Welcome to Boston Jazz Scene

Welcome to the Boston Jazz Scene web site--the place to find out what happened, what is happening, and what is coming in jazz and other improvised music in Boston and surrounding communities. The most recent post is listed below this information. Words listed below the Topics heading to the right refer to information you can find here about jazz and other improvised music, the arts in general, food, and travel in and near Boston.

If you click on the Scheduled Jazz Highlights topic, you will see a selection of upcoming jazz gigs that we think are particularly noteworthy.

If you click on one of the History - Jazz Journal topics, you will see a selection of journal entries covering performances and relevant events that have taken place in Boston since the 1970s.

If you click on the History - Major Contributors topic, you will see a list of Bostonian musicians who have made significant contributions to the development and evolution of jazz in Boston and elsewhere.

If you click on the Images - Musicians topic, you will see a selection of photos of current and former Boston area jazz musicians and significant visiting jazz musicians. If photos of musicians are displayed on this page and you click on Older Posts at the bottom of this page, you will see earlier image pages eventually going back to page 1.

If you click on the Images - Venues topic, you will see a selection of photos of current and former Boston area jazz venue locations.

If you click on the History - Jazz Timeline topic, you will see a brief list of significant events in the development and evolution of jazz in Boston beginning with the first groundwork in colonial America.

If you click on the Essays on Music topic, you will see essays about the development of jazz and other music since the late nineteenth century and particularly the evolving context in which the music has been and continues to be created.

If you click on one of the Travel options, you will see a variety of information that may be of interest to people visiting Boston (or even some people who live here).

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Jazz Journal - 2018

December

Early in the program Grace Hughes sang “Were You There on that Christmas Night?”  When music director Mark Harvey announced the work his tongue slipped.  He used the word “Morn” rather than “Night.”  As Grace finished singing the first line she chose to use Mark’s “Morn” but astutely retained the original rhyme with “Night” at the end of the second line.  It was all handled so sure-footedly that I doubt many in attendance noticed the sleight of tongue.  The comfortable “footwork” of the vocalist was indicative of the preparedness and in-the-moment skills of the entire Aardvark Jazz Orchestra--Arni Cheatham, Peter Bloom, Phil Scarff, Chris Rakowski, Dan Zupan, KC Dunbar, Jeanne Snodgrass, Bob Pilkington, Jay Kaiser, Jeff Marsanskis, Bill Lowe, Richard Nelson, John Funkhouser, Harry Wellott, Grace Hughes, and Mark Harvey.  The performance was the band’s 46th annual Christmas Concert.  Imagine that--a jazz-rooted Christmas event lasting so many decades.  And bringing out so many fans year after year, some obviously knowing little about jazz but having a ball anyway.  Along with a variety of Christmas music both familiar and less well known the orchestra performed three Mark Harvey works to close out the evening.  The Prophet was written for Kip Tiernan twenty years ago in celebration of Rosie’s Place (which is perhaps the best known of several civil rights action groups founded by Tiernan).  In fact the evening was a Christmas message about the life of the remarkable activist and a fund-raiser for the Poor Peoples United Fund, another important organization founded by Kip Tiernan to battle homelessness and poverty.  Then the orchestra presented Healers of the Universe, the first complete, full-orchestra performance of the work, a celebration of the life of Kip Tiernan.  Mark Harvey’s raucous Benedictus closed out the evening.  Audience enthusiasm was enough to warrant an “out of control” version of “Jingle Bells.”  There was a lot of music 12/8 at Emmanuel Church in Boston, and there were a lot of highlights.  Among my favorite moments was the alto sax work of Arni Cheatham in solos and support of the fine singing of Grace Hughes in “The Cradle of Bethlehem.”  The home run composition/arrangement was Mark Harvey’s Healers of the Universe, the best writing of the evening inspiring the orchestra’s best section work and improvisations of the night.  Applause.  If you would like to know more about the profound work of Kip Tiernan, you might start online here

I do not write about private house performances.  I feel that such coverage might cause future problems for the generous person(s) providing the space.  But I must mention briefly one such event 12/21 (minus the location) if for no other reason than it offered music fans a chance to witness superb improvising veterans Jane Wang and Matt Samolis sharing bowed metal responsibilities for part of the evening.  It was note-worthy sonically but also for the rarity of such a fine confluence of special talent.  Every now and then these things happen…

For some band members and some audience members it was the last Explorers gig of 2018.  So there was a bit of holiday cheer in the air, in spite of the crumbling political and economic situation.  It would be different if Republicans were driven by a moral core and Democrats had brains.  But, except for a few international decisions, it is apparent that Washington will continue rolling along off the rails.  For me it was an evening of music as antidote.  This sextet version of the Explorers--Charlie Kohlhase, Seth Meicht, Dan Rosenthal, Josiah Reibstein, Curt Newton, and guest Tony Leva--showed up ready to play.  It was the first time I had caught Tony with this band, and he more than fit in.  He obviously was very comfortable with these guys and put his round sound bass stamp on the music.  The band opened with a blues, as Charlie is wont to do on these sessions.  It does seem to be an effective way to get the band off the ground and flying for the rest of the evening.  All of the music--featuring compositions by the leader, John Tchicai, Elmo Hope, and other notables--by now is quite familiar to most Explorers fans.  And to our good fortune, the musicians use that familiarity as a jumping off point to new sonics and ideas, rather than an excuse for sleep walking.  Also, the instrumentation/personnel grouping works so well sonically.  The ensemble voicings of trumpet and tuba are wonderful, but the engaging contrast in solo work by Josiah and Dan is equally impressive.  It becomes apparent to anyone enjoying this music that one of the great joys of this band is that reedmen Seth and Charlie do not think at all alike when it is time to solo.  One delightful recent programming surprise is the addition of Ellington’s “I Got It Bad and That Ain’t Good” to the band’s book.  It’s a work familiar to all jazz fans that was included in the list of mandatory tunes established for the Jazz Along the Charles festival this year.  As I mentioned in the September issue of this Journal, band members were so impressed by Eric Hofbauer’s solo guitar performance and Charlie’s arrangement for his quintet gig on that day--and the fact that the two perspectives on the work were so different--that they were pushing for some way to combine the two arrangements within a new arrangement for the band.  Well, it has happened, and I heard part of that arrangement 12/20 at the Outpost.  The new arrangement features Eric using his arrangement as an intro to the work which continues with the full band performing Charlie’s arrangement.  Unfortunately for us, Eric was on an extended tour/vacation 12/20 (however fine that must be for Eric).  Fortunately for us, what’s left of the new arrangement--sounding very new while retaining the core of the Ellington original--is quite fine.  I look forward to the complete arrangement when Eric returns to the band.  With these guys there’s always something to look forward to…

Once again we find ourselves facing continuing news about how wonderful software-driven technology is.  What many of us curmudgeons have feared seems to be true.  There is no “I told you so” factor here.  Believe me, I would prefer to be wrong.  Children spending more than two hours per day looking at screens exhibit significant negative characteristics.  Not only that.  Two-thirds of U.S. children spend more than two hours each day looking at those screens.  Laura Sanders in a recent issue of Science News reports that a study of 4,500 8-to-11 year olds suggests young people’s use of smartphones, tablets, and televisions is bad for the brains of those children.   The data gathered is part of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.  Children on average spent 3.6 hours per day using screens for video games and other activities.  Children who spent less than two hours per day on screens scored about 4 percent higher than other children on a battery of thinking-related tests.  As Sanders notes, “When analyzed on their own, sleep and physical activity didn’t seem to influence test results.”  More research is needed.  For example, Michael Rich of Boston’s Children’s Hospital points out that “it could be that smarter kids are less likely to spend lots of time on screens.”  Well, duh…  Katrina Brooker in an issue of Vanity Fair earlier this year claims that Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, is “horrified by what has become of his creation.”  The Web was designed, says Berners-Lee, to make the “individual incredibly empowered.  It was all based on there being no central authority that you had to go to ask permission.”  The Web, he says, “has failed instead of served humanity,” citing Google, Amazon, Facebook, and “rampant spying by government agencies…  Enough is enough.  Get out your Magic Marker and your signboard and your broomstick.  And go out on the streets.”  But maybe it’s too late…

It was the eve before Christmas Eve and most people were traveling or preparing or partying.  Nevertheless, a good-sized crowd of jazz fans (including females) showed up to see and hear the Joe Hunt Quintet.  No doubt a major attraction was “the regulars”--Joe, Yuka Hamano Hunt, and Keala Kaumehiewa.  But this time there was a bonus, visitors John Eckert and Mark Pinto.  Both had done a bit of traveling.  Mark lives in Stoneham but he had been in New Hampshire since 10 a.m. rehearsing and eventually performing there with a big band (perhaps offering echoes of his many gigs with Herb Pomeroy).  He had come directly from that gig and was--even by his own account--exhausted.  John traveled farther.  He was in town from New York visiting relatives.  There was virtually no conventional rehearsal time.  “All our rehearsals were via email,” Joe announced.  That’s how they decided the set list, keys, and other music matters.  As announced 12/23 at the Lily Pad, the evening was a celebration of the joys of bebop.  And the music performed--including everything from “Quasimodo” to “Four” to “It Never Entered My Mind”--could be the basis of an ideal Bebop Fakebook.  The rhythm section was its usual peerless self.  John with both trumpet and flugelhorn (showing greater facility on the former) nailed the charts and offered thoughtful creativity in his well-received solos.  Mark with alto sax fooled the god Hypnos, either that or he carried out some of the most exhilarating sleep walking I’ve witnessed in solos or anywhere else.  In other words, it was a fine evening of music, bebop music.  And it was the perfect bebop audience with foot-tapping and seat-dancing throughout the room…

Completely improvised solo performance is one of the most daunting presentations a musician can pursue.  In addition to a variety of special challenges involved in the presentation, musicians (and certainly fans) cannot understand the extent of the creative burden until one has experienced fully the first solo gig.  It is amazing how fast one’s brilliant ideas come and go, leaving one naked on the bandstand.  More than once I have heard a musician recall the first improvised solo set.  The recollection goes something like, “I had just offered everything I had to say.  I was empty, ready to take a bow.  I looked at my watch and realized that I had been playing for ten minutes.”  Once a musician goes through that nightmare, he or she has a much more realistic understanding of what a full solo set of completely improvised music entails.  As ready as a musician might be, the prospect remains daunting.  But apparently not for Curt Newton.  Warm, ebullient, and cool as a cuke before the gig 12/11, Curt was about to take on his second completely improvised solo performance in less than a year.  In both cases he was wise enough to set himself up at intimate performance spaces, earlier at MIT Chapel and now at Café Fixe in Brookline.    Apparently the word got out.  All seats were taken, and there were some fans standing and others sitting on the floor.  A good audience.  The only sounds made during the set of music came from the drum kit and accessories.  It is difficult to try to suggest the sequence of events at a percussion concert in which even the “familiar” is unfamiliar and there are no clichés.  The setup was fairly conventional--bass drum, snare, two toms, hi-hat, and cymbals.  He used a mallet, sticks, a brush, hands, and a variety of accoutrements--toys, rags, and metal bowls among them.  There are many ways in which a series of solo improvisations may be perceived.  In this case I heard Curt’s performance to a great extent as biographical.  Yes, I know that any improvised solo is a type of statement of “who I am.”  But this night I heard--however flawed my hearing may be--a biographical narrative.  Here was a story for all to see and hear--everything from Curt’s wonderful “battle” via stick and bare hand with a rag that wanted to dance and then to his dissertation using small bowls and other metal objects that came across as a “thank you” to Paul Lovens without in any way mimicking the German master.  “Look what I’ve taken from you,” Curt seemed to say, “to help me become me.”  Of course, Curt’s story is larger than all that.  There was much more to the narrative, often via startling technique--but technique never was the point.  After such a compelling sonic journey the audience responded enthusiastically.  An encore?  Curt responded with his drum transcription of a piece composed by Ornette Coleman.  He reached back to “Some Other,” a 1960 recording finally released in the 1970s on To Whom Who Keeps a Record.  Curt said he chose that composition because he wanted to evoke “some other place and time,” when the world would be a better home.  All of us shared a special hour, and Curt sent us out the door with hope.  Quite a fine gig…

By now most people are aware of the fact that the national debt is very large and growing.  Instead of compromising on the most recent budget (you know, that masterful process in which neither side gets all of what it wants and the citizens benefit), the two parties decided not to do much haggling.  The result is that both sides got what they wanted, and the American public lost.  The tax burden was exacerbated by a tax bill that gave people in the bottom 80% of the economy virtually meaningless tax breaks but huge tax breaks to the top 20% economically (of course, including almost everyone in Congress) and big business.  For example, according to an H&R Block handout regarding the new tax law, a single fictitious worker named Jessica making $29,350 annually in 2017 and 2018, would get a tax break resulting in her paying $604.00 less in Federal taxes in 2018.  That works out to slightly less than $1.66 per day.  On the positive side, I do not believe there is a tax stipulation that Jessica has to spend her tax break in more than one place.  On the other hand, if Jessica were in the top 20% income bracket (not even near the top of that bracket; let’s say a half million dollars annual income) she would have made out a little bit better on her taxes.  Our better off fictitious worker named Jessica making $500,000 annually in 2017 and 2018, would get a tax break resulting in her paying $58,927.85 less in Federal taxes in 2018.  Hey, that tax break is significantly better than the less well off Jessica’s total annual income, in fact slightly more than double the non-rich Jessica’s annual gross income.  I’m guessing if the less well off Jessica worked out the tax law, it probably would be different.  Yes, there is no question the Jessica Tax Cuts and Job Act would be different from the Trump Tax Cuts and Job Act.  In addition to throwing money at people who do not need more money, the tax bill is a problem for all of us.  It’s a two-pronged pincer movement against the average American--a huge tax burden coupled with significantly reduced federal tax income to pay for the burden.  So here’s the fallout: Ritholz.com recently released the research report of Deutsch Bank on the state of the U.S. economy in 2017.  Yes, 2017.  It takes a while to crunch those numbers.  As Deutsch Bank tells us, “Interest alone on the U.S. Government’s rising debt reached $1.5 billion a day in 2017.”  That’s $1.5 billion per day in interest.  To put that figure in context, consider the Bal Harbor Shops, the high end shopping mall in Miami Beach, FL.  Total annual sales for that mall are approximately $1.5 billion.  That’s per year.  That information makes the federal deficit mess a bit clearer.  There are ways we can lower the debt.  We can make the rich slightly more uncomfortable by cutting back the tax breaks for the top 20% income folks, or we can screw the bottom 80% by cutting back on entitlements such as Social Security and Medicare.  Or some kind of compromise.  But our politicians have lost the will to compromise…

It was the evening after Christmas, but there was a solid crowd at the Lily Pad attentively ready at the scheduled 7:30 start time.  They wanted to see what Charlie Kohlhase was up to, and almost exactly at 7:30 he counted off the first music of the evening, letting fans know exactly what he was up to.  Instead of the larger Explorers combo, Charlie brought what he called his “Explorers Trio” to the gig.  And it was nothing like Charlie’s more typical Explorers ensembles.  Except for the play list.  Even the “unusual” works of the evening were less well known only because he hadn’t played them in several months.  So Charlie and the guys--Jef Charland and Curt Newton--were doing the same charts as the larger groups, but they were doing something different with them.  Something special.  I was not quite sure going into the gig what Charlie was going to do.  After all, it was potentially a great showcase for Charlie’s instrumental talents, particularly with such outstanding support likely from his trio band mates.  But he chose to make the night a celebration of music in general and the specific brilliance of Jef and Curt.  In that process he reminded us inevitably of his own extraordinary reed talents.  The opening blues was a perfect case in point.  Typically Charlie opens each gig with a blues that has an evolving moniker relevant to some recent Trump administration blunder.  The title for the piece 12/26 was “Do You Still Believe in Santa Clause?”  Familiar but very different.  The trio opened on fire, growling and screeching and thundering at a level I’ve never heard from a Charlie Kohlhase ensemble.  No prisoners.  But that was merely the stunning surface impact.  Even more compelling (if that was possible) is what happened to each of the musicians.  The music was all about each musician in the trio context.  The stage became wider.  Each musician was given his own substantial creative music space.  So, yes, there was Charlie with horn (alto, tenor, or baritone) out front blowing fans back a couple rows.  But during that solo and after there was plenty of space for bass and drums to take over the stage.  Take over the room.  Take over Cambridge.  For example, Jef took an extended “Explorers” intro solo that was a substantial thesis about the piece so compelling I was surprised that I saw no one in the audience taking notes.  Wonderful.  By the time his bass work told us explicitly what (i.e., the melody) he was telling us about, I half expected Charlie and Curt to become statues, refusing to come in and carry out the specifics of the chart (which they nevertheless did quite compellingly).  And Curt.  One of the things I enjoyed most about the evening is that the expanded bandstand gave Explorers fans a chance to see and hear what a truly extraordinary Boston treasure the drummer is.  The nice thing about that experience is that the moments of solo free rein, as wonderful as they are in themselves, offered an opportunity for people to see and hear just how amazing Curt (ears and all) is, even while he is making Jef and Charlie sound so good.  And all of that is such a fine indicator of who Charlie is--so good that he is not hesitant to show us how terrific his band mates are.  A true jazz icon.  And three brilliant jazz musicians opening the door to hopefully a better New Year…

With the end of one year and a new one arriving, perhaps I was thinking about where improvised and other new music might be going.  In any case, out of nowhere I recalled an ancient story I once encountered.  I say “ancient” because I encountered the story when I was in elementary school.  My memory tells me it happened in a barbershop while I waited to get a haircut.  To kill time I picked up a science fiction comic book.  In those days science fiction probably was more popular than it is today.  Ubiquitous--the Science Fiction Book Club (which put you on a waiting list to be among the first commercial passengers to go to the moon; I signed up and still am waiting), TV shows, the Science Fiction Theater radio show every weekday, and of course countless cinema space adventures.  The comic book sci-fi adventure I encountered so many decades ago was about a passionate violinist whose life was music.  But his playing--it did not say whether his music was composed or improvised--certainly was original and poorly received.  However, the reception was not quite like the aggressive rejection of new music that we typically associate with first performances of Berg’s Altenberg Lieder or the May 15, 1958 performance of Cage’s Concert for Piano and Orchestra or music of countless jazz performances.  No, the violinist’s performances did not cause rage or anything like it.  Rather it was almost the opposite.  His violin performances caused people to fall asleep.  At first it was family and friends.  As he grew older occasionally he was able to talk someone into giving him a gig.  The result was dozens--perhaps hundreds--of people falling asleep at once.  Miraculously he got himself a TV gig and put people all over the country to sleep, no doubt with some kind of calamitous results.  Confronting reality and unable to put away his instrument, the violinist spent the next years of his life walking the woods and hills playing to the rocks, trees, and grasses.  This behavior continued for some time.  Then, in the final panels of the comic story, we see the mature musician sawing away at his violin, hair flowing in the breeze and complete satisfaction radiating from his face.  The last panel is a pull-back shot of the performance, revealing the slender artist making sounds for a fully attentive audience of aliens from apparently a variety of different planets.  I recall this memory because it may be entertaining to readers but especially for those of you who occasionally find yourselves pausing in midstep, looking around, and saying to yourselves, “Why am I here?  I know I’m not from this planet.”  Happy New Year…


 November  

I missed a ton of fine jazz gigs this month.  Some of that loss was due to typical November activities--interstate travel, family connections, and Turkey Day events.  But the real killer for me was a bug that invaded my home for more than two weeks.  I can’t remember the last time I was in bed with a sore throat for several days in a row.  So coverage of local jazz performances this month is slim.  But there are other recent developments--political and artistic--that warrant comment and perhaps your consideration…

As some fans of the music know by now, the Outpost website domain was shut down this month.  It was a surprise for one of the most important performance venues in the Boston area and a vital center for the presentation of post-Ayler jazz in particular.  Concerned, I attempted to contact via email producer Rob Chalfen about the shutdown.  I had no idea whether it was a glitch or even if the venue itself was closed.  Rob did respond, saying that the venue is indeed up and running.  I have heard that Rob is attempting to renew the original web site domain.  We wish him the best success in his attempts to solve the problem…

Regarding the recent elections for US Senate and House seats, a friend sent me the following unattributed statement.  There seems to be something to the argument:


Some elderly fans can remember when every major city in New England had at least one daily paper that featured a jazz column one or two times per week.  In the 1950s and well into the last quarter of the 20th century there were jazz listings at least twice per week and some form of “jazz column” about live gigs at least once per week in the Boston Herald and the Boston Globe featuring the observations of such respected writers as Ernie Santosuosso, Bob Young, Bob Blumenthal, and others.  Today coverage of jazz by the Herald and the Globe is sporadic, unpredictable, and invariably about the local performance of some international star or the passing of one of the jazz giants--each type of story often somehow coming across as indistinguishable from the other.  Even in New York the weekly reviews of jazz gigs by Gary Giddins in the Village Voice and Nate Chinen in the New York Times are gone.  As in the case of Boston (where you can find live jazz coverage at this web site and elsewhere online), New York jazz gigs are documented exclusively on a scheduled basis online only.  Until recently.  On 1/1 of this year (Happy New Year!) the New York Times announced the birth of a new monthly “live jazz” column featuring the writing of Giovanni Russonello, who was not unfamiliar to New York area jazz fans.  The difference in this commitment was the predictability of its nature.  At the beginning of each month the Times would publish reviews of jazz gigs that took place in the previous month.  The idea is something like this Jazz Journal for Boston area events, but significantly the coverage was taking place in print--New York Times print.  A major newspaper has been paying Giovanni Russonello to review several jazz performances in New York City each month.  In addition to that aspect of the commitment is the fact that it is likely most of the musicians covered are relatively unknown to jazz fans, even in New York.  To his credit (and the newspaper’s), Giovanni Russonello is eschewing the easy path of drawing readers with names such as John Patitucci, Dave Holland, or Pat Metheny.  Instead he “introduces” probably most of us to the likes of Marquis Hill, Nioka Workman, and Thomas Morgan.  Yes, most of the groups I’ve seen referenced in his monthly feature are rooted in bebop, pop fusion, or ethnic influences on chord cycle jazz (with a little composed European music for spice).  He seems to cover perhaps less than desirable quantities of completely free stuff or arrangements devoid of chord cycles and non-chronometric pulse.  But he obviously is open-minded.  And the New York Times “experiment” is just beginning.  May it soar…     

Harvard University offers gifts to the rest of us sometimes, such as this quote from physicist Niels Bohr in the Harvard Business Review: “An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field.”

According to National Geographic (10/17/18), the salt that we use every day is contaminated with micro-plastics, pieces of plastic that are smaller than 1/5 inch.  The study examined 39 brands of salt in 21 countries (including the U.S.) and found that 90 percent of the salt samples contained micro-plastics.  Not surprisingly the plastics are harmful, affecting human immune responses and the transmission of toxic chemicals and pathogens.  Because of huge amounts of plastic waste in the oceans, sea salt is the most contaminated, followed by lake salt and rock salt.  The report estimates that the average adult consumes 2,000 pieces of micro-plastic every year.  I saw nothing about a way to filter salt in your home effectively…
Update 1/12/19: I pursued the problem of plastic particles in salt and soon discovered that the choice of less contaminated kinds of salt such as lake salt and rock salt offered their own set of problems, including difficulty of availability and/or having less than desirable applications for human consumption.  However, there is salt available that is completely free of plastic contamination.  Unfortunately only one brand of uncontaminated salt is available in the U.S.  Redmond Real Salt is mined ancient (i.e., long before we had plastic bottles and toys) sea salt found in Utah.  It is available in local stores such as Whole Foods and online.  One caveat: It contains no iodine.  So you have to obtain your daily iodine from another source, such as food supplements and (better yet) healthy foods such as fish and other sea food, seaweed, kelp, cranberries, strawberries, and green, leafy vegetables.  You probably will not be surprised to discover that Redmond Real Salt is more expensive than common sea salt, but using it may keep you alive longer to continue weighing the costs vs. the costs…

For the second set of Eric Rosenthal’s monthly series at the Lily Pad 11/14 Eric brought Nate McBride (acoustic bass and electric basses) to the stage for Nate’s second gig of the night.  Eric brought some out-of-town brass also.  Ellwood Epps (tpt) came from the North (i.e., Montreal) and Stephen Haynes (cornet) came from the South (i.e., CT) to have a reunion of sorts, sharing the reunion with the two Bostonians.  The event was more than bringing together people from three geographic areas.  Fortunately for all in attendance, the two upper brass musicians (Stephen Haynes also brought out a flugelhorn on occasion) think differently musically.  For the most part Ellwood Epps is a sound sculptor and Stephen Haynes is a conversationalist/lyricist on their horns.  And that difference generally worked in a fine complementary way.  If that wasn’t enough, Nate and Eric were on fire, making music worth any audience member’s presence in itself.  I got the feeling that even I could get up on the stage and make beautiful sounds with them in back of me (I jest of course).  But their dancing context was quite wonderful.  In spite of all that, there was one glitch.  A group statement of free music can last for an hour or more, but there is no rule that specifies how long a “piece” should be.  I’ve heard superb free music statements that lasted for five minutes or even three.  But, as I’ve mentioned on occasion in this Journal before, one of the keys to mastering free playing is knowing when to stop.  It’s a problem sometimes in straight-ahead playing, but it’s a more common problem in free playing.  Stephen Haynes apparently is experienced enough that he does not seem to have that problem, but he and the “rhythm section” found themselves coming up with sounds apparently in an attempt to keep Ellwood Epps from hanging out to dry.  The “endless” false endings did not destroy the evening, but I found myself recalling the exchange between Miles and Coltrane when Miles called out the saxophonist for that problem.  Coltrane somewhat apologetically explained that he would get going and get carried away.  Miles’ response (and perhaps I paraphrase) was, “Just take the horn out of your mouth.”  So simple.  At least it seems so simple…

Unless your income is in the top 20% this year in the U.S., that famous Trump “tax cut” is not helping you enough to compensate for related economic developments.  Two of those developments probably are enough to clobber you.  According to CNBC.com, the consumer price index--you know, the cost of basics such as gasoline, produce, and haircuts--rose by 2.8% in May, the biggest annual gain since 2012.  And, if you are “lucky” enough to have a home and mortgage, you likely are losing a significant tax break this year.  About 32 million filers took a mortgage-interest federal tax deduction last year.  But in 2018 the total of filers pursuing that deduction is projected to plummet to fewer than half that number.  The number drops to 14 million because the Trump “tax cut” nearly doubles the standard deduction to $12,000 for singles and $24,000 for married couples.  This means that, if you own a home, you cannot take advantage of the smaller tax deduction you had on your last federal taxes.  But you don’t have to own a home to get burned.  According to the Wall Street Journal, a couple in 2017 needed greater than $12,700 in write-offs to benefit from listing deductions on Schedule A.  In 2018 the write-offs have to exceed $24,000.  In other words, you have to be rich enough to have more than $24,000 in write-offs to get the benefit.  Now put the average person’s economic status in the context of the recent national congressional results.  If you accept the results of the Senate races to be a reflection of the status of the Electoral College and the results of the House races to be a reflection of the status of the popular vote (as most pundits do), then the outcome of the 2018 elections is a repetition of the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election.  That fact raises the question: If the economic status of the bottom 80% of the population is worse than it was in 2015 and still deteriorating, are the recent House and Senate results a reflection of the fact that 1) the 80% is ignoring reality, 2) the 80% is feeling the economic crunch but not enough to abandon the President, or 3) the Democrats are so incompetent and confused that the “Electoral College” majority of voters has decided to stick with the greedy party that lacks a moral compass in lieu of the party of stupidity…

Maybe white middle-aged men without college degrees are not ready to blame Republicans and the President for the everyday economic woes via the ballot box.  But there is another way for people to demonstrate economic satisfaction or dissatisfaction.  According to The Economist and The Week (issue 902, p. 16), the global suicide rate has dropped 29% since 2000 because of “improvements in the quality of life.”  Good for the globe.  On the other hand, the U.S. suicide rate has risen 18% since 2000, “mostly because of the decline in the quality of life for white middle-aged men without college degrees.”  Some people vote with their feet.  Some people vote at the ballot box.  Some people vote in absentia…

On the hopeful side, the Texarkana (Arkansas) Gazette in a recent editorial points out that red state Arkansas voters are not “dumb.”  They do not believe the conservative arguments that raising the minimum wage will create job losses and higher prices.  “And,” claims the editorial, “they know that despite the soaring economy, high corporate profits, and rising executive compensation, not much has trickled down for them.”  As a result of that insight, Arkansans voted to raise the minimum wage in the state in 2014 and again this month with 68% of the voters supporting the increase to $11.00 per hour.  Another red state, Mississippi (you know, the state with the victory of Cindy “I’m just a cowgirl” Hyde-Smith over Mike Espy), did the same this month, voting a minimum wage increase to $12.00.  “Both business and lawmakers failed,” said the editorial, “to pay attention to--or worse, just didn’t care about--the very real struggles of low income Arkansans.”  We may be seeing a lot of ballot questions in upcoming elections over the next few years in both red and blue states…

Maybe you’ve heard or read about the “smaller carbon footprint” trains being produced in Germany.  They are taking on “polluting diesel trains with costlier but more eco-friendly technology.”  The new engines do not pollute in the way that gasoline or diesel engines do.  The only emissions the engine produces are steam and liquid water.  The process results in a travel range comparable to diesel without the pollution.  Eventually the trains will be cheaper to run than diesel.  Sounds great.  However, so far I have heard nothing about safety procedures and security.  The train is hydrogen-powered.  Ring a bell?  The new engine is being developed by the same people who gave us the hydrogen-filled blimp that became famous when it tried to land at Lakehurst, New Jersey on May 6, 1937.  Oh, the humanity… 

In what now seems like the distant past, bands would have nightly gigs at clubs for weeks or even months at a time.  The ongoing nightly challenge made individual musicians stronger and bands better.  Not very many jazz ensembles get to experience anything quite like that today.  A few times each year clubs such as Scullers and the Regattabar will bring in a name to perform two or sometimes three nights in a row.  Touring to some extent acts as a good substitute for extended gigs at a single venue.  Performing as a unit for eight out of ten nights in a row or even for a month or more (if the band survives the challenge) helps bring an ensemble together, enhancing intuitive musician interplay along the way.  Cutout had a bit of that experience recently in the Mid-West--with a quick sequence of two charted nights of music and an evening of free pursuits--before a superb set of music as part of Eric Rosenthal’s monthly series 11/14 at the Lily Pad.  The band--Pandelis Karayorgis, Jorrit Dijkstra, Jeb Bishop, Nate McBride, and Luther Gray--was burning in every positive sense.  The complex charts (a Cutout hallmark) were executed with the ease of breathing during a casual walk.  The ensemble attacks and interplay were luminous.  And the solos--punctuated by inspiring sonic commentaries from band mates--were as soaring, surprising, and ear-catching as any I’ve ever heard from the band.  Nate surely has “recovered” from his self-imposed layoff, demonstrating a physical strength and creative flexibility that fans have reveled in over the years.  Working with fount of creativity and fire Luther Gray certainly helped.  No doubt Luther was carrying molten embers with him to his next gig that night in Jamaica Plain.  I could not figure out whether Pandelis Karayorgis was having more fun soloing, silently listening to the music around him, or getting into and under the charts--stoking the music emphatically.  I know I was not the only audience member swept up in what I was seeing and hearing.  A good-sized and attentive audience it was.  The music of Jeb and Jorrit was quite fine.  I don’t think I’ve heard the two of them hear and react to each other so well before.  Really special.  And both of them reached down and found improvisations that genuinely surprised me--partially because I had not heard such “ideas” from each of them before and partially because of how effectively they took my ears to places wonderfully uncomfortable.  It makes me wonder sometimes whether Jorrit knows just how at home he is when he squeezes such fine sounds out of both soprano and alto saxes.  I’ve known Jeb and his music since the mid-1990s when he was playing both rock and jazz music.  I thought he was terrific then and always since then.  An extraordinary talent.  And now he is a justifiably revered improvising musician on several continents.  He’s at the time in his life when a person works on the music and, with focussed effort, makes smalls steps upward.  At this stage in his career how many aesthetic leaps can a person make?  I don’t know.  But I heard Jeb push the music in his solos 11/14 into places I’d never heard him go before--and I’ve listened in joy countless times to his work.  How does a musician operating at his level completely erase all paths that solos take him on and re-write the map from scratch?  I don’t know.  But I know I--and a bunch of lucky people at the Lily Pad--heard him begin that journey…


 October 

Flutist and renowned producer of performance events Matt Samolis has taken a low profile in recent months.  Some of that profile is due to travels outside the Boston area.  But a good portion of his work in the shadows is due to his shift in social and performance activity to a more intimate world of “house events” including much fine art grazing and imbibing.  His music at the performances have involved primarily meditative “cymbal bath” events in which he (and sometimes friends) play bowed cymbals using an elaborate device of Matt’s design consisting of cymbals and other metal elements.  Matt left the shadows 10/21 to offer a solo performance at Third Life Studios for a good-sized superbly quiet audience.  People generally embraced the meditative event from chairs, in various yoga positions, or just quietly sprawled on the floor or cushions.  I got the impression that each audience member brought a very personal definition of “meditation.”  One person took a yoga position for a while, stretched for a while, and continued the cycle.  A young man stretched full-length on the floor, resting on his elbows while transfixed for most of the hour and half performance by his cell phone.  A woman joined the group, lying on her back, facing the ceiling just in time to catch the last twenty minutes of Matt’s fine improvised bowing.  Most of the attendees quietly seemed to be taking in their own calm (for the time of the performance at least) reality.  I was one of the chair people, comfortable, observing others in the room at times but mostly fading in and out of the marvelous sonic context…

Hamiet Bluiett died 10/4 at age 78.  He had a strong fan base in the Boston area in the 1980s and 1990s when he performed somewhat frequently in local clubs within various instrumental configurations, perhaps most often with the World Saxophone Quartet.  His innovations on the baritone saxophone were rooted in and inspired by the pioneering work of our own Harry Carney.  There is a good Giovanni Russonello obituary in the 10/7 The New York Times covering Bluiett’s seminal years in St. Louis and the founding of BAG (Black Artists Group) to his life in Illinois since 2002…

The Sunday Night Jazz gigs were scheduled to resume at the Press Room 10/28.  The shuttered restaurant and music venue was supposed to reopen to fanfare on 10/26.  But the renovation was not completed on time.  So the opening was re-scheduled for Halloween.  The first Sunday evening jazz gig will not take place until November.  More information about scheduled music at the Press Room can be found online and by phone (603-431-5186)…

Two days earlier I had witnessed music by the Kassel-Zicarelli Quintet, a group that I praised in the September Journal for its open music with solid mainstream grounding.  I found it fascinating and uplifting to witness in sequence two chord-cycle-based ensembles that are so convincing.  Many times in this Journal I have lamented the boring music offered by almost all mainstream jazz ensembles today.  And here at the Lily Pad 10/2 was another antidote to such disappointments.  The Allan Chase Quartet--with Joe Berkovitz, Bruno Råberg, and Austin McMahon--presented music that had sonic commonalities with the music performed 9/30 at the Lily Pad.  The groups shared one other characteristic that may have contributed to musical success.  Both groups played a few “standards” but mostly original material.  Perhaps original material--because it is relatively devoid of historical precedent--has by definition built-in possibilities of sonic discovery.  At least that may be the case for these two bands.  Also quite fortunately these groups otherwise are unlike each other.  Although most Boston-based jazz musicians were not born and raised in the Boston area--a fact that applies at least as far back as the beginning of the twentieth century--there has been and to some extent remains a Boston band sound/identity.  For example, during the 1980s the Jones-Lewis Orchestra in New York, the Duke Belaire Big Band in Rhode island, and Herb Pomeroy’s Big Band in Boston shared a northeastern U.S. sound that distinguished all of them from, for example, the Akiyoshi-Tabakin Big Band or the Gerald Wilson Orchestra in California.  Further, the sound of the Boston-based big band was distinct from that of the New York City-based band and the Providence-based band.  Even today the “Boston sound” shows up from time to time locally, as in the case of the 10/2 gig (but not the 9/30 performance).  Another distinction between the groups is that musicians in the Kassel-Zicarelli Quintet are quite comfortable pushing notes of a line or even the tune itself outside what is written or expected in performance.  People in Allan Chase’s Quartet tend to push the sonics within the architecture or melodic line, stretching sonics internally.  Both approaches to the music are challenging and engaging for the listener.  The single-set performance 10/2 opened with Frank Loesser’s “Slow Boat to China,” a currently all but unknown tune that was quite popular in the 1950s and recorded by jazz musicians astute enough to exploit its inner workings.  The band at the Lily Pad did such exploiting as well.  A fine opener.  Most of the evening’s music was charted by band members, some of the music going back to the early 1980s, such as Allan’s delightfully busy “Cruel Jazz.”  Austin offered an original chart that transformed Cole Porter’s “I Love You” into a work that looked both backward and forward.  Several of the charts were composed (or at least completed) within the past couple of months, and the leader’s “Dodge” was “completed 48 hours ago.”  The terrific evening concluded with comments from band members about the impact of former NEC faculty member Jaki Byard on their musical development.  That was followed by the closer, Byard’s “Bird’s Mother.”  As Thoreau said, “It is the province of the historian to find out, not what was, but what is.”…

There is a lot of smoke and mirrors in national politics today, but it does seem that Congress (even including most Democrats) and the White House are doing their best to make sure that the rich get richer and the bottom 80% of the population gets poorer.  Analysts such at David Leonhardt in the The New York Times points out that the good news about the economy is primarily a description of the “experiences of the affluent.”  Stocks are worth 60% more than they were in 2007, but most shares are owned by the wealthy and the typical household’s net worth remains about 20% lower than it was in early 2007.  His comments are on the money.  The tax breaks for the wealthy and businesses did not go to the employees; they went to shareholders and executives.  The wonderful Trump tax break I got cannot keep up with the fruits and vegetables I buy that are 20 to 40% more costly than they were six months ago.  I’m not going to go hungry because of the callous game, but I am not trying to provide food, clothing, and shelter for a family of four…

Over the years I have been privileged to witness the body movement (AKA dance) productions of choreographer Joe Burgio.  Several years ago he danced with and led what he referred to as his aptly named body drama ensemble.  I was hooked.  As his work has evolved to pursuit of tactics and strategies to raise the level of quality of improvised dance, I have remained hooked.  In recent years he works with sound and movement as complementary performance elements.  Some wonderful improvising musicians--John Voigt, Walter Wright, Matt Samolis, Emilio Gonzalez, and others--have been involved in Joe’s productions.  I was privileged one evening this month to witness one of Joe’s practice sessions.  Four searching, passionate movement artists and indefatigable and resourceful improvisor Walter Wright were tackling the possibilities of improvised art through breaking down the “language” of psychological and physiological choices during the process of improvising.  The challenge for these creative people is as great as my description sounds.  And the challenge is no less daunting for Joe Burgio as he helps them unlock what he envisions.  Witnessing the process is exhilarating…


According to The New York Times and other publications this month, MIT is “spending $1 billion on a new college devoted to artificial intelligence.”  In other words, students no longer have to take such computer science studies as an add-on to their college major.  Instead the Stephen A. Schwarzman College of Computing, Computer Science, and AI will focus on that subject in the context of ethics and everyday reality.  Schwarzman has donated $350 million to find out if we can “understand this technology, not just get hit by it.”  Good luck to MIT and all of us…

Most musicians and jazz fans who were around during the last quarter of the twentieth century remember the mbira, an African thumb piano, was fairly popular among both straight-ahead and post-Ayler jazz musicians.  The instrument shows up on bandstands occasionally even today.  According to the 10/27 issue of Science News (p.4) the instrument has had an impact on a variety of scientific pursuits.  “Bioengineer William Grover built his first mbira-inspired sensor with his 8-year-old son… using scrap materials from around the house.”  A user of the mbira-inspired  sensor can “upload audio recordings from the sensor to a website that analyses the sound frequencies to discern differences too subtle to hear.  Comparing the frequency from a suspect liquid with that of a known sample can reveal whether the two have the same density, and thus the same ingredients.”  The device can help analyze a variety of liquids for a wide range of purposes.  For example, a woman in southern India uses the device the measure the fat content of bison milk to assess the animal’s health. 

This photo from the Science News article shows the mbira (left) and two mbira-inspired devices that measure liquid density…

David Haas and his ensemble returned to the Lily Pad 10/21 to offer two sets of improvised music and a more tactile gift, Face of Reason, a half hour CD featuring the work of seven regulars and the leader.  It was a fine gesture.   David Haas and six of the bandmates on the CD--Kevin Frenette, Scott Getchell, Glenn Dickson, Todd Brunel, Kit Demos, and Joe Musacchia--romped joyously at times and searched now and then quietly.  The leader seemed to be lost in thought much of the night, offering spare, often pointed commentary via the piano.  There were fine moments throughout the evening from Kevin, Todd, Kit, and Joe particularly.  But each member of the David Haas Group offered something to listen to on that gig.  The band has carved out a monthly niche in Inman Square, and the audience seems to be growing…

Sports fans in the Boston area have major league teams in five different sports to root for.  It is acknowledged generally that the Boston Red Sox team has the largest and most rabid fan base in New England.  But that fact suggests just how far removed from the reality of current major league sports that fan base is.  On the morning of 10/28, the date of World Series game five, I entered “today’s game” in the Google address bar.  The resultant list included nothing but information about scheduled NFL games.  Until the bottom of the page which specified information about scheduled NBA games.  The scheduled World Series game?  Nada.  Zilch.  Nothing.  Trying the address bar again but with “today’s baseball game” I got the information I was looking for, the start time of the World Series game. The locals won the Series that night…


 September

I knew I could not catch all of the twenty-five bands performing 9/23 at Jazz Along the Charles on the Esplanade, so I started at the western end of the festival and hop-scotched my way eastward.  This “plan” resulted in my 2 to 4 p.m. adventure beginning with the Novick-Nieske Duo.  Basically it was Billy Novick and and Bob Nieske protected by a temporary tent covering, as were almost all the other bands.  But I was surprised by the lack of any kind of amplification.  My concern was that perhaps there would be no amplification for the other bands.  I was fortunate enough to be standing in the front row of listeners and therefore heard the music fairly well.  People standing in the second or third row probably were not so fortunate.  The lack of microphone meant that, although I could pick up a few random words, I never heard anything that Billy Novick had to say.  Of course, with a bit of ineffective lip reading on my part and my experience hearing musician commentary over the years, I was able to imagine most of what he probably was saying.  My general concern about amplification was unwarranted.   For some reason the Novick-Nieske Duo had no amplification, but all the other bands I encountered did have electricity for amps (but I saw no sound boards).  My impression was that anyone standing in the first three rows would have no trouble hearing bands with amps.  On the other hand, except for bands with mics for vocalists, no band leader commentary was clearly understood by most audience members.  The good news is that people generally could witness the music effectively.  And so it was a lucky start for me to hear such fine music from respected veterans.  The bonus was hearing the bass-clarinet duo work so smoothly.  I had caught Billy Novick perform several times over the years with long-time duo partner Guy VanDuser.  The switch to bass partner Bob Nieske (presenting an experienced pairing also) offered a delightful alternative.  Immediately I encountered one of the negative positives of the festival.  If I walked the entire Esplanade bandstand area intending to hear just one tune performed by each band over the two-hour span, I would not be able to hear all twenty-five bands.  Since I heard 2 ½ tunes performed by the Novick-Nieske Duo, right off the bat I was in serious “sampling difficulty.”  So I heard snippets of several groups and one or two tunes from a few bands.  It was pretty obvious that the selection committee did a good job of coming up with a nice variety of changes-rooted ensembles, most of them quite engaging.  Of greater significance to me as a jazz fan is that there was a good number of genuinely top quality jazz ensembles at the fest.  One of those groups was the only magazine cover band at the event, the Jason Palmer Quintet.  It was easy to spot the ensemble.  That was the one that looked like a marshmallow surrounded by ants.  I confess to having mixed feelings about the audience reaction, and not just because anyone at the back of the crowd did not get to see that solid young group of enthusiastic musicians.  I think it is great that so many people showed up to witness such fine music.  And what I heard of it was fine music.  But, because of fan enthusiasm and previously mentioned time constraints, those joyous fans inevitably missed most or all of the other genuinely stellar ensembles at the fest.  Ironically, to either side of the marshmallow were bands led by Boston jazz pillars Yoron Israel and John Kordalewski.  I should interject that listeners were everywhere.  It was not a big but empty jazz club by any means.  I would guess the smallest audience I saw was about forty strong, but estimating is impossible because throngs were everywhere, some apparently passers-by but perhaps genuinely engaged.  Given the number of mandatory works to be performed, most groups I witnessed apparently used lead sheets enhanced by spontaneously created “arrangement” elements--often to good effect.  One effective example of that was the Charlie Kohlhase Explorers Quintet that worked from lead sheets and/or “real book” charts with Charlie’s modifications and enhancements.  Like most bands I encountered, Charlie and the band--including Seth Meicht, Daniel Rosenthal, Aaron Darrell, and Curt Newton--took the festival seriously and made sure there were rehearsals.  One Explorer regular, Eric Hofbauer, was not in the band 9/23.  He was performing in an alcove at the south side of the Esplanade bridge closest to the Hatch Shell.  To my mind it was visually the best “bandstand” of the festival (and it was devoid of a tent cover).  Intimate and engaging.  Of some significance is that Eric’s performance was the only solo one of the festival.  Given potential acoustic and sociological problems at the base of such a bridge, it was something of a gutsy move by Eric.  If that was not enough, he never turned his amp to anything approaching eleven.  Fans had to attend to the subtleties of Leonard Bernstein’s “Maria,” if they were going to hear the magic.  You could see people in the audience who are guitarists or wannabees--the ones with the jaws dropped to the ground.  It’s the first Eric Hofbauer solo gig I had caught in way too long.  My impression is that most band leaders and band members took the event seriously with appropriate rehearsals and other preparations.  But I find it difficult to imagine anyone who immersed himself in the music for this event more than Darrell Katz.  His band Odd Song, featuring vocalist Rebecca Shrimpton, was ready.  Four saxes--Phil Scarff, Allan Chase, Will Silvio, and Melanie Howell-Brooks--and Ms. Shrimpton showed up and nailed the charts.  No easy stuff.  Band members were inspired by the music and the fact that Darrell spent the summer writing original--the most original of the festival (in terms of what I heard)--charts of all 16/18 compositions.  All that work for a single event, and I was able to catch only a small portion of it.  But I am thankful for catching any of it.  It was a wonderful sonic ending to a significant event that had some problems.  Problems that were far outweighed by successes.  The biggest complaint I heard from musicians is that--unlike a more typical jazz festival--none of them had a chance to hear any of the other bands.  That’s a problem that can be fixed next time, at least one potential solution also allowing fans to hear more bands (among the 25) in a single afternoon.  In the mean time, already there is at least one positive post-fest outcome.  Before the festival band members in the Explorers Quintet heard Eric Hofbauer’s arrangement of Ellington’s “I Got It Bad” and noticed it was completely different from the one Charlie came up with for the quintet.  Curt Newton told me that the different ideas are complementary and may be combined into a completely new arrangement of the work for future Explorers gigs.  That’s what creative people do…

Dave Bryant bills his monthly gigs at the Outpost as “open rehearsals.”  From time to time band leaders have referred to working band gigs as such, sometimes tongue in cheek and sometimes accurately.  It would appear that Dave’s Outpost performances are the latter.  As one who believes that art is process, I love witnessing rehearsals of excellent ensembles.  This one--including Tom Hall, Eric Hofbauer, Jacob William, and Miki Matsuki--is such an ensemble.  And I was privy to rehearsal as part of process.  All of it is quite engaging and informative.  Dave picks a composition by Ornette or one of his own works for the band to pull from their books or folders.  Then he talks about the work contextually and compositionally.  The contextual information can take any form--the origin of the title, the sonic inspiration, the physical environment during the writing, permutations of the head, impetus for re-writes, and more.  Dave’s comments about each composition usually involve an array of explanatory resources, such as performance of a line on the keyboard, humming, reference to the relevant nature or impact of another composition (sometimes by another composer), listening to and commenting on a line from the work performed by another musician in the band, and having the band play part of the work at different tempi.  Not all of Dave’s comments are explicitly “practical.”  But they are informative.  Discussions revealing the wit of Ornette Coleman or the creative brilliance of Bobby Ward add spice to the mix.  Ultimately such elements result in music.  Actual performance.  Some of the elements--Dave included--imply continuity over time.  And it is there in the performance.  But, because the music is true jazz performed by brilliant, distinctive improvisors, the music performed was distinctive, new.  For example, one of my favorite Dave Bryant compositions is “Detour.”  I have heard it with pleasure performed many times in person and on record (The Eternal Hang – Accurate AC5035).  But I never heard it played as it was 9/9 at the Outpost.  Wonderful in its uniqueness.  And every work performed at that rehearsal was compelling.  I look forward to the special experience of witnessing future Dave Bryant Quintet open rehearsals…

The church was full, even the balcony (featuring parishioners from the Mt. Pisgah AME Church in Philadelphia).  Musicians, fans, family, and friends had come to St. Paul AME Church in Cambridge to celebrate the life of Paul Broadnax 9/1, one month after his passing.  And a celebration it was, everything from the Prelude offered by Inge T. Engler and Donnell Patterson and the Rev. I. Ellis Washington’s welcome all the way to the closing “When We All Get to Heaven” Recessional.  Between all that there were hymns and readings from the Old and New Testaments, all to fine effect.  I looked at the program and noticed Monica Hatch would sing Ellington’s “Heaven,” a thematically appropriate selection but technically unwieldy, even for someone with her voice training.  Her start was shaky, but she and her support (Fred Haas, Peter Kontrimas, and Les Harris, Jr.) found solid ground quickly and completed the fine effort to thunderous applause.  Paul’s nephew Stacy Scott got the entire congregation celebrating vocally.  That was followed by “My Tribute” sung by Ashwa Marshall who avoided the center of notes as written on the page and creatively and spontaneously rearranged sequences of notes, presenting accompanist Patterson with his greatest challenge of the day.  But the most potent fact of her performance was vocal power, in effect putting all of those vocal matters on the back shelf.  If Ashwa Marshall were present at the battle of Jericho, Joshua could have left all the ram horns home.  In recent years one composition performed by Paul and Peter Kontrimas with some frequency is “Ave Maria” (Bach/Gounod), a feature for Peter.  No doubt through the wizardry of Peter’s engineering skills, Paul’s piano accompaniment for the work at a previous performance was isolated for playback at the celebration, creating a live performance of the work by Peter with pre-recorded accompaniment by Paul.  The emotional impact of the performance could be seen in tears and hankies and invisibly palpable beyond that.  Interspersed in all of this there were verbal “Reflections.”  Representing the Lasell Village, home for Paul and wife Caroline, Anne Doyle spoke of the couple’s impact on other Villagers.  Donn Trenner, musician friend of Paul going back to World War Two, got the most laughs of any speaker.  His love for Paul and special relationship with him came through in every anecdote.  Fred Haas, tenor sax go-to guy for Paul, spoke of how much Paul meant to him musically and interpersonally.  And he sang his feelings.  Eloquently.  Paul’s son Marc generously helped us to insight as to how Paul has fostered children of such character.  The fruit does not fall far.  Son Peter Schastny has been near enough to Paul geographically that they have gotten to share the little things, like sports.  Peter talked about what they shared and let the rest of us into it.  I had known that sports--particularly the Patriots--was no “little thing” to Paul.  And Peter with a wink shared such things with all of us.  The closing sermon--listed as a Eulogy but really a full sermon--was delivered by Paul’s son, the Rev. Jay B. Broadnax, Pastor of Mt. Pisgah AME Church of Philadelphia, PA.  He is what I think of as a black evangelical minister.  The everyday life of blacks in America is a second class existence.  I’m talking about racism.  But there are two elements of black life in the U.S. that are for the most part superior to those found in everyday white American life: Gospel choirs and evangelical preaching.  My thoughts on how amazing good black gospel choirs are I’ll save for perhaps another day.  But the Rev. Broadnax from Philadelphia brings to us the elephant in the room--theologically--that cannot be ignored.  There have been some terrific white evangelical preachers in my lifetime, but all the ones I can think of are deceased.  The ones we see in action now are on television preaching about money they need rather than true salvation and driving from their studios/cathedrals in limos.  There’s a special place in Hell for those people.  But here on 9/1 in Cambridge we lucky people had the chance to witness the real deal.  The Rev. Broadnax had the esteemed assignment to deliver the Eulogy.  He may well have done that during his preaching, but what he gave us was a sermon--“a speech on conduct or duty.”  And it was a true black evangelical sermon of the highest order, calling upon the life of Paul Leo Broadnax as an example for all of us, and using the classic cultural device of refrain, rooted in the timeless call and response survival vocal works of the fields.  The refrain is such an important part of the black evangelical ministry that even white people refer to the famous refrain-driven speech of Dr. Martin Luther king, Jr. as the “I Have a Dream” speech.  And so it was for the Rev. Jay B. Broadnax who worked the refrain, “Well-tuned Instrument,” from the specific reference to his father to the generalized call to all of those present in St. Paul AME Church to be of a like mind and conduct themselves as “Well-tuned Instruments,” to do their constructive duty.  The reaction throughout the Eulogy/Sermon among people in the church consisted of a variety of heartfelt encouragements.   The conclusion was received with universal applause.  When a state of calm returned to the church, the Rev. Ellis I. Washington spoke for the entire congregation when he said, “Wow!”  And so all of us left the church inspired by the example of the love of Paul Broadnax.  As we walked a short distance to the St. Paul Christian Life Center for the jazz celebration of the life of Paul Broadnax, I saw musicians Gray Sargent, Donna Byrne, Peter Bodge, Dominique Eade, Tom Hall, and more.  The crowds at the church and at the Christian Life Center were so large that one could not spot all familiar faces.  Although the jazz trio from the church kicked things off at the jazz celebration, I could not stay long enough to witness all the different musicians who may have sat in at the jam session.  The environment was joyous and the musicians were game, but sonic verisimilitude was lacking.  I hugged and wished the best for a fine array of Paul lovers at the event.  But I knew that my recordings of Paul and these same musicians would sound closer to reality than in the hall.  And my memory of Paul in full flight would carry me through night…

Rhode Island’s Greg Abate is a true veteran.  He’s picked up what he knows--not from recordings and books--from “the street.”  Yes, he went to Berklee, but he grew up witnessing the music of Charlie Mariano and Cannonball.  A long-time anchor in the legendary Duke Bellaire Orchestra, Greg performed with Joe Pass, Oscar Peterson, and the Artie Shaw Band under the leadership of Dick Johnson.  By then he also had built a working relationship with Johnson’s talented son, drummer Gary Johnson.  Greg Abate showed up 9/8 at Amazing Things with his alto sax as well as soprano and flute.  He also brought Matt D'Champlain, Todd Baker, and Gary Johnson.  Showing his Cannonball (with Miles) roots, Greg opened with the aptly named “Modal.”  It was a fine start with everyone on the same page.  He continued with a bow to another significant influence via Harold Arlen’s “A Sleepin’ Bee.”  As far as I know, Phil Woods first recorded that tune in 1976 on “Live” at the Showboat (RCA BGL2-2202).  Then the two reed players did a reprise on a CD together.  Greg’s performance of the work 9/8 was one of the highlights of the evening.  All hands supported the leader well.  There was an early hiccup by pianist Matt D'Champlain while the band was trading fours.  Greg’s decision to exchange only “eights” for the rest of the evening smoothly prevented a recurrence.  Bassist Todd Baker was solid throughout, apparently taking on some music director responsibilities in stride.  The decades-long relationship between Greg and Gary was evident in telepathic interplay.  I have had the good fortune to witness countless performances by Gary Johnson over the years, and once again it was a joy to experience the consummate jazz musician--a team player in the truest sense and a thoroughly creative improvisor.  All good drummers keep things rolling with time and support.  But it is a handful who hear and think so well that they anticipate a band mate’s subtlest nuance and give the right sound when the nuance occurs, making the band mate’s idea sound even more brilliant.  That’s “standard” practice for Gary.  At least partially because of that, the entire quartet performed beautifully throughout the two sets of music.  As I’ve suggested here, the group did give us several highlights.  For me the finest group effort--all together and communicating at a superb level--occurred in the performance of Kern’s “I’m Old Fashioned” (from the Hayworth-Astaire musical, You Were Never Lovelier).  Everyone deserved an extra bow.  And the soaring continued for the leader right through the closer, Joe Henderson’s “Inner Urge.”  A barn-burner.  And the bonus was Greg’s best soprano work of the evening…

As readers of this Journal know by now, I’m not a big fan of most “slick” magazines (jazz-oriented or otherwise).  Every now and then one of those publications offers a pleasant surprise.  Such is the case of the brief interview with Terri Lyne Carrington in the 9/19 issue of The Improper Bostonian (p. 56).  I found her comments about roadblocks to women becoming jazz musicians insightful and constructive.  It is significant that she acknowledges she had it a bit easier than most females because her tenor playing father opened doors for her.  It is apparent that she plans to build on her awareness of roadblocks and doors to help bring female instrumentalists into the music.  There is more about her hopes and work in that interview.  For example, she has fine things to say about Bill Pierce and her 9/26 celebration at Berklee Performance Center of the man who is retiring from his post as Chair of Berklee’s Woodwind Department.  A worthy salute…

Last October?  That was the best guess for the most recent Para performance in town.  Needless to say, it was a happy reunion for leader Jacob William, Forbes Graham, Steve Lantner, and Laurence Cook.  Not surprising, there was some rust in the gears.  A variety of factors have kept Laurence away from the drum kit for a couple months, he’s battling a seasonal sinus condition, and the foot pedal for his bass drum decided to get cranky.  If that wasn’t enough, the group has not performed together since 2017.  But these are some of the finest musicians in the Boston area (or anywhere), and we got a chance to witness serious problem-solving 9/12 at the Outpost.  I heard Steve’s piano go to places I’d never heard him take it.  The leader played enough bass for two gigs.  Forbes’ solos were adventuresome enough--and beautiful enough--to be sufficient reason in themselves for fans to show up at the gig.  By the beginning of the second set some form of WD-40 seemed to be taking effect.  Highlights dominated the music, we could hear the bass drum, and the Laurence Cook dry wit radiated from the drum kit.  No dates yet.  But all musicians are anxious for more.  As are the fans…

Here’s a quote found in the New York Times from historian Timothy Snyder that seems painfully relevant to our times:  “To abandon facts is to abandon freedom.  If nothing is true, then no one can criticize power because there is no basis upon which to do so.”

It had been far too long since I had witnessed the Kassel-Zicarelli Group in performance.  Though I was able to catch only the first set 9/30 at the Lily Pad, I was glad to have what I could.  This version of the band was a quintet--leaders Melissa Kassel and Tom Zicarelli featuring the work of Phil Grenadier, Bruce Gertz, and Gary Fieldman.  These five excellent musicians know each other well musically and are well versed in the challenges of the material and its unique demands.  All the musicians are well-grounded in mainstream jazz and excel at such performances.  That grounding is essential for the realization of this music.  But that is merely the beginning.  These charts and the “unwritten” requirements of interpretation result in music that has conventional footing but operates with open, flexible parameters for both solo and support roles.  In a conversation at the end of the first set, Bruce enthused about the marvelous tension and interpretive freedom inherent in the music of the band.  Band members are attracted to performances with the band because they know what to expect--the unexpected, the beauty of anticipating and diving headfirst into surprise.  The ensemble works so well to a great extent because each musician is quite comfortable in completely free musical settings.  So “last minute” changes are taken in stride as another surprise on the journey.  Gary has played with the group so long (and he’s such a respected musician in other contexts) that superficially he offers the image of a drummer who’s just chugging along in a pleasant walk.  But for good reason I heard two band members at different times on a break rave about “how much” Gary hears and creates on the bandstand.  His partner in all this of course is Bruce, who relishes that interpretive freedom the bassist participates in beautifully and helps create.  Phil on the break talked about an upcoming trip he and other folks from Berklee will be taking to Shanghai.  They will teach with three performances scattered throughout that visit.  I could not help thinking how lucky the students will be to hear just how wonderful a trumpet in the right hands can sound.  All this fine music 9/30 is born and nurtured out of the core duo of Melissa and Tom.  They are the band’s visionary source, time and again leading by example.  They write, perform, and improvise inspiring surprises.  Audience members with ears and band members are the lucky ones…

Some things are inexplicable.  It was a major event, but there were actually a few empty seats at the Outpost 9/13 when the first set began.  Several of us arrived a half hour before the scheduled 8 p.m. start time.  I figured that by 8 p.m. there would be people out in the hallway and hanging from the ceiling.  Not so.  Even if local fans are not the greatest when it comes to showing up for local musicians, usually they come out of the woodwork for touring “names.”  The fact that internationally revered musicians Frode Gjerstad and Fred Lonberg-Holm were on the bill would have been more than attractive enough to fill the place.  The fact that the quartet included Jeb Bishop and Curt Newton only made the pot sweeter.  So the extra breathing room was a surprise.  But the quality of the music was not a surprise.  Well, that’s not quite accurate.  I expected the music to be terrific, but it was even better than that.  This quartet consists of people who have performed over the years with at least one of the other band members.  There are working connections.  But these guys--right from the get-go-played as if they were a working band just hitting its stride.  Everyone seemed to know exactly when to jump in as part of a full foursome or as an unaccompanied soloist.  And everything between.  Each set began with a fine reed-cello duo, a sort of welcome to the “outsiders.”  And it provided a chance for audience members to witness two long-time friends having a musical conversation of reunification.  Then the quartet took over, giving plenty of opportunity for Frode (on alto sax and clarinet) to demonstrate why he is one of the most highly-regarded creative improvisors anywhere.  Fred stayed with the acoustic cello all night, much to my joy.  His electronics are quite fine, but he’s one of my two favorite improvising cellists.  Once again, his ideas, his sonics killed me.  Jeb, of course, has performed with the two guests on many occasions, and he’s a recognized trombone giant internationally.  He obviously was in his element, charging forward when that would be most effective or bantering or supporting or you name it.  All superb.  It was a wonderful evening of music, and Curt was the glue that kept it all together no matter where the music went.  Bringing together a handful of superstars of improvisation does not guarantee superstar music.  Given who these four musicians are, success was more than likely.  But having Curt at the top of his game--using toys and other adjuncts at exactly the right instant, sitting out when silence was the most eloquent sonic device, making the kit a machine of thunder or a cushion of kisses.  Always pushing his skills and ideas to the better music, the better skills and ideas of his band mates.  As a result of all of that, everyone in the quartet brought the music to an extraordinary level.  I don’t know which group of people felt more like a kid in a candy store, the musicians or the fans.  All of us were lucky to be there at that time and with those people.  Unfortunately it may be a while before we see Frode again.  The AFM-customs pact (as has been discussed here many times) makes it almost impossible for creative improvising musicians to come here to perform with U.S. musicians.  Because the power brokers in Washington do not like any form of human/artistic immigration and the Musicians Union sees sonic art entering this country as a threat to AFM members jobs (e.g., see my comments about the New York Times coverage of the subject in the October 2017 Journal), it takes ridiculous efforts to bring wonderful foreign musicians such as Frode to the Boston area.  As for Fred, maybe there is a brighter future for Boston area fans.  Last year Fred moved near the Hudson River in New York, about a half hour North of Joe McPhee’s home.  That’s a lot closer than Chicago.  I imagine that Jeb and Curt could come up with something.  For example, one heck of a trio…



August    
 
Paul Broadnax died 8/1 in Newton at age 92.  As noted in The Major Contributors topic of this site and in recent newspaper and online obituaries, for more than seven decades Paul Broadnax made a significant contribution as a pianist, vocalist, and arranger to the development of jazz in New England.  Although the articles and tributes emphasized his good deeds and durability as an artist, both worthy of such emphasis, I found little genuine appreciation for the quality and historical significance of his work.  For example, I saw no mention of the new arrangements/rearrangements for Sabby Lewis’ band that helped the band leader meet AFM requirements for an enlarged band in some Manhattan venues.  As a result, Sabby’s band performed frequently there and subsequent band recordings featured the “full” orchestra.  At the other end of the chronology, I read nothing about the adventuresome nature of the last half dozen years or so of Paul’s improvisations.  In those later years he pushed the parameters of mainstream jazz to their limits.  It is as if Paul forgot that a straight-ahead player was not supposed to put “that sequence of notes” together in a solo or while comping.  It was illegal but always amazing, beautiful.  No, it was not a matter of making an error and turning it into a thing of wonder (although he would do that also).  These sonic adventures were conscious transformations of melodic lines and “abandonment” of the chord, an activity resulting in profound resonance in the listener’s ear.  Any time on a break when I approached in wonder and tried to get him to talk about these pursuits, he would take it all lightly and modestly.  Yes, he always appreciated positive comments about his music, but he--perhaps due to his immersion in the adventure--never seemed to appreciate how profound it all was.  And so I was surprised at the lack of awareness in published writing of how far Paul pushed his piano work in his later years.  Perhaps there are exceptions I have not discovered.  Yoko Miwa (perhaps because she is an active pianist) on her web site has posted a musically insightful statement about Paul.  Along with that she has posted a video of the complete last Paul Broadnax Trio set in Cambridge (7/14).  The “Where is he going?” tag at the conclusion of “The Party’s Over” is a gem.  He probably did not want the party to be over…

I spent most of the past month on vacation trips to New York, Chicago, and Newport.  It was a great time, but I missed some terrific music in the Boston area.  Among the better music I did catch was consecutive nights of Nate Wooley, Sylvie Courvoisier, and former Bostonians Ken Vandermark and Tom Rainey at the Green Mill in Chicago.  It is quite an amazing experience to witness this foursome unleashed.  Definitely one of my fan highlights of 2018.  Once again, if there is a better true jazz club in the U.S. today than the Green Mill, I have not been there.  Before those two gigs I caught Joe McPhee, Susan Alcorn, and Ken Vandermark in a trio gig 8/1 celebrating the visual art of Josiah McElheny whose works were celebrating the music of Joe McPhee.  The fine event took

place at the Corbett vs. Dempsey gallery in Chicago.  The place was SRO.  As part of the event John Corbett (left) and Jim Dempsey presented the first “Horse with No Name” awards to Joe McPhee and Susan Alcorn.  The donor of the two $50,000.00 awards is an anonymous fan (living in Europe, one story has it).  In any event, it is a terrific “lifetime achievement” celebration of two wonderful creative improvising musicians.  The music performed by the trio was superb.  No doubt part of the reason is the trumpet used by Joe.  Joe’s father was a great influence on him, musically and otherwise.  If you are a male who has had a father of presence, you know that such a thing is a mixed blessing.  In any event, the trumpet played by Joe’s father from Joe’s infancy and onward finally came into Joe’s possession.  It is a B-flat Holton.  As you might imagine, the legacy is daunting.  Joe claims that on a couple occasions he planned to perform on the instrument in public, but he could not get even a sound out of it.  He has had a chance to grapple with the demons.  And

he thought the visual art celebration of his sonic art would be a good time to play that trumpet in public.  Play he did.  And wonderfully.  It is a great-sounding horn, and Joe did a fine thing to bring it alive again at such a meaningful concert.  It was quite an evening.  Profound music and money together, however fleeting.  What could be more incongruous than that?...

It sounds like fake news, but the research results can be found in a variety of recent scientific news releases (“giant hogweed” might be a good Google starting point).  I never knew about this phenomenon, possibly because I always wash lime juice off my fingers after I serve someone a vodka tonic with lime.  Here’s the deal: Apparently the juice/sap from lemons, limes, dill, fennel, parsnip, and other plants on human skin--if exposed to the sun--causes human skin to burn.  For example, if you make lemonade and get the juice on your fingers and touch your arms, if you wash your hands and spend some time in the sun, you will experience “severe burns” on your arms (but your washed hands will be OK).  The burning condition is known as phytophotodermatitis.  I’m not making this up…

Charlie Kohlhase’s Explorers Club showed up as a quintet 8/22 at the Lily Pad.  Nothing unusual about that, but personnel shifts were significant.  The “regulars” on bass, trumpet, tuba, and trombone were absent.  But other regulars--Charlie, Seth Meicht, Eric Hofbauer, and Curt Newton--were on hand to make sure the ship would set sail and arrive securely at the dock.  As if that were not enough, Jef Charland and Jeff Galindo showed up filled with adventures to share.  Jef, of course, has a long Explorers history and was therefore comfortable enough to tackle even the least familiar charts.  Jeff Galindo was a particularly welcome guest.  Not only has it been too long for him to have not shared the stage with these guys, a variety of personal and professional demands have kept him away from his Boston fan club (myself included) far too much.  Parenthetically, wouldn’t it be a heck of a kick to witness a band with a front line of only Jeff and Jeb Bishop!  So the Explorers did their usual pieces composed by band members and Charlie’s superb selections penned by some of the leader’s favorite music legends.  The mix of musicians and by now familiar (to audience members and regulars on the bandstand) compositions created a fine aural mix of recognition and surprise.  Such evenings are among the treats of summer in Boston when schedules are unstable and resources therefore uncertain.  Somehow occasionally the necessary problem-solving results in improvisatory journeys unlikely in the matriculation seasons of October and March.  Thank you, Charlie for your timely--and artistic--resourcefulness…

The most fundamental political/economic problem facing the average American is obvious, and yet the President and a vast majority of legislators on both sides of the aisle seem oblivious to the problem.  Those in power keep referring to high employment and the booming stock market.  Most people either are already employed or choose not to be, and they certainly do not have sufficient income to benefit from the S&P Index.  It seems that only people who do not have a prayer of gaining significant political power during the next five to ten years--i.e., the socialists--get it.  Those socialists have a wide array of goals, and among them is the BIG ONE: Fixing economic inequality.  For the average American stealing from the rich and giving the stolen money to the rich does not solve the problem.  The socialists get that.  Early this month NBCNews.com released data that works beautifully for socialist politicians.  The report says, “Of adults between 18 and 64 years old, 39.4 percent said they had trouble with at least one of four basic necessities--housing, utilities, food, and health care.”  It is too bad that neither political party is capable of exploiting what the socialists know and turning that knowledge into gaining seats in the House and Senate.  But neither party seems to care about the reality of the average American.  And that will show itself in the 2018 elections when there will be media excitement about upsets, major victories, and significant losses.  But the power balance will not change because (other than pro-Trump fanatics) few remaining potential voters will go through the obstacles (Gerrymandering or otherwise) to elect greedy and/or stupid politicians.  Because, for the most part, that’s the choice…

For some time the monthly Steve Lantner ensembles--historically everything from duo to more than quintet--have materialized as a threesome.  The same threesome--Steve, Allan Chase, and Luther Gray.  Boring.  Yeah.  Boring in the same way that a great meal, a first kiss, or facing a judge in court is boring.  Also, time and again band members bring their everyday experiences to the stage to help us--doubtless without such intent--to understand the humanity behind and within the music.  And like the music itself, the non-musical humanity is engaging, compelling.  Over the years audience members have heard stories about gardening, buying and moving into a new home, stoats, and much more.  Even about experiences with other musicians.  And that’s what happened 8/28.  There were stories all over the place--Sam Rivers lost in Prescott, AZ, gigs at Charlie’s Tap in the 1980s and 1990s, the changing music scene over the years…  The humor and awe--the history--in all these events are in the blood and music of these musicians.  Three quite distinct personalities in their “conventional” interpersonal humanity.  And that is the way it is in the music itself.  Humans who care about other humans.  Musicians who care about the music and the other people on the bandstand making music.  And so the art materializes with Steve looking to the other two musicians, trying to see where they want to go or who wants to start running with the ball.  Sometimes someone runs, and the music goes for a time where that musician takes the whole trio.  And sometimes Allan and Luther look back at Steve--deadpan.  Then Steve takes the explicit reactions and turns to the keyboard.  In such instances he may offer a trill, a few notes to suggest something for the other musicians to bounce off.  And sometimes it’s a torrent, as if to say, “Hey, are you guys on board?”  And they always are…


July

The full Leap of Faith Orchestra--two million strong--offered its most convincing performance to date at Killian Hall on 7/14.  The gig opened with a fine totally free nonet performance.  The “small” group--PEK, Glynis Lomon, Yuri Zbitnov, Mimi Rabson, Elinor Speirs, Jim Warshauer, Syd Smart, Eric Rosenthal, and Steve Niemitz--gave us a good opportunity to hear solos and soli up close before the “big band” took the stage to hit us with more than an hour and a quarter of Dave Peck’s "Cosmological Horizons."  I applauded the Pickman Hall Leap of Faith Orchestra performance in last December’s Journal but noted aspects of “SuperClusters” that I believed could be improved.  I’m happy to report that the tweaks incorporated in this new piece have provided much more effective architecture.  I did not pick up for review my copy of the chart and notes for "Cosmological Horizons" until about a third of the way through the performance.  I prefer to hear music in performance (to assess what it sounds like) rather than to read along (looking for mistakes?).  Also, the reproduction of the chart for audience members is something less than 100% and therefore cumbersome to read in less than brilliant light.  However, one did not need help from the copy of the chart to witness the improvements.  They were quite audible.  The only reason I picked up the score at all was to confirm that the writing was telling me that the reasons for the improvements were what I imagined.  The sonic definition and timing of sub-units and solos is much clearer than ever before.  Band members--those in the nonet plus Jane Wang, Silvain Castellano,  Zachary Lavine, Albey onBass, Charlie Kohlhase, Zack Bartolomei, Eric Dahlman, Forbes Graham, Bob Moores, Duane Reed, Dave Harris, Eric Woods, Reverend Grant Beale, Chris Florio, and Eric Zinman--seem to be having more fun integrating “toy instruments” (auxiliary instruments) into the mix, and that’s not a throwaway remark.  Among other things, that joy suggests how much the band members “get it”--the idea, the texture.  Maybe it is a result of the acoustics of the room, but the performance throughout the evening suggested that band members were hearing each other better than ever.  So many good things were happening that I hesitate to offer a caveat.  However, by his own admission in notes distributed for performances of the full orchestra over the years, Dave is an unabashed tinkerer (e.g., in each new score he adds “something new to my notational system.”).  An idea or physical creation can be “improved” to death.  One of the reasons people are crowded three or four deep to see “The Starry Night” any time I visit MoMA is that Van Gogh knew when to put his brush down.  He knew that additional “improving” would diminish the quality of the work.  I’m suggesting that Dave’s writing (as demonstrated in the 7/14 performance) has reached a high point and perhaps it is time to reconsider the value of Frame Notation tinkering.  I say this for two reasons.  First, Dave’s tinkering is not a matter of creating a new composition.  It is a revision of compositional mechanics.  True, "Cosmological Horizons" is a different composition from “SuperClusters,” but the salient distinction between the two works is the compositional mechanics of the pieces.  If he wanted to and lived long enough, Dave could write an infinite number of distinct compositions employing unchanged compositional mechanics that were used for "Cosmological Horizons" (or “SuperClusters” for that matter).  So the only question is whether or not the compositional mechanics of his arrangements at this point (i.e., used in writing "Cosmological Horizons") are operating at their optimal level.  I do not know the answer to that question, but I believe it may be time for Dave to think seriously about that question. The second reason I believe it may be time to reconsider notational tinkering is that the 7/14 performance may have suggested that the tinkering has gone too far.  I emphasize may have because perceptions of what happened musically on 7/14 are the result of a single experience, and what I am hearing/seeing that concerns me is a subtle matter.  In other words, if I were to witness the exact same performance again, I might have a slightly different reaction to the experience.  To cut to the chase, as I sat there 7/14, from time to time I heard individuals and (more commonly) sub-groups performing what sounded like through-composed music.  I know there are people (including the late Gunther Schuller) who believe it is a great compliment to refer to an improvised solo as so good it “sounds like it was composed.”  But, as far as I’m concerned, saying that a solo sounds like it was composed is one of the greatest of insults in the jazz world.  After all, one of the profound things that giants such as Coleman Hawkins taught us is that the purpose of a jazz solo is to create music that is better than the head.  I realize there are no “tunes” or any kind of conventional notation in the score for "Cosmological Horizons," but graphic scores (going back at least to mid-century) have dictated/implied a range of “freedom/stricture” that is vast.  I guess I’m suggesting that the “stricture” part of that range was creeping into the performance.  No.  Don’t ask people in the band about strictures.  You will get a bunch of puzzled faces.  They were having too much fun--and justifiably so--to be aware of such things.  No.  I’m suggesting that the hard-working Dave Peck (Has anyone paused to consider the time and money he’s putting into this project?  Pause and applause.) may want to listen to (and watch?) the 7/14 performance to assess whether he needs a pause in the tinkering for the next Leap of Faith Orchestra chart (to re-test where he is) or tweak a bit backwards.  Whatever he does, it is most likely to be a decision in the right direction.  After all, the full Leap of Faith Orchestra gave its most convincing performance to date at Killian Hall on 7/14…

But wait.  There’s more.  The duo performance was something of a historic event.  I had caught Glynis Lomon and Dave Peck perform as a duo a few times in the 1990s, but I had thought they had performed at least once or twice during the past couple of decades.  No.  Dave noted that somewhat recently they had performed during a brief single set, but they had not been together as a duo for an entire gig since the 1990s.  As it turns out, that “duo gap” was significant.  On the surface, the lack of such a duo outing does not seem to be remarkable.  During the past decades fans have witnessed Dave and Glynis’ work on stage many times.  They are performing together three times during this month alone.  But, as Glynis and Dave demonstrated 7/21 at the Outpost, many factors--personnel, number of musicians, audience, and instrumentation among them--affect the musical outcomes of a performance.  All of those factors affected the sonic specifics 7/21, but the most apparent factor was the number of people on stage.  As any improvising musician will tell you, the challenges of performing solo are different from those of performing in a duo, and the challenges of performing in either of those contexts is different from performing in a trio.  You get the idea.  Dave and Glynis are affiliated with trio ensembles, and typically Leap of Faith performances involve numbers from quartet to a couple dozen or more.  The numbers affect the sonic experience.  I’m not talking about quality.  A soloist can offer a terrible or a terrific performance, as is the case for a stage full of musicians.  What a musician does in these different numerical contexts of necessity is different in each case.  That fact became wonderfully clear 7/21 at the Outpost.  For many years fans have had the terrific experience of realizing the contributions of these two musicians to the work of others in larger ensembles, such as Glynis leading a roar of other “voices” during the 7/14 Leap of Faith Orchestra performance at Killian Hall.  In the duo performance (I’m tempted to suggest) the “weight” of supporting others was lifted.  There were no quotidian musical responsibilities.  It was just two superb improvisors chatting over lunch on a day off.  But it was more than a good-natured, relaxed encounter between old friends.  The music they made was affected by the context, but the “same” instruments were bringing forth different sonics.  Both of them from time to time performed using various percussion tools, voice, and Aquasonics.  But Glynis’ primary focus was cello, and Dave switched back and forth between an array of primarily metal percussion instruments (gongs, metal bars, bells, and more) and a zillion double and single reed instruments (with a flute entering the fray briefly).  The primary difference in this performance was not which instruments they used but how they used them, what they said.  They certainly were not different people on this gig.  But, for example, consider PEK’s parade of instruments.  On a gig with the full orchestra one can see Dave move from instrument to instrument, something like a bee having a great time with the flowers on a honeysuckle vine but stopping briefly at each “flower” (i.e., instrument) to imbibe and throw a dash of paint here or an energy boost there as needed.  There were splashes of paint and energy boosts 7/21 at the Outpost.  But the musicians knew that something different was going on.  There were solos, and the clarity of the isolation of such fine improvisations was greater than in the larger context.  But it was the unity of the two of them in duo sonics that came across so profoundly, impossible in the “busy” context of even a silent large ensemble.   Here was Dave selecting colors to enrich the lines offered by Glynis (particularly on cello but found in voice and Aquasonics as well).  Yes, there were splashes of paint and energy, but the consistent wonder of the evening came from the contributions of each musician to classic sonic architecture as “improvised metal, glass, and masonry.”  Each musician had something important to say, and much of that came through the enhancement of the other sonic creations on stage.  I’m all for historic events, but waiting another quarter century to hear this special music again is not a good idea…
  
According to a 7/16 press release, renovation of the Press Room in Portsmouth, NH is scheduled to be completed before the end of the summer.  One of the most important jazz venues north of the Massachusetts border, the Press Room has been closed for more than a year.  It was widely believed that the restaurant/music venue would be closed permanently or reborn as a business devoid of jazz activity.  As NH regulars know, for several years the venue has featured mostly pop/blues bands with occasional jazz gigs.  On those jazz occasions the Press Room often presented some of the best jazz musicians in NH and eastern Massachusetts.  Although the press release makes references to music in general, there is no specific statement that jazz (or any kind of music) will be featured when the Press Room reopens.  Perhaps musicians who have performed there in recent years will contact the venue’s owners to mention that jazz gigs are good for Portsmouth--and the world…

I worked in the computer industry for a couple decades, and I must confess that it took me almost five years before I discovered that computer software was the cause of most problems customers and people in the company I worked for were having with the equipment.  I’m not talking about technical bugs.  There is something genuinely strange about software development “geniuses.”  They do not create software to help people get work done.  They develop software to impress each other.  Since Microsoft and Apple have taken over the world, we find ourselves in the best of both worlds: the marriage of software developers and greedy businessmen/businesswomen.  The AARP Bulletin (Vol. 59, No. 5) quotes Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak as saying, “I go to sleep regretting where it went--the internet was supposed to be pure, a place for people to share and do business.  It got cornered by big business.”

There is no bass in the Josiah Reibstein Quintet, a fact that has several significant effects on what happens onstage with this band.  First, it means that the tuba and drums are the key to the band.  If Josiah Reibstein and Joe Musacchia are not at the top of their game, the band does not work.  That’s not a slam at Tyler Burchfield, Sam Dechenne, and Jacob Baron.  It is just that, without exhilarating work and telepathic communication on the part of Josiah and Joe, the fine other band mates cannot overcome the peculiarities of the instrumentation.  If a bass were added to the quintet, that would open space for the tuba to take on more conventional support roles and pursue Josiah’s improvisational dancing.  But Josiah has chosen to be both “bass” and “tuba,” demonstrating justified confidence in his ability to be both.  But that dual role is possible only because of the leader’s decision to call on Joe Musacchia and his spot-on work at the drum kit.  The most obvious significant effect of a lack of bass in the band is the tuba-centric ensemble sound.  The fact that Josiah is carrying out two instrumental functions means that the tuba sonics are almost ubiquitous.  In other words, no matter what other arranging devices are employed, the band retains a signature “tuba” sound.  In addition, because the tuba and drums are an inspiration rather than a constraint, the other band members can perform written and improvised parts with confidence and a certain amount of abandon.  There was plenty of applause for solos from Tyler Burchfield, Sam Dechenne, and Jacob Baron, but that applause might have been for their execution of the charts also.  Josiah obviously is fascinated by sounds and tempos, and those elements end up in his charts (such as “Florestinia”).  As in the case of mostly big band arrangers before him (e.g., Manny Albam’s wonderful arrangements of music from “West Side Story” on Coral LP CRL 57207) Josiah loves street sounds and plugs them into his music to good effect.  One gets the feeling that a Josiah fantasy is to have been invited to perform on Max Roach’s Quiet as It’s Kept or Dave Brubeck’s Time Out or basically any Don Ellis big band album.  He has an attraction to what has become known as “odd” time signatures, particularly those incorporating five beats in the cycle.  The sounds and the time signatures do not daunt the guys in the band.  Their performance 7/13 at Third Life Studio demonstrated that the challenge was an inspiration…

I try to limit my references to artistic pursuits other than jazz (e.g., visual art, theater, and so-called “classical” music), but I must confess that I love all the arts and sometimes get carried away.  Whenever I post information about non-jazz arts I rationalize.  For example, when I posted “A Tribute to John Cage” among the scheduled jazz listings, I did not hesitate because so many jazz musicians and fans that I encounter are John Cage fans (and therefore may be Nam June Paik fans).  The exhibit closes early this month.  So anyone reading this who has not caught the exhibit likely has missed it.  I do hope that people in the Boston area with artistic sensibility made time to go to the exhibit.  There is no question that film documentation of John Cage performing 4’33” in Harvard Square is historically important locally, but consider that back in the 1970s our own WGBH-TV chose to present ground breaking video art--several times--and went so far as to support a Nam June Paik fellowship.  Also, keep in mind that Alvin Lucier featured in the film made his artistic breakthrough--at the prodding of Cage--at a major performance of new music at Brandeis University’s Rose Art Museum.  Ponder these things, folks.  Those cutting edge institutions have fallen asleep.  There is nothing cutting edge about WGBH today--“Take two aspirin and call someone with a British accent in the morning”--and it will take Brandeis University many years to live down its casual willingness to sell off significant museum holdings to fix a problem not created by any artists or the museum.  I hasten to add that recent developments at the Rose Art Museum are cause for optimism.  But keep an eye open.  The Rose has some of the most important paintings of the 1950s breakthrough artists found anywhere among the unfortunately staid Boston area museums.  Ah.  You see what has happened.  I get talking about the other arts on the Boston scene and can’t seem to stop.  And don’t get me going about how brain-dead the decision makers at the MFA are regarding visual art since 1950.  Maybe that’s why I find solace in post-Ayler jazz.  After all (although no one around here seems to understand the fact) Boston is one of the major post-Ayler jazz centers in the world.  Thank you, new music jazz warriors…

It was an encore prompted by a warm and sustained audience response at the end of the evening.  The musicians chose to play “All the Things You Are.”  It was a nice choice, a jazz standard known by everyone in the universe and no doubt everyone in the audience.  Since approximately mid-century the Kern- Hammerstein composition has sustained quite a beating from mainstream jazz musicians.  Taking inspiration from Parker and Gillespie while ignoring the vast melodic resources of the work that the bebop pioneers knew and exploited, jazz musicians since then time and again have used the composition as a show piece muddled with running the changes.  But there was none of that in the encore 7/22 at the Lily Pad.  A freshman at one of our many local music schools might have reacted with displeasure at how slowly the piece was played, perhaps confused at the superb music that was being mined.  Actually the work was not performed slowly, something closer to medium tempo.  But listeners have become so accustomed to break-neck performances of the piece that listening to a truly musical performance of the work is something of a surprise.  The encore played by the Joe Hunt Trio--Joe, Yuka Hamano Hunt, and Keala Kaumeheiwa--was a perfect demonstration of why anyone longing to catch a live performance of mainstream jazz played “the way it used to be” should show up to witness the monthly Joe Hunt Trio gigs.  By that I mean mainstream jazz performed with contextual insight rooted in witnessing the pioneers in flight rather than second-hand dogma and reference to recordings.  It is important to interject that the authentic grounding to a great extent comes from Joe’s performances in the early 1960s in New York with George Russell, Eric Dolphy, and others before he performed with Stan Getz and Bill Evans.  Of course, part of what he learned is to take the music and push it further--just as Yuka, Keala, and Joe did all evening.  At the conclusion of the encore, as if to emphasize to the audience what everyone was not hearing, Yuka offered a quiet coda consisting of the long-since-abused famous Parker-Gillespie intro to “All the Things You Are” (e.g., the Massey Hall performance, among others).  Joe will be on tour in August, but the trio returns in September…

The Week is a weekly digest of politics and culture that fairly successfully presents news and opinion, offering perspectives from the left, the right, and between.  Each issue devotes part of one column to several usually interesting quotes from a wide range of historic and current figures.  Here are a few of my favorites from the 7/20 issue:

“The true test of a man’s character is what he does when no one is watching.”--Basketball coach John Wooden

“I bring out the worst in my enemies and that’s how I get them to defeat themselves.”--Attorney Roy Cohn

“He who knows only his side of the case knows little of that.”--John Stuart Mill

“By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.”--Benjamin Franklin


June 

As a warm-up to the 6/26 gig at the Outpost several people in the band and in the audience discussed some of the manual labor involved in home ownership--everything from unpacking boxes after a move to chain saw work (still ongoing in my case) to create fireplace logs and debris from the windfall of the great spring storm.  But Steve Lantner’s description of digging, establishing a base, and laying stone (only to have an unexpected rain mess things up) took center stage.  Fortunately, manipulating 50 pound stones seems to have had no effect on his ability to play the piano.  The Steve Lantner Trio with Allan Chase and Luther Gray did some building of its own on stage.  Maybe it was coincidental, but the music of the first set brought stone to mind.  Stone for art.  The men worked in sound sculpture to an extent I cannot remember for the three of them on a gig.  You know, something significantly closer to the music of John Butcher than that of Joe McPhee.  The beautiful sonic shape shifting continued for most of the first set, resulting in sighs and applause from the audience.  The second set was more of a sonic travelogue with music rambling and changing, moving the lead from one person (or one duo) to another with slow but compelling mood shifts.  After the hearty applause at the end of the second set was done, I asked Steve whether someone had fixed the tuning-cranky piano.  I was amazed at how he could make such a less than perfect piano sound so good.  He said that before the first set he had had time to test the piano and fix five of the notes.  Five notes.  Imagine fixing only five notes on the Outpost instrument and being able to play that much piano.  No doubt the superb work of Allan and Luther helped bring out the best…

Vocalist Rebecca Parris died 6/17 at age 66.  Her passing has been noted in a variety of local print and online media and a fine Andrew R. Chow obituary in The New York Times.  She had a formidable presence and stage personality, not unlike the larger-than-life female blues singers of the first half of the last century.  But she was a jazz singer, one who mentored youngsters and inspired by example.  Born Ruth MacCloskey in Needham on 12/28/51, she made the savvy business decision to use the name Rebecca Parris.  Throughout her half century as a performer she sang with almost all of the respected mainstream musicians in town and had appearances with Nat Pierce, Gerald Wiggins, Woody Herman, Red Mitchell, and many others.  For more than a decade Rebecca Parris battled a daunting list of medical afflictions including heart disease, hip replacement, diabetes, and collapsed discs.  She was a person of indomitable spirit.  Minutes after sitting in with her partner Paul McWilliams at a jam session 6/17 in South Yarmouth, Rebecca Parris collapsed in the parking lot…

The David Haas Group--David Haas, Kevin Frenette, Scott Getchell, Glenn Dickson, Todd Brunel, Kit Demos, and Joe Musacchia--is a rarity, a free improvising ensemble that shows up every month with essentially the same personnel to perform at the Lily Pad.  And, as I’ve noted before, once a free ensemble consists of a half dozen musicians or more--with no predefined cues or architecture--group interaction can be especially tricky.  So I always enter a David Haas Group gig with fingers crossed.  On the other hand, the ensemble has been doing a fine job of figuring out how to cope with the challenges without developing crutches, handles, or back doors--a significant achievement.  The fact that some of Boston’s finest musicians are the heart of the band is central to its success.  Even with the ensemble’s maturity, during the first set the group presented a lot of “searching” interspersed with moments of compelling solo, duo, and ensemble offerings.  Scott played some wonderful solo lines and managed to become a whole brass section when he teamed with the clarinets.  Bass and drums engaged and surprised with occasionally foot-stomping “rhythm section” work trading with moments during which--intentionally and with fine effect--the two instruments (sometimes with synth essays) were not even on the same page.  While I applaud musicians occasionally laying out for the sake of the total impact, we could have used more commentary from Scott and Kevin throughout both sets.  Their contributions sonically always were spot on.  The leader revels in the sound party as much as any of his band mates.  Most of the time he is happy to use the piano as a prod.  But there are “surprise” occasions when he offers lines that become sentences and paragraphs that change the group path completely.  One of the most consistently successful elements of the band during both sets was the pairing of Messrs. Brunel and Dickson.  Obviously there is a natural affinity between the two clarinets, and these gentlemen over the months have figured out how to exploit that affinity with a range of everything from delightfully cacophonous “arguments” to the realization of two instruments becoming one.  The first set and the break apparently set up the second set, during which everything of the best music touched on and hinted at in the first set came to fruition.  All those brilliant solo, duo, and ensemble moments seemed to resolve as an organic unity.  The work of individuals and groups within the ensemble retained the strong identities offered during the best moments of the first set, but (as strong as each element was) each of the voices and groups of voices was more integral to the whole during the second set.  It was as if each voice had a greater awareness of and commitment to the whole ensemble.  And the ensemble reciprocated…

It is not remarkable that Wynton Marsalis led the Jazz at Lincoln Center Orchestra 6/10 at Jordan Hall, but maybe there is some significance that The Improper Bostonian had the Celebrity Series event listed as a Classical gig…

The Third Life Choreographer Series event 6/15 at Third Life Studio featured brief performances by nine movement ensembles.  The evening was an engaging celebration of the human body in motion.  Almost all of the presentations (for a variety of practical reasons) featured pre-recorded sounds with the performances.  A notable exception was Joe Burgio’s Ensemble Inedit, an interdisciplinary group.  There was fine improvised/structured movement at the core of the work.  In addition (and concurrently) two of the body movement specialists in sequence recited foreign language poetry including the ancient “Remembrance” by Todros Abulafia and the contemporary “Spectacle of the dance” by Hector de Saint-Denys Garneau.  The “alien” vocal sounds, integral with the movement, is a wonderful innovation for the ensemble, opening a door to endless sonic/dance possibilities.  Joe’s ideas have evolved significantly over the years since his compelling “body drama” choreography.  Risk is much more central to his current work, risk that is rooted in a more pervasive abstraction of motion.  Bringing in other elements, such as vocalization, enhances the challenge and resultant aesthetic energy.  One element that Joe has incorporated successfully for years is improvised music.  The sonic structure/architecture established by Joe for the choreography has evolved over time, but some musicians, such as John Voigt and Walter Wright keep soldiering on through all the changes.  And beautifully.  On this gig John and Walter were joined by a relative newcomer, guitarist Reggie Liu.  The combination of flexible veterans and youthful adventurer came together superbly--opening doors and sustaining events in ways that supported and spotlighted the vocal sounds and evolving abstraction of human movement.  The result was a wonderful highlight of a celebratory evening… 

This Journal in February mentioned the impending closing of Ryles.  There have been several follow-up articles on the subject in The Boston Globe and elsewhere since then.  As far as I know, Scout Cambridge (No. 32, page 8) and The Cambridge Chronicle are the first local publications to point out a significant restriction in the property’s for-sale listing.  According to Scout Cambridge, anyone who purchases the Ryles property will be prohibited by contract from “opening a restaurant, bar, gourmet food store, or music venue in the space...  The stipulation extends over the next thirty years.”  So much for the idea of Ryles being replaced by another jazz club.  Supposedly the owners’ rationale for the restriction is to prevent competition for S&S Restaurant, which is owned by the same folks who own Ryles.  One can understand the owners’ concern about competition from another restaurant in the Inman Square area.  But anyone offering gourmet food or music certainly would not be competing with what is happening at S&S these days.  Somehow I find it difficult to imagine S&S upgrading its menu or booking bands.  In any case, two thoughts come to mind.  First, it could be a long time before Ryles is sold.  Why would anyone want to buy a restaurant but not be able to use it as such?  Second, we are quite unlikely ever to hear any jazz coming from either the Ryles or the S&S property…

Summer may be the best time to enjoy Manhattan.  Piano in Bryant Park in New York is up and running at lunch time (12:30-2:30) again this year.  So, if you are in the vicinity of the New York Public Library this summer for lunch, you can catch a range of people offering solo performances on the upright piano at the East end of the park.  People scheduled who are likely to appeal to jazz fans include Jon Weber (July 9-13) and Bertha Hope (August 20-24) and others…

With George Garzone overseas, there was a lack of The Fringe in Boston.  But there was a night for the Bob Gullotti Trio, a great opportunity for Bob to bring John Lockwood and long-time collaborator Tim Ray to Third Life Studio for the enjoyment of a near full house 6/22.  By way of introduction Bob said, “We usually improvise, but tonight we are going to play some tunes, too.”  It seems that someone in the audience did not understand Bob was using common short-hand to make the distinction between totally free playing and straight-ahead jazz.  The person apparently thought the comment was a joke and laughed.  But he was alone.  Others knew what they were in for--or at least thought they knew.  During the two sets of music the line between solos in a mainstream context and free adventures remained blurry, and to good effect.  No doubt to make audience members comfortable, the trio opened the first set with a Wayne Shorter tune--but manipulated it with sounds that pushed the architecture in many different directions.  The next piece was completely spontaneous, and the blurring of the lines continued.  There were times when the music brought to mind the more successful trios of Bill Evans and Tommy Flanagan.  It was not a matter of mimicry but rather the intimacy of the three instruments, the idea that (for example) the sounds suggested the guy playing the piano also was playing the bass--or vice versa.  Woven throughout the evening were another Shorter piece as well as works by Tadd Dameron and trombone monster Jeff Galindo (with some Flanagan channeling) and a Monk closer.  And through it all we caught fine moments of the musical personalities on stage--the dry wit of the pianist, the empathetic twenty fingers of the bassist, and the compelling-propelling earth quake coming from the signature Eames trap set.  After the gig Bob told me of his upcoming busy summer including two months in Europe and Scandinavia.  Apparently later in the summer The Fringe will return to Denmark as the core faculty of that country’s jazz camp for professional musician students.  The legendary trio will be bringing with them other U.S. jazz musicians to fill out the faculty, apparently this year including Kenny Barron and Louis Hayes.  That should be quite a party…

In the March Journal I mentioned the scathing comments that former CIA Director John Brennan made about our president.  Recently conservative political analyst George Will claimed in the Washington Post that the vice president is an even worse person than the president, referring to Mike Pence as “America’s most repulsive public figure.”  Trump, Will claims, “is what he is…a floundering, inarticulate jumble of gnawing insecurities, but Pence has chosen to be an obsequious toady… for whom no amount of brownnosing is too much.”  Why is it that high-visibility non-liberals seem to be the most vehement in attacking the White House?  Are they more disappointed than liberals, or is it simply that today’s liberals are remarkably ineffectual both politically and verbally?...

On the lighter side, according to Science online, approximately 320,000 years ago early homo sapiens or similar beings made remarkable tool-making advances and developed trading networks.  Apparently the tools these beings developed were a significant step up from the clunky stone products used exclusively up to that time.  According to archaeologist John Shea of Stony Brook University, “Early homo sapiens and their immediate African ancestors [who lived at the investigated site] were at least as smart as the scientists investigating them.”…

A full house showed up 6/4 at the Outpost to catch Tatsuya Nakatani and friends--Damon Smith, Jeb Bishop, Forbes Graham, and Andria Nicodemou.  Everyone on stage was operating in top form.  Damon Smith continues to impress with his ability to plug in exactly what is needed or omit the potentially superfluous during any instant of a performance.  There are no questions about his technique, but his strength is the important stuff--the music.  He has established a solid place in Boston as both a superb musician and catalyst for music events.  I’m starting to think of Jeb and Forbes as the Boston Brass.  Whenever they are on the stand together profound stuff happens.  And it happened at an extraordinarily high level through two sets 6/4.  They really had their own duo band going--the conversation and the “interruptions” were spell-binding.  Through it all they were pushing the activity of those around them to higher levels also.  And neither of them has forgotten how to solo.  A special thank you is due to Andria Nicodemou who booked the band.  Fans and even many musicians do not know how much extra effort is involved in leading and/or booking a band.  She wisely brought in four non-percussionists who are familiar with each other musically to play with the touring Tatsuya Nakatani.  As if inspired by her fine practical work, Andrea was in top form musically, drawing on an array of techniques (including some very effective horizontal drum stick slams) but never for the sake of technique.  And when there was a need to bring on the energy, she tore up the place.  Fine stuff.  All of this was happening because Tatsuya Nakatani returned to Boston for a gig.  The past couple of times I witnessed his work he performed as a solo percussionist and in another case (also at the Outpost) he led an ensemble of local musicians playing gongs.  Both of those experiences were quite fine, but I must confess that I had missed his creativity within the context of a band, the kind of context he performed in most frequently when he lived here.  So I got my wish, and there was no disappointment.  Tatsuya obviously was having a ball, feeding and being fed, creating marvelous bowed and sticked sounds.  He even took bows to the vibraphone to open the second set with a duo of bowed music, side by side with Andrea.  Tatsuya is one of my all-time favorite percussionists, and his ensemble work 6/4 showed me once again why.  Fans know that he is a musician of positive energy, but maybe that energy is up a notch these days.  Since his last visit to Boston Tatsuya Nakatani has become a married man.  Erika, his wife, was in the audience and obviously is his greatest fan.  The two of them have moved to a home in New Mexico.  That means, since his very first arrival on the West Coast of the U.S., Tatsuya again is living west of the Mississippi.  That’s great news for fans on the Pacific coast.  But it does give us Easterners pause.  Annual visits here by Tatsuya are too infrequent.  Can we continue to hope for even that much?... 


May

Touring percussion duos are fairly rare occurrences.  Most of the reasons for the rarity are pretty obvious.  Creating great music with two guitars or saxophones, for example, is not a simple matter.  But two musicians attempting to connect with each other and audiences can produce many more “musical solutions” with tonal lines than with instruments whose characteristics tend to emphasize sounds and timbre peripheral to rather than central to most conventional music theory.  Although the challenges of duo percussion performance are real, it is important to interject that the brilliant John Cage saw percussion as “the future of music.”  It was two improvising percussionists from Chicago--Hamid Drake and Adam Rudolph--who took on the duo challenge 5/3 at Third Life Studio.  They eliminated some potential problems by having Hamid focus most of his attention during the substantial single set on the traps (provided by Curt Newton) while his partner emphasized the sounds of an array of congas and toms.  The dramatic differences sonically gave each musician a greater number of options.  For the most part there would be no ambiguity regarding who was making what sound.  No stepping on toes.  In addition, initially there was some “politeness,” particularly on the part of Hamid, insuring that each musician would be heard.  But polite playing seldom results in great music.  Therefore it was good to see them become more adventuresome, as each musician pursued a greater variety of sonics, employing everything from whistles and other small toys to larger instruments, such as Hamid’s frame drum.  The largest “adjunct” percussion object of the evening, a piano, was found in the “corner” of the stage by Adam Rudolph.  He chose to pursue primarily minimalist sonics while Hamid responded with a barrage of cleansing rhythmic patterns on the kit.  A fine contrast of approaches to the music.  About 35 minutes into the set the artists gave the audience what at least some people came to witness--trap set and congas unleashed in a very personal version of the classic drum battle.  No losers (except the fans who missed the gig).  Just winners.  The final part of the evening began with Hamid on frame drum conversing with Adam Rudolph’s sintir while both offered vocal expressions from Africa and influenced by the culture of Tuva.  Then Adam Rudolph moved to frame drum and other instruments, finally pursuing the conga set to respond to the superb Hamid Drake frame drum work to conclude the set.  Because they have worked together for many years (first connecting at age 14, according to Hamid), it should not have come as a surprise to audience members that the music ended with the same, simultaneous slam-dam.  Followed by much applause.  Then Hamid offered shamanistic (a valid reference considering his life path) words about the importance of the jazz continuum and the music within all of us that the masters help us find--whether we perform music or not…

Bloomberg.com announced this month that U.S. Treasury net borrowing hit $488 billion through March of this year, a record for the first quarter and $47 billion more than it had estimated.  Even though they argued for tax cuts, fiscal conservatives are not applauding the borrowing.  If that’s not enough, The Los Angeles Times has reported that the U.S. economy slowed to an annual rate of 2.3% in the first quarter of this year, “despite large tax cuts taking effect…  Consumer spending dropped to its lowest level in nearly five years.”  Something is trickling down, but it certainly is not greater income…
The two-set evening opened with a blues and closed with a hymn composed by the bass player.  The performances were fine (and almost traditional) Kohlhase bookends for an evening of a variety of works by disparate and engaging composers.  They were composers often represented on Charlie Kohlhase gigs--Charlie and other members of the band as well as Graham Connah, Elmo Hope, Makanda Ken McIntyre, Roswell Rudd, John Tchicai.  Such works are among the strengths and weaknesses of Charlie’s gigs.  The strengths--the quality of the works primarily--are significant.  The weaknesses are rooted in the familiarity of the works for both musicians and fans.  Execution and listening are less challenging over time.  The most obvious solutions to the problem are new compositions by Charlie (and other band members) or new arrangements of different works by the same fine composers.  I say that with awareness of Charlie as a person constantly juggling too many plates.  Arranging works of other composers is time-consuming enough, and writing and arranging brand new works is even a greater challenge.  One of the factors that helps minimize the problem of sonic predictability is the unpredictability of instrumentation/personnel on each gig.  Typically the Explorers consist of anything from four to eight musicians--regulars all.  On 5/17 at the Outpost the band was a quintet--Charlie, Seth Meicht, Daniel Rosenthal, Josiah Reibstein, Aaron Darrell, and Curt Newton.  The full-scale “rhythm section” was reduced by one, and the middle and top brass of the front line were missing completely.  Right away there were challenges for Seth and Charlie divvying up lead and support lines and potential spontaneous transcriptions.  The “rhythm section” did its normal thing plus provided composed lines not written for them (but Curt is a very melodic drummer), and Aaron is very good at looking over Josiah’s shoulder while Josiah is filling in the blanks.  At one point someone raised questions about the ambiguity of who was going to handle the closing head.  Charlie shrugged and said that they would figure it out when the end of the piece arrived.  That’s not the most comforting direction from a band leader, but it’s the kind of statement of confidence that works just fine with top-shelf musicians.  And the seat-of-the-pants flying is the kind of activity that often brings out the best in the musicians--and the audience.  One recent development that I find to be very healthy (for band members and listeners alike) is the vocal contributions all around, to a great extent inspired by the late Roswell Rudd apparently.  Hey, Benny Goodman was no great vocalist, but what would we do without “Gotta Be This or That”?  And then there was the bass pizzicato with hummed vocal by Aaron.  There he is (without bow) doing the Boston tradition via Ray Perry and Slam Stewart of the vocal an octave above the simultaneous bass line.  At the end of the evening I thanked Aaron for “carrying on the tradition.”  He responded with two surprises.  First, he had been listening to a recording of Stewart on the way to the gig.  Second, he did not know that the bassist while at school in Boston during the early 1930s picked up the technique from Ray Perry.  So I guess the octave separation between voice and bass was just a matter of good “Boston” instincts.  After all, others--most notably Major Holley--picked up the idea from Slam Stewart but hummed in the same octave as the bass line.  Or maybe Aaron’s octave gap was simply a matter of vocal necessity…

Sad news for guitar fans.  The Wall Street Journal announced that early this month Gibson filed for bankruptcy.  Poor management decisions at the top of Gibson caused the failure of the Nashville-based company.  Internationally the company sells more than 20% of all guitars.  Control has been handed over to bondholders…

A dinner engagement (however delightful) ran much longer than expected, causing me to show up very late to the fine double bill 5/9 at the Lily Pad.  I assume that all of the double bill was quite fine because I caught the last part only of the first set by Cutout--Pandelis Karayorgis, Jorrit Dijkstra, Jeb Bishop, Nate McBride, and Luther Gray--and what I witnessed was as fine as is to be expected by now.  Jorrit and Jeb are great foils for each other improvisationally, and the “rhythm section” does it all with the charts and chatter.  One of the highlights was how effectively the two horns and the piano voicings realized the charts as a trio front line.  And there was terrific busy-ness everywhere in the pieces I heard.  The charts are challenging but engaging, always pushing the solos.  No question about it.  This is thorny music, but the energy and focussed engagement of the musicians are so compelling that only a deaf person would not smell the roses.  I was fortunate enough to catch the entire second set featuring Every Opportunity--Jeb Bishop, Forbes Graham, Abigate Reisman, Brittany Karlson, Curt Newton, and two-set curator Eric Rosenthal.  I confess that the primary draw to this gig for me was the percussion section.  In March I had the wonderful opportunity to witness a solo improvisation set at MIT Chapel offered by Curt.  And every blue moon I am lucky enough to catch Curt and Eric present a duo set of improvised percussion work.  So here was a chance for me to see/hear this superb duo smack in the middle of an improvising sextet.  I was not disappointed.  Sometimes one of them would be motoring along, setting off sparks while the other percussionist sat motionless (sometimes with arms folded) but bearing a grin stolen from the Cheshire cat.  Other times the two of them would be carrying on a percussion discussion, back and forth or simultaneously, often finishing each other’s sentences.  Of course, some of the time they created simply delightful mayhem.  And all of it--all of it--functioned marvelously as conversation with or support for what everybody else on stage was doing.  The Boston Brass returned to the stage once again, playing wonderfully separately and together.  Forbes was more subdued than I can remember.  He spent much time watching and listening.  When he did play, the results also were subdued, spare.  And with it all, there was no diminishment of beauty or constructive support.  It should be of no surprise, but I’ll mention that a busy first set caused no backing off on the part of Jeb.  He was as energetic and eloquent as ever.  And the two brass remain a solid team.  The unknown quantity for me were the two string players.  I heard that they had performed with Andria Nicodemou, Jeb, and some other familiar names.  And all of that is good news.  But I confess to knowing nothing about either of them prior to this gig.  The most obvious thing about the two of them is that they are young.  They did not perform at the level of the other musicians on the stage during the second set.  All of the non-string musicians have sustained solid reputations for decades.  That’s not a slam.  It’s just a fact.  I hasten to add that I found the work of the violinist and the bassist to be thoughtful and engaging.  For example, I really liked some of the things they didn’t do.  I witnessed no musical attempts to show the audience that either of them graduated at the top of her class at XYZ Music School, or alternately in a self-effacing manner trying to hide in the sounds of others on stage, or bowling us over with technique as a substitute content, or offering a litany of licks from favorite recordings.  And the list could go on.  Such are the performance pangs of young jazz musicians.  But there was none of that here.  So the two of them share a good bit of performance maturity.  Older musicians have fared less well.  Each string player exhibited what might be referred to as--evolving?--musical personality.  Abigale Reisman apparently loves to trill, employing it as an ornament for a sequence of notes, a glissando, or a single tone.  This she alternates with a butterfly attack to create a verbal monologue that occasionally brings to mind the improvised “soundings” of Malcolm Goldstein.  Again, these comments are descriptions of sonic activities, not criticisms.  In the same way there is no criticism of the work of Brittany Karlson when I say that she exhibits elements of a distinct musical personality.  In fact, one of the things I liked so much about the bassist’s performance 5/9 was her restraint, her understated attack on the instrument.  Much more seasoned musicians could learn from her consistent resort to necessity in making sonic choices.  Both string players have chops and noteworthy decision-making abilities.  They respond without pure echo.  They join into spontaneous group melody without playing the predictable.  And more.  Did I mention that these two fine young improvisors are females?  It is such an optimistic joy to witness two young musicians who are both really good at what they do and also are women.  As any longtime jazz fan knows, some of Boston’s finest jazz musicians are women.  There just aren’t enough of them.  We have not done enough to bring young females to gigs to experience the music.  And these two string musicians bring the hope of drawing more young females to the music.  It’s the future…

For what may be the last Opensound series concert ever Lou Bunk 5/25 brought into Third Life Studio what might be thought of as some of the best music/musicians who for more than a decade (since approximately 2005) have been presented on the series.  First up was a new composition from current Maine-iac Steve Norton with electronics help from Michael Rosenstein.  Steve for some time (since college days?) has had a fascination (obsession?) with Samuel Beckett.  He and I have exchanged differences and agreements about Beckett’s works for several years.  So when he told me he had written a composition, “No once in pastless now,” derived from Beckett’s late work, Worstward Ho, I had some moments of concern.  I say all this with the understanding that I mention Steve’s work in some detail (in spite of the fact that it is a composed work) because long-time fans of the post-Ayler scene in Boston think of Steve’s contributions as those of an improvisor.  Such folks may want to know about his latest through-composed work.  Therefore I mention that the through-composed work consists of a series of “repeated” (actually almost repeated) minimalist lines on contra-alto clarinet supported by an electronic drone pulse initially and then a variety of thumps and crunches before returning to the pulse and other subdued sounds.  The thing about the work that works is that it grapples successfully with Beckett’s minimalist language sonically--not an easy assignment.  Keep in mind that Beckett searched for language that would function with the distilled clarity of music.  The presentation was theatrical, both visual and sonic.  A single fluorescent tube provided the stark (Beckett-inspired?) light in an otherwise almost completely dark room.  But perhaps the light’s primary function was as the source of a constant 60-cycle buzz throughout the entire work.  “Ungrounded” ground for the music.  Although I have enjoyed performances by Andrea Pensado in group contexts, I much prefer her work as a soloist.  That thought resurfaced as I watched and listened to Andrea’s solo electronics and amplified voice during the second set of the evening.  Basically I cannot imagine anyone else feeding her better ideas sonically than she feeds herself.  Part of the reason Andrea is so effective as a loner is that--as in the case of the 5/25 gig--she thinks in terms of predetermined structures into which she works out her wonderful improvisations.  She opened with a signature barrage followed by a reading of a philosophical prose/poetry statement about universal self-realization and love.  A two-part opus, each part quite distinct technically and aesthetically, but holding the light to two angles of the same subject (at least that’s my take on the experience).  There is much more to it, of course.  For example, it may be somewhat helpful to think about the first part of her performance by using analogy.  She worked her way through “whispered” vocal utterances over a range of electronic sounds from near-inaudible to ear-shattering.  And all of it is a journey.  There is nothing static about her process, and you cannot help but be carried (dragged?) along with her.  Think of the journey at the heart of any major Andrei Tarkovsky film--tension, foreboding, the encounter with the “non-existent” other.  And you cannot turn your head away.  Blown out of my seat at Third Life Studio but transfixed.  Electronics man and cellist (and more recently filmmaker) Vic Rawlings and percussionist Tim Feeney brought a completely different set of improvised sonics with them as part three of the evening.  For example, any type of pre-determined architecture would be unthinkable to them in their “experimental” pursuit of improvisation.  In case it is not clear by now, there is no one best form of post-Ayler music.  There are many paths to Realization.  The two musicians are well matched aesthetically and instrumentally.  Tim pursues “explicit” vibrations via conventional and non-conventional resources and techniques.  The sounds Feeney fans perhaps most closely associate with him are produced via vibrating drum head--skin (human) on skin (drum head) and other tools on drum head.  Tangible.  Acoustic.  Playing off that effectively is the variety of “electric” sounds produced by Vic’s electronics and connected equipment.  It is as if the traditional cello has been abandoned and re-purposed.  Throughout the set there was almost no use of the conventional pizzicato or arco cello technique.  On those rare occasions when Vic drew the bow across the instrument, the sounds came from “off-limits” parts of the strings, well below the bridge.  The searching of this duo was an apt setup for the final part of the evening, an echo of the music of the late Opensound anchor, Lou Cohen.  As fans of his work know, Lou was a student of John Cage (and was present at the famous “25-Year Retrospective Concert” at New York’s Town Hall in 1958).  In addition, Lou’s mind and music were full of the math and science of MIT where he had been an undergrad.  He thought of himself as a composer primarily, but I always preferred his electronics pursuits as an improvisor.  To celebrate Lou Cohen and his contributions to the growth of the Opensound series and music in general as we approach the fifth anniversary of his passing, Lou Bunk closed out the evening by playing the recording of Lou Cohen’s Symphony 9 (from Lou Cohen -  Music on Pogues CD 21071-s).  It is a single work from a three-CD set, the only commercially available recording of Lou Cohen compositions.  There is another example of Lou’s creativity, this time in a two-CD set of improvisations with Steve Norton and Matt Samolis (also produced just before Lou’s passing).  The release does not even have a proper title or number.  So, if you want to obtain a copy of the material, you will have to collar Steve or Matt for information.  Such artifacts help us to understand how much we have lost through what we have gained…


 April 

I am happy/sad to report that I witnessed no jazz performances during the month of April.  I caught some other musics but no jazz.  Before my two-plus week visit to Belize, Guatemala, and Honduras to learn more about current and ancient Mayan culture, a variety of non-jazz activities and last-minute arrangements for the trip prevented jazz venue hopping experiences on my part.  Upon our return my wife and I spent all of our time cleaning up the yard from major tree damage and coping with some kind of jungle bug.  As I write this I am showing signs of physical improvement and the doctor has put Sunny on antibiotics and a cruel diet in an attempt to defeat a parasite.  In case you wonder, both of us had a great time.  A superb learning experience.  But enough about me (let’s talk about me).  This personal revelation is intended as an introduction to a few moments on the trip that may be of some interest to music fans or just any humans in general.  We visited about a half dozen ancient Mayan sites (perhaps the most famous being Tikal and Copán) and seemingly countless museums.  But the museum of the greatest interest to music fans is Casa K’ojom Musica Maya near Antigua, Guatemala.  By way of introduction to the visitors there is a display of small animal-shaped whistles and “ocarinas” used for thousands of years and a reproduction of four musicians from the famous murals at Bonampak in Mexico.  Director/curator Samuel Franco emphasized that instruments were intended to emulate and otherwise celebrate animal life, particularly birds.  For example, there is evidence that clapping hands at the base of one of the sides of the main temple at Chitzen Itza will create the call of the sacred quetzal.  The Mayan musicians represented in the 1,200 year old mural offer insight into the music of the ancients.  When Director Samuel Franco talked about the four musicians and instruments displayed, I asked him whether the first instrument, the horn that looks something like an early cornetto in Western culture, was played to create a single sound or to produce multiple tones, he insisted that the horn produced a single sound.  I said nothing but was skeptical.  A single horn player was shown on the wall, not a chorus of single-tone didgeridoos, but a single horn that might provide a musician an opportunity to play melodies as in the case of the early key-less cornetto or slide-less sackbut of Western civilization.  Why not?  Upon my return home I looked at mementos from a spring 2003 visit to the Peabody Museum at Yale in which were displayed an amazing hand-painted reproduction of one of the three murals at Bonampak.  My mementos from that experience clearly show a chorus of four musicians blowing their horns together, as Australians might do with didgeridoos (but the horns are aimed skyward, unlike typical didgeridoo performance).  Therefore my solo, multi-tone horn performance theory is not bullet-proof.   Problematic but certainly possible.  As the image of Samuel Franco and instrumental reproductions below suggest, the ancients used instruments--skins on conga type drums and a kind of maraca--still in use throughout the world today.  The third percussion instrument portrayed in the reproduction is a bit less common today.  It consists of the remains of a turtle, the plastron of which is struck by a deer antler to create different percussive sounds on various parts of the plastron.



As the group of us moved through the museum, Samuel Franco showed us a wide array of ancient and colonial (e.g., marimbas) instruments.  But the instruments that really caught my attention were the slit drums (see the image below).  The instruments are known particularly to post-Ayler jazz musicians.  Perhaps the Boston-area jazz musician most associated with the use of the slit drum is Bob Gullotti.  When I mentioned to the Museum Director that slit drums are used today in jazz performance he was surprised.  I could see him make a mental note of that fact.


But that was just the beginning for slit drums.   On one of our visits to Copán, we came across a sculpture of a slit drum.  In other words, more than a thousand years ago the music of the slit drum (and other sacred instruments) was so important that the instrument was sculpted as were the stelae and other sacred elements of Mayan culture.  Below is a side view of a sculpture of a slit drum.

The image below is a photo of the same slit-drum sculpture taken from above.

For those of you who want something other than music I offer the following images.  Sometimes non-music events and ideas can be compelling even for music nuts.  How about the Popul Vuh?  Come on. Unless your brain is dead, you’ve heard about the great Mayan myth of the twins and the corn and the journey and all that stuff.  The photo below shows a tour guide explaining all the fine features of the Church of St. Thomas near Antigua in Guatemala.  The sign next to the guide explains that the church has received special support from the U.S.  But no signs tell visitors the big news (after all, it is a Roman Catholic church) that this is the church where the most important translation of the Popul Vuh was discovered.

Live volcanoes.  As anyone living in Hawaii can tell you, they do happen.  But in Guatemala such things are an almost everyday occurrence.  The dormant and single live (as well as future young) volcanoes dominate the view of Lake Atitlan in Guatemala.  In the photo below better-half Sunny stands in the corner of the rooftop lounge of our hotel in Antigua, taking in the view. 

A friend on the trip shared her phone photo of the same volcano at night, as shown below.  At night you can see the red glow of the magma.

Of less spectacular but perhaps significant content is the photo below of Eli, the group leader, and a police officer.  A number of people in the tour group (ourselves included) had concerns about political unrest in some Central American countries, particularly Guatemala and Honduras.  We heard at least three apparently well-informed but contradictory explanations for the vote on international rulings regarding the border between Belize and Guatemala.  At the same time I have the feeling we flew out of Honduras before civil unrest was about to explode.  As you may know, U.S. political and private actions in the region for decades have been questionable at best.  I believe it is significant that no matter where we went in Central America--regardless of the economic or social status of the people involved--we in the touring group were met with kindness and open hearts.  Nevertheless, civil uprisings and ugly strife from decades of ago remain in the memories of the people of Central America.  Therefore, although the warfare is no longer active, our touring vehicle used an accompanying police vehicle and armed personnel to take us from Belize to the Guatemalan border and from Guatemala to Honduras.  The image below is of the tour leader filing paperwork and paying the police who accompanied us to the Honduran border.  With no war or active civil strife taking place in any of the countries we visited, did we really need a police escort?  Of course not.  But if you were operating tours in Belize, Guatemala, and Honduras, would you want to tell the police that you don’t need them anymore?  Of course not.

At Mayan excavation sites researchers are very protective about the data and potential revelations.  This is true for archeological sites and outdoor museums that have had no research activity for decades.  In fact, one of the troubling pieces of information to come out of our review of so many important sites is that there is virtually no excavation taking place at even the most famous Mayan sites.  No research funds.  And yet everywhere we saw signs like the one below intended to keep people from spying  on “nothing going on.”  The one active site we did review (no photos please) was sponsored by the Chinese government.  It was a shame that we could not take photos of the dig.  The whole thing was fascinating.  Of course, I had no idea what my camera might have revealed to the detriment of some PhD candidate.  And yet, I love the “no drones” mentality.  If I see a drone in my backyard, particularly if it is bee-sized, I want to smash the damn thing--even if it means being in jail with a bunch of political prisoners--fine people I used to teach at the Walpole facility.  But don’t turn your back…

Jobs data for March were posted this month and noted in The Washington Post.  The jobless rate since the last months of the Obama administration has been just above 4% and remains there.  One of the most absurd claims by both major political parties (and Presidential candidates) is that they would create more jobs.  It wasn’t the jobs that Americans needed.  It was greater income.  So it is not surprising that the unemployment rate remains extremely low.  The Post claims today there is “a position open for every unemployed person in the country.”  But the big jobs problem remains.  Since March 2017 hourly pay has grown only 2.7 percent.  A person making $100 per day can’t scrape that increase into a Happy Meal, let alone feed and clothe the kids.  On top of that, we have started feeling the inflation.  I have not seen anything that definitively points to increasing petroleum costs (up more than two bits per gallon during my trip to Central America) or the fact that someone has to pay for the S&P growth and resulting stockholder payoffs and the “huge tax cuts” for everybody except the middle and lower classes.  But everyday costs are going up.  Oddly I noticed it first in the fruit & veggie department at my local Stop and Shop right after I returned home.  In the couple weeks I was gone, bananas went from 39¢ to 49¢ per pound, oranges went from $1 each to 4 for $5, Macs went from $1.29 to $1.49 per pound, and Grannies went from 1.49 per pound to $1.79 per pound.  Hey, somebody has to pay for all the economic “improvement.”…

Cecil Taylor died 4/5 at age 89.  He had been in poor health for the past several years.  He was a giant and one of a small handful of original pioneers of the new music of the late 1950s and early 1960s.  We music lovers in the Boston area can be somewhat justified in calling him one of our own.  He got his music together while studying at NEC, a school he returned to on a number of occasions for brief guest faculty stints.  He received an honorary doctorate from that institution in 1977.  His very first commercially available recordings were produced in the mid-1950s by Boston-based Transition Records.  A couple decades later a group of Bostonians at the core of the Great Black Music Loft took off to study with Mr. Taylor at Antioch College in Ohio.  The impact on Boston’s Black music scene was (and remains) profound.  One of those musicians, Raphé Malik, became a mainstay in the Cecil Taylor ensembles of the mid to late 1970s, working as the power brass foil to Jimmy Lyons’ marvelous lyricism.  The loss is great but the legacy will outlive us all…

According to PasteMagazine.com (as mentioned in the 4/6 issue of The Week, p. 32), U.S. sales of “physical” music (including CDs, vinyl, and cassettes) were greater than income from downloads last year for the first time since 2011.  U.S. music sales increased, digital downloads dropped to $1.3 billion, and physical music sales grew to $1.5 billion.  It seems that the whole retro thing keeps growing.  On the other hand, given the state of international politics, living in caves might not be merely a cool choice…


March

During the evening of the Explorers Club--Charlie Kohlhase, Seth Meicht, Daniel Rosenthal, Josiah Reibstein, and Curt Newton--gig 3/15 at the Outpost Charlie asked Josiah Reibstein if he would like to play a solo intro to Charlie’s “No Such Explorers.”  Band members watched and listened as Josiah offered an intricate and extended free solo, filled with oblique references to the work’s primary theme.   It’s the kind of solo that young, enthusiastic tuba players of all types should have been present for.  It was not merely the astonishing technical facility on such an elephantine instrument.  Impressive as that was, it was a small part of what the students should witness.  How important it would have been for them to take in the unfolding creativity of ideas as a torrent ultimately forming a wondrous arc, making way for the first notes of the composition.  Throughout most of the evening Josiah showed us why the tuba became the instrument of choice for certain contexts, when the bass fiddle was left at home back in the first decades of jazz.  No, the bass and the tuba are not interchangeable as rhythm section instruments, but the absence of acoustic bass on this gig did give us a fine chance to catch Josiah wearing several hats.  He is a fine team player, and his work with Curt was one of the most compelling instrumental aspects of the evening of original works (mostly) and fine borrowings from Elmo Hope, John Tchicai, and Roswell Rudd.  Although there were many different combinations of players doing terrific things all evening, the moments I found most fascinating were those when Josiah and Curt would establish a ground--perhaps busy, almost pure melody, or “acoustic bass” and drums support.  It is the latter that produced the most distinctive results.  The basic effect of that tuba and drums rhythm section work was an in-your-face type of transparency.  That support combination made whatever was going on with the front-line horns project with a special type of clarity.  And when one of those horns was out alone soloing in front of the “bass and drums,” the spotlight was more intense than in the case of larger instrumental resources.  And the best news is that the spotlight was good for those improvisors.  So, if you want to know how fine an improvisor Seth is, 3/15 at the Outpost was the place to find out.  As it was true for the work of Dan and of the leader.  The Explorers show up to gigs time and again in numbers from solo to beyond octet, and for the most part they are working with the same charts (typically intended for seven or eight musicians).  The result is the need for on-the-spot adjustments.  The “adjustments” almost invariably result in stunning creative problem solving.  There has been no better example of how remarkable that is than the 3/15 Outpost gig…

The use of computer-generated sonics to create or perform music has been around for decades.  But how many decades?  According to an issue of Archaeology (March/April 2017, pp. 9-10) that I came across recently, such activities go all the way back almost to the very beginning of what we think of as computers.  You’ve got a bunch of people in the late 1940s trying to work out concepts such as stored computer programs, and yet they make time to come up with computer sounds.  Alan Turing’s Mark I generated its first “notes” in 1948, using a “hooter to provide auditory feedback.”  In 1951 Christopher Strachey programmed the Mark II to play “God Save the King.”  In that same year the BBC recorded that anthem and two other tunes generated by the Mark II, “Baa Baa Black Sheep” and “In the Mood.”  Recently Jack Copeland and James Long studied the recording and determined there were some flaws (mostly due to recording speed errors).  In any case, they fixed the recording which originally was made in a studio using microphones to pick up the sounds.  The result of using a microphone means that the recording captures both computer sounds and human reactions, including a pun on the title of the Glenn Miller theme song.  You can hear the cleaned up recording at the Archaeology web site…

Yo-Yo Ma gave the Compton Lecture 3/19 at MIT, emphasizing the role of culture in society and its important evolving nature.  After the lecture and during a Q&A session the renowned cellist talked about various ways in which the students can bring about an “enlightened citizenry.”  According to MIT’s The Tech (3/22, p .12) his final suggestion was “In the meantime, ‘party hard.’”…

If you measure music by the pound, Leap of Faith performances during the past couple years are the gigs for you.  The 3/24 music at Third Life Studio is a perfect case in point.  The program consisted of four 15-minute improvisations by quartets and a quintet from the full orchestra followed by 50 minutes’ worth of the full orchestra.  So the big question is whether the evening was an endless sonic display or a cornucopia.  Mostly the latter, primarily due to some astute decisions by organizer-programmer Dave Peck (AKA PEK).  Trying to put together and lead a large free-improvising ensemble is an enormous challenge.  Even the Peter Brötzmann Tentet born in Chicago (typically consisting of eleven or more musicians) had its weak moments--in spite of the fact that the lineup consisted of international all-stars.  Peter initially dealt with such a large and diverse group of people by using charts written by band members but mostly by himself (e.g., see two versions of the ensemble’s interpretation of Stonewater on OKKA OD12032 and OD12043).  Eventually Peter dropped the charts.  One of the productive ideas that Peter incorporated in concerts was the use of small unit sets of music preceding or plugged into the middle of the full orchestra performance.  It seems that Dave has come to similar conclusions regarding Leap of Faith Orchestra concerts.  Although having four small unit 15-minute concerts before the 50-minute blowout does result in a long (sometimes fatiguing) evening of music, the benefits are significant.  Band members get a chance to warm up their improvisatory chops before the larger challenge takes place, and audience members have the opportunity to witness more clearly the sonic personality of each musician in the instrumentally intimate context.  The first set consisted of a quintet--Dan O’Brien, Eric Dahlman, Zack Bartolomei, Bob Moores, and Eric Zinman--that played Eric Zinman’s aggressive keys off a fine series of dances by brass, reeds, and toys.  The choice of instrumental group in this case may have had more than warmup implications.  Some of the highlights of the full orchestra performance came to us from impressive spontaneous brass-reed ensemble sections.  The second set was an interesting mix of relative newcomers to the LoF family--Adrienne Schoenfeld and Steve Proviser--and musicians--Glynis Lomon and Yuri Zbitnov--whose free sonics work together goes back to the last decades of the 20th century.  And with that mix there was the resonance between the bass and the cello throwing information to the brass and drums, who found much to discuss sonically.  Glynis and PEK are co-leaders of an ensemble that goes back to at least the 1990s, and on the third set they were paired with bassist Adrienne Schoenfeld once again and Silvain Castellano.  The twist here (an interesting one) was that all four musicians opened the set by playing Aquasonics.  During the past couple years Glynis’ performances on the instrument seems to have created some type of Aquasonic fever in the Boston area.  On 3/24 it looked like it was raining Aquasonics on stage.  Business for musician and Aquasonic craftsman Jackson Krall must be booming.  Eventually we got to hear the strings in conversation with the joyously melodic Silvain Castellano and Dave Peck.  For the fourth set Eric Woods and Grant Beale’s “electric” sounds welcomed the return to the stage of PEK and Yuri Zbitnov.  Everyone in the group was loose and open.  One of the highlights of the set was the conversation between Messrs. Woods and Zbitnov about the sounds coming from the reeds and guitar.  The complete orchestra filled the stage for the final 50-minute adventure.  As in the case of Peter Brötzmann and the major change in his Tentet in the new century, Dave Peck made the decision to show up without charts.  I did not ask him about that significant decision.  For example, I do not know whether the band rehearsed with charts but were told to leave the paper home.  But I suspect that there was no chart at all for this event.  Dave did offer a single direction to the band before the start of the performance: “Lay out for a third of the time.”  In other words, each musician was supposed to play for 50 minutes but choose approximately 16½ minutes of that time to take a break from playing.  There was no further comment, but one suspects that each musician could choose to stop playing for a stretch of 16½ minutes or stop for six minutes and then later for 10½ minutes.  Or some other workable combination.  Nevertheless, although I did not put a stopwatch to each musician, I think it is fair to say that fewer than half the musicians did not lay out for so much as 16½ minutes.  But Dave’s directive did have a constructive impact.  People did lay out for at least some of the time.  The result was a greater variety of sonic events and perhaps enhanced listening on the part of the people “resting.”  There were fine sub-section and individual solo moments scattered impressively throughout the stage for the duration, including especially fine improvised brass-reed ensemble lines.  Several times that sub-section offered extended slow fanfares that permeated the other ensemble activity to great effect.  One of the highlights of the evening occurred when the brass and reeds joined forces for a staccato attack that lifted the music almost literally off the stage.  Fine.  So many elements came together with the help of the “lay out time.”  But maybe there was an exception.  Yuri Zbitnov did lay out conscientiously and at constructive moments.  Nevertheless I had the nagging feeling that the “lay out” rule should have had Yuri as an exception.  His motoring, chatter, and pops invariably made musical activity everywhere on stage sound more meaningful.  But maybe that is just a comment on how good the ears throughout the stage were.  So it was quite an evening for people who measure music by the pound.  But there was much to savor even for those on a diet…

Going back to the first years of our nation (with the possible exception of Washington) all of our Presidents have been attacked and ridiculed by opponents and commentators.  As anyone alive and breathing well knows, our current President is no exception.  Some attacks have been humorous (primarily on late night television) and others have been political (certainly coming from Democrats and even some Republicans).  But I am unaware of any searing anti-Trump vitriol that can match comments from former CIA Director John Brennan, as included in several media stories on 3/17.  Attorney General Jeff Sessions, at the behest of the President, fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe just two days before McCabe was set to retire (causing the FBI Deputy Director financial loss and other problems).  In response to those actions Brennan wrote publicly to Trump:
 “When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy AmericaAmerica will triumph over you.”
No doubt the Brennan attack sent White House staffers scurrying for their lexicons…

It had been decades since the last time I had witnessed any music at MIT Chapel, a wonderful part of the Saarinen architectural space off Massachusetts Avenue that is anchored by Kresge Auditorium.  It was a near-perfect space for me to witness 3/28 something I also had not experienced in decades, a solo percussion performance by Curt Newton.  He had been excited about working with the space’s acoustics and even analyzed the sonic characteristics of the Chapel several times before deciding that his smaller drum kit would be best for the event.  A good-sized audience showed up.  One person told me that she took the day off from her job to make sure she would not miss the noontime performance.  People witnessing the solo session consisted of arts fans, the curious, and jazz musicians.  For example, it was a comment of some significance that musicians as aesthetically disparate as Luther Gray, Peter Warren, and Ken Field made time to be there.  No doubt the primary attraction for Curt as a percussionist was to work with the somewhat lively acoustics of the space.  It is a fine bonus that the alter sculpture is almost certainly the largest Harry Bertoia work in the Boston area.  Most of the sculptor’s works were intended as sonic instruments.  The term “sonambiant” was used by Bertoia to describe the spatial and tonal environment created when his sound sculptures are set in motion.  One of the musicians in the audience admitted that on a gig at the Chapel he had played the sculpture.  There are no signs in the Chapel directing people to play or not play the alter piece.  So the situation is ambiguous.  In my experience, museums exhibiting Bertoia works usually have such signs.  There is no sign in the Chapel telling us who the sculptor or architect is.  However, after the performance I exited via the northwest doors and spotted a small sign outside 20 or 30 feet from the doors.  On that sign is basic information about the architecture and sculpture of Saarinen and Bertoia.  Curt opened his set with a few words about his efforts to combat the effects of global warming.  Such work has driven much of his world view in recent years.  He suggested that his improvisations 3/28 would be rooted in his concerns and his hopes about the planet.  Of course, I am not capable of reading specific psychological and emotional roots in a performance of music.  Like most people, I am capable of generalizing when it comes to interpretation. But whatever roots were at play in the performance--and there are many more missions in Curt’s life than helping to save the planet--the sonic results were well worth waiting for.  Given the somewhat unpredictable nature of the acoustics of the Chapel, several people and I discussed before the gig the best seating location in the space.  None of us were confident.  The only thing I felt somewhat confident about is the idea that a person in a back row seat would have a different sonic experience from that of someone in a front row seat--not necessarily better or worse--just different.  I went to my default seat down front.  During the performance I was very much self-conscious of the idea that maybe I was getting too much direct sonic experience rather than room acoustics sound.  No complaints on my part, however.  What I heard was wonderful.  And there were terrific room sonic moments that probably everyone in the space experienced--as in the case of the small metal bowl on Curt’s tom.  He bashed away at the skin surface--perhaps an angry moment--until intentionally he knocked the bowl off the skin.  It landed on the floor perhaps three or four feet from the kit, danced beautifully for a few seconds, and explained through its noisy dance exactly what the acoustics of the MIT Chapel are all about.  Whatever I may have heard or missed of the rest of the space’s properties, it was obvious from body language and facial expressions that Curt heard the room’s acoustic properties clearly, beautifully.  In kind, I do not know what I may have missed, but I did not miss any music.  It was everywhere in every kit surface, every toy, and every stick or brush stroke or slap.  As an example, one of the highlights was Curt’s fly swatting routine.  Perhaps you have seen percussionists take a brush and in a quiet moment snap the brush for a special feathery sound.  Sometimes it works.  Sometimes not.  However, in either case, the activity is not sustained because the inevitably transitory room acoustics cannot be sustained.  But Curt showed us 3/28 just how well the acoustics of MIT Chapel and a silently attentive audience could work together to make sure that the percussionist’s brilliant swirling and snapping brushes took flight.  It was almost more a visual experience than a sonic one--fireflies of sound dancing above the drum kit.  Fine as that was, it was no more than a highlight of a marvelous sonic travelogue of trap set, striking devices, and percussion “toys.”  When the quick forty-five minutes were over, the applause was lengthy enough that Curt finally gestured for it to stop.  Maybe Curt’s next solo return will take place soon.  Let’s hope it recurs much sooner than the 3/28 MIT Chapel event...


February

Mark Shanahan reported in the Boston Globe online 2/26 (but 2/27 in the newspaper) that “After more than 40 years Ryles Jazz Club is closing its doors.”  Such news is not unexpected in these times of disappearing music venues of all sorts.  But there is a jolt to it all nevertheless.  Long gone are the days when jazz clubs would close frequently but almost immediately be replaced by another.  Openings and closings on 52nd Street in New York in that jazz haven’s heyday, if represented graphically by lights, would have looked like one of those Christmas trees with intermittently blinking bulbs.  The same was true in Boston.  Sometimes jazz clubs would come and go over the years at the same location, as in the case of 76 Warrenton Street (the Theatrical Club, the Ken Club, and Jazz at 76, among others).  Sometimes a club would move to a new location and keep its name, as in the case of Storyville at Copley Square for two different stretches, the Hotel Buckminster, and the Hotel Bradford.  There was even a summer version of the club on Cape Ann for about a decade.  But the most typical pattern was the opening and closing of a club to be replaced by another somewhere else in town, as in the case of Jonathan Swifts, Lulu White’s, Tinker’s, and countless others.  The problem today is that, when a club closes, it is not replaced by some other club in short order.  If we search for true jazz clubs--i.e., clubs known primarily as jazz clubs with food rather than restaurants with live background music--then we might argue that the only true jazz clubs in Boston and Cambridge are Ryles, Wally’s, Scullers, and the Regattabar.  When Ryles is gone, two of the remaining three true jazz clubs will be the two clubs with hotel subsidies.  It does not mean that a fan has only three places to go to for hearing live jazz.  There are dozens of such venues in the Boston area.  But it is apparent that when a jazz club (or even a restaurant with jazz) disappears it rarely or ever is replaced by something comparable.  So the loss of Ryles, even though its luster is gone, is of consequence.  Any jazz club that survives for more than 40 years is historically significant.  During the first years of operation (1976-93) club owner Jack Reilly had a fairly serious commitment to bringing in top-quality musicians.  Among the jazz headliners who performed there during Reilly’s tenure were James Williams, Maynard Ferguson, McCoy Tyner, Herb Pomeroy, Bill Pierce, Greg Abate, Nick Brignola, Joe Maneri, Jerry Bergonzi, and many other top-shelf musicians.  The everyday lineup was strong enough that, when Pat Metheny lived in the Boston area, he would drop in occasionally to jam with the band.  There is no question that, when the owners of the S&S Restaurant took over the club 25 years ago, the situation for fans and jazz musicians deteriorated at Ryles.  Post-Ayler jazz disappeared from the upstairs room.  Pop, folk, R&B, and Salsa became the venue’s bread and butter.  Not only was Ryles ownership less than enthusiastic about booking and promoting even straight-ahead jazz gigs, but musicians complained about less than warm encounters with the bookers, even being told they could not enter the club through the front door.  Among jazz musicians the alley entrance to the club became known as “the servants’ entrance”--not just for drummers but also pianists, reed players, and everyone else in the band.  Some of Boston’s most respected jazz musicians, insulted by such treatment, decided never to play there again.  All of that sounds rather harsh, but even considering such events during the past quarter century, one must come to the conclusion that the club was/is good for the local jazz scene.  Over the past quarter century jazz musicians did perform there at least a couple times per week, comfortably or not.  And fans during the post-Reilly era did get to witness music performed by Pandelis Karayorgis, Jeff Stout, Luther Gray, Bruce Gertz, Jacob William, Gray Sargent, Steve Lantner, George Garzone, Ray Santisi, and others of stature.  In other words, if you are a fan of the music, the impending demise of Ryles is a sorry event.  The odds are good that whoever buys the club is likely to turn it into something other than a jazz club.  Perhaps a restaurant without live music.  As the Globe article suggests, owner Gary Mitchell does not seem to be in a great hurry to sell the place, taking his time to find the right offer.  In any event, the jazz club likely will be gone by the end of the year…

Republicans and Democrats over the years have espoused different political philosophies in general.  But in some ways the parties are quite similar.  For example, both parties include vocal and influential sub-groups.  One such Democratic group, the Dixiecrats, was so upset by the party’s anti-racist civil rights activities that the Dixiecrats left the party.  Those Dixiecrats have become the very core of the Republican Party today.  But the Republican Party has its traditionally strong factions also.  Although almost all Republicans believe what is good for business is good for America, sub-groups have specific other agendas.  The Fiscal Conservatives push hard for small government.  The Christian Evangelicals argue on behalf of what they perceive as Christian values and often call into question the concept of separation of church and state.  No Happy Holidays cards for them during the Christmas season.  The Libertarians are something of an offbeat intellectual wing of the Republican Party, pushing for open borders, the importance of the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments (somewhat ironically arguing side by side with the ACLU before the Supreme Court on occasion), the legalization of drugs, the avoidance of international military conflicts, and a more limited role for the federal government.  However, these three Republican sub-groups have been uncharacteristically quiet since the election of Donald Trump.  The Republican Congress, following the President’s suggestions, voted for a tax bill that presumably would give any Fiscal Conservative heart failure.  But the Fiscal Conservatives in virtual silence voted for the bill.  During the election campaign a witnessed audiotape of Donald Trump bragging about groping and otherwise molesting women was released to the press.  Donald Trump took the press coverage lightly, referring to his comments as “locker room talk.”  That incident and subsequent complaints from several women about being sexually abused by Donald Trump have resulted in no moral/theological outrage from Congressional leaders among the Christian Evangelicals.  More recently writer Mona Charen, a conservative, after her comments at this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference was removed by security guards because of the audience reaction to her criticism of Republicans for their silent acceptance of harassment allegations against Trump.  We hear no arguments against the wall construction on the Mexican border or the military build-up in the Middle East from Libertarians in Congress.  Republicans cower at the words and glances of the President.  Things have gone so far in that direction that more and more we hear Republican leaders defer comments about action in Congress until the President makes his scheduled statements on the subject.  The President always is assumed to be his party’s leader.  But until now party members never have been the President’s minions.  It does seem that members of the Republican Party are intimidated by the Great Disruptor.  It is pretty obvious that Donald Trump takes great joy in stating a political position to rile one political group only to buy into the opposite position a day or two later to anger and frustrate another group.  His recent “round table” discussion on gun control infuriated pro-NRA politicians and temporarily brought great joy to Democrats (and 70% of the U.S. population).  Even the Democrats have not yet learned to be skeptical about anything Donald Trump says.  Not long after this Journal entry is published no doubt the other shoe will drop and Democrats will discover the mirage.  Meanwhile the Republicans continue to cower in the presence of Donald Trump.  Their inability to stand up to the President is somewhat puzzling.  But perhaps I found an answer in scientific research.  In an article titled “Bonobos gravitate toward hinderers” (Science News, February 3, 2018, p.10), Bruce Bower recounts research carried out by anthropologists at St. Andrews University and Duke University on bonobos, a type of ape similar to chimpanzees.  It is difficult not to wonder whether Republicans really are just bonobos in suits.  Bower writes, “Rather than latching on to individuals with a track record of helpfulness, adult bonobos favor obstructionists who keep others from getting what they want.”  He discusses the differences between bonobos and humans, pointing out that, “By three months old, humans do the opposite of bonobos, choosing to align more frequently with helpers than with hinderers…  Humans, unlike other apes, have evolved to seek cooperative partnerships that make large-scale collaborations possible.”  Bonobo behavior sure sounds like what is going on between spineless Republicans (but I guess that’s redundant) and the President.  Bower suggests the researchers believe, “Bonobos may view those who impede others’ actions as socially dominant and thus worth grooming as allies…”  Unfortunately, there is nothing in the research to suggest what can be done when politicians mimic the behavior of bonobos…

Gray Sargent, who took the innovations of Christian and Montgomery and developed his own voice, for decades has been one of my favorite straight-ahead jazz musicians.  Today he is known primarily as Tony Bennett’s guitarist of choice.  And while I applaud the singer’s choice of band mates, the public’s enthusiasm for the great pop singer has meant the development of two problems for the guitarist and the guitarist’s fans.  The first problem is rooted in the fact that for most music fans Gray Sargent is known as “Tony Bennett’s guitarist.”  While that moniker is a fine thing in itself and certainly is connected to rewarding playing opportunities for Gray, it means that most music fans do not recognize Gray as a guitarist who has been great for decades, performing regularly since the 1970s with Illinois Jacquet, Dave McKenna, Roy Eldridge, Benny Carter, Jo Jones, Dizzy Gillespie, Buddy Tate, and others of comparable stature.  He performed frequently at Lulu White’s and the Regattabar when those venues were truly great jazz clubs.  Even Harvard--in one of that school’s moments of real jazz acumen--hired Gray as Artist in Residence in the late 1980s.  But admittedly his current absence in the jazz circuit may to some extent be due to the lack of front-line personnel capable of challenging him.  The second problem is related to his disappearance from the consciousness of jazz fans.  He just does not play enough gigs for those of us who are lucky enough to know just how good he is.  And so I jump to take advantage of his annual performances in Methuen.  Such was the case 2/20 when I showed up at the Sahara Club to witness Gray performing with long-time partners Marshall Wood and Jim Gwin.  There was a little rust in the gears as the trio began the first set.  Usually when Gray performs at the club he is generous enough to invite musicians from the audience to perform with his group.  The musical quality of his New England-based guests varies from terrific to a lot less than terrific.  But each guest performs on one or two tunes and disappears.  Fine.  But this time things were not fine.  A saxophonist I never had heard of (in spite of the fact that he appeared to be a decade older than Gray) brought his tenor sax to the stage.  He seems to have had some training.  He could play the heads well and quite obviously knew a good number of standards.  But he had nothing distinctive to say when it was time for improvisation.  The timing was bad also.  The trio was really getting its sea legs, and then he was invited to join the group.  It is ironic that the saxophonist joined the trio when everything was coming together.  Gray’s best solo of the first set occurred while the quartet was playing Tadd Dameron’s “If You Could See Me Now.”  I’ll try to be clearer.  The saxophonist is not the worst tenor player I’ve ever heard.  Fifty years ago in Holiday Inns across America there were saxophone players soloing at this quality level for happy customers doing the business man’s bounce.  For such purposes, the saxophonist 2/20 would have been fine for the job.  But this was a jazz gig featuring one of the greatest living guitarists.  Such a guitarist should have a worthy foil.  Here’s an analogy.  You travel overseas to see the Mona Lisa.  You get to the museum and are able to stand there, face to face with the masterpiece.  Joy of joys.  Then, two minutes into your viewing experience a curtain unfurls in front of you.  On that curtain is the famous joke image of the dogs playing cards.  After a few minutes the curtain is raised, and you get a couple more minutes to see the Mona Lisa before the curtain drops again.  And so on.  So that is what it was like at the Sahara Club 2/20.  A fine Gray Sargent solo followed by a “dogs playing cards” saxophone solo.  Beauty disrupted.  “OK.” I can hear you saying, “So there were a couple tunes that were problematic.  The saxophonist sits down.  What’s the problem?”  After a few tunes, Gray announced that the saxophonist would remain on stage to perform with the trio for one more tune.  Hint.  Hint.  When that tune was over, the guest did not sit down.  If you have not figured out things by now, I’ll tell you definitely that I was in agony.  Almost physical pain.  I don’t know politically or otherwise what was going on at the club.  Oddly.  Well, maybe it was not so odd.  But most of the people in the audience seemed to be enjoying themselves.  There was no apparent awareness of the significant qualitative difference between the saxophone and guitar solos.  Gray is a nice person.  He was being generous.  The saxophonist performed on every tune until the end of the first set.  At the end of the first set Gray made the usual closing set comments and then announced that the saxophonist would be joining the trio again in the second set.  “Check please.”…

Speaking of the Sahara Club, it still carries on a fine tradition that was common in jazz clubs years ago in the Boston area and around the country, the “shut up” table card.  Until about 1990 it was common for club owners to let the uninitiated know that being quiet while the music is being performed is a good idea.  Fans of post-Ayler jazz generally do not experience talkative people in the audience because most fans of that music show up to catch the music.  So they shut up and listen (with a few unfortunate but rare exceptions).  If you go to venues that feature straight-ahead jazz (such as Thelonious Monkfish), you discover that audiences are different.  People seem to think of the live jazz performances as background music for their conversations.  The wording of “shut up” table cards has varied considerably from expletive-laden to civil.  As the image below demonstrates, the Sahara Club “shut up” table card is quite civil.

As part of the mess that followed 9/11 Congress in 2005 decided that we need special IDs to fly in planes and go anywhere our government is.  It passed the REAL ID law.  REAL DUMB.  It is a law that before 9/11 and presumably more recently the ACLU and the Libertarian wing of the Republican Party would have been having fits over.  However the subject has been all but invisible in recent years.  Even though the law has been around for almost fifteen years, its implementation has been slow.  I didn’t even know about the law until this month.  Slow to wake up, the law nevertheless is potent and ugly.  Before the October 1, 2020 deadline you need to get a REAL ID if you want to enter a government facility, such as airports.  Your current driver’s license will not do the trick on October 2, 2020.  Rest assured, in 2021 the guy sitting next to you on the plane is a fine citizen with a REAL ID card.  Or a terrorist with a REAL ID card obtained via rigorous security measures.  Of course, such terrorist breaches will be rare.  It is no piece of cake to obtain a REAL ID, particularly if you do not already have a U.S. passport.  However, because the security measures are rigorous, you can’t merely trade your current driver’s license for a brand new REAL ID driver’s license.  You must pass muster, whatever that process involves.  So, unless you are a Whitehouse insider without security clearance, youwww.dhs.gov/federal-enforcement will need to comply with “minimum security standards” to receive a REAL ID driver’s license.  It seems absurd to put people through this mess and additional expenses for a process of questionable efficacy.  I’d much rather see Massachusetts drivers lose their licenses simply for driving to endanger.  But the REAL ugly part of the law is its potential for manipulation by racists in positions of political power.  For example, I doubt whether a tall blond with plans to visit Norway will have trouble getting a REAL ID driver’s license.  On the other hand, it is obvious that REAL ID cards (and there are several types to choose from) can be used as another roadblock to minority participation in the voting process.  You can find out more at Homeland Security’s REAL ID web page.  You will notice almost immediately why the page is one of the finalists in The FU Bureaucratic Writing contest… 

The 2/16 concert at Paine Hall celebrating the life of Geri Allen was identified as Pianos for Geri and featured the work of four well-known pianists in duo and solo improvised performances.  Music curator Vijay Iyer and Kris Davis opened the evening performing together on two facing pianos.  Both pianists are highly regarded by critics, but the sonic encounter generally was a disappointment.  Kris, perhaps seeing her role as a “guest,” decided to establish a ground for Vijay Iyer’s playing.  That idea started out well.  She moved the support rhythmically and otherwise up and down the piano effectively, and her partner reveled in what she fed him.  But he never really opened the door for her.  She chose not to fight his solo flight.  On a couple occasions Iyer paused, apparently giving her space to develop her own out front statement.  In each case Kris took advantage of the opportunity by creating new lines of engaging beauty.  However, as soon as she completed the beginning of her melodic statement, Iyer emphatically would present his own loud and busy line and continue in that direction.  This sequence of events happened a couple times, resulting in his “solo” using her evolving line as more Kris Davis support.  Forget trading melodic lines or even a neo-Bach simultaneous two-part invention.  To her credit, rather judiciously Kris accepted her supporting role and let the curator enjoy his monologue with accompaniment.  After all, it really is his gig.  Fortunately the duo was followed by one of the highlights of the evening.  It sometimes is difficult to know which Jason Moran will show up to a gig, the man of “big ideas” or the terrific pianist.  The audience was witness to the latter.  The extended pensive opening with roots in the church and the blues no doubt was a meditation on his memory of Geri Allen.  In such affecting moments it is difficult for me as a witness to avoid reading explicit references in the music.  From time to time there were bold strikes at the piano, sometimes with the side of his right hand.  I heard all of that as anger at the loss.  Perhaps I was projecting too much, but the experience was powerful and direct.  Jason remained onstage where he was joined by Craig Taborn for a second duo session of the evening.  Like many fans, I have witnessed a number of piano duos and piano four hands performances, but through all of it the necessity of compatibility never occurred to me.  I suspect I never witnessed such a need because the pianists I caught always were on the same page aesthetically.  But here the problem of aesthetic incompatibility was on display for all to witness at Paine Hall.  Here were two pianists of unquestionably vast technical facility and enough critical praise to fill volumes.  And yet, try as the musicians might, no music came out of those pianos.  No sentences were begun by one musician and successfully completed by the other.  Neither piano commented brilliantly about the creations taking place on the other.  There was no single overwhelming statement made by all four hands.  There was a lot of thunder near the conclusion of the duo offering (in frustration?) but not much engaging music.  After hiding under a bushel in the opening duo of the evening, Kris Davis returned to the stage for her solo performance.  So far I have witnessed her music about a half dozen times in four different cities with a variety of notable musicians.  I am a fan.   Yes, she has chops, but only as a means to substantive ends.  The substance of what she plays overrides all other considerations for her--at least that’s how I hear her.  Her solo performance 2/16 offered more reinforcement for what has been obvious all along.  One really can’t describe the beauty of the simultaneous lines and rhythms she sustained through most of her improvisation.  She offered thunder and light in a wonderful arc of sound.  And then space.  Poignant space, apparently as a final improvisatory statement about Geri Allen.  The duo of Vijay Iyer and Craig Taborn took the stage next.  As previous performances have suggested, they are simpatico.  This duo performance ran way too long, but it reinforced my “discovery” about the need for strong aesthetic links between duo improvising pianists.  This duo was the most successful of the evening.  These two pianists heard, reacted to, and reveled in each other’s music.  It made me want to hang around to witness the Davis-Moran duo performance.  But…  The Iyer-Taborn duo improvisation ended the first half of the evening.  Almost an hour and half of ups and downs.  It was a fine celebration.  I looked up at the ceiling of Paine Hall and saw Geri Allen looking down on the event and smiling.  I thought it would be good for me to depart while she still was smiling…

As some readers may know, the new federal tax bill is designed to make Republicans look good and rip off the bottom 80% family income households.  The delayed Trump signing of the bill (remember, he didn’t sign the bill at the photo op right after the bill passed) insured that certain parts of the bill would not go into effect until after the mid-term elections.  I hope you are following this.  There are tax breaks for the bottom 80% that go into effect immediately, the result of which in some cases may cause the bottom 80% to thank Republicans for the breaks by voting for Republicans in the mid-term elections.  But the clever wealthy Republican legislators know when to give and when to take away.  The benefits for the wealthy do not disappear after the mid-term election, but some important ones for the bottom 80% do.  For example, the tax bill changes the medical expenses floor to 7½ % for 2017 and 2018.  So if you have a series of expensive medical procedures in 2017 or 2018, you can deduct qualified expenses that are over 7½ % of your gross adjusted income from your federal taxes for the year.  After 2018 (i.e., after the Republicans get those seats in the House and the Senate) the floor for the deduction jumps back to 10 % of gross adjusted income.  In other words, if you are contemplating very expensive surgery, have the surgery now.  And don’t forget to thank the Republicans for bait and switch.  There’s more.  According to the 2/23 issue of The Week (p. 31), the deficit-driven tax bill will not only hit future generations with financial burdens almost beyond comprehension, but in the short term it helps the top 20% earners and screws the rest of us.  Morgan Stanley polled corporate analysts and found that 13% of the corporate tax cut savings will go to employees and 43% will go to investors.  The rich look after their own, and that’s no surprise.  Even the poor look after their own.  Nevertheless, this corporate behavior demonstrates once again that when the government employs trickle-down economics, the money does not trickle down…

It was something of a recovery room 2/27 at the Outpost when Steve Lantner, Forbes Graham, Allan Chase, and Luther Gray showed up.  Forbes had had a severe cold for two weeks, but he claimed he had fully recovered.  Steve had experienced a troubling injury and also claimed that he was fully recovered.  They certainly looked fine and--as the evening demonstrated--they could play music as beautifully as ever.  Caused by ailment and recovery time or not, there was something different and distinctive about the music 2/27.  The first set opened with lines talking back and forth, recalling some of Braxton’s small ensemble work of the mid to late 1980s, but it soon evolved.  Sonically the evening was remarkably evocative visually.  As I sat there I kept seeing clips from imagined films.  No story line or plot.  Just sequences of events.  People walking or talking or contemplating.  Much of it had to do with travel--by car with the flicker of oncoming headlights or by train with odd-sounding clickety clacks.  At one point Allen picked up his soprano sax and I found myself in a Middle Eastern bazaar.  As I thought about such things, it hit me that no member of the band likely was thinking such things and might have responded to any such suggestion with raised eyebrows.  Still caught in the world of cinema, I pictured the Maltese Falcon’s Gutman offering his sales pitch to Sam Spade and pausing briefly before saying, “You think me crazy.”  But instead of talking about cinematic music, Allen and I spent much of the break discussing the better and worse moments in the 40+ year history of the now disappearing Ryles.  The half-time conversation did not alter the direction of the music.  More cinematic marvels.  It was something of a wonderful travelogue.  Maybe Forbes and Steve needed a musical trip to accelerate recovery further.  Or maybe everyone on the bandstand was merely enjoying the journey as much as the apparently mesmerized audience.  Steve at the end of it all announced, “One more short one,” and there was a burst of energy transformed into a rolling storm that turned out to be one of those screen-filling Sergio Leone steam engines that eventually--shortly after the opening of Once Upon a Time in the West--lumbered into the station, crawled, and came to a hissing stop.  To be followed by a final single crack of gunfire.  Everyone in the audience applauded right through the credits…

I wonder if somewhere lurking beneath my Joe Average veneer there might be a genuine spark of creativity.  Maybe stranger things are true.  After all, I revel in the sonic creations that take place at the better jazz gigs.  To enjoy it as much as I do, perhaps I have some insight into the improvisational process.  For example, the more one understands the process of English language communication, the more that person will get knocked out by the plays of Shakespeare, Shaw, and Beckett.  On the other hand, all of the jazz and stuff about creative thinking most likely is wishful thinking on my part--sparked by a bit of research that caught my eye.  It seems that, according to Science News (2/13/18, p. 5), neuroscientists at Wesleyan--with applause from Harvard neuroscientist Roger Beaty--have determined that jazz musicians have higher “creative aptitudes” than classical musicians and non-musicians.  The researchers believe improvisation is the factor that separates the jazz musicians from the others because of their “out-of-the-box thinking on creativity tests.”  The researchers suggest that compared the other test subjects, the improvisors kicked butt creatively.  I’m sure that news is very exciting to all jazz musicians reading this Journal, but not so fast.  Think about it.  The research was done in Middletown, Connecticut, Anthony Braxton’s old stomping grounds.  Also, only 36 test subjects (12 of each type) were involved in the research.  You can figure out where I’m going with this.  What if Maestro Braxton were one of the 12 jazz musicians tested?  Do you really think his involvement as a test subject would not skew the data significantly?  So maybe the test results are valid and I can harbor my fantasies of being creative.  Or maybe the Braxton factor will be uncovered when follow-up research on three groups of mortals bursts the bubble of those neuroscientists in Middletown.  In any case, whether deep down I carry an aging spark of creativity or I’m merely a duffer, I refuse to unload my Edwin Fischer recordings…

I was able to acquire a Conestoga (auto to Alewife and then the “T” to Ashmont) to make the two-hour trip to the Eric Hofbauer Quintet gig 2/15 at Parish of Saints, Dorchester (and only 1½ hours for the return later in the evening).  The venue acoustics for the audience were fine and the musicians were ready to play.  The presentation was different from that of previous EHQ gigs.  It began with two solo guitar performances, first “Fables of Faubus” and then “Buddy Bolden’s Blues.”  The tunes were recognizable but reworked to the extent that one might argue they were “recomposed.”  It is a fine example of a jazz approach to given material--improvisationally transformed original material plus improvisation based on that material.  As impressive as the transformation was--and perhaps because of it--I suspect Messrs. Mingus and the Cornish-Bennett-Morton group would have approved.  After a brief pause, the complete quintet presented its take on Ellington’s Reminiscing in Tempo.  The work is the group’s most recent reworking of through-composed material.  Each time the quintet tackles the composition it seems to have greater success in overcoming the two related booby-traps inherent in the work for anyone trying to incorporate improvisation into the material--the fact that the composition and composed solos were intended for a specific set of musicians and the repetitious nature of the primary recurrent theme.  The solution this time--and by far the most successful to date--was greater emphasis on improvisation and improvisational thinking.  Each person’s solo statements were more forward in the mix, and the presentation of the composed material was freer, more open than ever before.  In effect the entire performance of the transformed Ellington composition had the impact of an improvisational event, one which successfully disguised the repetitious cycle.  After some introductory comments by Eric, the band performed excerpts of the quintet’s three other “classical” works--in the reverse order in which the ensemble first performed them in public.  In other words, excerpts respectively from Three Places in New England, Quatuor pour la fin du temps, and finally Le Sacre du printemps.  Eric offered a rationale for the reverse sequence, but the best reason was simply sonic impact.  The Ives and the Messiaen are thorny works--transformed or not--that are difficult for the casual listener or faint of heart.  No doubt there were such people in the audience.  But generally people seemed entertained or perhaps entranced.  That fact is a comment on the musicianship of the people on the bandstand--Eric, Jerry Sabatini, Todd Brunel, Junko Fujiwara, and Curt Newton--and the more open chart interpretation carried over from the Ellington piece.  The sheer power of nailing the music so convincingly is enough for these musicians to grab the eyes, ears, and heartbeats of people in the audience.  Add to that impact the freer chart interpretation and you have a crowd set up for the Stravinsky knockout punch.  After the final notes of the evening’s performance died, I mentioned to a couple of the musicians independently the fact that the much more free-wheeling interpretation of the charts resulted in the best performances of these works that I’d ever heard.  Not knowing what the other musician said, each of the two musicians responded with virtually the same self-effacing comment: “Well, not every one of those free instances was planned.”  How nice.  Somebody somewhere once said, “A major part of creativity in jazz is turning mistakes into beauty.”  It certainly was true 2/15 at Parish of the Saints.  And what about that final Stravinsky knockout punch?  Three fine elements came together   First, the improvisatory nature of the chart interpretations combined superbly with some of the finest solos of the night.  Second, Curt decided to revel in the rhythms of the work.  At no time did the composed rhythms lack in clarity.  And yet Curt managed to travel all over the universe of rhythm. Dancing on, over, and around the rhythmic ground--spreading joy throughout the band.  The final element was programming.  Le Sacre is driven by rhythm.  Add the other two fine elements, and the result is an audience that exploded with applause at the conclusion of the event.  When music is this good, how wonderful it is to see 85+ (by one estimate) people witness and react so enthusiastically to the music…


January

Due to a set of unfortunate circumstances 1/16 at the Outpost I was able to catch only the first improvisation of the evening by the new Jacob William Ensemble--with Jeb Bishop, Forbes Graham, Pandelis Karayorgis, and Eric Rosenthal.  I was in aesthetic agony as I walked out the door because what I heard was so good.  A front line of trombone and trumpet is so unusual in jazz that I’m tempted to refer to the ensemble as a “brass band.”  There are few bands with that instrumentation but one--almost forgotten band it seems today--does stand out in my memory.  The Clark Terry-Bob Brookmeyer Quintet I believe was one of the best jazz combos of the 1960s, and they even had a pretty strong jazz fan base at the time.  A nice sound with fine solos.  So it was a kick to hear (however briefly) superb musicians do such fine things with essentially the same instrumentation.  There are important differences, of course.  The Terry-Brookmeyer group featured flugelhorn as well as trumpet in the high brass and Mr. Brookmeyer played a valve trombone.  Perhaps most distinctive is that the earlier group was making music in and of the 1960s and using charts.  Jacob’s new ensemble improvises freely and is very much of the now.  Of course, the strongest link between these two double-brass ensembles is the superb quality of the music.  Jacob’s quintet consists of five of the best post-Ayler musicians in the Boston area (i.e., or anywhere).  That means individual contributions are worth focusing on at any location on the bandstand, and group awareness is so profound that taking in ensemble interaction at the most superficial level to the deepest is a boundless joy.  Perhaps the most engaging moments involve the interactions of two or three band members--dances and dialogues.  For example, Pandelis reciting poetry via piano in the context of poetry fans on bass and drums.  And there’s that amazing double brass.  Sometime it’s a brilliant dialogue of two brass orators.  Sometimes it’s two instruments in one with each musician not merely finishing each other’s sentences but rather in rapid fire alternating syllables.  And on and on.  In other words, these five guys hit the ground running.  I walked out of the gig in pain for the sounds I would not hear but in a state of joy for the sounds I did...

We have been in a situation of diminishing returns for fans of great straight-ahead jazz.  That fact is not news to anyone old enough to remember the classic combos of the 1950s and the 1960s.  All of the great swing, bop, and immediate post-bop jazz greats were born prior to World War Two.  And the few younger convincing straight-ahead musicians seem to have a cutoff birth date of around mid-century (e.g., Gray Sargent and Jerry Bergonzi).  Therefore it is not surprising to find me at nonagenarian Paul Broadnax gigs.  It was for this and other reasons that the 1/21 Joe Hunt Trio performance in the Lily Pad listings caught my eye.  It is not simply that Joe and Yuka Hamano Hunt are married, but that they have played a lot together.  Joe, of course, has played with just about everybody including Bill Evans in 1966 and 1967--years before many current Boston area musicians were born.  So, when the trio played Evans’ “Peri’s Scope,” they had a pretty good idea of what they were doing.  But it was not exclusively a matter of Joe’s track record or the sonic empathy between piano and drums.  Joe had made the wise decision to fill out the trio with Keala Kaumeheiwa, one of the most in-demand acoustic bassists in the area.  They heard each other beautifully, resulting in often exhilarating interplay and mutual support in presenting mostly jazz classics and nuggets from the Great American Song Book.  Their “Gone with the Wind” tribute to classic Argo period Ahmad Jamal was an evocative essay that never fell into plastic mimicry.  Most of the rest of the two sets of music was an array of tunes we all know and love played by three musicians working out their unity, their group voice.  If I understood Joe correctly, the band had only one real rehearsal, a brief one.  If so, the results were especially impressive.  I hope they keep doing it.  I look forward to watching/hearing the process…

When Ken Vandermark was an undergraduate student in Montreal he also led a fairly successful jazz trio there and even recorded his first LP with that group.  One of the members of the trio was guitarist Geof Lipman.  In 1986 when the scholastics were completed, Ken returned to the Boston area, and Geof came along with the shared idea of creating a band together.  Through Bob Gullotti Ken met Curt Newton and Lombard Street (the appearance of the famous San Francisco street suggesting the nature of the music the trio would perform) was created.  It was the first jazz ensemble Ken led in the Boston area since his high school days.  The trio lasted (with two subsequent musicians taking on guitar responsibilities) through part of 1989.  Lombard Street recorded two cassettes (a common album medium during the documentation transition from LP to CD format).  Geof moved to San Francisco.  Ken moved to Chicago in 1989.  Curt, of course, remained here and has become one of the more highly regarded percussionists in town.  Without prior plans, Geof and Curt independently decided to show up at the Stone in lower Manhattan to catch a Ken Vandermark performance.  The reunion photo below of Geof, Curt, and Ken was taken 1/4 at Boulton & Watt in the East Village

The classic Steve Lantner Quartet showed up in its entirety--Steve, Allan Chase, Joe Morris, and Luther Gray--1/23 at the Outpost.  Before the first set there were cheerful greetings among band members and fans.  But overall the mood of the venue seemed to be subdued.  I got the feeling that the weather had something to do with it.  For the past three weeks inside Rte. 495 the thermometer had jumped repeatedly from below zero to 50˚ (F).  We had heavy snow, light snow, with and without 50-plus MPH winds.  Fog.  Flooded streets.  Downed trees.  And, of course, rain.  It had rained heavily all day on 1/23, and at the scheduled start of the music the rain seemed to be subsiding.  It is not the different kinds of weather, all of which are common in southern New England in winter.  It is the almost daily roller coaster nature of the sequence of the weather.  It is psychologically wearing.  And it still is only January.  That is how it struck me as I took in the feel of the Outpost.  There was very little typical bandstand pre-set chatter.  Just a few scattered single-sentence pleasantries.  And the music of the first set began and continued in the same vein as the preceding verbal communications.  Somewhat pensive and understated.  The communication and the interplay were there, and the quality of the sonics were there.  But the energy level was low throughout.  During the break conversations on stage and throughout the audience were more typically animated.  Much of the conversation on the bandstand seemed to be about the anticipation, anxiety, and challenges of moving from one house to another.  You know, mortgages, preparation of the new home, timing of events.  A lot of stuff that home owners encounter.  The animated communication on the break seemed to carry over to the second set.  The energy level was elevated.  Such things are difficult to articulate, but I’m sure everyone in the audience was aware of it.  A great pianist can strike the same note twice, creating identical volume levels for each note, but one of the notes (if intended) will exhibit a greater energy level than the other.  On 1/23 at the Outpost the energy of the entire quartet was tangibly greater than during the first set.  Both sets presented music of very high quality, but during the second set the musicians were problem-solving through sound--helping to complete the paperwork, prepare the basement for the move, insure the best timing for the buy/sell transition, and so much more.  All that problem-solving required and generated energy.  Sonic energy at the highest level.  And there was a very nice turnout to witness all of this, including two young females “in their twenties” I was told.  The future.  There were happy voices and good wishes all around as people went on with their quotidian lives.  Outside the rain had stopped… 

The February Downbeat hit the stands early this month.  It is the annual “Great Jazz Venues” issue.  I have no complaint about the Massachusetts jazz venues included in the magazine, but the lack of inclusion of other venues is puzzling.  The publication seems to list the same locations every year without checking out what is really happening.  The venue omitted once again that is most puzzling is the Outpost.  I don’t think this monthly Journal would be even half as long as it is without the Outpost.  Maybe Rob, Jocko, and the rest of the jazz bookers in the state who present significant talent and whose venues are ignored need to get on the magazine’s case.  Of course, recent policy changes at the publication--particularly dropping John Corbett’s contributions--are even more puzzling.  Fortunately one can find occasional work by our own Fred Bouchard in the magazine, as in the case of his nice celebration of the 70th birthday of Wally’s (p. 59)…

The Hassels--no doubt a pun on the last name of guitarist Terrie Hessels (AKA Terrie Ex of The Ex) but more pointedly a reference to the hassles/difficulty musicians from foreign countries experience trying to get into the U.S.--performed 1/8 at the Sherborn incarnation of the Alternate Space.  Readers of this Journal over the years have some idea of how the Musicians Union through its impact on visa regulations for foreign musicians has made it near impossible for creative musicians to come to the U.S. to perform.  For example, the paperwork (in itself a nightmare) to process a temporary visa for a musician to perform in the U.S. typically costs $4,000.00.  That may not be a big deal to the Berlin Philharmonic, but it is an insurmountable barrier to a post-Ayler musician from Europe who wants to come to the U.S. to perform.  “How many break-even gigs do you have to do to make $4,000.00 on a tour of the U.S.?” he asked with tongue in cheek.  The Hassels, a quartet of one U.S.-based musician and three Europeans is a classic example of an impossible touring situation.  I will not go into details to describe how the three musicians ended up on a multi-gig tour of the U.S. snow belt in winter without paying such a ridiculous cost, but you can guess that the problems are significant.  Let’s just say that the kind generosity of the Norwegian government is not enough to make up the difference financially.  The group arrived at the venue in Sherborn with fine support from the folks at the Alternate Space, Nate McBride (providing acoustic bass), Jeb Bishop (guitar amplifier), and Curt Newton (trap set).  The gig 1/8 was the second leg of the tour after a premiere at the old Stone in New York.  Although this band--Terrie Ex, Jon Rune Strøm, Ken Vandermark, and Paal Nilssen-Love--was brand new, each musician was quite familiar with the music of all the others.  Any person in the group has performed for a decade or more with one or more other group members.  Nevertheless, it is a new band working out the identity of this specific configuration of instruments and musicians.  Even though the music was thoroughly engaging right from the first notes of the set, the interaction among musicians became more compelling over time.  Each improvised work was of higher quality than the previous offering.  It was just one more reason that the set seemed so brief.  During the single set of music there were moments of quiet introspection, but there is no question that the forte of the band is forte.  No sleeping during performances is allowed (i.e., not possible).  It was my first opportunity to witness the work of Jon Rune Strøm on acoustic bass.  He attacks the instrument much of the time as a demon guitarist would.  In fact, the thought that kept recurring to me during the set is how amazing it is that Jon Rune plays acoustic bass in this context in which electric bass is the obvious choice.  He does also play electric bass, but as I thought about it, it became apparent that he is too good at what he does to play electric bass with this band.  No doubt the challenge of bringing out the possibilities of the acoustic bass is just too constructive for him to take the “easy” alternative.  Terrie and Ken were the operatic front line.  Ken offered soprano coloratura much of the time on b-flat clarinet and growling bass/baritone lines on the tenor sax while Terrie skated back and forth taking on the role of Romantic protagonist.  It was the perfect in-your-face Orpheus role, even scraping the pegs at the end of the neck of the guitar across the floor.  The result was ethereal music, altering the sounds by doing little more than twisting and turning the guitar body to captivate the audience with evolving sonics.  If there was any doubt about the rightness of his protagonist role, Terrie--frustrated by the pops and sizzles of a problematic amplifier, wrestled the beast (more in the role of Hercules) for a time until the adversary was quieted for the rest of the evening.  Paal is one of the great post-Ayler drummers in the world.  Even though he performs the whole gamut of required percussion at the highest level, I must confess that I get lifted off my chair most dramatically when he explodes with his kick-ass agenda.  My goodness.  Like everyone in the band, he is thoughtful about life in general and of course music.  After the music ended there was a time when I trapped him in the kitchen of my home to hear what he had to say.  We discussed many things, and there was much for me to hear.  At one point I mentioned that what I loved about Alan Dawson (aside from the fact that he helped his students develop remarkable skills) is that all of his committed students left his teaching sessions with unique musical personalities (e.g., think of Gerry Hemingway vs. Tony Williams).  At that time and later Paal lamented the degree to which younger musicians mimicked their teachers and other icons.  He mentioned several examples of drummer mimicry, some of them humorous.  For example, he noticed that a drummer on a gig had his head turned sideways with one ear facing the wall in back of the drums and the other ear facing the audience.  At the end of the set Paal asked the drummer why he kept his head in that sideways position throughout the entire set.  The drummer explained that his favorite drummer performed with his head in that position.  Paal then explained to the young drummer that the young man’s favorite drummer performed with his head in that position because he is deaf in one ear.  So, in a sense, I was privileged to catch a great double bill of extraordinary music in Sherborn and thoughtful, provocative commentary by Paal and other musicians until the wee small hours in my home.  So I’m just one of many lucky people between New York and Chicago to witness the sounds and thoughts of such a fine international touring band.  It’s just more evidence of how much we are deprived because the Musicians Union-inspired immigration visa policies keep creative sonic artists out of the U.S…

As Charlie Kohlhase reminded us at the fine 1/18 Explorers Club gig, Roswell Rudd died 12/22 in Kerhonkson, New York at age 82.  I first heard his amazing trombone work in 1968 when I purchased the LP Archie Shepp Live in San Francisco.  Like everybody else, I’ve been amazed ever since.  Charlie was a friend who performed and recorded with Roswell Rudd on occasion.  A few days before Roswell Rudd died Charlie visited him and tried unsuccessfully to talk with the man who was feeling the effects of pain killers.  In an attempt to communicate with the trombonist and perhaps make him feel better, Charlie took out his baritone sax and performed a few tunes.  While playing “Pannonica” (a Monk tune recorded on Roswell Rudd’s last CD release) Charlie’s memory slipped a bit when he came to the bridge.  He stopped playing and said, “Damn.  Sorry I fucked that up.”  Roswell Rudd said, “No.  That’s fine.  Keep playing.”  Those were the only words the trombonist said to Charlie on that day…

Kit Demos’ Dark Matter series is one of the truly durable and challenging monthly jazz events in town.  Although most of the people he invites to perform at these sessions write jazz charts (or at least perform them) on occasion, a vast majority of the Dark Matter sessions feature free improvisation.  I found the lineup for the 1/27 gig at the Outpost particularly intriguing because most of the people performing--Kit, Forbes Graham, and Luther Gray--are known to most fans in the area for their free work (even though each of them has presented some of his most provocative music via improvisation in the context of carefully crafted scores).  Add to that proclivity the fact that almost all Dark Matter sessions are free improvisation sessions and the inclusion of one of the most compelling straight-ahead guitarists in town--Steve Fell--in the mix caused me to wonder what strategies the musicians would use to make it all work.  True, I’ve caught Steve functioning quite capably in free contexts, but I’ve always found him to be apparently most comfortable playing within a chord cycle.  In any case, I was convinced that this gig was not going to be a typical Dark Matter session (if there is such a thing). The key question was exactly how it would be different.  How would the aesthetic tendencies and strengths be melded to result in engaging, satisfying music?  For me there was no question of if, only how.  A big part of the answer was quite apparent even before anyone played a note.  Music scores were scattered all over the bandstand and even on seats of the front row.  But don’t worry.  The answer to the question about “how” is not a simple one.  There would be no clever arrangements of “Stardust” or “Cherokee” or even “Naima.”  The scores were provided by band members, and almost all of the charts were ugly.  I use the word “ugly” not as a description of the implicit sounds of the charts or of the potential results of what the band members might do with them.  By “ugly” I refer to the challenge the charts presented to the people on the stage.  Even though the charts came from different musicians with presumably different sets of aesthetics, all of the charts were architecturally and melodically spare.  Stark.  Sets of simple lines in a sequence of bars.  Even tone rows (that may or may not have been intended to suggest serialism).  One might argue that the minimalist nature of the writing in general created environments for improvisation that were functionally close to those of totally free playing.  However, as challenging as totally free playing can be, I suspect that these charts may be even more problematic for improvisors in some ways.  On the one hand the music presents a line or piece of architecture that suggests a specific context--perhaps a specific type of confinement--but at the same time offers an overwhelming amount of “open space” for improvisation.  In other words, this type of writing when done well presents the improvisor with a great amount of contextual tension between space and suggested limits.  I should interject that minimalist writing of this type has been around for at least a decade in post-Ayler jazz, and most of it is terrible.  When you hear the bad stuff you can spot it.  It is the proliferation of recordings and live performances by “hip” post-Ayler musicians that sound “simply” mechanical in the performance of the charts and usually in the improvisations also.  It is difficult for an improvisor to overcome bad minimalist writing.  You can guess by now that there were no such problems 1/27 at the Outpost.  I’m not suggesting everything was perfect.  This was difficult music with many challenges.  Kit decided to shake out the cobwebs by designating that the opening work of the first set would be a totally free performance.  Although the last piece of the night was quite free-wheeling, my memory tells me that this opener was the only completely free piece of the night.  I think Kit’s instincts were good.  The cobwebs did need to be removed.  But the process was less than scintillating.  There were a few scattered notes here and there and much hesitating with halting gestures.  Everyone was concerned about ruining the soufflé.  Or, at least that is what it seemed like for the first half of that first venture.  As the improvisation found its legs, the musicians and members of the audience seemed to realize that the upcoming challenge would be met successfully.  And it was a success.  Qualitatively.  The challenges mentioned did not disappear.  So the profound revelations to the musicians as they solved the problems were there for people in the audience as well.  In general it was an attentive audience--one that remained almost intact to the end.  In other words, it was a worthwhile but taxing sonic revelation.  With the final applause all musicians and members of the audience were conscious that they had participated in or witnessed the construction of the pyramids.  But the music was so successful that even the observers were feeling like Egyptians.  Drained but happy Egyptians…

The photo below appeared with the heading “Images Speak TRUTH TO POWER” in the winter 2018 issue (p. 5) of STAND magazine, a publication of the ACLU.  The photo of the black woman being arrested was taken during a protest in Baton Rouge, Louisiana after the killing of Alton Sterling in 2016.  The accompanying article makes the case for public photo and video images at such events as being “a critical check against power.”  In a sidebar about “recording injustice” the magazine emphasizes that citizens have the right to record still images and video of police activity in public places (but some states restrict audio).  Further, police officers “may not confiscate or view your digital photography or video without a warrant and may not delete your material under any circumstance.”  At the same time, it is important to note that government agencies do not always uphold the law.  In that same article about the power of images is the statement that journalists reporting on the Dakota Access Pipeline at Standing Rock “were hit by rubber bullets and had their equipment confiscated by law enforcement.”  Also, the FAA instituted flight restrictions preventing journalists from capturing “aerial footage of police confronting protesters…”  In other parts of the magazine the ACLU reports that since November 2016 (i.e., the election) ACLU membership in Texas has quintupled (p. 28) and membership in Maine has quadrupled (pp. 34-35), an increase comparable to that of “virtually every ACLU affiliate.”  Antidote…

Eric Rosenthal has an ongoing series he calls the Point 01 Percent Project.  It’s a double bill consisting of established local musicians performing in two different groups--a great idea that almost inevitably produces variable results.  But the good news is that usually fans can count on at least one of the groups to perform at a high level.  The 1/10 gig at the Lily Pad set the bar even higher with the best double bill I’ve caught anywhere in this new year.  First up is what apparently is now being called Cutout, a quintet that has opened several of these Eric Rosenthal sessions.  As I’ve noted in previous Journal entries, it is fascinating to observe this group of fine musicians--Pandelis Karayorgis, Jorrit Dijkstra, Jeb Bishop, Nate McBride, and Luther Gray--work on and improve the music performed on each outing.  I think it’s fair to say that the quintet has reached what may be described as a functional level of quality.  The term may sound like a put-down, but I offer it as a designation of a significant milestone.  Think of the band as having worked out almost all of the bugs.  Remember, this is a band of five distinctly different musical personalities who are improvising and playing charts.  This is a big deal.  None of these musicians think about music or write resultant music that is like the thoughts and writing of any other band member.  If you ponder that fact even briefly, the setup looks like a disaster in the making.  But the band members have enough in common--not the least of which is a passion for creating the best music with the other top-shelf musicians--to stick with the challenge and make it all work.  On that gig for the first time I was convinced that they made “it all work.”  Again, it is important to keep in mind how good these musicians are.  All of them know how to read a chart and solo superbly.  That sort of professionalism was in place even in the earliest ventures by the quintet.  But--in spite of the fact that the band played music composed by all five musicians--the charts were mechanically invisible.  Each chart was distinctive, but at no time did I feel that anyone in the band was “playing” the music.  It was a pleasant walk in the park for everyone concerned.  Breakthrough.  And the fluidity of presentation of the charts meant that the solos unfolded and soared more organically within the context.  All of that adds up to the fact that the quintet truly has arrived.  From here on with the “essentials” taken care of we can anticipate more incremental improvements in the band’s performances (if the experiences of bands led by Goodman and Basie are predictive.)  The current status also opens the door to experimentation, the types of directions only possible when a group is as sure-footed as it is now.  In any event, the process will be a lot of fun to witness.  The second set of the double bill 1/10 featured a completely different set of music, like the first set only in the sense that the musicians on the bandstand are superb and that they showed up to play their butts off.  Unlike the band of the first set that was chart-driven, Secret Handshake--Dave Bryant, Eric Hofbauer, Jacob William, and Eric Rosenthal--did not work with fixed arrangements.  There were heads popping up here and there throughout the performance (thanks mostly to inspiration from Bird and Ornette) and shifting chord centers often starting with the cycle for a head and morphing into a completely different harmonic and sonic pattern.  In addition, there were sections of totally free improvising.  Of course, all four men were kept busy creatively, even in instances in which the spontaneously chosen action was complete silence.  This quartet has performed together enough and the instincts of each musician operate at such a high level that the entire off-road journey produced music that came across as a completely natural (“predictable” after the fact) coming together of disparate components.  The bassist and drummer breathe together even when at first (until your ears adjust) it seems that they are going in different directions.  As I’ve said countless times, David’s acoustic piano work is a special joy to behold--everything from brilliant torrents to almost inaudible cloud formations.  At the same time the guitarist was a major force in defining the shifting support architecture for all the mayhem dancing around him (when he wasn’t scaring guitar fans with “impossible” solos).  It’s almost a rule in jazz: guitars and pianos don’t mix.  If you subscribe to that premise, I invite you to witness the truth of Dave and Eric H. on stage together.  One of the highlights of the set was a piano-guitar duo section in which both musicians called forth the very resources of Zeus to raise one the of the most joyous clamors of the new year.  Or likely of the whole year.  It was a terrific way to conclude a Point 01 Percent Project presentation that no doubt will set the bar for all double bills throughout 2018…