicians in the company of others who seldom or never perform together.  Intentionally it is something of a crapshoot.  Sometimes the chemistry and/or aesthetics do not work.  But, when it works, the results are quite fine.  Such was the case 2/23.  The scheduled lineup consisted of Kit, Pandelis Karayorgis, Jeb Bishop, and Max Goldman.  Even though Pandelis and Jeb had a solid history of working together, the output of the whole quartet was unpredictable.  Add to that the fact that a scheduling mishap meant Kit had to dig up a replacement for the trombonist.  All of us got lucky in that the trade was an icon for an icon.  Charlie Kohlhase brought his alto and baritone saxes.  The music began with a series of quartet adventures and continued with a fine single set of duo, trio, and quartet sonics.  I’m unfamiliar with the work of Max Goldman, but I get the feeling that he has a lot of experience playing in rock bands with guitars dialed into eleven.  The only problem I found in his playing was his judgment regarding balance.  There were times when Charlie’s horn--no more than three feet in front of me--was inaudible.  And yet there was fine balance in the early Max-Charlie duo, one of the highlights of the evening.  Other than the balance problem, the drummer’s ears were quite fine with exemplary reciprocal performance decisions.  Charlie’s playing is steeped in the jazz tradition.  He’s in the process of teaching his big band students at Longy to play charts going back to the early swing era.  And he’s comfortable playing post-Ayler music, charted or totally free.  Because he loves to write and loves to perform the compositions of post-Ayler giants, we fans do not experience much free playing in his Explorers ensembles (fine as those groups are).  So witnessing Charlie’s free narratives and “editing” of the work of other musicians 2/23 was a rare treat.  Over the years Pandelis has developed a reputation as a superb arranger and brilliant improvisor within those contexts.  Justifiably so.  But there was a time when he decided to pursue the free side of post-Ayler music and got it under his belt faster than any experienced chord-centered musician I’ve ever witnessed.  It was an extraordinary leap.  I have missed that side of his playing.  But here I was 2/23 witnessing the free Pandelis Karayorgis unleashed.  Just wonderful.  There was a stretch near the end of the evening where the word “obsessed” comes to mind to describe what I witnessed.  A blur of hands produced music of such complexity and raw beauty that even the dog in the audience must have held its breath.  Kit is a wonderful mix-master, offering such solid experiments each month.  But he’s also one of my favorite musicians, someone who would be famous in a world in which critics and fans were something more than blind and deaf.  His electronic pursuits always are surprising and engaging, even in those rare instances when they fail.  He stuck with the acoustic bass all evening 2/23, offering fine arco and mostly provocative, prodding pizzicato.  I know of no investigative bassist who is better than Kit.  You can tell that he spends a lot of time finding out the sonic possibilities of the instrument.  But he is spare in his use of those resources.  In other words, he plugs in his discoveries only when he knows they will contribute to the music in a significant way.  I think I saw him employ non-traditional techniques only twice during the whole set.  All substance.  He’s a treasure.  All in all, Kit brought a terrific evening of music to the Outpost 2/23.  Maybe we will be lucky enough during 2019 to witness Kit’s attempt to see lightning strike twice…

At a time when commentators and politicians across the political spectrum accuse a variety of media outlets of “fake news,” it is good to see examples of blatantly objective news reporting.  Recently the Wall Street Journal, one of Donald Trump’s staunchest supporters, but once again committed to real news, reported that Michael Cohen tried to rig the list of CNBC’s 2014 top 100 business leaders.  Trump’s attorney, according to the WJS, paid a tech company to rig the online vote used to establish the field of finalists.  “When Trump still didn’t make the final list, Cohen told CNBC that it would be sued,” and Trump complained directly to network executives.  In light of the fact that the WJS probably will continue to support Trump, the story about the rigging is a good example of objective journalism.  Now, if the directors of the paper’s editorial policy would read the paper’s day-to-day news reporting, maybe some shift in editorial position might occur.  But I doubt it…

The first quarter 2019 issue of Scout Cambridge (p.26) includes Lilly Milman’s “Step into the World of the Lylypad Mural,” a feature about artist Dan Masi’s mural in the popular Inman Square venue.  It is interesting to read about his working nights, sleeping days, and loving it.  He claims that being at the gallery for shows is “amusing, but hanging out here all night, playing my own music, with absolutely nobody around, and watching the sun come up on my way home is my most fond memory of this place.”  One thing that never struck me about the mural is that, according to Masi, it is a tribute to Goya.  Now that I read the article I can see some links visually.  Thinking it over, I wish he had been inspired to offer large depictions of the two versions of The Maja for the facing walls of the place.  But all of us have different understandings of “magic.”  In considering Inman Square gentrification and shuttered stores, the artist is happy that the Lily Pad does not face quite the same economic stress that other Inman Square places have to deal with.  He says, “I know that I can spend 260 hours over six months working on this, and it’s not going to turn into a Starbucks next week.”  And that’s a plus for all of us…

Over the decades of Steve Lantner’s ensembles--everything from solo to beyond a half dozen in size--have proven to be worth a good listen.  But there is something special within that instrumental spectrum--perhaps charismatic--about his quartets and quintets of recent years.  There is no better example than the quintet that showed up 2/26 at the Outpost.  Steve, Forbes Graham, Allan Chase, Joe Morris, and Luther Gray are musicians of veteran experience who perform at the highest level.  But there is a connection among these musicians on and off the stage that is unusual.  Through body language, words, and sonics we audience members find ourselves in the presence of family, brothers.  The benevolent kind of family relationship.  A discussion onstage before the music started resulted in musician consensus that it had been a year and a half since this five had played together.  But there were no signs of rust.  Taking the pensive opening few moments as a sign of sluggishness would have been a mistake.  At the beginning of the evening and throughout there was a lot of fully absorbed listening among band members.  Silent performance is what I think of when musicians listen in such a focussed way during performance of music this good.  No one soaked up the solos on the bandstand more than the non-soloists.  When Luther is soloing, you cannot help but be amazed.  But you cannot help taking a peek at Allan or Forbes or others silently playing along with him.  The whole experience is infectious.  These men genuinely love to hear each other perform and have no hesitation to hesitate while they do nothing but hear.  The evening consisted of two full sets of one group improvisation each.  The length of each piece offered plenty of opportunities for solos and group interaction, often with plenty of energy.  By this time in the evolution of the band I would not be surprised if each musician had his own set of groupies.  If so, they all were happy 2/26.  Although there were some spontaneous unison riffs by the two horns on occasion (just for the simple joy of being “together” no doubt), one of the most striking things about the band is the individuality of the voices.  When it is time for any band member to solo, it is apparent that the soloist does not construct music in the same way as anyone else in the band.  Steve may finish a whirlwind solo, passing it over to a completely different sequence of melody/shards created by Allan who passes his statement on to a high-speed barrage of notes from Forbes (or some other completely different note poetry from each).  It is a family of a band, and it is not surprising that many of the musician comments on the break were about family, causing some audience members to ponder the “family span” implied by father Forbes talking about his experiences with his two young sons with another child on the way and Joe revealing thoughts about his two children forging their own lives while he grapples with an empty nest.  Each musician is a superb improvisor, and the quintet as a group is stellar.  A stellar family.  Fans came out of the woodwork--even “as far away” as the Lily Pad--to welcome the ensemble home.  And those fans responded with an extended ovation at the end of the evening…


January

The cousins came from musical families.  Pianist and vocalist Paul Broadnax grew up with musician parents.  The father of his cousin Jeanne Lee was a concert and church vocal soloist.  Both cousins were wonderful musicians.  But there were significant differences.  Jeanne Lee died relatively young (age 59) in 2000.  Paul Broadnax was a nonagenarian who died this past year at age 92.  He wrote arrangements for Sabby Lewis and Count Basie, among others.  He loved many pianists but his primary influence was Nat Cole.  His vocal model was Joe Williams.  Jeanne Lee loved the work of Billie Holiday, but her vocal innovations opening the door to post-Ayler sonics are most obviously linked to her innovative elders, Betty Carter and Abbey Lincoln.  Broadnax and Lee shared genetics and aesthetic nurturing that resulted in brilliant envelope-pushing in two completely different forms of jazz.  Both musicians’ lives were celebrated recently, Paul Broadnax on 9/1 in Cambridge (as described in the September 2018 Journal) and Jeanne Lee on 1/27 at NEC’s Black Box Theatre.  Hers was a solo piano tribute by longtime partner Ran Blake.  When I showed up for the performance, like 80% of the attendees, I sat in the left bleachers of the room’s horseshoe-shaped seating.  All of us made the same mistake, trying to obtain a good view of the keyboard.  As the program booklet explained, the “concert will be as pitch-black dark as possible so that Ran Blake and audience members may close their eyes, listen, and reflect on the life and legacy of Jeanne Lee.”  And so Ran Blake with a support walker made it to the piano.  Once seated, he performed in darkness an introductory original, “I Remember Jeanne” and wisps of “We’ll Be Together Again.”  Still in darkness (except for necessary exit and safety lighting) he explained that he was asked to say a few appropriate words to the audience, but he chose to speak to Jeanne Lee instead.  We were invited to listen.  The conceit worked better than one might guess.  Ran Blake used the “conversation” as an opportunity to recall events they shared over the years as a context for comments about the music he intended to perform 1/27.  Along the way he told us of events, joyous and otherwise.  The two references that had the greatest emotional impact for me were his entrance to the church for the memorial service for Jeanne Lee in New York in which he encountered a barrage of musicians shilling their recordings and the description of Ran Blake and Jeanne Lee disrupting a plane flight with their hysterical mourning in reaction to the news of the slaughter of the four little black girls in the bombing of 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham on September 15, 1963.  The compositions performed, primarily drawn from their three duo recordings--The Newest Sound Around (1961), You Stepped Out of a Cloud (1989), and the brand new double-disk set of recordings from the mid-1960s, The Newest Sound You Never Heard--, were listed in the program booklet.  But a few, such as “A Cottage for Sale,” were added spontaneously by the pianist.  The music was presented as a single work--a wave of sound more than a suite--consisting of a sequence of melodies and barely hints of melodies pushed along in a rich and sometimes turbulent context.  The composition/improvisation/interpretation lasted for about forty-five minutes but seemed like five.  When the music ended, Ran and an assistant found their way out of the darkened venue.  Applause drew the pianist back to the darkened room for a brief encore ending with the melodic phrase “…sleep in heavenly peace” from Silent Night.  It was a fine celebration of Jeanne Lee and a special concert for Ran Blake fans.  They heard him at his best.  There were CDs for sale outside the performance space, but there was no Ran Blake to be found in that commercial busy-ness…

There is wisdom to be found in history.  We just tend to ignore what history can tell us.  For example, it is not long ago (but now it is history) that Donald Trump promised Mexico would pay for a wall at our southern border.  Now we find the President has decided we (federal employees and the rest of us) will have to pay for the wall.  What happened to those folks in Mexico?  I guess they just wouldn’t be bullied.  That’s history, too.  Two legendary figures of World War II come to mind regarding recent U.S. history.  The Washington Post (no surprise) not long ago found and printed this relevant “historical” quote from Charles De Gaulle: “Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism, when hate of people other than your own comes first.”  General George S. Patton is among the most quoted military leaders of World War Two.  One of his most famous quotes found its way into the celebrated film starring George C. Scott.  As scripted in the film, when someone suggested that attacking the bolstered German fortifications along the French border would pose a significant obstacle for U.S. troops, Patton replied, “Fixed fortifications are a monument to the stupidity of man.”  Our President supposedly is very much impressed by great military leaders, but most likely he never read anything substantive about Patton.  Even sitting through the movie might have been too much of a drain on his attention…

This is a jazz journal, but all the arts talk to each other.  Now and then I bring other parts of that conversation here.  In this case I refer specifically to the Borromeo String Quartet’s performance 1/16 at Jordan Hall.  The quartet has been wowing audiences here since the early 1990s, and for more than a decade I have been convinced that the group is the world’s greatest active “full-repertoire” string quartet.  I say “full-repertoire” because some quartets excel in the great 20th century repertoire, some have the Romantic period nailed, and so on.  The Juilliard Quartet broadcasts from the Library of Congress in the 1970s offered some wonderful performances of music from the Classical and early Romantic periods.  Today the quartet’s efforts in that repertoire sound tired, but more recent material seems to have inspired the group.  The Juilliard Quartet’s recordings of the Carter string quartets hold up well against other fine recordings of those works.  But somewhat convincing “full-repertoire” quartets are rare.  The Borromeo gang is a brilliant “full-repertoire” string quartet.  The 1/16 performance was a perfect demonstration of that fact.  They took the quartet from the form’s co-creator (Haydn) to the second half of the 20th century and presented music of three composers at the height of their artistic powers.  All of it thoroughly convincing.  The presentation was not chronological (for solid programming reasons).  They opened with Haydn’s Opus 71, No.1 performed marvelously and setting the audience up for the “what planet am I on?” experience (for most of them) of the 1968 Ligeti piece.  The second half of the concert was devoted to the Beethoven late work, Opus 127 which resulted in the loudest audience approval.  How anyone who loves string quartets would miss such an evening would be a puzzle.  And so I was there.  But mostly for the Ligeti.  We live in a time when the great art of the past 100 years--sonic or otherwise--takes a back seat to carefully chiseled pretense.  Therefore, not surprisingly, audience members near me in Jordan Hall exhibited everything from confusion to boredom to tears of joy.  So when I get a chance to witness art at such a high level as Ligeti’s Quartet No. 2 (more than half century old as it is), I jump.  And when I get something other than a lip service performance, the real deal, I jump for joy.  While I’m writing about such things, I should note that Bostonians can celebrate that they are blessed with what appears to be the only real challenge to the Borromeo Quartet as a great “full repertoire” string quartet.  I refer to the Parker Quartet in residence at Harvard, one of the few sonic lights at that institution these days.  I hasten to soften the word “challenge.”  Early in this century the Borromeo and the Parker Quartets had a teacher-student relationship at NEC.  And now the Parker Quartet has carved its own place in music with its own sonic personality (which you can check out 2/15 at Paine Hall when they do Xenakis and more at 8 p.m.).  The important thing is we Bostonians are the beneficiaries of these riches at NEC and Harvard…

Back when President Trump and his party pushed through the heralded “Tax Cut” bill, they claimed that the bill would pay for itself.  The New York Times recently (perhaps with an I-told-you-so tone) noted that the economy did grow by almost three percent in 2018.  But “federal tax revenues fell by 2.7 percent, or about $83 billion.”  The rich apparently did not put the big bucks back into the economy nor did they generate significant federal tax revenue (because of the bill).  Another way of looking at the lost tax revenue is that the pro-wall people in Washington could have built 14 walls (and had a lot of loose change left over) with the lost $83 billion in potential tax revenues.  As the Times reminds us, “The federal budget deficit is now on track to top $1 trillion this year.”  But that probably does not matter because it is easy to dismiss an amount of money that a potential voter cannot imagine…

Eric Rosenthal booked his second of two Point01Percent gigs this month at the Lily Pad on 1/22.  It featured the Pocket Aces and the KSR Trio.  A previous commitment prevented me from catching Pandelis Karayorgis, Damon Smith, and Eric, but fortunately they are booked to perform at the Lily Pad in February and March.  It had been at least a year since I had caught a Pocket Aces gig.  Eric Hofbauer, Aaron Darrell, and Curt Newton certainly keep in touch musically on a regular basis, through Explorers Club performances and other events.  So the Lily Pad gig was not a conversation among strangers.  The music of the current version of the trio is different nevertheless.  The most obvious difference is in architecture and “subject matter.”  Fans of Pocket Aces music have come to expect sonics grounded in composition, originals or classics.  The latest incarnation of the Pocket Aces has abandoned sustained written melody as a creative ground in favor of sequences of snippets of melody as the basic vehicles for creative sonics.  I cannot tell whether the (often repeated) brief sequences of notes (and/or rhythmic patterns) are composed or completely improvised.  Or a combination of both (the option that sounds most likely).  I have not discussed the nature of the music vehicle with band members.  In any case, the result is a sonic base of evolving sounds that evoke world cultures and pop folk music (sometimes together) over which and throughout each musician improvises--often quite stunningly--while supporting comparable efforts by the other two musicians.  The effect often is eye-popping and ear-popping.  The men never stop playing their butts off, except in moments when it is time for a duo or solo showcase.  There is a lot happening here, music that requires focussed attention on the part of the audience (and presumably the members of the trio).  But for me there is a “but.”  I’m trying to come up with a functional analogy, and analogies always include problems.  But let’s try a walk down the street.  I watch the other people going my way--some walking fast; others slow; some “dancing,” some marching.  As I walk I see magic light bounce off the awning of a passing building.  Someone’s selling popcorn.  Two people are arguing while another couple is kissing.  And it all zips by at an impressive clip.  The experience is quite impressive, even affecting.  But there is a voice in the back of my head informing me that I don’t know where I am or where I am going or why.  I am impressed by the details, but I am unable to transcend them.  I look forward to a chance to re-orient myself on the next Pocket Aces gig…

My personal friends realize that for me clothes fashions are among the least compelling aspects of human culture.  Nevertheless, the February J.Jill catalogue did catch my eye.  The current J.Jill marketing campaign features a celebration of music and important women in the realm of pop, jazz, and classical music.  For example, internationally renowned concert violinist Anne Akiko Meyers is shown in the catalogue playing the violin and wearing--you guessed it--J.Jill clothes.  In the catalogue’s take on the jazz world, full pages are devoted to “stylish” musicians Regina Carter and Berklee’s Tia Fuller.  It is easy to be cynical about such things.  But clothes-buying females decide J.Jill’s bottom line, and a celebration of women pursuing music who make our lives better is a pretty fine way for the company to say thank you.  In a world in which sales campaigns tend to be crass it is good to see some class.  There is even a place on the J.Jill web site that has information about the careers of the celebrated women and even upcoming gigs.  Applause…
Update 1/7/19: There is local coverage of Tia Fuller in the Improper Bostonian (January 30, p. 10) in which Nathan Tavares points out that her latest album us up for a Grammy.  If Fuller wins the Grammy, she will be the second female to win that award in the jazz instrumental album category.  Apparently the only other female to win that award is Terri Lyne Carrington (2013), also on the Berklee faculty…

According to BBC.com, during the past six years at least 259 people world-wide have died while taking selfies.  Death occurred (in order of frequency) from drowning, transportation mishaps (e.g., taking a selfie in front of an oncoming train), and falls from cliffs, water falls, and buildings.  One might think of it as technological weeding of the herd…

The audience 1/17 at the Outpost finally got a chance to hear the complete Explorers Club arrangement of Duke Ellington’s “I Got It Bad and That Ain’t Good.”  Almost.  Eric Hofbauer was on hand to offer his wonderfully spikey intro to the piece, followed by Charlie’s arrangement of the work as performed by the full sextet.  It is one of the best arrangements in the Explorers book these days.  As reported in the December Journal, Eric was on tour during the December gig and could not perform his introductory statement then.  So we almost heard the complete arrangement 1/17.  But not quite.  Percussionist Curt Newton was preoccupied making decisions and shuffling papers on the way to a new abode in Jamaica Plain.  A full Explorers ensemble minus drums is a new experience for me.  Very interesting.  And handled just fine by Charlie, Eric, Seth Meicht, Daniel Rosenthal, Jeb Bishop, and Aaron Darrell.  Longtime jazz fans will not be surprised that the ensemble work brought to mind what used to be called “chamber jazz.”  Aaron and Eric took up all the rhythm section chores, and all the horns chugged right along.  One of the positive results of the change is that the horns seemed to be listening to each other with greater focus.  The section work was brilliantly richer than usual--although “usual” ain’t bad.  So when Curt returns we can hear the complete complete arrangement of “I Got It Bad.”  In any event, it was a fine evening of terrific music that was topped off with the announcement that Eric and wife Elizabeth are expecting a daughter in May.  Hey, in 20 years she might be featured with another great Explorers ensemble…

Typically one expects the Wall Street Journal to be supportive of President Trump’s policies.  So we offer a tip of the cap to that paper for going against the grain.  In a recent issue the Wall Street Journal stated, “U.S. coal use fell to 691 tons in 2018, the lowest level since 1979.”  The paper claims coal use is down because of the falling costs of wind and solar power.  And that is good news…

The Joe Hunt Trio--with Yuka Hamano Hunt, and Shane Allession--returned to the Lily Pad 1/27.  This time the group featured the music of Bill Evans, Thelonious Monk, Charlie Parker and a variety of classics.  No complaints from me or anyone else in the audience regarding that programming.  And the playing was quite fine also.  There was a balance check/warm-up before the gig.  It was brief.  I could not make out the tune, but the changes and rhythmic patterns sounded like those of “Night and Day.”  Because that music was the first piece of the evening, I got a wonderful chance to hear that it was indeed a marvelous Yuka transformation of “Night and Day,” an arrangement that revealed the original melody while causing the listener--at least this listener--to re-hear the music.  I hope her take on the Cole Porter classic becomes a Joe Hunt Trio classic.  Among the fine Monk works exploited to fine effect was “Nutty,” featuring a delightful arco intro by Shane Allession.  Apparently the bassist loves arco playing, and that can be a fine occasional surprise solo.  However, he solos somewhat too frequently that way, making the improvisations sound a bit too predictable.  While studying in Boston in the 1930s Slam Stewart picked up the bow-and-hum technique from violinist Ray Perry.  I now consider for the first time that his successful adaptation of the technique to double bass may have been the result of an attempt to bring sonic variety to arco performance.  Offering an element of surprise even after several hearings.  It’s possible.  After all, it certainly did work.  Nevertheless, Shane Allession’s work throughout the evening was quite fine, supportive and creative.  And the music continued, perhaps with a nod to Diz and Bird in a fine ¾ performance of “All the Things You Are.”  Then there was the closer.  No Bill Evans or Monk or Parker.  How nice to say goodnight with the endless fount of creativity and inspiration, Edward Ellington.  Well, it was Ellington’s band, but the 1941 gem, “Johnny Come Lately,” came from the pen of Duke’s joined-at-the-hip--really hip--partner, Billy Strayhorn.  What a fine sendoff…

This month I received an email from Boston Baroque, the early music performance ensemble, telling me (and presumably many others) that they have chosen to join other arts organizations in sponsoring the EBT Card Culture program.  EBT (Electronic Benefits Transfer) cards can be used by Massachusetts residents who rely on support from the Department of Transitional Assistance to attend arts events and facilities throughout Massachusetts at a significant discount.  For example, as of now people can use their EBT cards to witness Boston Baroque season performances for five dollars each.  The discount in this case is truly significant.  For more information about the state-wide program, visit the EBT Card Culture program site…

We debated--Steve Lantner and I--the last time the classic Steve Lantner Quartet performed in Cambridge.  There was a lot of time fuzz blocking memories, but perhaps last spring was the last time.  Too long.  And the fanatics were at the Outpost 1/22 to welcome the return of Steve, Allan Chase, Joe Morris, and Luther Gray.  I was a bit late arriving but caught a good chunk of the first set and all of the second set.  Joe had been away from the acoustic bass too long--his assessment--and helped meet his technical challenges with bandages.  Not that anyone would notice from his playing.  It is important to state that any Steve Lantner ensemble--solo to much much larger--is definitely worth checking out.  But the classic quartet that showed up 1/22 has established a unique sonic footprint that features an extra level of room-filling energy and a special personality-driven rapport that is quite remarkable among groups I am familiar with.  Not surprisingly, the through-the-roof energy carried most of the music 1/22.  But there were superb moments of introspection that suggested the marvelous artistic range of these guys.  If that’s not enough, Steve claims these same musicians will return in February and bolstered by the brass work of Forbes Graham to turn this monster into a quintet…